Model-based simulations of weekday and weekend sleep times self-reported by larks and owls

The Annual Rhythms in Sleep, Sedentary Behavior, and Physical Activity of Australian Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Sleep, sedentary behavior, and physical activity have fundamental impacts on health and well-being. Little is known about how these behaviors vary across the year.

PURPOSE

To investigate how movement-related behaviors change across days of the week and seasons, and describe movement patterns across a full year and around specific temporal events.

METHODS

This cohort study included 368 adults (mean age = 40.2 years [SD = 5.9]) who wore Fitbit activity trackers for 12 months to collect minute-by-minute data on sleep, sedentary behavior, light physical activity (LPA), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Data were analyzed descriptively, as well as through multilevel mixed-effects linear regression to explore associations with specific temporal cycles (day-of-the-week, season) and events.

RESULTS

Movement patterns varied significantly by day-of-the-week and season, as well as during annual events like Christmas-New Year and daylight saving time (DST) transitions. For example, sleep was longer on weekends (+32 min/day), during autumn and winter relative to summer (+4 and +11 min/day), and over Christmas-New Year (+24 min/day). Sedentary behavior was longer on weekdays, during winter, after Christmas-New Year, and after DST ended (+45, +7, +12, and +8 min/day, respectively). LPA was shorter in autumn, winter, and during and after Christmas-New Year (-6, -15, -17, and -31 min/day, respectively). Finally, there was less MVPA on weekdays and during winter (-5 min/day and -2 min/day, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Across the year, there were notable variations in movement behaviors. Identifying high-risk periods for unfavorable behavior changes may inform time-targeted interventions and health messaging.

Reaction of the endogenous regulatory mechanisms to early weekday wakeups: a review of its popular explanations in light of model-based simulations

Introduction: Several widely held explanations of the mechanisms underlying the responses of endogenous sleep-wake-regulating processes to early weekday wakeups have been proposed. Here, they were briefly reviewed and validated against simulations based on the rhythmostatic version of a two-process model of sleep-wake regulation. Methods: Simulated sleep times on weekdays and weekends were compared with the times averaged over 1,048 samples with either earlier or later weekday risetimes. In total, 74 paired samples were collected before and during lockdown, and 93 paired samples were collected during early and later school start times. Results: The counterintuitive predictions of the simulations included the following: 1) only one night of ad lib sleep is sufficient to restore the endogenously determined sleep times after 1 day/5 days of larger/smaller reduction/extension of the sleep/wake phase of the circadian sleep-wake cycle; 2) sleep loss on weekdays is irrecoverable; 3) irrespective of the amount of such deadweight loss, sleep on weekends is not prolonged; and 4) the control of the circadian clocks over the sleep-wake cyclicity is not disrupted throughout the week. Discussion: The following popular explanations of the gaps between weekends and weekdays in sleep timing and duration were not supported by these simulations: 1) early weekday wakeups cause "social jetlag," viewed as the weekend and weekday (back and forth) shifts of the sleep phase relative to the unchanged phase of the circadian clocks, and 2) early weekday wakeups cause an accumulation of "sleep debt paid back" on weekends, or, in other terms, people can "catch-up" or "compensate" sleep on weekends.

Weekend sleep after early and later school start times confirmed a model-predicted failure to catch up sleep missed on weekdays

Background

Many people believe they sleep for longer time on weekend nights to make up for sleep lost on weekdays. However, results of simulations of risetimes and bedtimes on weekdays and weekends with a sleep–wake regulating model revealed their inability to prolong weekend sleep. In particular, they predicted identical durations of weekend sleep after weeks with relatively earlier and relatively later risetime on weekdays. In the present study, this paradoxical prediction was empirically confirmed.

Methods

Times in bed were calculated from weekday and weekend risetimes and bedtimes in pairs of samples of students with early and later school start time and in subsets of samples from 7 age groups with weekday risetime earlier and later than 7:00 a.m.

Results

Among 35 pairs of students, mean age ± standard deviation was 14.5 ± 2.9 years and among the age group samples, 21.6 ± 14.6 years. As predicted by the simulations, times in bed on weekends were practically identical in the samples with early and later school start time and in two subsets with earlier and later weekday risetime.

Conclusions

The model-based simulations of sleep times can inform an individual about an amount of irrecoverable loss of sleep caused by an advance shift of wakeups on weekdays.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11325-022-02648-5.

Sleep during "lockdown" highlighted the need to rethink the concept of weekend catch-up sleep

Purpose

Many people believe in their ability to sleep for longer time on weekends to make up for sleep lost due to early wakeups on weekdays. This widely held belief was not supported by the simulations of rise- and bedtimes on weekdays and weekends with a sleep–wake regulating model. The simulations suggested the inability to extend sleep on any of two weekend nights and they predicted identical weekend sleep durations for weeks with relatively earlier and relatively later weekday risetimes. By April 2020, about half of the world’s population was under some form of “lockdown” due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This “lockdown” provided a new opportunity to demonstrate the predictive power of the sleep–wake regulating models. Therefore, the purpose of this report was to support the prediction of identity of weekend sleep durations after weeks with earlier and later weekday wakeups.

Methods

Weekend and weekday rise- and bedtimes before and during “lockdown” for 31 samples were taken from recent journal publications. Time in bed on weekends and 12 other measures of sleep duration and timing were calculated and simulated.

Results

For only one of 13 measures, weekend time in bed, statistical analysis did not yield a statistically significant difference between the estimates obtained before and during “lockdown”. The model-based simulations pointed to the 0.3-h delay of the sleep–wake cycle in response to the 1-h delay of weekday risetime during “lockdown”.

Conclusion

The model-based prediction was confirmed, thus, highlighting again the necessity to rethink the concept of weekend catch-up sleep.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11325-021-02492-z.