From general day hospital treatment to specialized treatment programmes

Borderline Personality Disorder: Comparison of Two Treatment Modalities

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two treatment modalities for patients diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD). A total of 100 psychiatric patients diagnosed with BPD participated in this study. Among them, 50 patients were outpatients who attended the Reason and Emotion (RIO) program, and the remaining 50 were inpatients who were treated on psychotherapeutic ward at the same hospital. All the participants filled out the following battery of tests when entering the program/psychotherapy ward and 3 months later: Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale, Tennessee Self-Concept Scale (2nd ed), Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, The COPE Inventory, and the WHOQOL-BREF scale. The results showed significant positive effects of both treatment modalities on patients' self-esteem, different domains of self-concept, impulsivity, and different domains of subjective quality of life. No significant changes were observed in terms of coping strategies. Thus, the results speak in favor of the outpatient RIO program, which is more cost-effective than the inpatient ward treatment.

Evaluation of Diagnostic Thresholds for Criterion A in the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders

The Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS) of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) was formulated to assess the presence and severity of personality disorders (PDs). Moderate impairment (Level 2) in personality functioning, as measured by the LPFS, was incorporated into the AMPD as a diagnostic threshold for PD in Criterion A of the general criteria, as well as for the "any two areas present" rule for assigning a specific PD diagnosis. This study represents the first evaluation of the diagnostic decision rules for Criterion A, in a clinical sample (N = 282). The results indicate that an overall diagnostic threshold for PDs should be used with caution because it may not identify all DSM-IV PDs. The "any two areas present" rule proved to be a reasonable alternative, although this finding should be interpreted with caution because the LPFS does not measure the disorder-specific A criteria.

Current understanding of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder

This article reviews historical contributions to the conceptualisation of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder (NPD), including its evolution as a clinical diagnosis within the DSM classification of mental disorders. It discusses the epidemiology and aetiology of NPD, noting that empirical studies of both are limited. The challenges of managing patients with prominent narcissistic traits are presented, and the psychological therapies specifically designed for the treatment of patients with NPD are summarised.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

•

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

On Structure and Leadership in Mentalization-based Group Therapy and Group Analysis

Mentalization-based group therapy (MBT-G) has its roots in group analytic psychotherapy. Modifications were made in order to suit the needs of more disturbed personality disordered patients, and to avoid the chaotic and destructive processes often encountered in groups dominated by these patients. In this article I outline the kind of leadership, structure and authority that MBT proscribes and discuss these principles in comparison with group analysis. I also comment upon a study of a MBT group that failed to establish a good mentalizing culture, with reference to Bion’s concept of ‘attack on linking’. This study reminds us that strong professional support and competent supervision is necessary in order to achieve sound communicational ideals, when the group is composed of members who easily resort to prementalistic modes of thinking.

Step-down versus outpatient psychotherapeutic treatment for personality disorders: 6-year follow-up of the Ullevål personality project

BACKGROUND

Although psychotherapy is considered the treatment of choice for patients with personality disorders (PDs), there is no consensus about the optimal level of care for this group of patients. This study reports the results from the 6-year follow-up of the Ullevål Personality Project (UPP), a randomized clinical trial comparing outpatient individual psychotherapy with a long-term step-down treatment program that included a short-term day hospital treatment followed by combined group and individual psychotherapy.

METHODS

The UPP included 113 patients with PDs. Outcome was evaluated after 8 months, 18 months, 3 years and 6 years and was based on a wide range of clinical measures, such as psychosocial functioning, interpersonal problems, symptom severity, and axis I and II diagnoses.

RESULTS

At the 6-year follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in outcome between the treatment groups. Effect sizes ranged from medium to large for all outcome variables in both treatment arms. However, patients in the outpatient group had a marked decline in psychosocial functioning during the period between the 3- and 6-year follow-ups; while psychosocial functioning continued to improve in the step-down group during the same period. This difference between groups was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that both hospital-based long-term step-down treatment and long-term outpatient individual psychotherapy may improve symptoms and psychosocial functioning in poorly functioning PD patients. Social and interpersonal functioning continued to improve in the step-down group during the post-treatment phase, indicating that longer-term changes were stimulated during treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00378248.

Forty years of a psychiatric day hospital

INTRODUCTION

Day hospitals in psychiatry are a major alternative to inpatient care today, acting as key components of community and social psychiatry.

OBJECTIVE

To study trends in the use of psychiatric day hospitals over the last decades of the 20th century and the first decade of the 21st century, focusing on patient age, sex, and diagnostic group, using data from Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal.

METHODS

Data corresponding to years 1970 to 2009 were collected from patient files. Patients were classified into seven diagnostic groups considering their primary diagnoses only.

RESULTS

Mean age upon admission rose from 32.7±12.1 years in the second half of the 1970s to 43.5±12.2 years in 2005-2009 (p for trend < 0.001). Most patients were female (63.2%), however their proportion decreased from nearly 70% in the 1970s to 60% in the first decade of the 21st century. In males, until the late 1980s, neurotic disorders (E) were the most common diagnosis, accounting for more than one third of admissions. In the subsequent years, this proportion decreased, and the number of admissions for schizophrenia (C) exceeded 50% in 2004- 2009. In females, until the late 1980s, affective disorders (D) and neurotic disorders (E), similarly distributed, accounted for most admissions. From the 1990s on, the proportion of neurotic disorders (E) substantially decreased, and affective disorders (D) came to represent more than 50% of all admissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Mean age upon admission rose with time, as did the percentage of female admissions, even though the latter tendency weakened in the last 10 years assessed. There was also an increase in the proportion of patients with schizophrenia.

Eating disorders in a large clinical sample of men and women with personality disorders

OBJECTIVE

We assessed and compared the prevalence of anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) across six Axis II groups (borderline, obsessive-compulsive, avoidant, dependent, paranoid, and personality disorder NOS) and patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) without personality disorders (PD).

METHOD

The sample included 3,266 consecutive and first admissions to 16 different treatment units in the Norwegian Network of Psychotherapeutic Day Hospitals between 1993 and 2009. All patients were interviewed with the SCID-II for DSM-III-R (prior to 1996) or DSM-IV (from 1996) and the MINI for Axis I disorders in accordance with the LEAD (longitudinal, expert, all-data) standard.

RESULTS

The prevalence of any ED in the PD sample was approximately 17% for women and 3% for men. A lower rate of ED (5%) was found for patients with MDD without PD. A significantly higher proportion of patients with borderline personality disorder were diagnosed with BN or EDNOS. The rate of AN was significantly elevated in female patients with obsessive-compulsive personality disorder. Men demonstrated significantly less diagnostic co-occurrence and no significant differential variation across PD groups or MDD.

DISCUSSION

Data which included a psychiatric comparison group showed less co-occurrence and non-significant variation across PD groups for men, but demonstrated a meaningful and specific pattern of comorbidity between ED and PD for women. There was an elevated risk of ED among female patients with PD, most pronounced for borderline. An almost five-fold higher rate of AN was found among women with obsessive-compulsive PD.

Hospitalization replacement technologies in the Russian Federation

The article presents data on different forms of hospitalization replacement technologies in foreign countries and in the Russian Federation. The author describes an experience of administering medical aid according to individual profiles under the conditions of hospitalization replacement technologies.

Predicting response to day treatment for personality disorder

OBJECTIVE

Efforts to improve the effectiveness of day treatment should attend to factors that influence treatment response. Our prospective study identified predictors of response to day treatment for personality disorder (PD).

METHOD

Patients with a PD, consecutively admitted to a day treatment program, were assessed with self-report and interview measures. Predictors included personality characteristic, demographic, initial disturbance, and PD variables. Patients' overall response to treatment was classified as better, same, or worse, based on change in multiple outcome measures. A comprehensive approach to multivariate modelling was used.

RESULTS

The likelihood of being classified as better significantly increased if the patient was more psychologically minded, used avoidance-oriented coping strategies, and had a high level of baseline symptom severity. Probability of being classified as better decreased if the patient had a substance use disorder and a history of high service use.

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying factors that affect response to day treatment can help clinicians make better selection decisions or take measures to modify treatment.

Substance use disorders among personality disordered patients admitted for day hospital treatment. Implications for service developments

Personality disorders (PD) and substance use disorders (SUD) are highly comorbid conditions. However, their treatment services are often separated. The aims of this study was to investigate how extensive this separation was prior to a Norwegian health reform (2004) that promoted integration, and to discuss clinical challenges for an integrated treatment of PD and SUD. All patients with a diagnosis of PD (n=1783) admitted to 10 day hospital treatment programs (1993-2003) were examined. Diagnoses were assessed by Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV interviews. Socio-demographic data, psychosocial functioning (Global Assessment of Functioning Scale), symptom distress (Symptom Check List-90-Revised), interpersonal problems (Circumplex of Interpersonal Problems) and treatment course were recorded. The majority of patients were females (72%) and the prevalence of SUD was low (14%). SUD occurred among all PD categories. Patients with borderline PD were over-represented and patients with cluster C disorders were under-represented in the SUD sample. The SUD sample contained more men and it was associated with more previous violence against self and others. The reported violence was partly explained by gender (males) and diagnoses (borderline and SUD). PD patients with SUD also displayed more aggression during treatment and dropped out more frequently. The findings demonstrate that the female dominated specialized psychiatric treatment services for PD to a large extent had excluded PD patients who also had SUD. The reasons are probably related to the surplus problems that characterized the SUD sample and gender issues. Implications for the development of the PD and SUD services with respect to an integrated treatment for these comorbid conditions are discussed.

Controversies in diagnosis, classification and treatment of borderline personality disorder

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Borderline personality disorder is the most widely researched single personality disorder, and much research activity continues. This review covers empirical literature on diagnosis, classification and treatment of borderline personality disorder published during 2006 and 2007. Several of the issues that concern borderline personality disorder also concern personality disorders in general, and so the review is broadened in the diagnostic section to include the latter.

RECENT FINDINGS

Integration of categorical and dimensional approaches to personality disorders is actively being sought for inclusion in the next revision of the psychiatric classifications. Although there are few new studies on pharmacotherapy for borderline personality disorder, many new findings on psychotherapy have been reported. They indicate that a variety of treatment modalities can influence borderline personality disorder, but the role of spontaneous improvement over time and established prognostic factors have not received sufficient attention. New modalities of psychotherapy have been tested by less stringent designs.

SUMMARY

Research into classification, diagnosis and psychotherapy of borderline personality disorder is flourishing, but research activity in pharmacotherapy is limited.