Successful live birth after in vitro maturation treatment in a patient with autoimmune premature ovarian failure: a case report and review of the literature

Resistant ovary syndrome: Two case reports and a literature review of effective controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF

INTRODUCTION

Resistant ovary syndrome (ROS) represents a rare reproductive endocrine disorder that is predominantly associated with infertility, characterized by heightened endogenous gonadotropin levels in the presence of a normal ovarian reserve. Patients with ROS typically exhibit a poor response to exogenous gonadotropins during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). Due to the absence of a universally accepted effective COS protocol, this study aims to contribute to the existing body of literature by detailing 2 successful pregnancies achieved through conventional in vitro fertilization (c-IVF) in patients with ROS, and through retrospective analysis, seeks to elucidate the factors contributing to the successful ovarian stimulation in these cases, with the ultimate goal of establishing clinical guidelines for ROS management.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The central challenge addressed in this study pertains to the effective induction of oocyte maturation during c-IVF COS in ROS patients.

DIAGNOSIS

The study focuses on 2 infertile women diagnosed with ROS who sought to conceive via c-IVF.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were subjected to a COS protocol involving pituitary downregulation followed by ovarian stimulation using recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH) and human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG), preceded by 3 cycles of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) pretreatment.

OUTCOMES

The proposed protocol elicited a favorable ovarian response, culminating in the retrieval of numerous mature oocytes and the development of multiple viable embryos via c-IVF, ultimately leading to successful live births post-embryo transfer.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the outlined COS protocol may serve as a viable treatment option for ROS patients aspiring to conceive through c-IVF, thereby potentially expanding the therapeutic repertoire for this challenging condition.

A Systematic Review of Autoimmune Oophoritis Therapies

Autoimmune primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) is a devastating disease with limited clinical guidance. The objective of this systematic review was to identify treatments for autoimmune POI and analyze their efficacy. A comprehensive search of CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed from inception to April 2022. English language publications that evaluated women with autoimmune POI after a documented intervention were included. Animal models of autoimmune POI were also included. Risk of bias was assessed with the SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies or the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series as appropriate. Twenty-eight studies were included in this review, with 11 RCTs, 15 case reports, and 2 case series. Seventeen studies were in humans, and 11 were in animal models. No completed RCTs, cohort studies, or case-control studies were identified in humans. In observational human studies, corticosteroids were effective in select patients. In many case reports, adequate treatment of comorbid autoimmune conditions resulted in return of menses, hormonal normalization, or spontaneous pregnancy. In terms of assisted reproductive technologies, there was case report evidence for both in vitro fertilization (IVF) and in vitro maturation (IVM) in women wishing to conceive with their own oocytes. Ovulation induction, IVF, and IVM resulted in a total of 15 pregnancies and 14 live births. In animal models, there was additional evidence for stem cell therapies and treatments used in traditional Chinese medicine, although this research may not be generalizable to humans. Furthermore, litter size was not evaluated in any of the animal studies. Additional research is needed to establish the efficacy of current treatments for autoimmune POI with a controlled experimental design and larger sample size. Additionally, there is a critical need to develop novel therapies for this condition, as understanding of its pathophysiology and  available tools to modulate the immune response have progressed.

Good practice recommendations on add-ons in reproductive medicine†

STUDY QUESTION

Which add-ons are safe and effective to be used in ART treatment?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Forty-two recommendations were formulated on the use of add-ons in the diagnosis of fertility problems, the IVF laboratory and clinical management of IVF treatment.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The innovative nature of ART combined with the extremely high motivation of the patients has opened the door to the wide application of what has become known as 'add-ons' in reproductive medicine. These supplementary options are available to patients in addition to standard fertility procedures, typically incurring an additional cost. A diverse array of supplementary options is made available, encompassing tests, drugs, equipment, complementary or alternative therapies, laboratory procedures, and surgical interventions. These options share the common aim of stating to enhance pregnancy or live birth rates, mitigate the risk of miscarriage, or expedite the time to achieving pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

ESHRE aimed to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based recommendations focusing on the safety and efficacy of add-ons currently used in fertility procedures in order to improve the quality of care for patients with infertility.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

ESHRE appointed a European multidisciplinary working group consisting of practising clinicians, embryologists, and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of infertility. Patient representatives were included in the working group. To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, recommendations were based on the professional experience and consensus of the working group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 46 independent international reviewers. A total of 272 comments were received and incorporated where relevant.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The multidisciplinary working group formulated 42 recommendations in three sections; diagnosis and diagnostic tests, laboratory tests and interventions, and clinical management.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Of the 42 recommendations, none could be based on high-quality evidence and only four could be based on moderate-quality evidence, implicating that 95% of the recommendations are supported only by low-quality randomized controlled trials, observational data, professional experience, or consensus of the development group.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These guidelines offer valuable direction for healthcare professionals who are responsible for the care of patients undergoing ART treatment for infertility. Their purpose is to promote safe and effective ART treatment, enabling patients to make informed decisions based on realistic expectations. The guidelines aim to ensure that patients are fully informed about the various treatment options available to them and the likelihood of any additional treatment or test to improve the chance of achieving a live birth.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

All costs relating to the development process were covered from ESHRE funds. There was no external funding of the development process or manuscript production. K.L. reports speakers fees from Merck and was part of a research study by Vitrolife (unpaid). T.E. reports consulting fees from Gynemed, speakers fees from Gynemed and is part of the scientific advisory board of Hamilton Thorne. N.P.P. reports grants from Merck Serono, Ferring Pharmaceutical, Theramex, Gedeon Richter, Organon, Roche, IBSA and Besins Healthcare, speakers fees from Merck Serono, Ferring Pharmaceutical, Theramex, Gedeon Richter, Organon, Roche, IBSA and Besins Healthcare. S.R.H. declares being managing director of Fertility Europe, a not-for-profit organization receiving financial support from ESHRE. I.S. is a scientific advisor for and has stock options from Alife Health, is co-founder of IVFvision LTD (unpaid) and received speakers' fee from the 2023 ART Young Leader Prestige workshop in China. A.P. reports grants from Gedeon Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Merck A/S, consulting fees from Preglem, Novo Nordisk, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gedeon Richter, Cryos and Merck A/S, speakers fees from Gedeon Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck A/S, Theramex and Organon, travel fees from Gedeon Richter. The other authors disclosed no conflicts of interest.

DISCLAIMER

This Good Practice Recommendations (GPRs) document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and are based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation.ESHRE GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or bedeemedinclusive of all proper methods of care, or be exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results.Theydo not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, or variations based on locality and facility type.Furthermore, ESHRE GPRs do not constitute or imply the endorsement, or favouring, of any of the included technologies by ESHRE.