Current status and challenges of drug development for hormonal treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review of randomized control trials

Why do oestrogens matter: systematic review and meta-analysis assessing GnRH antagonists, considering add-back therapy, for endometriosis-associated pain

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have been demonstrated to reduce endometriosis-associated pain. Because of the hypo-oestrogenic state they induce, however, higher dosages of GnRH antagonists are not recommended for used long term. This unwanted effect may be eliminated by so-called add-back therapy (ABT). This review was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of GnRH antagonists, with or without add-back hormonal replacement therapy. Out of the 345 studies selected through the initial search, seven randomized controlled trials were included, comparing different oral GnRH antagonists at varying dosages, from a minimum of 50 mg to a maximum of 200 mg once or twice daily. Women treated with the lowest dose of GnRH antagonists had significantly greater mean pain score reductions from baseline throughout treatment compared with those treated with placebo (odds ratio [OR] -13.12, 95% CI -17.35 to -8.89 and OR -3.08, 95% CI -4.39 to -1.76 for dysmenorrhoea and non-menstrual pelvic pain, respectively). Compatible with the dose-response effect, a positive correlation was found between response rates and adverse event rates. While GnRH antagonists offer an advantage in terms of pain reduction for endometriosis, the more recent literature suggests using GnRH antagonists with ABT, which, while mitigating the hypo-oestrogenic effects of GnRH antagonists, maintain their efficacy, while allowing their long-term use.

Pilot Study of IL-1 Antagonist Anakinra for Treatment of Endometriosis

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of an interleukin-1 (IL-1) antagonist anakinra (Kineret®) on endometriosis-related quality of life (QoL), pain, and inflammatory biomarkers.

Methods

This was a single-site, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over pilot clinical study of patients recruited at an academic specialty clinic. Eligible participants were females aged 18-45 years with menstrual cycles every 24-32 days. Subjects had moderate to severe dysmenorrhea and either a surgical diagnosis of endometriosis or an endometrioma on imaging. Subjects were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to receive either the study drug or placebo administered as daily injections during the first 3 periods and then the alternate intervention for the next 3 periods.

Results

Fifteen subjects completed the 6 menstrual cycle study. After each period, they completed the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) QoL questionnaire and an assessment of dysmenorrhea using a 0-100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). All domains of the EHP-30 showed a trend towards improvement, with significant improvements in powerlessness (54.5 vs 63.3, p = 0.04) and self-image (58.1 vs 66.7, p = 0.03) on the study drug compared to placebo. The mean dysmenorrhea VAS also trended toward improvement with a score of 37.5 during active treatment and 42.6 with placebo (p = 0.26). No difference in menstrual cycle length was detected (29.3 days vs 27.7 days, p = 0.56). There were significant differences in multiple inflammatory biomarkers between the study drug and placebo, including BDNF, IL-1, and IL-6 among certain groups.

Conclusion

With all EHP-30 domains and the dysmenorrhea VAS showing either a statistical improvement or trend towards improvement, there is justification for a larger study. As no impact on menstrual cycles was detected, anakinra may be a particularly impactful option for women desiring fertility. Additional evaluation is needed on the role of anakinra on inflammatory markers given significant reductions were identified in multiple biomarkers.

Immune micro-environment analysis and drug screening for ovarian endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Patients of ovary endometriosis have an abnormal immune micro-environment, leading to endometrial tissue that from retrograde menstruation evade immune surveillance and subsequently develop into ectopic lesions.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to elucidate the crucial immune cells and molecular pathways that are associated with an aberrant immune micro-environment of endometriosis.

METHOD

In this study, we identified differentially expressed genes between ovarian ectopic endometrial tissue (OVE) and eutopic endometrial tissue from patients with endometriosis (PE) and non-endometriosis patients (CON) by analyzing the mRNA sequencing data. Additionally, we used WGCNA(Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis) to screen for key genes related to immune cell infiltration and compared the sub-types of infiltrating immune cells using CIBERSORT(cell-type identification by estimating relative subsets of RNA transcript). Subsequently, we conducted a single-cell analysis on the identified key genes. Furthermore, we analyzed potential drugs suitable for ovarian endometriosis treatment using pRRophertic.

RESULTS

Seven key genes associated with immune cell infiltration were screened out. The expression of these genes in OVE was significantly lower than that in PE and CON. These key genes were mainly enriched in the NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity pathway, especially for CD16 + CD56dim NK. Moreover, NK cells infiltration in ovarian endometriosis was significantly reduced compared with PE and CON, while M2 macrophage shown the opposite. Results of the single-cell analysis showed that the expression of the seven key genes in NK cells and monocyte-macrophages in OVE was significantly lower than that in PE or CON. Additionally, we identified potential drugs suitable for ovarian endometriosis treatment.

CONCLUSION

The decreased infiltration of NK cells and increased infiltration of M2 macrophages contribute to the evasion of immune surveillance against endometrial tissue, promoting the progression of OVE. Therefore, potential strategies for the treatment of OVE include increasing NK cell activation and decreasing M2 macrophage polarization.

Oral GnRH Antagonists in Combination with Estradiol and Norethindrone Acetate for Pain Relief Associated with Endometriosis: A Review of Evidence of a Novel Class of Hormonal Agents

Current medical treatment options for endometriosis associated pains are inadequate. Evidence on effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is scarce. Around one third of patients are not responsive to oral contraceptives or progestins due to progesterone resistance. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists can only be used for a short duration because of associated side effects. Oral GnRH antagonists, including elagolix, relugolix, and linzagolix allow oral administration, induce dose dependent reduction of estradiol levels, do not cause initial flare up of endometriosis symptoms, and allow the fast return of ovarian function and menstruation after discontinuation. Elagolix at a low dose of 150 mg once daily, or the higher dose of 200 mg twice daily, significantly increased the proportion of women achieving clinically meaningful decline of dysmenorrhea, noncyclic pelvic pain, and dyspareunia. Relugolix at an oral dose of 40 mg/day results in improvement in different forms of endometriosis related pelvic pain, with an efficacy and side effect profile similar to that of GnRH agonists. Adding 1 mg of estradiol and 0.5 mg of norethindrone to 40 mg of relugolix (relugolix combination therapy) allows extension of treatment to 24 weeks with maintained efficacy and an improved side effect profile. Linzagolix, in a dose of 75 mg/day, can be used alone to treat endometriosis associated pain. For severe pelvic pain and dyspareunia, linzagolix can be used in a high dose of 200 mg/day with hormonal add-back therapy to preserve bone health.

A review of phase II and III drugs for the treatment and management of endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disease that gives rise to pelvic pain and infertility. Although estroprogestins and progestins currently stand as the first-line treatments for this condition, demonstrating efficacy in two-thirds of patients, a significant portion of individuals experience only partial relief or symptom recurrence following the cessation of these therapies. The coexistence of superficial, deep endometriosis, and ovarian endometriomas, as three distinct phenotypes with unique pathogenetic and molecular characteristics, may elucidate the current heterogeneous biological response to available therapy.

AREAS COVERED

The objective of this review is to furnish the reader with a comprehensive summary pertaining to phase II-III hormonal treatments for endometriosis.

EXPERT OPINION

Ongoing research endeavors are directed toward the development of novel hormonal options for this benign yet debilitating disease. Among them, oral GnRH antagonists emerge as a noteworthy option, furnishing rapid therapeutic onset without an initial flare-up; these drugs facilitate partial or complete estrogen suppression, and promote prompt ovarian function recovery upon discontinuation, effectively surmounting the limitations associated with previously employed GnRH agonists. Limited evidence supports the use of selective estrogen and progesterone receptor modulators. Consequently, further extensive clinical research is imperative to garner a more profound understanding of innovative targets for novel hormonal options.

Effects of different progesterone levels on reproductive outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies: from molecular basis to treatment strategies

PURPOSE

The aim of this narrative review is to offer an overview about the role of progesterone levels on pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs).

METHODS

A detailed computerized search of the literature was performed in the main electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science) to determine the importance of elevated progesterone levels at different stages of the cycle for pregnancy rates in the in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. Our review also provides information on the differences between elevated progesterone levels and their interpretation in normal and in poorly responding women.

RESULTS

After careful evaluation, our search strategy yielded a total of 15 included articles, showing the possible factors that may have had an impact on the increased progesterone level before human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) injection and the different thresholds above which the pregnancy rate was lower. Furthermore, increased progesterone on cycle day 2 or 3 could serve as a marker for increased progesterone in the late follicular phase, which is associated with a lower pregnancy rate.

CONCLUSION

Despite the literature data that support the negative effect of elevated progesterone on fresh cycles, due to lack of randomized controlled trials, the value of measuring progesterone in daily practice is questionable. Available evidence supports the detrimental effect of elevated progesterone in different subgroups of women, although there is still the need for defining different thresholds and durations of high progesterone exposure. The need for various thresholds for different cohorts of women, the inter-assay variability is making this decision harder.

Concurrent Diagnosis of Adenomyosis and Congenital Uterine Anomalies: A Review

Background: Adenomyosis and congenital uterine anomalies (CUAs) can compromise reproductive potential and may coexist in the same patient, especially in cases of infertility. This review (CRD42022382850) aims to evaluate the published cases of concurrent adenomyosis and syndromic and nonsyndromic CUAs. Methods: A literature search for suitable articles published in the English language was performed using the following databases from inception to 30 November 2022: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, the Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment Database, and Web of Science. Articles including both CUAs and adenomyosis, with data about their potential relationship, were included. Results: The literature search retrieved 14 articles that met the purpose of this review and summarized the most recent findings regarding the concurrent diagnosis of adenomyosis and CUAs. Conclusions: Adenomyosis can be found in both syndromic and nonsyndromic CUAs, and may arise from several etiologies. The hypothesis that obstructions in CUAs increase uterine pressure and promote the development of adenomyosis remains to be further elucidated, and additional findings may also play a role. The patient's genetic, epigenetic, and hormonal patterns, as well as normal physiological processes, such as pregnancy, may influence the growth of adenomyosis.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Metabolites Analysis in Endometriosis Patients: A Prospective Observational Translational Study

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis affects women of reproductive age, and its pathogenesis is still unclear. Typically, it overlaps other similar medical and surgical conditions, determining a delay in early diagnosis. Metabolomics allows studying metabolic changes in different physiological or pathological states to discover new potential biomarkers. We used the gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS) to explore metabolic alterations in endometriosis to better understand its pathophysiology and find new biomarkers.

METHODS

Twenty-two serum samples of patients with symptomatic endometriosis and ten without it were collected and subjected to GC-MS analysis. Multivariate and univariate statistical analyses were performed, followed by pathway analysis.

RESULTS

Partial least squares discriminant analysis was performed to determine the differences between the two groups (p = 0.003). Threonic acid, 3-hydroxybutyric acid, and proline increased significantly in endometriosis patients, while alanine and valine decreased. ROC curves were built to test the diagnostic power of metabolites. The pathway analysis identified the synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies and the biosynthesis of phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan as the most altered pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

The metabolomic approach identifies metabolic alterations in women with endometriosis. These findings may improve our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of disease and the discovery of new biomarkers.

CTLA4-Linked Autoimmunity in the Pathogenesis of Endometriosis and Related Infertility: A Systematic Review

Several studies, although with conflicting results, have sought to determine the concentration of soluble CTLA4 antigens in peripheral blood plasma and peritoneal fluid in patients with endometriosis-related infertility. A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) through a search of the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, The Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment Database and Web of Science, and Clinical Trials research register. We included observational or prospective human and animal studies with any features related to endometriosis and/or infertility studies involving CTLA4-related pathogenesis published in English. The results of studies in which the size and characteristics of the observed groups were not stated were excluded. From the initial pool of 73 publications identified and screened, we finally included 5 articles to summarize the most recent knowledge about CTLA4-linked autoimmunity in the pathogenesis of endometriosis and related infertility. Evidence from clinical studies shows that CTLA4-based autoimmunity is involved in the maintenance of chronic inflammation in the peritoneal environment, with pre-clinical evidence of anti-CTLA antibodies as a potential novel target therapy for endometriosis. However, CTLA4 gene analyses do not support findings of CTLA4-linked autoimmunity as a primary determinant of the pathogenesis of endometriosis. These findings underlie the role of complex interactions within the family of immune checkpoint molecules involved. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical relevance of anti-CTLA target therapy, taking into account the potential adverse events and repercussions of novel immunologic therapy modalities. However, with the general scarcity of studies investigating this topic, the clinical importance of CTLA4 autoimmunity still remains unclear.