1
|
Nayel Y, Taylor M, Montasser AS, Elsherif M, Diab MM. Perceptions of ophthalmologists on the impact of trachoma in Egypt: a mixed-methods, nationwide survey. BMC Infect Dis 2023; 23:27. [PMID: 36650425 PMCID: PMC9847179 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07862-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Understanding the perception and practices of ophthalmologists for trachoma is important to develop interventions aimed at disease elimination in Egypt. The survey investigated: (1) the views and practice patterns of Egyptian ophthalmologists for trachoma and (2) the influence of geographic location, setting, and years of practice on ophthalmologists' perceptions. METHODS A questionnaire sent to ophthalmologists currently working in Egypt collected information on: (1) demographics, (2) caseload and practice patterns for trachoma, (3) 13 Likert scale questions regarding the current state of trachoma, and (4) two open-ended written response questions. RESULTS Of the 500 recipients, 194 ophthalmologists participated. 98% of the respondents reported seeing trachoma patients in their practice. 28.8% agreed that trachoma is currently an active health problem in Egypt, with ophthalmologists in public practice having significantly higher agreement scores compared to private practitioners (p = 0.030). Rural ophthalmologists were significantly more likely to agree that a targeted trachoma control program is needed in their location of practice compared to their urban counterparts (p < 0.001). Open-ended questions revealed recurrent themes, including the rural distribution of trachoma patients and the high volume of patients with corneal opacity. CONCLUSION Ophthalmologists' experiences with trachoma in Egypt differed based on practice setting, years in practice, and location, and the overall perception of the impact of the disease remains low. However, there was widespread agreement that trachoma is present in communities across the country. Practitioners in rural areas and in the public sector shared a disproportionate burden of the trachoma caseload. The perspectives of such ophthalmologists must be emphasized in decision-making related to trachoma interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yassin Nayel
- grid.464520.10000 0004 0614 2595American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine, Cupecoy, Sint Maarten
| | - Matilda Taylor
- grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada
| | - Ahmed S. Montasser
- grid.412093.d0000 0000 9853 2750Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Helwan, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Elsherif
- grid.22903.3a0000 0004 1936 9801Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Mostafa M. Diab
- grid.411170.20000 0004 0412 4537Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Al Fayoum, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Solomon AW, Hooper PJ, Bangert M, Mwingira UJ, Bakhtiari A, Brady MA, Fitzpatrick C, Jones I, Kabona G, Kello AB, Millar T, Mosher AW, Ngondi JM, Nshala A, Renneker K, Rotondo LA, Stelmach R, Harding-Esch EM, Malecela MN. The Importance of Failure: How Doing Impact Surveys That Fail Saves Trachoma Programs Money. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:2481-2487. [PMID: 33025878 PMCID: PMC7695084 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Trachoma programs use annual antibiotic mass drug administration (MDA) in evaluation units (EUs) that generally encompass 100,000–250,000 people. After one, three, or five MDA rounds, programs undertake impact surveys. Where impact survey prevalence of trachomatous inflammation—follicular (TF) in 1- to 9-year-olds is ≥ 5%, ≥ 1 additional MDA rounds are recommended before resurvey. Impact survey costs, and the proportion of impact surveys returning TF prevalence ≥ 5% (the failure rate or, less pejoratively, the MDA continuation rate), therefore influence the cost of eliminating trachoma. We modeled, for illustrative EU sizes, the financial cost of undertaking MDA with and without conducting impact surveys. As an example, we retrospectively assessed how conducting impact surveys affected costs in the United Republic of Tanzania for 2017–2018. For EUs containing 100,000 people, the median (interquartile range) cost of continuing MDA without doing impact surveys is USD 28,957 (17,581–36,197) per EU per year, whereas continuing MDA solely where indicated by impact survey results costs USD 17,564 (12,158–21,694). If the mean EU population is 100,000, then continuing MDA without impact surveys becomes advantageous in financial cost terms only when the continuation rate exceeds 71%. For the United Republic of Tanzania in 2017–2018, doing impact surveys saved enough money to provide MDA for > 1,000,000 people. Although trachoma impact surveys have a nontrivial cost, they generally save money, providing EUs have > 50,000 inhabitants, the continuation rate is not excessive, and they generate reliable data. If all EUs pass their impact surveys, then we have waited too long to do them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony W Solomon
- Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Pamela J Hooper
- Task Force for Global Health, International Trachoma Initiative, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mathieu Bangert
- Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Upendo J Mwingira
- Neglected Tropical Disease Control Program, Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dodoma, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Ana Bakhtiari
- Task Force for Global Health, International Trachoma Initiative, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Christopher Fitzpatrick
- Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Iain Jones
- Sightsavers, Haywards Heath, United Kingdom
| | - George Kabona
- Neglected Tropical Disease Control Program, Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dodoma, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Amir B Kello
- Expanded Special Project for Elimination of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo
| | - Tom Millar
- Sightsavers, Haywards Heath, United Kingdom
| | - Aryc W Mosher
- United States Agency for International Development, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | - Andreas Nshala
- Department of International Maternal and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.,IMA World Health, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Kristen Renneker
- Task Force for Global Health, International Trachoma Initiative, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Emma M Harding-Esch
- Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mwelecele N Malecela
- Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|