Communication, recruitment and enrolment in the preventative and therapeutic phase I clinical trial against HIV/AIDS based on the recombinant HIV-1 Tat protein

Recruitment and Engagement in Preventive Clinical Trials: Interdependencies and Mediation

This article takes a standpoint based in the human and social sciences to examine a decisive time in any research related to HIV-AIDS, ie, when healthy, seronegative individuals agree to take part in preventive clinical trials. The context of recruitment for such trials has been changing over the past several decades: the normalization of the epidemic after a period of sensationalism, the change in focus of social communities to other causes, the changes in the disease from a therapeutic point of view (new drug treatments and preventive drugs), the absence of compensation for participation in trials, the absence of any direct health benefits for the participants, and the fear of volunteers or the people in their lives of the idea of transforming their healthy body into a postexperimental body. Research on the prevention of HIV seems to be dependent on the consent of a limited number of people and groups because their reasons for taking part in such experiments, which are just as much personal as they are for the sake of science, are necessarily very particular. How can healthy individuals be recruited for preventive HIV trials? What is the social basis and what kind of mediation is involved in a mutual understanding between trial participants and investigators? Such questions are answered by the authors in this book, who approach the issues from a multidisciplinary and diachronic perspective.

Being "False Positive": An "Inconvenience"? Debates and Questions Regarding the Notion of Vaccine-Induced Seropositivity (VISP) in the Recruitment of Healthy Volunteers for a Preventive Anti-HIV Vaccine Trial

This article considers a stage in the clinical trial process seldom documented in social sciences: recruitment of healthy volunteers for an HIV preventive vaccine trial through a media campaign. It analyzes one of the consequences of participating in such a clinical trial: the development of vaccine-induced seropositivity (VISP) and how this biomedical notion is mobilized both in recruitment procedures' normative discourses and from the volunteers' points of view, and its consequences on their decision to participate. The interpretations of VISP by volunteers depend on several factors: socialization, itinerary into the recruitment procedure, sexuality, etc., and generates diverse feelings such as indifference, doubt, or even fear. Fear of VISP represents the principal refusal reason for those who interrupted their participating step, just before inclusion stage. Addressing VISP phenomenon is important because it represents a major challenge for the information and the communication procedures for the next anti-HIV prophylactic trials recruitment campaigns.

Exceptional Risk: Healthy Volunteers' Perceptions of HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials

As with all early-stage testing of investigational drugs, clinical trials targeting HIV/AIDS can pose unknown risks to research subjects. Unlike sick participants seeking a therapeutic benefit, the motivations and barriers for healthy volunteers are more complex and understudied. Drawing on interviews and clinical trial data from 178 healthy volunteers, we examine how they perceive HIV/AIDS studies in the early stages of testing. A subset of healthy volunteers see phase I HIV/AIDS studies as particularly risky for reasons ranging from fear of catching the disease or having long-lasting and uncomfortable side effects to inexplicable fears that they cannot even articulate. Some participants have had past negative experiences in such trials that inform these views, but others cite information from staff and other participants as influential. Healthy volunteers' general fears concerning AIDS also shape their views of participating in phase I HIV/AIDS clinical trials.

Motivators to participation in actual HIV vaccine trials

An examination of actual HIV vaccine trials can contribute to an understanding of motivators for participation in these studies. Analysis of these motivators reveals that they can be categorized as social and personal benefits. Social benefits are generally altruistic, whereas personal benefits are psychological, physical, and financial. In this systematic review, the authors performed a literature search for actual preventive HIV vaccine trials reporting motivators to participation. Of studies conducted in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, the authors retrieved 12 studies reporting on social benefits and seven reporting on personal benefits. From the non-OECD countries, nine studies reported on social benefits and eight studies on personal benefits. Social benefits were most frequently described on macroscopic, altruistic levels. Personal benefits were most frequently psychological in nature. Rates of participation were compared between the OECD and the non-OECD countries. Knowledge of actual motivators in specific countries and regions can help target recruitment in various types of actual HIV vaccine trials.

Experiences on recruitment and retention of volunteers in the first HIV vaccine trial in Dar es Salam, Tanzania - the phase I/II HIVIS 03 trial

Background

Eventual control of HIV/AIDS is believed to be ultimately dependent on a safe, effective and affordable vaccine. Participation of sub-Saharan Africa in the conduct of HIV trials is crucial as this region still experiences high HIV incidences. We describe the experience of recruiting and retaining volunteers in the first HIV vaccine trial (HIVIS03) in Tanzania.

Methods

In this trial enrolled volunteers from amongst Police Officers (POs) in Dar es Salaam were primed with HIV-1 DNA vaccine at months 0, 1 and 3; and boosted with HIV-1 MVA vaccine at months 9 and 21. A stepwise education provision/sensitization approach was employed to eventual recruitment. Having identified a “core” group of POs keen on HIV prevention activities, those interested to participate in the vaccine trial were invited for a first screening session that comprised of provision of detailed study information and medical evaluation. In the second screening session results of the initial assessment were provided and those eligible were assessed for willingness to participate (WTP). Those willing were consented and eventually randomized into the trial having met the eligibility criteria. Voluntary participation was emphasized throughout.

Results

Out of 408 POs who formed the core group, 364 (89.0%) attended the educational sessions. 263 out of 364 (72.2%) indicated willingness to participate in the HIV vaccine trial. 98% of those indicating WTP attended the pre-screening workshops. 220 (85.0%) indicated willingness to undergo first screening and 177 POs attended for initial screenings, of whom 162 (91.5%) underwent both clinical and laboratory screenings. 119 volunteers (73.5%) were eligible for the study. 79 were randomized into the trial, while 19 did not turn up, the major reason being partner/family advice. 60 volunteers including 15 females were recruited during a one-year period. All participated in the planned progress updates workshops. Retention into the schedule was: 98% for the 3 DNA/placebo vaccinations, while it was 83% and 73% for the first and second MVA/placebo vaccinations respectively.

Conclusion

In this first HIV vaccine trial in Tanzania, we successfully recruited the volunteers and there was no significant loss to follow up. Close contact and updates on study progress facilitated the observed retention rates.

Trial registration numbers

ISRCTN90053831 ISRNCT01132976 and ATMR2009040001075080

Experiences in recruiting volunteers through community based initiatives in phase-1 vaccine trials in India

Success of HIV vaccine trials is dependent on infrastructural preparedness of the site, technical expertise of the trial team and strong Socio-political support of the local community. The processes followed and experiences gained while implementing various community based initiatives for recruitment of healthy volunteers during the three HIV vaccine trials in India are described. Major initiatives in community engagement implemented for the first time in India included establishment and involvement of Community Advisory Board and capacity building and engagement of lay community based volunteers called "peers" using "lay health promotion" model. Community education program designed for trial participants' education, identification and enrollment was a three-tiered approach, moving from large community awareness meetings (first step) to facility-based small group meeting to provide trial specific information (second step); ending with one-to-one vaccine center based meeting with the volunteers to clear doubts, myths, and misconceptions about HIV/AIDS, the experimental vaccine and HIV vaccine trials as well as to explain trial specific procedures (third step). It is important to focus on gender issues, locally relevant socio-cultural factors, informed consent, and post-trial care related matters during the conduct of sensitive clinical trials in socio-culturally diverse and resource limited setting like India.

Motivators to participation in medical trials: the application of social and personal categorization

The Health Belief Model provides a framework to understand motivators for volunteering for medical research. Motivators can take the form of social and personal benefits. In this systematic review of review articles, we contrast motivators of participation in actual cancer trials to those in actual HIV vaccine trials. We retrieved eight review articles from 2000 to 2012 examining motivators to participation in actual cancer trials. Personal benefits were most often psychological in nature, such as "coping with symptoms." Social benefits included "advancing research," "helping other cancer patients," and "for their family." While specific motivators vary between considerations - cancer research and HIV vaccine trials, these motivators fall into similar categories at similar frequencies. For example, personal/psychological benefits are common in each. Participant recruitment must be mindful of these categories of motivators for both cancer and HIV vaccine research.

Patient recruitment into a multicenter randomized clinical trial for kidney disease: report of the focal segmental glomerulosclerosis clinical trial (FSGS CT)

We describe the experience of the focal segmental glomerulosclerosis clinical trial (FSGS CT) in the identification and recruitment of participants into the study. This National Institutes of Health funded study, a multicenter, open-label, randomized comparison of cyclosporine versus oral dexamethasone pulses plus mycophenolate mofetil, experienced difficulty and delays meeting enrollment goals. These problems occurred despite the support of patient advocacy groups and aggressive recruitment strategies. Multiple barriers were identified including: (1) inaccurate estimates of the number of potential incident FSGS patients at participating centers; (2) delays in securing one of the test agents; (3) prolonged time between IRB approval and execution of a subcontract (mean 7.5 ± 0.8 months); (4) prolonged time between IRB approval and enrollment of the first patient at participating sites (mean 19.6 ± 1.4 months); and (5) reorganization of clinical coordinating core infrastructure to align resources with enrollment. A Web-based anonymous survey of site investigators revealed site-related barriers to patient recruitment. The value of a variety of recruitment tools was of marginal utility in facilitating patient enrollment. We conclude that improvements in the logistics of study approval and regulatory start-up and testing of promising novel agents are important factors in promoting enrollment into randomized clinical trials in nephrology.