A new point-of-care method for monitoring anti-platelet therapy: application of the cone and plate(let) analyzer

Monitoring of Antiplatelet Therapy

In the late 1990s, the antithrombotic antiplatelet agent, clopidogrel, a P2Y12 inhibitor, was introduced. Around the same time, there was an increase in a number of new methods to measure platelet function (e.g., PFA-100 in 1995), and this has continued. It became evident that not all patients responded to clopidogrel in the same way and that some patients had a relative "resistance" to therapy, termed "high on-treatment platelet reactivity." This then led to some publications to advocate platelet function testing being used for patients on antiplatelet therapy. Platelet function testing was also suggested for use in patients awaiting cardiac surgery after stopping their antiplatelet therapy as a way of balancing thrombotic risk pre-surgery and bleeding risk perioperatively. This chapter will discuss some of the commonly used platelet function tests used in these settings, particularly those that are sometimes referred to as point-of-care tests or that require minimal laboratory sample manipulation. The latest guidance and recommendations for platelet function testing will be discussed following several clinical trials looking at the usefulness of platelet function testing in these clinical settings.

Twice daily dosing of aspirin improves platelet inhibition in whole blood in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and micro- or macrovascular complications

The efficacy of low-dose aspirin in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been questioned. We tested if twice daily dosing of aspirin would be more effective in T2DM, possibly due to increased platelet turnover. A randomised cross-over study compared 75 mg aspirin OD, 75 mg BID and 320 mg OD (≥2 week treatment periods) in 25 patients with T2DM and micro- or macrovascular complications. Platelet responses were examined by impedance aggregometry (WBA) and the IMPACT-R aspirin test in whole blood, light transmittance aggregometry in plateletrich plasma (LTA), and urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 (TxM). Aspirin 75 mg BID decreased arachidonic acid (AA)-induced WBA compared to 75 mg OD (9.7 ± 4.5 vs. 12.6 ± 3.5 ohm; p=0.003) or to 320 mg OD (11.5 ± 4.2 Ohms; p=0.049). WBA responses to collagen were similarly attenuated by BID or high dosing (by 12–14%; p=0.02 for both). The IMPACT-R showed a better response to 75 mg BID compared to 75 mg OD (p=0.049), but not to 320 mg OD. AA-induced aggregation by LTA was <6.5% on all occasions, with no differences between aspirin dosages. TxM was reduced after 320 mg OD (p=0.002), but not 75 mg BID (p=0.07). Reticulated platelets were highly correlated with mean platelet volume (MPV; r2=0.74, p<0.0001). Both markers for platelet turnover were correlated with AA-induced WBA, but neither identified patients who benefited from BID dosing dependably. In conclusion, twice daily dosing improved laboratory responses to aspirin in high risk T2DM patients. Studies of whether BID dosing of aspirin can improve clinical outcomes in such patients are of interest.

Monitoring aspirin therapy in children after interventional cardiac catheterization: laboratory measures, dose response, and clinical outcomes

Very few studies have investigated dose response of aspirin and agreement of different platelet function assays in children. One hundred five children were studied at baseline and after interventional cardiac catheterization during aspirin treatment and, in cases of aspirin resistance (AR), after dose increase. Results from arachidonate-induced aggregation (AA) were compared with aggregation induced by ADP, PFA-100 closure times (CTs), urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 (urinary 11-dhTxB2) levels, and Impact-R % surface coverage. Aspirin at 2-5 mg/kg/day inhibited platelet function in a large majority. While 19 % showed bruising and mild epistaxis, no thrombotic complications were recorded. AR was detected by AA in seven children (6.7 %). After dose increase, the majority showed inhibition by aspirin. Infants had higher urinary 11-dhTxB2 baseline levels; this assay showed some correlation with AA. Both assays manifested high sensitivity and specificity for aspirin while inferior results were found for the other assays. With the PFA-100, 15.2 % of patients were found to have AR, but this corresponded to AR by AA in only one of seven children.

CONCLUSION

While there was poor agreement among assays, AA and urinary 11-dhTxB2 show good specificity for the monitoring of aspirin therapy in children. Aspirin at 2-5 mg/kg inhibits platelet function; AR in children is rare and can be overcome by dose increase.

Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance using the cone and plate(let) analyser in Indian patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Resistance to antiplatelet drugs is a well-known entity. However, data for aspirin and clopidogrel resistance, and its clinical significance, in Indian patients are meagre.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the prevalence of resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel in Indian patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD), using the cone and plate(let) analyser (CPA) technology.

SETTING AND DESIGN

A single centre prospective study in a cohort of patients with stable CHD on chronic aspirin and clopidogrel therapy attending the cardiology outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital in Southern India.

METHODS

Platelet function was measured using the Impact-R device (DiaMed, Cressier, Switzerland). Resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel was measured in a cohort of 100 patients with stable documented CHD. Relation of antiplatelet resistance to various clinical comorbidities was also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients, 85% were men, and 15% were above 65 years of age. 47% patients had diabetes, 29% of patients were hypertensive and 16% were smokers. Using the CPA, 12 patients (12%) were found to be resistant to aspirin and 19 patients (19%) were clopidogrel resistant. In addition, 10 patients (10%) were resistant to both aspirin and clopidogrel. There was no significant correlation between the presence of antiplatelet resistance and several baseline clinical variables, including age, sex, diabetes, hypertension and smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

Resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel and dual antiplatelet resistance are prevalent in Indian patients, comparable with the prevalence worldwide. The CPA is a feasible assay to determine antiplatelet resistance.

Testing platelet function

Platelet function tests have been traditionally used to aid in the diagnosis and management of patients with bleeding problems. Given the role of platelets in atherothrombosis, several dedicated platelet function instruments are now available that are simple to use and can be used as point-of-care assays. These can provide rapid assessment of platelet function within whole blood without the requirement of sample processing. Some tests can be used to monitor antiplatelet therapy and assess risk of bleeding and thrombosis, although current guidelines advise against this. This article discusses the potential utility of tests/instruments that are available.

Assessment of platelet inhibition by point-of-care testing in neuroendovascular procedures

Antiplatelet agents are an important component of the preventive strategies currently used in clinical practice to minimize the risk of thromboembolic events during and after endovascular procedures. Because of the variability in the response to antiplatelet agents, measuring the degree of platelet inhibition may help identify and properly treat poor responders. POC testing is defined as diagnostic testing at or near the site of patient care. Knowledge of the specifics of these devices among practicing neurointerventionalists is relatively limited. In this article, the different POC devices available are presented, and their clinical utility in relation to endovascular procedures is discussed.

Platelets and primary haemostasis

Platelets have a critical role in haemostasis when vessel wall is injured. Platelet receptors are involved in sequence in this process by slowing platelets down via GPIb/von Willebrand factor to bring them into contact with exposed collagen, then activating them via GPVI to release granule contents and express integrins in a matrix protein binding state. More platelets are incorporated into the growing thrombus and a series of events are set off that finishes with the exposed subendothelium protected by a non-thrombogenic platelet surface and tissue repair underway and the blood flow through the vessel maintained. GPIb is also involved in thrombin activation and, together with GPVI, in the formation of COAT platelets. In thrombosis, pathological changes occur that may lead to life-threatening blockage of vessels. Prevention of thrombosis while maintaining haemostasis remains a major goal of medical research.

Measurement of Shear-Activated Platelet Aggregate Formation in Non-Anticoagulated Blood: Utility in Detection of Clopidogrel–Aspirin-Induced Platelet Dysfunction

We studied the ability of a new instrument, the PlaCor PRT that measures shear-induced platelet aggregation in fingerstick, non-anticoagulated blood without added agonists, to detect platelet dysfunction ex vivo. Platelet reactivity time (PRT) and whole blood aggregation (WBA) were measured in 160 healthy volunteers, before and after aspirin and in 170 participants with established vascular disease or risk factors thereof treated with aspirin ± clopidogrel. Pretreatment PRT and WBA were significantly correlated (collagen r = −.63; arachidonate r = −.65; P < .0001). Following aspirin, the mean PRT increased from 82 to 142 seconds ( P < .0001), and in participants treated with clopidogrel–aspirin, the mean PRT (286 seconds, n = 65) was significantly longer than with aspirin alone (166 seconds, n = 105; P < .001). Only 13% of PRTs of participants treated with clopidogrel and aspirin were within the normal range. We conclude that the PlaCor PRT is a simple, rapid, point-of-care instrument that compares favorably with published descriptions of other platelet function instruments.

Clinical and prognostic implications of the initial response to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Increased platelet reactivity and decreased response to antiplatelet drugs may result in recurrent ischemic events after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We evaluated laboratory response to aspirin in patients with ACS before and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and assessed its effect on major adverse clinical events. Sixty-three consecutive patients with ACS were tested for response to aspirin by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and the IMPACT-R test (with arachidonic acid) before and 2 to 4 days after PCI and clopidogrel loading. Patients were followed for clinical events up to 15 months from PCI. Response to aspirin improved significantly after PCI and clopidogrel treatment (mean arachidonic acid-induced LTA decreased from 34.9 ± 3.35% before PCI to 15.2 ± 2.2% and surface coverage increased from 2.2 ± 0.27% to 6.2 ± 0.6%, p <0.0001 for the 2 methods). Improved response to aspirin after PCI correlated with response to clopidogrel (LTA and IMPACT-R, p <0.01). Patients with good laboratory response to aspirin before but not after PCI had a significantly lower major cardiovascular event rate during 15-month follow-up in multivariate analysis. In conclusion, laboratory response to aspirin is highly dynamic in patients with ACS. Improved response to aspirin after PCI may result from stabilization of coronary artery disease and/or clopidogrel treatment. Laboratory response to aspirin before PCI and clopidogrel loading is a sensitive marker for platelet reactivity that correlates with clinical outcome in patients with ACS.

Evaluation of children with a suspected bleeding disorder applying the Impact-R [Cone and Plate(let) Analyzer]

BACKGROUND

A convenient screening test for children with bleeding symptoms before more labor-intensive diagnostic steps are taken would be of value. The Impact-R was designed in an attempt to analyse platelet function under near physiological conditions. Results are presented as surface coverage (SC, %) and average size (AS, microm(2)).

OBJECTIVE

In this cross-sectional retrospective study, we assessed the use of the Impact-R in the evaluation of children with a suspected bleeding disorder (BD).

METHODS

The hospital charts of 110 children referred to the coagulation laboratory were reviewed for personal and family bleeding history (BH) as well as results of the laboratory evaluation.

RESULTS

A laboratory 'diagnosable' BD (LBD) was found in 23 children (21%, 95% CI 14-30%). A diagnosis of LBD was associated with the severity of bleeding but not with family BH. By receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the SC was superior to the AS for diagnosis of a LBD. The Impact-R was abnormal in 43/97 children (44.3%, 95% CI 34-55%). The predictive values of a normal and abnormal Impact-R were 96% (95% CI 92-97%) and 42% (95% CI 28-56%), respectively. When considering the personal and family BH, the post-test probability for LBD after a normal Impact-R was reduced from 20% to 3.5% (95% CI 2.5-7%).

CONCLUSIONS

A normal Impact-R test is highly effective in excluding LBDs. Yet, in case of an abnormal Impact-R test, further testing is needed. An algorithm that includes the personal and family BH and the results of a screening test may improve the diagnostic process. Prospective studies are now needed to confirm these findings.

Testing agonist-induced platelet aggregation by the Impact-R [Cone and plate(let) analyzer (CPA)]

The Impact-R [Cone and plate(let) analyzer (CPA)] is useful to assess platelet adhesion in different diseases and to monitor antiplatelet therapy. The purpose of the present study was to adapt this system to test agonist-induced platelet aggregation. Blood samples were tested by light transmission platelet aggregometry (LTA), Impact-R regular test and Impact-R agonist-response test. In the latter, samples were pre-incubated for 1 min with an agonist leading to platelet activation, micro-aggregates formation and reduced adhesion. Impact-R regular test of ten healthy volunteers demonstrated platelet adhesion (surface coverage, SC) of 11.2 +/- 2.6% while LTA induced by ADP, ristocetin, epinephrine, collagen and arachidonic acid (AA) yielded maximal aggregation (81% to 93%). In the Impact-R agonist-response test, SC was reduced to 2.2 +/- 1.0%, 1.2 +/- 0.9%, 2.3 +/- 1.0%, 2.2 +/- 0.8% and 2.4 +/- 0.4%, respectively. Prostaglandin E(1) treatment weakened SC reduction in response to ADP and epinephrine (SC of 8.8 +/- 1.8% and 9.5 +/- 2.0%, respectively). Inhibition of P2Y(12) receptor with 2MeSAMP resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in maximal aggregation in the ADP-induced test, which inversely correlated to SC in the Impact-R ADP-response test. The Impact-R agonist-response tests detected aggregation defects in patients with storage pool disease, severe von Willebrand disease and epinephrine response deficiency, and may be useful to assess the effect of different agonists on platelet aggregation.

Differential platelet deposition onto collagen in cone-and-plate and parallel plate flow chambers

To routinely test the formation of thrombi and the effect of drugs modifying it, proper test systems are needed. Their design should rely on the laws of rheology and the physiology of laminar flow. To best model physiological or pathological shear conditions, parallel/linear and rotational type flow chambers are developed. We have compared the initial phase of platelet thrombus formation in a parallel plate flow chamber (PPC) and a cone-and-plate chamber (CPC) under von Willebrand dependent shear conditions. Blood was allowed to flow through human collagen type III surfaces at a shear rate of 1000 s(-1) for 150 s. Thrombus deposition was characterized by surface coverage, average area and height of thrombi. VWF distribution within thrombi was analyzed with confocal laser scanning microscopy. Reduced surface-specific platelet adhesion and aggregation (surface coverage and average thrombus size) were observed in CPC along with a significant increase in single platelet disappearance from the circulating blood. Our data suggest that the higher rate of platelet consumption in this device, as opposed to PPC, is limiting the adhesion to the surface. Consequently, surface-specific processes and aggregation in the flowing blood are both assessed using CPC, while comprehensive evaluation of surface-specific processes is best achieved with PPC. Therefore, the choice of chamber type as a diagnostic tool is purpose-dependent.

Point-of-care assessment of antiplatelet agents in the perioperative period: a review

The aim of this paper was to review the strengths and limitations of current 'point-of-care' techniques for the detection of antiplatelet drug effects. The review was based on a Medline search for articles with key words related to "platelet function tests", "point-of-care", and "anaesthesia", published in English between January 1996 and September 2008. It was found that global assessments of 'haemostasis', such as the standard thrombelastograph, Sonoclot, Clot Signature Analyser and Hemodyne, are not specific for platelet function and are essentially insensitive to cyclooxygenase inhibitors (aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) and P2Y12 antagonists (ticlopidine, clopidogrel). Global assessments of 'platelet function', such as the PFA-100 and PlateletWorks, are more specific for platelet function, but also have limited sensitivity for cyclooxygenase inhibitors and P2Y12 antagonists. The newer devices developed specifically for the assessment of antiplatelet drugs, such as Platelet Mapping, the Impact Cone and Platelet Analyser and the VerifyNow, are more promising, but are not as sensitive as laboratory platelet aggregometry. All three categories of devices detect G(p)II(b)/III(a) antagonists (abciximab, tirofiban, eptifibatide) activity, but not all provide quantitative assessments for monitoring therapy. The limitations appeared to be related to the complexity of platelet function, the multiple pathways of platelet activation, the wide interpatient variability in platelet responses and the interdependence between platelets and other aspects of coagulation. The strengths and limitations of point-of-care devices should be appreciated before they are used to assist clinical decision-making in the perioperative period.

Aspirin responsiveness in acute brain ischaemia: association with stroke severity and clinical outcome

PURPOSE

Platelets play a critical role in the pathogenesis of acute brain ischaemia. We studied the association between the degree of inhibition of platelet function by aspirin (ASA) and the severity and outcome of acute brain ischaemia.

METHODS

Platelet responsiveness to ASA was assessed in patients with acute brain ischaemia, treated with ASA since hospital admission. The degree of ASA responsiveness was assessed by optical aggregometry and categorized into patients with good response, partial response and complete unresponsiveness to ASA (good responders, partial responders and non-responders, respectively). An additional evaluation of responsiveness to ASA was performed by Impact-R (cone and platelet analyzer). Patients underwent serial clinical assessment during hospitalization, at discharge and during follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 105 patients (mean age 63 +/- 12 years; 66% men), impaired ASA responsiveness at baseline as assessed by aggregometry was associated with increased stroke severity at baseline, unfavourable clinical course, and poor functional outcome during follow-up (p < 0.05 for all). Age-adjusted odds ratios in non-responders compared to good responders were 9.8 for severe stroke on admission (95% CI 2.8-34.9), 3.1 for lack of early clinical improvement (95% CI 1.1-8.8) and 8.6 for poor functional outcome during follow-up (95% CI 2.4-30.4). Less robust trends were observed with the Impact-R.

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired responsiveness to ASA in acute brain ischaemia is common and is associated with worse neurological deficits at stroke onset, early clinical deterioration and poorer functional outcome. The clinical significance of these findings requires further evaluation in larger longitudinal studies.

Variable responsiveness to clopidogrel and aspirin among patients with acute coronary syndrome as assessed by platelet function tests

Unresponsiveness to clopidogrel or aspirin has been reported in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Platelet aggregometry (PA) and the Impact-R [Cone and Plate(let) Analyzer (CPA) technology, measuring whole blood platelet adhesion under flow conditions] were compared in detecting laboratory unresponsiveness to clopidogrel and aspirin among ACS patients. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) samples were evaluated in 404 patients by PA using adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid (AA) and whole blood samples by the Impact-R ADP- and AA-response tests. The first cohort (n=114) was assayed by PA on days 1 and 4 of the onset of ACS. A patient with relative decrease of </=10% in ADP-induced maximal platelet aggregation after clopidogrel treatment was defined as laboratory non-responding (NR) patient to clopidogrel. This relative value correlated well with an absolute value of ADP-induced aggregation >/=70%. A patient with an absolute value of AA-induced maximal aggregation >/=60% was defined as laboratory NR patient to aspirin. The second cohort (n=290) was tested on day 4 by both systems and results analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve. The following cut-off values of the Impact-R surface coverage were obtained: </=2.8% and </=3.4% for clopidogrel and aspirin NR patients, respectively. The incidence of NR patients to clopidogrel and aspirin, according to the two methods was 27% and 22%, respectively. Impact-R compared to PA in detecting clopidogrel and aspirin NR patients revealed: 79% and 82% agreement, 71% and 73% sensitivity, 83% and 86% specificity, respectively. In conclusion, the Impact-R and PA results demonstrated high degree of similarity.

Measuring antiplatelet drug effects in the laboratory

This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of currently available tests for the monitoring of antiplatelet therapy (especially aspirin and clopidogrel). Many tests of platelet function are now available for clinical use, and some of these tests have been shown to predict clinical outcomes after antiplatelet therapy. However, in most of these studies, the number of major adverse clinical events was low. No published studies address the clinical effectiveness of altering therapy based on the results of monitoring antiplatelet therapy. Therefore, the correct treatment, if any, of "resistance" to antiplatelet therapy is unknown and, other than in research trials, monitoring of antiplatelet therapy in patients is not generally recommended. A clinically meaningful definition of "resistance" to antiplatelet drugs needs to be developed, based on data linking drug-dependent laboratory tests to clinical outcomes in patients.

Clopidogrel resistance: fact and fiction

The antiplatelet agent clopidogrel in combination with aspirin has been shown to reduce thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes and/or who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, a large interindividual response variability to clopidogrel has been described. The reported rates of inadequate clopidogrel response vary considerably depending on the definition and methodologies used to measure the inhibition of platelet function. Recently, several (small) studies have demonstrated the clinical relevance of an inadequate response to clopidogrel. Moreover, several factors have been associated with a high interindividual variability in response to clopidogrel. These are: dosing, impaired intestinal absorption, cytochrome P450 3A4 and 3A5 activity, drug–drug interactions, polymorphisms of the receptors involved in the process of arterial thrombosis and hemostasis, and the method of measurement of platelet function. Future research for the evaluation of clopidogrel resistance should be based on the assessment of selective P2Y12 receptor inhibition (e.g., the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein-assay or the measurement of stabilization of platelet aggregates) with quick and simple tests. Only then can we reveal the true prevalence and impact of clopidogrel resistance.