Clopidogrel resistance — The cardiologist's perspective

Acute myocardial infarction occurring while on chronic clopidogrel therapy ('clopidogrel failure') is associated with high incidence of clopidogrel poor responsiveness and stent thrombosis

Objectives

The clinical significance of the laboratory-based phenomenon of clopidogrel hypo-responsiveness and platelet reactivity associated with acute myocardial infarction, despite chronic clopidogrel therapy, is largely unknown. We aimed to determine platelet reactivity and clinical and angiographic features in 29 consecutive patients sustaining an acute myocardial infarction despite chronic (≥1 month) clopidogrel therapy.

Methods

Platelet reactivity was determined on admission using conventional aggregometry. All patients underwent coronary angiography within 24 hours of admission. Patients were matched with clopidogrel-naïve acute myocardial infarction patients. Clopidogrel-naïve patients received a 600 mg clopidogrel loading dose and 75 mg/day thereafter.

Results

Of the 29 study patients, 19 (66%) presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and in 25% the infarction was related to angiographically-proved definite stent thrombosis. Two-thirds of these patients were poor responders to clopidogrel (adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation >50%) and dual antiplatelet poor responsiveness was found in 57% in the chronic clopidogrel therapy group. Compared with clopidogrel-naïve patients, chronic clopidogrel therapy patients were more likely to demonstrate clopidogrel poor responsiveness (66% versus 38%, p = 0.02), to be diabetic (52% versus 33%, p = 0.1) and to have multi-vessel coronary disease (79% versus 55%, p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Patients sustaining acute coronary syndrome despite chronic clopidogrel therapy are more likely to exhibit inadequate platelet inhibition with clopidogrel.

Calcium-channel blockers reduce the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel

OBJECTIVES

Because of the known CYP3A4 inhibition by calcium-channel blockers (CCBs), we hypothesized that there might be a drug-drug interaction between clopidogrel and dihydropyridines in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel is activated by CYP3A4, which also metabolizes CCBs of the dihydropyridine class.

METHODS

Responsiveness to clopidogrel was assessed by the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay and aggregometry in 200 patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

RESULTS

The platelet reactivity index (PRI) (in the VASP assay, normal range 69% to 100%) was higher in patients receiving both clopidogrel and CCBs (61%) as compared with patients receiving clopidogrel without CCBs (48%). The absolute difference was 13% (95% confidence interval: 6% to 20%; p = 0.001), and the relative difference approached 21%. A decreased platelet inhibition by clopidogrel (PRI >69%) was seen in 40% of patients with concomitant CCB treatment and in 20% of patients without concomitant treatment (chi-square test, p = 0.008). Intake of CCB remained an independent predictor of reduced platelet inhibition by clopidogrel after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. Adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation was 30% higher in patients on concomitant CCB treatment compared with patients without CCBs (p = 0.046). Moreover, intake of CCBs was associated with adverse clinical outcome. In vitro incubation with CCBs (nimodipine, verapamil, amlodipine, and diltiazem) did not alter the PRI or the adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation of patients taking clopidogrel. This finding indicates that the negative effect occurs in vivo, conceivably at the level of the CYP3A4 cytochrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Coadministration of CCBs is associated with decreased platelet inhibition by clopidogrel.

Initiation and persistence with clopidogrel treatment after acute myocardial infarction: a nationwide study

AIMS

To identify possible underuse by analysing initiation and persistence with clopidogrel treatment in an unselected population of patients admitted with myocardial infarction (MI) with or without subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

Patients admitted with first-time MI from 2000 to 2005 and subsequent prescription claims of clopidogrel were identified by individual-level linkage of nationwide administrative registries in Denmark. Independent factors affecting initiation and persistence with treatment were analysed by multivariable logistic regression models and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

A total of 46,190 MI patients were included in the study, of whom 14,939 were treated with PCI. From 2000 to 2005 initiation of clopidogrel increased from 80.4 to 93.7% among MI patients with PCI and from 2.8 to 39.3% among MI patients without PCI. MI patients with concomitant heart failure received less treatment [odds ratio (OR) 0.49, confidence interval (CI) 0.43, 0.56 among patients with PCI and OR 0.90, CI 0.81, 0.99 among patients without PCI in 2002-2003, and OR 0.89, CI 0.80, 1.00 in 2004-2005, respectively]. Of MI patients with PCI, 77.5% completed 9 months' clopidogrel treatment in 2004-2005, the corresponding figures for MI patients without PCI being 53.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiation and persistence with clopidogrel treatment is high in MI patients with PCI. However, we found substantial underuse among MI patients without PCI and in MI patients with heart failure.

Controversies and unresolved issues in antiphospholipid syndrome pathogenesis and management

While much is understood concerning the clinical features of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), many issues remain. The proper designation of patients with "definite" APS and the correct categorization of patients by both laboratory and clinical features are matters of ongoing debate. Recent proposals have identified new subsets of patients who have many typical features of APS but either do not fit the criteria for a "definite" diagnosis or have initially negative laboratory tests for antiphospholipid antibodies. Meanwhile, decisions about laboratory tests are based on expert opinion, rather than the results of controlled trials. As for treatment, many guidelines are offered, but few are backed by data from strong clinical trials. This article summarizes the clinical questions remaining to be answered and debates concerning pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.