Thrombopoietin receptor agonists for the treatment of primary immune thrombocytopenia: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Risk-based and individualised management of bleeding and thrombotic events in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)

Although bleeding is one of the main symptoms of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), risk factors for bleeding have yet to be fully established. Low platelet count (PC; <20-30 × 109 /L) is generally indicative of increased risk of bleeding. However, PC and bleeding events cannot be fully correlated; many other patient- and disease-related factors are thought to contribute to increased bleeding risk. Furthermore, even though ITP patients have thrombocytopenia and are at increased risk of bleeding, ITP also carries higher risk of thrombotic events. Factors like older age and certain ITP treatments are associated with increased thrombotic risk. Women's health in ITP requires particular attention concerning haemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. Management of bleeding/thrombotic risk, and eventually antithrombotic therapies in ITP patients, should be based on individual risk profiles, using a tailored, patient-centric approach. Currently, evidence-based recommendations and validated tools are lacking to support decision-making and help clinicians weigh risk of bleeding against thrombosis. Moreover, evidence is lacking about optimal PC for achieving haemostasis in invasive procedures settings. Further research is needed to fully define risk factors for each event, enabling development of comprehensive risk stratification approaches. This review discusses risk-based and individualised management of bleeding and thrombosis risk in adults with primary ITP.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists use and risk of thrombotic events in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) have a role in second-line immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) treatment, binding to and activating thrombopoietin receptors on megakaryocyte membranes in the bone marrow. This promotes megakaryocyte maturation and increases platelet production. Despite a 2-6% incidence of thrombotic events during TPO-RA treatment, it remains uncertain whether TPO-RAs elevate thrombosis rates. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted using the relevant search criteria. To assess the risk of bias, the included studies were assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool 2.0, and a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1. A total of 1,698 patients with ITP were included from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). There were 26 thromboembolic events in the TPO-RAs group and 4 in the control group. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of thrombotic events between the two groups [odds ratio (OR)=1.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-4.00, P=0.18], even if the duration of treatment was >12 weeks (OR=2.46, 95% CI: 0.81-7.43, P=0.11). Subgroup analysis showed that none of the four drugs significantly increased the incidence of thrombotic events (romiplostim: OR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.14-6.13, P=0.93; eltrombopag: OR=2.32, 95% CI: 0.64-8.47, P=0.20; avatrombopag: OR=4.15, 95% CI: 0.20-85.23, P=0.36; and hetrombopag: OR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.03-18.76, P=0.87). There was also no significant difference in the results of the double-blinded placebo-controlled RCTs (OR=1.21, 95% CI: 0.41-3.58, P=0.73). Compared to patients with ITP who did not receive TPO-RA treatment, those receiving TPO-RA treatment did not exhibit a significantly increased risk of thrombotic events.

Avatrombopag, a promising novel thrombopoietin receptor agonist for refractory/relapsed/intolerant non-severe aplastic anemia: a phase 2 single-arm clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic options for thrombocytopenia in non-severe aplastic anaemia (NSAA) are limited. Avatrombopag (AVA) is prescribed for thrombocytopenic diseases but not for NSAA.

METHODS

Herein, we conducted a phase 2, non-randomized, single-arm trial to explore the efficacy and safety of AVA in refractory/relapsed/intolerant NSAA. AVA dose was initiated at 20 mg/d and titrated to a maximum of 60 mg/d. The primary endpoint was the haematological response at 3 months.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were analyzed. The overall response rate (ORR) at 3 months was 56% (14/25), with 12% (3/25) achieving a complete response (CR). At a median follow-up of 7 (3-10) months, the OR and CR rates were 52% and 20%, respectively. Responders had a shorter duration of diagnosis of AVA administration than non-responders (10 (6-80) vs 37 (6-480) months, p = 0.027) and belonged to the relapsed/intolerant NSAA type (71% vs 27%, p = 0.047); 44% (8/18) patients previously treated with eltrombopag before enrollment responded at 3 months, with an average prior eltrombopag dose of median 72.5 (50-100) mg/d and an average AVA dose for a response of median 43.5 (20-60) mg/d. 3-month ORR had no significant correlation with eltrombopag exposure (p = 0.09), prior eltrombopag length (R²=0.11), or cumulative eltrombopag dose (R²=0.30). Only one patient relapsed after stopping AVA for 1 month. No serious AVA-related side effects or clone evolution were detected.

CONCLUSION

AVA is effective and well-tolerated in NSAA patients who are refractory, relapsed, or intolerant to CsA/tacrolimus ± eltrombopag. Earlier treatment and relapsed/intolerant AA may show a better short-term response rate. More studies are needed to define the optimal dose and the long-term efficacy (NCT04728789).

Treatment of immune thrombocytopenia during pregnancy with thrombopoietin receptor agonists

The introduction of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) led to a paradigm shift in the management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, TPO-RAs are not approved for use during pregnancy due to the absence of evidence and concerns for possible effects on the fetus due to their expected transplacental transfer. This comprehensive review examines the safety and efficacy of TPO-RA in 45 pregnancies of women with ITP (romiplostim n = 22; eltrombopag n = 21; both in the same pregnancy n = 2). Mothers experienced failure of the median of three treatment lines during pregnancy prior to TPO-RA administration. A platelet response (>30 × 109 /L) was seen in 86.7% of cases (including a complete response >100 × 109 /L in 66.7%) and was similar between eltrombopag and romiplostim (87.0% and 83.3%, p = 0.99). The maternal safety profile was favourable, with no thromboembolic events encountered. Neonatal thrombocytopenia was noted in one third of cases, with one case of ICH grade 3, and neonatal thrombocytosis was observed in three cases. No other neonatal adverse events attributable to TPO-RAs were seen. This review suggests that the use of TPO-RA during pregnancy is associated with a high response rate and appears safe. Nevertheless, TPO-RA should not be routinely used in pregnancy and should be avoided in the first trimester until further evidence is accumulated.

Development and Validation Nomogram for Predicting the Survival of Patients with Thrombocytopenia in Intensive Care Units

Background

The number of patients with thrombocytopenia (TCP) is relatively high in intensive care units (ICUs). It is therefore necessary to evaluate the prognostic risk of such patients.

Aim

This study investigated the risk factors affecting the survival of patients with TCP in the ICU. Using the findings of this investigation, we developed and validated a risk prediction model.

Methods

We evaluated patients admitted to the ICU who presented with TCP. We used LASSO regression to identify important clinical indicators. Based on these indicators, we developed a prediction model complete with a nomogram for the development cohort set. We then evaluated the mode's accuracy using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) in a validation cohort.

Results

A total of 141 cases of ICU TCP were included in the sample, of which 47 involved death of the patient. Clinical results were as follows: N (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.97, P=0.003); TBIL (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.02-1.99, P=0.048); APACHE II (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.39, 2.48, P=0.045); WPRN (HR 6.22, 95% CI 2.86-13.53, P<0.001); WTOST (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.21-1.46, P<0.001); and DMV [HR1.87, 95% CI 1.12-2.33]. The prediction model yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.918 (95% CI 0.863-0.974) in the development cohort and 0.926 (95% CI 0.849-0.994) in the validation cohort. Application of the nomogram in the validation cohort gave good discrimination (C-index 0.853, 95% CI 0.810-0.922) and good calibration. DCA indicated that the nomogram was clinically useful.

Conclusion

The individualized nomogram developed through our analysis demonstrated effective prognostic prediction for patients with TCP in ICUs. Use of this prediction metric may reduce TCP-related morbidity and mortality in ICUs.

Use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in adults with immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and Central European expert consensus

There are currently three thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) approved in Europe for treating patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): romiplostim (Nplate®), eltrombopag (Revolade®), and avatrombopag (Doptelet®). However, comparative clinical data between these TPO-RAs are limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to perform a literature review and seek expert opinion on the relevance and strength of the evidence concerning the use of TPO-RAs in adults with ITP. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Embase within the last 10 years and until June 20, 2022. A total of 478 unique articles were retrieved and reviewed for relevance. The expert consensus panel comprised ITP senior hematologists from eight countries across Central Europe. The modified Delphi method, consisting of two survey rounds, a teleconference and email correspondence, was used to reach consensus. Forty articles met the relevancy criteria and are included as supporting evidence, including five meta-analyses analyzing all three European-licensed TPO-RAs and comprising a total of 31 unique randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Consensus was reached on seven statements for the second-line use of TPO-RAs in the management of adult ITP patients. In addition, the expert panel discussed TPO-RA treatment in chronic ITP patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 and ITP patients in the first-line setting but failed to reach consensus. This work will facilitate informed decision-making for healthcare providers treating adult ITP patients with TPO-RAs. However, further studies are needed on the use of TPO-RAs in the first-line setting and specific patient populations.

Current approaches for the diagnosis and management of immune thrombocytopenia

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), is an acquired autoimmune disorder characterized by the destruction of platelets and megakaryocytes, resulting in thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100 × 10⁹/L). This review focuses on the diagnosis and current management of ITP. The diagnosis of ITP is based principally on the exclusion of other causes of isolated thrombocytopenia using patient history, physical examination, blood count, and evaluation of the peripheral blood film. The clinical treatment goals should be to resolve bleeding events and to prevent severe bleeding episodes. The platelet count should be improved to attain a minimum of > 20-30 × 10⁹/L. Therapy should be given as an inpatient in newly diagnosed ITP with a platelet count of > 20 × 10⁹/L or if there is active bleeding. Corticosteroids are considered the standard initial treatment for newly diagnosed patients. Subsequent medical therapies with robust evidence include thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), rituximab and fostamatinib. Surgical therapy with splenectomy may be considered for patients failing medical therapy. The choice between therapy options is highly dependent upon patient values and preferences.

How we treat primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an immune-mediated bleeding disorder characterized by decreased platelet counts and an increased risk of bleeding. Multiple humoral and cellular immune abnormalities result in accelerated platelet destruction and suppressed platelet production in ITP. The diagnosis remains a clinical exclusion of other causes of thrombocytopenia. Treatment is not required except for patients with active bleeding, severe thrombocytopenia, or cases in need of invasive procedures. Corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and anti-RhD immunoglobulin are the classical initial treatments for newly diagnosed ITP in adults, but these agents generally cannot induce a long-term response in most patients. Subsequent treatments for patients who fail the initial therapy include thrombopoietic agents, rituximab, fostamatinib, splenectomy, and several older immunosuppressive agents. Other potential therapeutic agents, such as inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase and neonatal Fc receptor, are currently under clinical evaluation. An optimized treatment strategy should aim at elevating the platelet counts to a safety level with minimal toxicity and improving patient health-related quality of life, and always needs to be tailored to the patients and disease phases. In this review, we address the concepts of adult ITP diagnosis and management and provide a comprehensive overview of current therapeutic strategies under general and specific situations.

Efgartigimod alfa for the treatment of primary immune thrombocytopenia

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disorder characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia. Most patients with ITP have antiplatelet antibodies of the immunoglobulin G (IgG) subtype which through interaction with platelet and megakaryocyte glycoproteins result in increased platelet destruction and inhibition of platelet production. There are a variety of therapeutic options available for the treatment of ITP including corticosteroids, IVIgG, TPO-RA, rituximab, fostamatinib, and splenectomy. Long-term remissions with any of these therapies can vary widely and patients may require additional therapy. The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) plays a pivotal role in IgG and albumin physiology through recycling pathways. Efgartigimod is a human IgG1-derived fragment that has been modified by ABDEG technology to increase its affinity for FcRn at both physiologic and acidic pH. The binding of efgartigimod to FcRn blocks the interaction of IgG with FcRn facilitating increased lysosomal degradation of IgG and decreasing total IgG levels. Based on the mechanism of action and the known pathophysiology of ITP as well as the efficacy of other therapies such as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), the use of efgartigimod in patients with ITP is attractive. This article will briefly discuss the pathophysiology of ITP, current treatments, and the data available on efgartigimod in ITP.

SAFETY STUDY OF ROMIPLOSTIM BIOSIMILAR

Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura is a chronic autoimmune hematological disease caused by an increased destruction of platelets and associated thrombocytopenia, for the treatment of which the imported drug romiplostim is used. Сreation of the drug biosimilar provides a reduction in the cost of therapy and an access for the treatment to more patients.

The aim of the study was to compare the safety indicators of the reference drug and its biosimilar in vivo and in vitro.

Materials and methods. In the in vitro study, a model of “complement-dependent cytotoxicity” induced by the complement was formed on the 32D hTPOR clone 63-cell line, followed by a cell viability measurement with the CellTitter Glo® kit. An in vivo part of the study was carried out on Javanese macaque monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). During the experiment, the clinical condition, mortality, appetite of the animals, their body weight, body temperature, respiratory rate were assessed, the clinical parameters of blood and urine of the animals were also monitored, and the hemostasis indicators were additionally measured.

Results. In the in vitro experiment, the original drug romiplostim and its biosimilar GP40141 were compared in terms of EC50 values. The indicatirs did not show complement-dependent cytotoxicity. According to the in vivo results, no deviations were recorded in the clinical status of the animals and their feed intake, and no lethality was fixed out in the groups either. For all the parameters studied (body weight and temperature, respiratory rate, clinical urinalysis, clinical and biochemical blood tests, coagulation hemostasis), GP40141 and romiplostim, when administered at the doses equivalent to 10 toxic doses (TDs), had comparable effects.

Conclusion. In the comparison of safety performance both in vitro and in vivo, the original drug romiplostim and its biosimilar GP40141 showed similar results.

A Novel Combination Therapy of Erythropoietin and Thrombopoietin to Treat Erythropoietin-Resistance anemia

PURPOSE

Treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) may correct anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. However, up to 10% of these patients exhibit EPO resistance or hyporesponsiveness, which may be caused by the depletion of erythroid progenitor cells. Thrombopoietin (TPO) stimulates the self-renewal of stem cells and promotes the growth of early erythroid progenitor cells. The objective of this study was to determine whether the combination of recombinant human TPO (rHuTPO) and rHuEPO could correct the depletion of erythroid precursor cells to treat EPO-resistant anemia.

METHODS

To test our hypothesis, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies of rHuEPO and rHuTPO were performed in healthy rats. Rats received rHuEPO or rHuTPO alone or in combination. Plasma concentrations of rHuTPO and rHuEPO were measured. PD responses, including erythropoietic and thrombopoietic responses, were assessed in peripheral blood.

RESULTS

On one hand, the results demonstrated the synergistic effect of the combination of rHuEPO and rHuTPO on erythropoiesis. Compared with rHuEPO monotherapy, the combination therapies further stimulated the production of red blood cells and hemoglobin. On the other hand, rHuEPO inhibited the platelet production induced by rHuTPO and mitigate the risk of blood clots. Furthermore, we successfully developed a mechanism-based PD model to simultaneously characterize the responses of the two molecules.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our study indicated that a combination therapy of rHuTPO and rHuEPO could be used to treat EPO-resistant anemia and provided a quantitative basis for further optimizing the combination therapy for clinical use.

Evaluating fostamatinib disodium as a treatment option for immune thrombocytopenia in adult patients

INTRODUCTION

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder characterized by increased platelet destruction and decreased platelet production, leading to thrombocytopenia with or without bleeding manifestations. The majority of patients experiencing treatment need will eventually need secondary treatment following first line therapy with steroids. In 2018, the oral spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor fostamatinib received US Food and Drug Administration approval for ITP patients with an insufficient response to a previous treatment.

AREAS COVERED

This review outlines pharmacological characteristics of fostamatinib and provides an overview of its efficacy and safety results in phase II and III trials, followed by the expert opinion of the authors.

EXPERT OPINION

Increasing knowledge on the role of different players and mechanisms in the pathophysiology of autoimmune disorders in general and of ITP in particular, has led to the development of several new treatment options, as illustrated by the introduction of fostamatinib in the treatment of ITP. However, lacking direct comparison with other recent treatment options (in particular thrombopoietin receptor agonists), its use should be evaluated critically taking into account the unique toxicity and potential drug-drug interaction profile.

Recent advances in treatments of adult immune thrombocytopenia

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is isolated thrombocytopenia characterized by autoimmune-mediated disruption of platelet without other etiologies. Treatments for chronic ITP consist of corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins, anti-D immunoglobulin, rituximab, thrombopoietin receptor agonists, immunosuppressants and splenectomy. Although current therapies are effective in over two-thirds of patients, some patients are refractory to therapies or fail to achieve long-term responses. Recently, great advance has been made in identifying various mechanisms involved in ITP pathogenesis, and new treatments targeting these pathways are being developed. Novel agents such as splenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Bruton kinase inhibitor, plasma cell targeting therapies, neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor, platelet desialylation inhibitor, and inhibition of the classical complement pathway are expected to be effective for ITP treatment. This review summarizes current strategies and emerging therapies of ITP.

Efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in the treatment of thrombocytopenia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Thrombocytopenia is a tough complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with elusive pathogenesis and lack of well-established therapies. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) have been used for thrombocytopenia post HSCT in recent years, but the outcomes remain debatable. We conducted this meta-analysis and systematic-review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TPO-RAs for platelet recovery after HSCT. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for studies on the application of TPO-RAs (eltrombopag and romiplostim) in the settings of primary or secondary thrombocytopenia after HSCT by 17 March 2021. Efficacy outcomes included response rate and survival rate, and adverse events were also evaluated. A total of 19 studies involving 378 patients were included. The pooled response rate was 73% (95%CI: 68-78%), which was significantly higher than recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) (27.8%). The pooled survival rate was 66% (95%CI: 54-77%), and infection was found to be the main cause of death. In addition, the pooled rate of adverse events was 3% (95%CI: 1-7%), with no severe adverse events reported. TPO-RAs could effectively and safely promote the recovery of platelets in patients after HSCT.

Off-Label Use of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists: Case Series and Review of the Literature

Since their license in 2008, studies on thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are proceeding at a fast pace. Their favorable efficacy and safety profile makes them good candidates for the management of thrombocytopenia in different settings, even beyond their current indications. In the last 10 years, we faced patients with refractory thrombocytopenia that required treatment with off-label TPO-RA, despite the paucity of data in the literature and the possible risks, particularly that of thrombosis. We hereby report our 10-year real-life single-center experience of TPO-RA used off-label. Fourteen patients were divided into three groups according to the etiology of thrombocytopenia: myelodysplastic syndromes, post-transplantation, and lymphoproliferative diseases. Clinical features and results are reported within each group. Overall, TPO-RA proved effective in all these conditions achieving responses also in heavily pretreated patients. The overall response rate (ORR) was 100% in patients with thrombocytopenia after transplantation and in those with lymphoproliferative diseases and 75% in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. The median duration of therapy was 285 days (range 93–1,513 days). Four patients (29%) discontinued treatment because of lack of response (n=2) or a sustained response (n=2). No grade 3–4 adverse events occurred, particularly no thrombosis. In our real-life experience, TPO-RAs were effective and safe and proved of value in the challenging management of patients with refractory thrombocytopenia associated with different conditions.

Safety and efficacy of eltrombopag in the treatment of children with immune thrombocytopenia: a Meta analysis

OBJECTIVES

To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in the treatment of children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Weipu Data, CNKI, and Wanfang Data were searched for studies on eltrombopag used for the treatment of children with ITP. RevMan 5.3 and R version 3.6 were used to perform a Meta analysis of included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies were included, with 2 randomized controlled trials and 9 cohort studies. The Meta analysis of the 9 cohort studies showed that eltrombopag had a response rate of about 70% (95%CI: 65%-76%) in the treatment of children with ITP, with no serious adverse events. The Meta analysis of the randomized controlled trials showed that the eltrombopag group had a higher response rate than the placebo group (RR=2.64, 95%CI: 1.58-4.44, P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the incidence rates of adverse events and serious adverse events between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Eltrombopag has good efficacy and safety as a second-line treatment regimen for children with ITP.

Experts' review: the emerging roles of romiplostim in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)

INTRODUCTION

The management of ITP has in recent years been transformed from reliance on immunosuppressants and splenectomy to targeted therapy with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) that directly stimulate platelet production in the bone marrow. This has reduced the long-term infective complications and toxicities associated with the use of potent immunosuppressants and splenectomy. The welltolerated romiplostim, itself a novel drug construct called peptibody, has established itself, alongside other TPO-RA as the preferred 2nd line therapy in major international guidelines on treatment of ITP.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the data from early licensing trials of romiplostim and discusses the real-world experience to date, the unexpected emerging data on treatment-free long-term remission achieved using TPO-RA, and the case for its early introduction in the therapeutic pathway. The emerging risk of thrombosis is also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of romiplostim and other TPO-RA will be increasingly brought forward in the management pathway of ITP with the prospect of modifying the long-term outcome of the disease by increasing sustained treatment-free remission. With the prospect of several new targeted therapies been introduced into clinical practice, TPO-RA will likely be a key component of future combination therapies for difficult cases.

Management of Adult Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): A Review on Current Guidance and Experience from Clinical Practice

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune process resulting in increased destruction and inadequate production of platelets that can result in bleeding, fatigue, and reduced health-related quality of life. While treatment is not required for many patients with ITP, the occurrence of bleeding manifestations, severe thrombocytopenia, and requirement for invasive procedures are among the reasons necessitating initiation of therapy. Corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and anti-RhD immune globulin are typical first-line and rescue treatments, but these agents typically do not result in a durable remission in adult patients. Most patients requiring treatment therefore require subsequent line therapies, such as thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), rituximab, fostamatinib, splenectomy, or a number of other immunosuppressive agents. In this focused review, we discuss management of adult ITP in the acute and chronic settings.

How I treat primary ITP in adult patients who are unresponsive to or dependent on corticosteroid treatment

Approximately 80% of adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) have treatment failure with corticosteroids or become dependent on them and require second-line therapy. Several new and effective therapies have been introduced during the past decade and our understanding of disease burden and its effect on quality of life has expanded. It is now recommended that splenectomy, the standard second-line therapy for decades, be delayed for at least 12 to 24 months, allowing for more patients to achieve remission on medical therapies before considering surgery. It is highly recommended that medical therapies be used that have abundant clinical trial evidence, such as the thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) rituximab and fostamatinib. Unfortunately, there are no reliable biomarkers that help in treatment selection. These therapeutic medical options have variable efficacy, safety profiles, mechanisms of action, and modes of administration. This enables and mandates an individualized approach to treatment, where patient involvement, preferences and values have become central to the process of choosing the appropriate therapy. Both TPO-RAs and fostamatinib are maintenance therapies, whereas rituximab is given for a limited number of doses. Although the response is usually maintained while receiving a TPO-RA or fostamatinib therapy, half of rituximab responders will no longer respond 1 to 2 years after administration and require retreatment or other therapy.

Treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) secondary to malignancy: a systematic review

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) can be associated with lymphoproliferative diseases (LPD) or solid tumors. A systematic review of published literature was conducted to evaluate response to treatment of ITP secondary to malignancy. Primary outcome was overall response (complete response+response) to first-line treatments [steroids alone or in combination with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg)]. Among secondary outcomes, overall response to second-line treatments [splenectomy, rituximab or thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA)] and death were evaluated. Of the retrieved 238 text articles, 108 were analyzable, for a total of 154 patients: 142 in 105 case reports and 12 in 3 observational studies. Thirty-nine patients had solid tumors, 114 LPD, and 1 both. The median follow up was 19 months (IQR, 9-40). The overall response was 50% (62% in solid tumors, 46% in LPD) after steroids and 47% (67% in solid tumors, 36% in LPD) after steroids+IVIg, which are lower than historical responses observed in primary ITP (≈80%). The overall responses to rituximab (used in LPD only), splenectomy and TPO-RA (70%, 73% and 92%, respectively) were similar to those observed in primary ITP. Seven patients (6%) died due to bleeding events. ITP secondary to malignancy appears to be associated with unsatisfactory response to first-line treatments.