Flow cytometry-based platelet function testing is predictive of symptom burden in a cohort of bleeders

Flow cytometry for comprehensive assessment of platelet functional activity in response to ADP stimulation

OBJECTIVES

Flow cytometry with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) allows to characterize molecular changes of platelet function caused by this physiologically important activation, but the methodology has not been thoroughly investigated, standardized and characterized yet. We analyzed the influence of several major variables and chose optimal conditions for platelet function assessment.

METHODS

For activation, 2.5 μM CaCl2 , 5 μM ADP and antibodies were added to diluted blood and incubated for 15 min. We analyzed kinetics of antibody binding and effects of their addition sequence, agonist concentration, blood dilution, exogenous calcium addition and platelet fixation.

RESULTS

We tested our protocol on 11 healthy children, 22 healthy adult volunteers, 9 patients after a month on dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 7 adult patients and 14 children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We found that our protocol is highly sensitive to ADP stimulation with low percentage of aggregates formation. The assay is also sensitive to platelet function inhibition in post-PCI patients. Finally, platelet preactivation with ITP plasma was stronger and caused increase in activation response to ADP stimulation compared to preactivation with low dose of ADP.

CONCLUSIONS

Our assay is sensitive to antiplatelet therapy and platelet preactivation in ITP patients under physiological conditions with minimal percentage of aggregates formation.

Consensus report on flow cytometry for platelet function testing in thrombocytopenic patients: communication from the SSC of the ISTH

BACKGROUND

Platelet count alone does not reliably predict bleeding risk, suggesting platelet function is important to monitor in patients with thrombocytopenia. There is still an unmet need for improved platelet function diagnostics in patients with low platelet count in many clinical situations. Flow cytometry is a promising tool allowing reliable platelet function study in this setting.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this joint project between the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Scientific Standardization Committee (SSC) Subcommittees on Platelet Physiology and Platelet Immunology is to provide expert consensus guidance on the use of flow cytometry for the evaluation of platelet function, particularly activation, in patients with low platelet counts.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify relevant questions and areas of interest. An electronic expression of interest form was thereafter announced on the ISTH webpage, followed by a survey encompassing 37 issues regarding preanalytical, analytical, postanalytical, and performance aspects. Areas of disagreement or uncertainty were identified and formed the basis for 2 focus group discussions.

RESULTS

Consensus recommendations relative to patient sample collection, preanalytical variables, sample type, platelet-count cutoff, any potential specific modification of the standard flow cytometry protocol, and results expression and reporting are proposed based on the current practices of experts in the field as well as on literature review.

CONCLUSION

The proposed consensus recommendations would allow standardization of protocols in upcoming clinical studies. The clinical utility of platelet function testing using flow cytometry to predict bleeding risk still needs rigorous multicenter outcome studies in patients with thrombocytopenia.

Screening and diagnosis of inherited platelet disorders

Inherited platelet disorders are important conditions that often manifest with bleeding. These disorders have heterogeneous underlying pathologies. Some are syndromic disorders with non-blood phenotypic features, and others are associated with an increased predisposition to developing myelodysplasia and leukemia. Platelet disorders can present with thrombocytopenia, defects in platelet function, or both. As the underlying pathogenesis of inherited thrombocytopenias and platelet function disorders are quite diverse, their evaluation requires a thorough clinical assessment and specialized diagnostic tests, that often challenge diagnostic laboratories. At present, many of the commonly encountered, non-syndromic platelet disorders do not have a defined molecular cause. Nonetheless, significant progress has been made over the past few decades to improve the diagnostic evaluation of inherited platelet disorders, from the assessment of the bleeding history to improved standardization of light transmission aggregometry, which remains a "gold standard" test of platelet function. Some platelet disorder test findings are highly predictive of a bleeding disorder and some show association to symptoms of prolonged bleeding, surgical bleeding, and wound healing problems. Multiple assays can be required to diagnose common and rare platelet disorders, each requiring control of preanalytical, analytical, and post-analytical variables. The laboratory investigations of platelet disorders include evaluations of platelet counts, size, and morphology by light microscopy; assessments for aggregation defects; tests for dense granule deficiency; analyses of granule constituents and their release; platelet protein analysis by immunofluorescent staining or flow cytometry; tests of platelet procoagulant function; evaluations of platelet ultrastructure; high-throughput sequencing and other molecular diagnostic tests. The focus of this article is to review current methods for the diagnostic assessment of platelet function, with a focus on contemporary, best diagnostic laboratory practices, and relationships between clinical and laboratory findings.

Consensus recommendations on flow cytometry for the assessment of inherited and acquired disorders of platelet number and function: Communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Platelet Physiology

Flow cytometry is increasingly used in the study of platelets in inherited and acquired disorders of platelet number and function. However, wide variation exists in specific reagents, methods, and equipment used, making interpretation and comparison of results difficult. The goal of the present study was to provide expert consensus guidance on the use of flow cytometry for the evaluation of platelet disorders. A modified RAND/UCLA survey method was used to obtain a consensus among 11 experts from 10 countries across four continents, on the appropriateness of statements relating to clinical utility, pre-analytical variables, instrument and reagent standardization, methods, reporting, and quality control for platelet flow cytometry. Feedback from the initial survey revealed that uncertainty was sometimes due to lack of expertise with a particular test condition rather than unavailable or ambiguous data. To address this, the RAND method was modified to allow experts to self-identify statements for which they could not provide expert input. There was uniform agreement among experts in the areas of instrument and reagent standardization, methods, reporting, and quality control and this agreement is used to suggest best practices in these areas. However, 25.9% and 50% of statements related to pre-analytical variables and clinical utility, respectively, were rated as uncertain. Thus, while citrate is the preferred anticoagulant for many flow cytometric platelet tests, expert opinions differed on the acceptability of other anticoagulants, particularly heparin. Lack of expert consensus on the clinical utility of many flow cytometric platelet tests indicates the need for rigorous multicenter clinical outcome studies.

Platelet Activation and Reactivity in a Large Cohort of Patients with Gaucher Disease

OBJECTIVES

 Patients with Gaucher disease (GD) are at increased risk of bleeding and have varying degrees of thrombocytopenia, making the analysis of platelet function difficult. This study aimed to provide a clinically relevant quantitative assessment of platelet function and determine its relationship with bleeding and GD-related data.

METHODS

 Unstimulated and stimulated platelet function was measured by whole blood flow cytometry of platelet surface-activated αIIbβ3 integrin (detected with monoclonal antibody PAC1), P-selectin (CD62P), and lysosomal-associated membrane protein (LAMP3/CD63) in 149 GD patients.

RESULTS

 GD patients had a higher level of unstimulated CD63 expression than healthy subjects, which was mildly correlated with glucosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb1) levels (r = 0.17, p-value = 0.042). Splenectomized GD patients had a higher level of unstimulated αIIbβ3 integrin and P-selectin expression. Reduced platelet reactivity (-2 standard deviation of reference range) was found in 79 (53%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 44-61%) patients, of whom 10 (6.7%, 95% CI: 3.3-12%) had more severe platelet dysfunction. In a multivariate model, only lyso-Gb1 levels were associated with the more severe platelet dysfunction. Fifty-four (49%) of 128 adult patients who completed the bleeding tendency questionnaire reported positive bleeding history. In a multivariate logistic model, older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.1) and low P-selectin reactivity (OR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.25-3.35) were associated with more than one bleeding manifestation.

CONCLUSION

 Flow cytometry enables the study of platelet function in thrombocytopenic GD patients. A platelet degranulation defect, but not αIIbβ3 integrin activation defect, is associated with clinical bleeding. In vivo increased CD63 expression may be related to GD-related inflammation.

Current methods of measuring platelet activity: pros and cons

: Platelets play a pivotal role in controlling hemorrhaging from vessels of the human body. The impairment of platelets may lead to the development of bleeding manifestations. Unraveling the precise defects of platelets by means of suitable laboratory methods paves the way for the effective control and management of platelet disorders. Choosing the most appropriate approach for the detection of platelet disorders may be difficult for a researcher or clinical internist when faced with ordering a platelet-function test. The aim of the current study was to provide a user-friendly overview of the advantages and disadvantages of the available detection systems. To reach this goal, 11 commonly used methods of studying platelet activity were evaluated and compared in detail. A literature search, with no time or language limitations, was conducted in Google Scholar and Medline. All publications published before June 2019 were analyzed. The following laboratory methods were compared: number and size of platelets, bleeding time, clot retraction time, platelet function assay 100 & 200, Rapid platelet function assay, flow cytometry, light transmission aggregometry, multiple electrode aggregometry, 96-well plate aggregometry, cone and plate(let) analyzer (Impact-R), and Plateletworks (single platelet counting system). This article provides the reader with a rapid comparison of the different systems used to study platelets activities.

Platelet function testing at low platelet counts: When can you trust your analysis?

BACKGROUND

Although flow cytometry is often brought forward as a preferable method in the setting of thrombocytopenia, the relative effects of low sample counts on results from flow cytometry-based platelet function testing (FC-PFT) in comparison with light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) has not been reported.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of different sample platelet counts (10, 50, 100, and 200 × 109 L-1) on platelet activation measured with FC-PFT, LTA, and MEA using the same anticoagulant and agonist concentrations as for the commercial MEA test.

METHODS

Platelets were stimulated with two commonly used platelet agonists (ADP [6.5 μmol L-1] and PAR1-AP [TRAP, 32 μmol L-1]). The specified sample platelet counts were obtained by combining platelet-rich and platelet poor hirudinized plasma in different proportions with or without red blood cells.

RESULTS

For FC, P-selectin exposure and PAC-1 binding was reduced at 10 × 109 L-1 after stimulation with PAR1-AP (by approximately 20% and 50%, respectively), but remained relatively unchanged when ADP was used as agonist (n = 9). The platelet count-dependent effects observed with PAR1-AP were eliminated when samples were pre-incubated with apyrase, implying that reduced purinergic signaling was the main underlying factor (n = 5). Both aggregometry-based PFTs showed a 50% reduction at 50 × 109 L-1 and more than 80% reduction at 10 × 109 L-1, irrespective of agonist used (n = 7).

CONCLUSIONS

Although FC-PFT is generally preferable to aggregometry-based PFTs in situations with low sample platelet counts, a careful optimization of experimental parameters is still required in order to eliminate platelet count-related effects.

A simplified flow cytometric method for detection of inherited platelet disorders-A comparison to the gold standard light transmission aggregometry

Background

Flow cytometric platelet activation has emerged as an alternative diagnostic test for inherited platelet disorders. It is, however, labor intensive and few studies have directly compared the performance of flow cytometric platelet activation (PACT) to light transmission aggregometry (LTA). The aims of this study were 1/ to develop a simplified flow cytometric platelet activation assay using microtiter plates and 2/ to correlate the outcome to gold standard method LTA, and to clinical bleeding assessment tool scores (BAT score).

Methods

The PACT method was developed in microtiter plates using adenosine diphosphate (ADP), collagen-derived peptide (CRP-XL) and thrombin receptor activator for peptide 6 (TRAP-6) as agonists. Antibodies against GPIIb-IIIa activation epitope (PAC1), P-selectin (CD62P) and lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein 3 (LAMP3; CD63) were used as platelet activation markers. Sixty-six patients referred to the coagulation unit for bleeding symptoms were included in this single-center observational study. Platelet activation was determined by PACT and LTA. The results of both methods were correlated to BAT score.

Results

A two-by-two analysis using Cohen’s kappa analysis gave moderate agreement between LTA and PACT (82%, kappa = 0.57), when PACT analysis with ADP and CRP-XL was compared to LTA. Using LTA as reference method, positive predictive value was 70% and negative predictive value was 87%. A substantial number of patients had high BAT score and normal LTA and PACT results. Patients with abnormal LTA or PACT results had higher BAT score than patients with normal results, but the difference was not significant.

Conclusions

The performance in microtiter plates simplified the PACT method and enabled analysis of more patients at the same time. Our results indicate that with modification of the current PACT assay, a higher negative predictive value can be obtained. Furthermore, with comparable result to LTA the PACT could be used as a screening assay for inherited platelet disorders.

Standardization and reference ranges for whole blood platelet function measurements using a flow cytometric platelet activation test

Introduction

Platelet function testing with flow cytometry has additional value to existing platelet function testing for diagnosing bleeding disorders, monitoring anti-platelet therapy, transfusion medicine and prediction of thrombosis. The major challenge is to use this technique as a diagnostic test. The aim of this study is to standardize preparation, optimization and validation of the test kit and to determine reference values in a population of 129 healthy individuals.

Methods

Platelet function tests with 3 agonists and antibodies against P-selectin, activated αIIbβ3 and glycoprotein Ib (GPIb), were prepared and stored at -20°C until used. Diluted whole blood was added and platelet activation was quantified by the density of activation markers, using flow cytometry. Anti-mouse Ig κ particles were included to validate stability of the test and to standardize results. Reference intervals were determined.

Results

Blood stored at room temperature (RT) for up to 4h after blood donation and preheated/tested at 37°C resulted in stable results (%CV<10%), in contrast to measuring at RT. The intra-assay %CV was <5%. Incubation of anti-mouse Ig κ particles with antibodies stored for up to 12 months proved to give a stable fluorescence. The inter-individual variation measured in the 129 individuals varied between 23% and 37% for P-selectin expression and αIIbβ3 activation, respectively.

Conclusions

The current study contributes to the translation of flow cytometry based platelet function testing from a scientific tool to a diagnostic test. Platelet function measurements, using prepared and stored platelet activation kits, are reproducible if executed at 37°C. The reference ranges can be validated in clinical laboratories and ongoing studies are investigating if reduced platelet reactivity in patients with bleeding complications can be detected.