Impact of estradiol and progesterone levels during the late follicular stage on the outcome of GnRH antagonist protocols

Premature Progesterone Rise Is Associated with Higher Cumulative Live Birth Rate with Freeze-All Strategy

Background/Objectives: This paper undertakes an investigation into the implications of premature progesterone rise (PPR) on pregnancy outcomes in freeze-all strategy cycles. Methods: A retrospective cohort study encompassing 675 IVF/ICSI cycles using a freeze-all strategy was enrolled. The cycles were categorized into two groups based on serum progesterone levels at the time of hCG administration: 526 cycles had levels below 1.5 ng/mL, while 149 cycles had levels equal to or above 1.5 ng/mL. Results: The findings revealed a significantly higher number of mature follicles and retrieved oocytes in patients with PPR across all AMH categories. Multiple analyses revealed factors influencing PPR, including the duration of induction and the number of retrieved oocytes. Within the same oocyte retrieval number group, patients with PPR demonstrated non-inferior pregnancy outcomes compared to non-PPR patients. Upon adjustment for age, AMH, and total follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) dosage, PPR maintained a positive correlation with the cumulative live birth rate (LBR). Conclusions: The study showed that PPR correlates with an increase in retrieved oocytes while maintaining similar embryo quality and oocyte retrieval rates and results in a higher cumulative LBR.

Effect of the ratios of estradiol increase on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with antagonist regimens: a single center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF) is often determined according to follicle and estradiol levels following gonadotropin stimulation. In previous studies, although most of them analyzed the estrogen level from ovaries or the average estrogen level of a single follicle, there was no study on the ratio of estrogen increase, which was also correlated with pregnancy outcomes in the clinic. This study aimed to make timely adjustments to follow-up medication to improve clinical outcomes based on the potential value of estradiol growth rate.

METHODS

We comprehensively analyzed estrogen growth during the entire ovarian stimulation period. Serum estradiol levels were measured on the day of gonadotropin treatment (Gn1), five days later (Gn5), eight days later (Gn8), and on the trigger day (HCG). This ratio was used to determine the increase in estradiol levels. According to the ratio of estradiol increase, the patients were divided into four groups: A1 (Gn5/Gn1 ≤ 6.44), A2 (6.44 < Gn5/Gn1 ≤ 10.62), A3 (10.62 < Gn5/Gn1 ≤ 21.33), and A4 (Gn5/Gn1 > 21.33); B1 (Gn8/Gn5 ≤ 2.39), B2 (2.39 < Gn8/Gn5 ≤ 3.03), B3 (3.03 < Gn8/Gn5 ≤ 3.84), and B4 (Gn8/Gn5 > 3.84). We analyzed and compared the relationship between data in each group and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

In the statistical analysis, the estradiol levels of Gn5 (P = 0.029, P = 0.042), Gn8 (P < 0.001, P = 0.001), and HCG (P < 0.001, P = 0.002), as well as Gn5/Gn1 (P = 0.004, P = 0.006), Gn8/Gn5 (P = 0.001, P = 0.002), and HCG/Gn1 (P < 0.001, P < 0.001) both had clinical guiding significance, and lower one significantly reduced the pregnancy rate. The outcomes were positively linked to groups A (P = 0.036, P = 0.043) and B (P = 0.014, P = 0.013), respectively. The logistical regression analysis revealed that group A1 (OR = 0.376 [0.182-0.779]; P = 0.008*, OR = 0.401 [0.188-0.857]; P = 0.018*) and B1 (OR = 0.363 [0.179-0.735]; P = 0.005*, OR = 0.389 [0.187-0.808]; P = 0.011*) had opposite influence on outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Maintaining a serum estradiol increase ratio of at least 6.44 on Gn5/Gn1 and 2.39 on Gn8/Gn5 may result in a higher pregnancy rate, especially in young people.

Delayed blastocyst development is influenced by the level of progesterone on the day of trigger

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between progesterone (P) level on the day of trigger and time to blastulation in IVF cycles.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study with autologous IVF cycles performed at our Institution from January 2019 to December 2021. A total of 1109 IVF cycles were included. The primary outcome was to compare time to blastulation in terms of percentage of expanded (grade 3) blastocysts on day 5 according to progesterone level at trigger.

RESULTS

A total of 3517 blastocysts were analyzed. After dividing progesterone level in quartiles (Q1, P < 0.50 ng/ml; Q2 0.50 ng/ml ≤ P ≤ 0.78 ng/ml; Q3, 0.79 ng/ml ≤ P ≤ 1.15 ng/ml; Q4, P > 1.15 ng/ml), we observed a delay in blastocyst development according to the increasing level of progesterone at trigger (analysis by rank, P-value = 0.01). After adjusting for confounding factors at the multivariate analysis, the percentage of day 5 blastocysts was reduced for Q3 (- 13.8%, 95% CI from - 20.5 to - 7.0%, p < 0.001) and Q4 (- 7.7%, 95% CI from - 15.5 to 0.0%, p = 0.05) compared to Q1 (reference).

CONCLUSIONS

Progesterone levels on day of trigger correlate to the percentage of expanded (grade 3) blastocysts on day 5 and a delayed blastocyst development day 5 is expected for high progesterone levels.

Impact of Elevated Progesterone in Late Follicular Phase on Early Pregnancy Outcomes and Live Birth Rate After Fresh Embryo Transfers

Objective: To investigate the effect of progesterone elevation during late follicular phase on early pregnancy outcomes and live births after fresh embryo transfers.

Methods: Patients who underwent IVF/ICSI treatment cycles were retrospectively enrolled. The effect of progesterone elevation was analyzed on early pregnancy outcome and live births after fresh embryo transfers.

Results: A total of 2,404 patients were enrolled on the day of HCG triggering (HCG0), 1,584 patients on the day before HCG triggering (HCG-1), and 800 patients 2 days before HCG triggering (HCG-2). With a 1 ng/ml increase in the progesterone level on HCG0 day when the progesterone level was ≥1.5 ng/ml, the clinical pregnancy rate decreased by 60% (95% CI: 0.2–0.7, p = 0.004), the intrauterine pregnancy rate decreased by 70% (95% CI: 0.2–0.7, p = 0.003), and the live birth rate decreased by 70% (95% CI: 0.1–0.7, p = 0.004). With a 1 ng/ml increase in the progesterone level on HCG-1 day, the clinical pregnancy rate decreased by 90% (95% CI: 0.0–0.5, p = 0.003) when the progesterone level was ≥1.6 ng/ml, the intrauterine pregnancy rate decreased by 90% (95% CI: 0.0–0.5, p = 0.001) when the progesterone was ≥1.5 ng/ml, and the live birth rate decreased by 90% (95% CI: 0.0–0.6, p = 0.015) when the progesterone was ≥1.7 ng/ml. On HCG-2 day when the progesterone was ≥1.2 ng/ml, the clinical pregnancy rate decreased by 80% (95% CI: 0.1–0.6, p = 0.003), and the intrauterine pregnancy rate decreased by 70% (95% CI: 0.1–0.7, p = 0.007) with a 1 ng/ml increase in the progesterone level.

Conclusion: Elevated progesterone level during the late follicular phase is an independent risk factor affecting the clinical pregnancy rate, intrauterine pregnancy rate, and live birth rate among infertile patients undergoing IVF/ICSI after fresh embryo transfers. When the progesterone level exceeds a certain level, the early pregnancy and live birth rates after fresh embryo transfers show a rapid downward trend.

The effect of late-follicular phase progesterone elevation on embryo ploidy and cumulative live birth rates

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does late-follicular phase progesterone elevation have a deleterious effect on embryo euploidy, blastocyst formation rate and cumulative live birth rates (CLBR)?

DESIGN

A multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study including infertile patients aged 18-40 years who underwent ovarian stimulation in a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) followed by a freeze-all strategy and euploid embryo transfer between August 2017 and December 2019. The sample was stratified according to the progesterone concentrations on the day of trigger: normal (≤1.50 ng/ml) and high (>1.50 ng/ml). Moreover, sensitivity analyses were performed to determine whether different conclusions would have been drawn if different cut-offs had been adopted. The primary outcome was the embryo euploidy rate. Secondary outcomes were the blastocyst formation rate, the number of euploid blastocysts and CLBR.

RESULTS

Overall 1495 intracytoplasmic sperm injection PGT-A cycles were analysed. Late-follicular phase progesterone elevation was associated with significantly higher late-follicular oestradiol concentrations (2847.56 ± 1091.10 versus 2240.94 ± 996.37 pg/ml, P < 0.001) and significantly more oocytes retrieved (17.67 ± 8.86 versus 12.70 ± 7.00, P < 0.001). The number of euploid embryos was significantly higher in the progesterone elevation group (2.32 ± 1.74 versus 1.86 ± 1.42, P = 0.001), whereas the blastocyst formation rate (47.1% [43.7-50.5%] versus 51.0% [49.7-52.4%]), the embryo euploidy rate (48.3% [44.9-51.7%] versus 49.1% [47.7-50.6%], the live birth rate in the first frozen embryo transfer (34.1% versus 31.1%, P = 0.427) and CLBR (38.9% versus 37.0%, P = 0.637) were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Euploidy rate and CLBR do not significantly differ among PGT-A cycles with and without late-follicular progesterone elevation in a freeze-all approach.

Progesterone/Oestradiol ratio can Better Predict Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes than Absolute Progesterone Level

Background:

Several parameters were proposed to predict the impact of premature luteinization on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes such as isolated progesterone (P) level, progesterone to oocyte ratio, and progesterone/estradiol ratio (P/E2).

Aim:

The aim of this study is to compare the predictive value of P/E2 ratio and isolated P level on the ovulation triggering day for pregnancy outcomes in fresh GnRH antagonist ICSI cycles.

Settings and Design:

A retrospective cohort study conducted in a university-affiliated in vitro fertilization center between January 2017 and April 2019.

Methods:

The study included women who underwent their first- or second-ranked GnRH antagonist ICSI cycles with day-3 embryo transfer. P/E2 ratio was calculated as (P [ng/mL] × 1000)/E2 (pg/mL). Cutoff values of ≥1.5 ng/ml for high P (HP) and ≥0.55 for HP/E2 ratio were chosen based on the literature.

Statistical Analysis:

A receiver operating curve was performed to detect the predictability of serum P/E2 and P for the ongoing pregnancy rate. First, patients were divided according to either P level (low P < 1.5 ng/mL and HP ≥1.5 ng/mL) or P/E2 ratio (low P/E2 <0.55 and HP/E2 ≥ 0.55). Patients were further divided into four subgroups: (Group A: HP and HP/E2 ratio, Group B: low P and low P/E2 ratio, Group C: HP only, and Group D: HP/E2 only). A multivariate regression analysis models were used to account for the effect of the cycle confounders on the likelihood of pregnancy.

Results:

A total of 402 ICSI cycles were analyzed. The area under the curve was 0.67 and 0.59 for P/E2 and P, respectively. P/E2 showed a significant association with ongoing pregnancy (adjusted odds ratios [aOR]: 0.409, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.222–0.753, P = 0.004) while HP revealed no significant predictive value (aOR: 0.542, 95% CI 0.284–1.036, P = 0.064) after the multivariate analysis.

Conclusions:

P elevation may not present as an independent predictor for cycle outcomes. P/E2 ratio has a better prognostic value than P alone in predicting pregnancy of GnRH antagonist cycles.

Revisiting debates of premature luteinization and its effect on assisted reproductive technology outcome

The impact of the prematurely elevated serum progesterone on the late follicular phase, commonly known as premature luteinization (PL), is a matter of continuing debate. Available evidence supports that serum progesterone ≥ 1.5 ng/ml on the day of ovulation triggering could reduce the pregnancy potential in fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles by jeopardizing endometrial receptivity. Causes of PL during ovarian stimulation are unclear. Recent studies point toward the daily follicle-stimulating hormone dosage, duration of controlled ovarian stimulation, number of oocytes retrieved, and peak estradiol level as factors affecting the incidence of PL. Emerging data show additional influence on embryo quality. The prevention of PL has been challenging. The key elements in preventing PL include individualization of ovarian stimulation according to patient's ovarian reserve, proper ovulation trigger timing, and use of medications such as corticosteroids and metformin. Embryo cryopreservation with deferred embryo transfer is the established strategy to overcome PL, yet it is an extra burden to the IVF laboratory and increased cost for patients. Herein, we review the up-to-date knowledge of this frequent IVF problem including causes, proposed diagnostic criteria, and its impact on endometrial receptivity, embryo quality, and pregnancy outcomes. The preventive measures and rescue strategies are also discussed.