Effect of neutrophil adhesion on the size of aggregates formed by agonist-activated platelets

Platelet aggregation in whole blood is not impaired by a platelet-sparing leukoreduction filter and instead depends upon the presence of leukocytes

BACKGROUND

Recent studies characterizing in vitro hemostatic properties of whole blood (WB) leukoreduced (LR) with a platelet-sparing filter have described subtle, if any, changes to viscoelastic clotting; however, reductions in platelet (PLT) content and impedance aggregometry (IA) responses have been noted. The effects of filtration of WB (i.e., filter-contact effects, reduction in platelet and leukocyte count) have not been rigorously investigated as to their individual impacts on platelet IA responses.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

WB units from healthy donors were collected and characterized to assess the effects of platelet-sparing leukoreduction (LR) upon the in vitro hemostatic measures of platelet IA and thromboelastometry. Further characterization of platelet IA responses was carried out in WB samples to delineate the effects of platelet count and leukocyte presence/absence upon the response.

RESULTS

WB filtration reduced the platelet count and IA responses but had no impact on viscoelastic clotting measures in fresh WB. Experiments revealed that IA responses have a linear correlation with platelet count in both apheresis platelets and WB and that passage of platelets through the WB-LR filter has no impact upon the strength of this response. Further experiments in LR WB showed that addition of autologous leukocytes back to the platelets fully restored the platelet aggregation response to pre-filtration levels.

CONCLUSION

WB filtration results in platelet count reduction and leukocyte removal; however, platelet IA is not degraded by passage through the filter. Apparent declines in platelet IA responses can be fully attributed to the reduction in platelet count and the removal of leukocytes.

The effect of menstrual cycle on platelet aggregation in reproductive-age women

Our aim was to assess the change in platelet activity along the menstrual cycle. We conducted a prospective observational study. The study group included 16 healthy women with regular menstrual cycles, which were compared to a control group of 14 healthy males. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years or >45 years, use of oral contraceptives or any other forms of hormonal therapy and medical disorders or medications that might affect platelet aggregation. Blood samples were taken from each of the women at four different phases of the menstrual cycle: day 1 +/- 1, day 7 +/- 1, day 14 +/- 1, and day 21 +/- 1. A single blood sample was taken from the males. Platelet aggregation was assessed in whole blood samples using the Multiplate analyzer with three different agonists (ADP, arachidonic acid (AA), and thrombin-receptor activating peptide (TRAP)). Platelet aggregation for each of the women at each of the phases of the menstrual cycle was expressed as the percentage change from the day 1 +/- 1 value. A total of 390 aggregation assays were performed. The mean aggregation activity was significantly higher in females compared with males, irrespective of the agonist used. For the TRAP and the ADP agonists, the relative platelet activity decreased along the menstrual cycle from day 1 towards day 21 and from day 7 towards day 21, respectively, although differences reached statistical significance only for day 21 (-12.4% +/- 3.2%, P < 0.05 for TRAP, and -9.5% +/- 3.9%, P < 0.05 for ADP). When using AA to induce platelet aggregation, the relative platelet activity was highest around the time of ovulation (11.0% +/- 4.7%) and was significantly lower on day 21 (-8.5% +/- 6.7%, P < 0.05). In conclusion, platelet aggregation activity is higher in females compared with males. The association between the phase of the menstrual cycle and platelet activity appears to vary with the type of agonist, but platelet aggregation is consistently lowest in the mid-luteal phase irrespective of the agonist used.

Variables influencing Multiplate™ whole blood impedance platelet aggregometry and turbidimetric platelet aggregation in healthy individuals

We investigated the relationship between impedance platelet aggregometry (IPA) as measured by the Multiplate system and turbidimetric platelet aggregation (TPA) induced by ADP, arachidonic acid (AA), and collagen; blood cell counts; platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) closure times (CT), and von Willebrand factor (VWF) in 120 well-characterized healthy individuals. Pre-analytical and analytical conditions were standardized comprehensively. Analytical reliability of IPA and TPA and the influence of pre-analytical variables on assay results were also examined. IPA and TPA did not change significantly between 0.5 and 5 hours after blood collection when samples were stored at room temperature. TPA and IPA showed significantly greater intra-assay imprecision than respective TPA induced by the same agonists. Intra-individual variation did not differ significantly between IPA and TPA. The lower limits of reference range (2.5th percentiles) of AAIPA, ADPIPA and collagen IPA determined AM were 37, 20 and 40 AU, respectively. ADPIPA showed significantly lower maximum aggregation values than AAIPA and collagen IPA (P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in any parameter between males and females. No significant differences between blood group 0 and non-0 individuals were noted with respect to IPA and TPA. IPA did not change significantly during the day. In contrast, TPA measured PM was significantly lower than corresponding values determined a.m. (p < 0.0001). CEPI-CT, CADP-CT and leukocyte counts increased significantly from a.m. to p.m. (P = 0.008 and P > 0.0001, respectively). Donors had significantly greater IPA induced by any agonist than non-donors (P-values < 0.0001, 0.0001 and 0.001, respectively), whereas TPA was not significantly different between donors and non-donors. IPA did not correlate significantly with TPA nor with PFA-100 CT. ADPIPA and collagen IPA correlated significantly with platelet count. TPA was not associated with platelet count. An inverse significant correlation was observed between TPA induced by any agonist and leukocyte count, whereas leukocyte count did not influence IPA. CEPI-CT and CADP-CT correlated significantly with VWF:CBA and with each other but not with TPA. We concluded that IPA and TPA measure different aspects of platelet function. IPA results reflect interactions between platelets, red and white cells, while TPA does not. This explains discrepancies in associations of IPA and TPA with cell counts, time of day and blood donation. The clinical significance of IPA determined using the Multiplate device remains to be determined in studies on patients with platelet dysfunction and under treatment with antiplatelet agents.