Eumovate (clobetasone butyrate 0.05%) cream: a review of clinical efficacy and safety

Investigational drugs for atopic dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Many novel medications and herbal medicines have claimed efficacy on atopic dermatitis (AD).

AREAS COVERED

This review covers evidence on efficacy of topical and oral forms of novel and investigational drugs. Topical agents include emollients, phosphodiesterase E4 (PDE4) inhibitors, and topical herbs. There is little evidence that ceramides or natural moisturizing factors provide relief in AD. PDE4 inhibitors have shown promise as an effective topical treatment for mild-to-moderate AD with minimal adverse events, and dupilumab as an effective subcutaneous agent for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD in adult patients with little adverse effects. However, only preliminary data are available for dupilumab in children with AD. The long-term effects of dupilumab are also not known. Potential new systemic treatments include a number of herbal concoctions.

EXPERT OPINION

Randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated topical PDE4 inhibitors are effective and safe in the treatment of both children and adults with AD but further evaluations are needed. RCTs have also shown that subcutaneous dupilumab is an effective and safe agent for the treatment of AD in adults. Long-term effects of these topical and systemic investigational drugs are currently unavailable. Regarding herbal medications, scientific methods are often flawed and objective evidence is lacking.

Consumers appropriately self-treat based on labeling for over-the-counter hydrocortisone

BACKGROUND

Over-the-counter (OTC) topical corticosteroids, such as hydrocortisone cream (HC), are commonly used for the treatment of minor dermatological conditions. The safety and efficacy of such products are well documented, but details on patterns of use and self-treatment with HC in the OTC environment remain scarce.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine compliance with label directions of OTC HCs by examining self-reported patterns of OTC HC use in adults and children.

METHODS

A random digit-dialed telephone survey was conducted with 2000 US adults. Following identification of users of OTC HC in the last 6 months, respondents were asked questions about the conditions being treated with OTC HC and the frequency and duration of use in both adults and children.

RESULTS

Of adults completing the survey, 20% (n = 396) had used OTC HC. In 83% of cases, the conditions treated were consistent with the OTC label. Use was limited; HC was applied < or =4 times daily in 98% of adult users and lasted < or =7 days in 92%. Patterns of pediatric use were similar and almost always consistent with the labeling. Of households with children, 25% (n = 168) had used OTC HC to treat pediatric dermatological conditions. Of child users, 93% were 2 years of age or older, treatment was limited (97% applied HC < or =4 times daily and 94% of treatments lasted < or =7 days), and the conditions treated were appropriate in 86% of cases.

LIMITATIONS

This telephone survey relied on respondents' recall and self-reporting. Our data on pediatric use of OTC HC are skewed toward treatment of younger children.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that OTC HC products are used for self-treatment in a limited and appropriate fashion that is likely to be safe in both adults and children.