Etanercept therapy in patients with autoimmunity and hepatitis C

A case of recalcitrant silicone granuloma treated with adalimumab: A case report

Liquid silicone is a relatively inexpensive injectable used for soft tissue augmentation. Injection of silicone is associated with a risk of delayed granuloma formation associated with elevated levels of tumour necrosis factor-α. We report a case of recalcitrant silicone granulomas following facial injections of silicone successfully treated with tumour necrosis factor-α blockade. Our case, as well as previous reports, demonstrates the effectiveness of this therapy for the treatment of foreign body granulomas from due to silicone.

TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab for the treatment of psoriasis: therapeutic utility in the era of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory condition for which eleven FDA-approved biologic therapies are approved. Over the past decade, studies have documented the higher efficacy of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors for the treatment of psoriasis compared to the TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab, an IL-12/23 inhibitor. Despite this, there remains an important role for the use of TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab in the treatment of psoriasis. Here, we review how considerations of infection and malignancy risk, patient demographics, treatment resistance, and co-morbidities may make certain TNF-alpha inhibitors or ustekinumab an excellent choice for therapy in particular patient subgroups.

Differential Leukocyte MicroRNA Responses Following Pan T Cell, Allorecognition and Allosecretome-Based Therapeutic Activation

Effective immunomodulation of T-cell responses is critical in treating both autoimmune diseases and cancer. Our previous studies have demonstrated that secretomes derived from control or methoxypolyethylene glycol mixed lymphocyte alloactivation assays exerted potent immunomodulatory activity that was mediated by microRNAs (miRNA). The immunomodulatory effects of biomanufactured miRNA-based allo-secretome therapeutics (SYN, TA1, IA1 and IA2) were compared to Pan T-cell activators (PHA and anti-CD3/CD28) and lymphocyte alloactivation. The differential effects of these activation strategies on resting peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were assessed via T-cell proliferation, subset analysis and miRNA expression profiles. Mitogen-induced PBMC proliferation (> 85%) significantly exceeded that arising from either allostimulation (~ 30%) or the pro-inflammatory IA1 secretome product (~ 12%). Consequent to stimulation, the ratio of CD4 to CD8 cells of the resting PBMC (CD4:CD8; 1.7 ± 0.1) decreased in the Pan T cell, allrecognition and IA1 activated cells (averages of 1.1 ± 0.2; 1.2 ± 0.1 and 1.0 ± 0.1). These changes arose consequent to the expansion of both CD4⁺CD8⁺ and CD4^–CD8^– populations as well as the shrinkage of the CD4 subset and the expansion of the CD8 T cells. Importantly, these activation strategies induced vastly different miRNA expression profiles which were associated with significant differences in cellular differentiation and biological function. These findings support the concept that the “differential patterns of miRNA expression” regulate the biologic immune response in a “lock and key” manner. The biomanufacturing of miRNA-enriched secretome biotherapeutics may be a successful therapeutic approach for the systemic treatment of autoimmune diseases (TA1) and cancer (IA1).

Initiating and Monitoring Patients on Biologic Therapy for Psoriasis beyond the FDA: Our more Cautious Approach

Biologics are offering new hope for patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, and every day more dermatologists are prescribing these medications for their patients. Prior to prescribing a biologic it is important to conduct the proper screening to determine if your patient is an appropriate candidate. While patients are being treated with biologics they need to be monitored carefully to maximize the benefit of the agent and minimize harmful side effects. Apart from the recommendations and requirements of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), there are as yet no consensus statements or guidelines addressing the appropriate approach to initiating and monitoring patients being treated with biologics. In this article we will discuss our own approach to initiating and monitoring that we believe is appropriate for patients being treated with biologics. Our recommendations, which in many ways go beyond the recommendations and requirements of the FDA, should not be interpreted as the standard of care.

Management of psoriasis patients with hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus infection

The systemic therapies available for the management of Psoriasis (PsO) patients who cannot be treated with more conservative options, such as topical agents and/or phototherapy, with the exception of acitretin, can worsen or reactivate a chronic infection. Therefore, before administering immunosuppressive therapies with either conventional disease-modifying drugs (cDMARDs) or biological ones (bDMARDs) it is mandatory to screen patients for some infections, including hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). In particular, the patients eligible to receive an immunosuppressive drug must be screened for the following markers: antibody to hepatitis B core, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBsAg), HBsAg, and antibody to HCV (anti-HCV). In case HBV or HCV infection is diagnosed, a close collaboration with a consultant hepatologist is needed before and during an immunosuppressive therapy. Concerning therapy with immunosuppressive drugs in PsO patients with HBV or HCV infection, data exist mainly for cyclosporine a (CyA) or bDMARDs (etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab). The natural history of HBV and HCV infection differs significantly as well as the effect of immunosuppression on the aforementioned infectious diseases. As a rule, in the case of active HBV infection, systemic immunosuppressive antipsoriatic therapies must be deferred until the infection is controlled with an adequate antiviral treatment. Inactive carriers need to receive antiviral prophylaxis 2-4 wk before starting immunosuppressive therapy, to be continued after 6-12 mo from its suspension. Due to the risk of HBV reactivation, these patients should be monitored monthly for the first 3 mo and then every 3 mo for HBV DNA load together with transaminases levels. Concerning the patients who are occult HBV carriers, the risk of HBV reactivation is very low. Therefore, these patients generally do not need antiviral prophylaxis and the sera HBsAg and transaminases dosing can be monitored every 3 mo. Concerning PsO patients with chronic HCV infection their management with immunosuppressive drugs is less problematic as compared to those infected by HBV. In fact, HCV reactivation is an extremely rare event after administration of drugs such as CyA or tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. As a rule, these patients can be monitored measuring HCV RNA load, and ALT, aspartate transaminase, gamma-glutamyl-transferase, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, albumin and platelet every 3-6 mo. The present article provides an updated overview based on more recently reported data on monitoring and managing PsO patients who need systemic antipsoriatic treatment and have HBV or HCV infection as comorbidity.

Psoriasis: Biologic treatment and liver disease

Patients with moderate or severe psoriasis have a high prevalence of chronic liver disease. Chronic liver disease in these patients is related to metabolic syndrome, alcohol abuse or viral infections. Therefore, treatment of these patients is challenging. Classic systemic treatments may be contraindicated because of their immunosuppressive and hepatotoxic potential. First-line therapy in this setting is generally ultraviolet B phototherapy combined with topical treatment, but its feasibility and efficacy are sometimes limited. The therapeutic options are further restricted by concomitant psoriatic arthritis. Biologic treatments have shown to be effective in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, and they are largely devoid of liver toxicity. Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) treatments have proven to be effective and safe in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections and other non-infectious chronic liver disorders, including alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver diseases. However, in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV), anti-TNF-α treatments carry a potential risk of HBV reactivation. Anti-interleukin-12/23 treatments are also effective in patients with psoriasis, but data regarding their safety in chronic hepatitis infections are still limited. Safety reports in patients with psoriasis and chronic HCV infection are contradictory, and in chronic HBV evidence indicate a high risk of viral reactivation. Moreover, concerns remain about the long-term safety of both TNF-α antagonists and ustekinumab. Non-viral liver diseases such as alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver diseases are more prevalent in patients with psoriasis than in the general population. TNF-α antagonists have also been prescribed in these patients. Although data are still scarce in this setting, results suggest a favorable profile in patients with psoriasis and non-alcoholic liver diseases. We review the literature regarding all these aspects.

Drug-induced autoimmune liver disease: A diagnostic dilemma of an increasingly reported disease

The aetiology of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is uncertain but the disease can be triggered in susceptible patients by external factors such as viruses or drugs. AIH usually develops in individuals with a genetic background mainly consisting of some risk alleles of the major histocompatibility complex (HLA). Many drugs have been linked to AIH phenotypes, which sometimes persist after drug discontinuation, suggesting that they awaken latent autoimmunity. At least three clinical scenarios have been proposed that refers to drug- induced autoimmune liver disease (DIAILD): AIH with drug-induced liver injury (DILI); drug induced-AIH (DI-AIH); and immune mediated DILI (IM-DILI). In addition, there are instances showing mixed features of DI-AIH and IM-DILI, as well as DILI cases with positive autoantibodies. Histologically distinguishing DILI from AIH remains a challenge. Even more challenging is the differentiation of AIH from DI-AIH mainly relying in histological features; however, a detailed standardised histologic evaluation of large cohorts of AIH and DI-AIH patients would probably render more subtle features that could be of help in the differential diagnosis between both entities. Growing information on the relationship of drugs and AIH is being available, being drugs like statins and biologic agents more frequently involved in cases of DIAILD. In addition, there is some evidence on the fact that patients diagnosed with DIAILD may have had a previous episode of hepatotoxicity. Further collaborative studies in DIAILD will strengthen the knowledge and understanding of this intriguing and complex disorder which might represent different phenotypes across the spectrum of disease.

Induction and exacerbation of psoriasis with Interferon-alpha therapy for hepatitis C: a review and analysis of 36 cases

BACKGROUND

Interferon-alpha (IFN-α) therapy is used to treat hepatitis C infection. The exacerbation and occurrence of psoriasis in hepatitis C patients treated with IFN-α is increasingly recognized, but the distinct associated features, aetiology and management have not been reviewed.

OBJECTIVE

To review all published cases of hepatitis C patients who developed psoriasis while receiving IFN-α therapy.

METHODS

The review was conducted by searching the PubMed database using the keywords 'hepatitis C' AND 'psoriasis.' In addition, references to additional publications not indexed for PubMed were followed to obtain a complete record of published data.

RESULTS

We identified 32 publications describing 36 subjects who developed a psoriatic eruption while receiving IFN-α therapy for hepatitis C. Topical therapies were a commonly employed treatment modality, but led to resolution in only 30% of cases in which they were employed solely. Cessation of IFN-α therapy led to resolution in 93% of cases. Hundred per cent of those who developed psoriasis while on IFN-α therapy responded to systemic therapy and were able to continue the drug.

CONCLUSION

Further studies and analysis of IFN-α-induced lesions are necessary to clarify the role of IFN-α and the hepatitis C virus in the development of psoriatic lesions.

The safety of etanercept for the treatment of plaque psoriasis

Effective treatment with etanercept results from a congregation of immunological signaling and modulating roles played by tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), a pervasive member of the TNF super-family of cytokines participating in numerous immunologic and metabolic functions. Macrophages, lymphocytes and other cells produce TNF as part of the deregulated immune response resulting in psoriasis or other chronic inflammatory disorders. Tumor necrosis factor is also produced by macrophages and lymphocytes responding to foreign antigens as a primary response to potential infection. Interference with cytokine signaling by etanercept yields therapeutic response. At the same time, interference with cytokine signaling by etanercept exposes patients to potential adverse events. While the efficacy of etanercept for the treatment of psoriasis is evident, the risks of treatment continue to be defined. Of the potential serious adverse events, response to infection is the best characterized in terms of physiology, incidence, and management. Rare but serious events: activation of latent tuberculosis, multiple sclerosis, lymphoma, and others, have been observed but have questionable or yet to be defined association with therapeutic uses of etanercept. The safe use of etanercept for the treatment of psoriasis requires an appreciation of potential adverse events as well as screening and monitoring strategies designed to manage patient risk

Safety of anti-tumour necrosis factor agents in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To identify all of the patients affected by chronic hepatitis C infection treated with TNF-α blockers (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab and infliximab) in order to evaluate the safety profile.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature from January 1990 to October 2010.

RESULTS

In total, 37 publications with data on 153 patients who were treated with anti-TNF-α agents in the setting of HCV infection were found. The mean anti-TNF-α treatment duration was 11.9 months. Ninety-one patients had RA, 22 had psoriasis, 6 had Crohn's disease and 14 patients had other chronic inflammatory diseases. To date, etanercept is the biological agent that has been most extensively used in the patients with HCV infection, with only one definitely confirmed case of HCV hepatitis worsening and five suspected cases (elevation of transaminases not associated with an increase in the HCV viral load and vice versa) in 110 treated patients. Treatment with this agent resulted in stable levels of liver transaminases and a stable viral load in 74 patients, with an improvement in HCV chronic liver disease in combination with IFN-ribavirin therapy in 29 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety profile of anti-TNF-α agents in the setting of HCV infection seems to be acceptable, even if differences in the hepatotoxic profile are apparent between different agents. In the absence of long-term and large, controlled clinical trials a definitive statement on the safety of anti-TNF-α therapies in the setting of chronic HCV infection cannot be made.

Autoimmune hepatitis: new paradigms in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cirrhosis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis are the three major autoimmune diseases affecting the liver, and of these three, AIH is the most typical autoimmune disease being characterized by a T-cell-rich infiltrate, raised circulating γ-globulins, autoantibodies, HLA associations, and links with other autoimmune diseases. It is the only one, of the three diseases, that responds well to immunosuppressive therapy. AIH is caused by dysregulation of immunoregulatory networks and the consequent emergence of autoreactive T cells that orchestrate a progressive destruction of hepatocytes leading untreated to liver failure. T cells play a major role in the immunopathogenesis, and both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells are involved together with effector responses mediated by NK cells, γδ T cells, and macrophages. A number of triggering factors have been proposed including viruses, xenobiotics, and drugs, but none have been conclusively shown to be involved in pathogenesis.

Treatment of psoriasis in patients with hepatitis C: from the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation

BACKGROUND

Treating psoriasis in patients with concomitant hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection presents a special challenge. Not only is psoriasis exacerbated by interferon therapy, the standard of care for HCV, but many psoriasis therapies are potentially hepatotoxic, immunosuppressive, or both, which has been generally thought to be a contraindication in chronic infections such as HCV.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to arrive at a consensus on treating psoriasis in patients with concomitant HCV infection.

METHODS

Reports in the literature were reviewed regarding common psoriasis therapies and liver toxicity.

RESULTS

Topical therapies are first-line therapy for patients with limited psoriasis and HCV. Ultraviolet B phototherapy may be considered as a second-line treatment when needed. Ultraviolet B phototherapies in combination with topical therapies are first line for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, and are considered safe in those patients with concomitant HCV infection. Other systemic therapies, such as acitretin, etanercept, and, possibly, other tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, are considered second line. Psoralen plus ultraviolet A should also be considered a second-line therapy.

LIMITATIONS

There are few evidence-based studies on treating psoriasis with systemic therapy in patients with pre-existing liver disease.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no large double-blind clinical trials addressing the treatment of psoriasis in patients with HCV infection and more studies are needed.

Use of infliximab in particular clinical settings: management based on current evidence

With the increasingly widespread use of the anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agent infliximab for the treatment of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, there have been some concerns raised about the potential consequences of such therapy in particular clinical settings. In this review, we report the current strategies for optimizing treatment outcomes and minimizing the risks of some of the most serious events attributable to infliximab therapy. In particular, an up-to-date overview is provided on how to treat patients with inflammatory bowel disease using infliximab therapy, with regard to the diagnosis and management of latent tuberculosis infection and the risk of reactivation of hepatitis B and C infections. Furthermore, based on the available evidence, we evaluate the possibility of using infliximab during pregnancy. Finally, we evaluate whether patients with malignancies or pre-neoplastic lesions could be candidates for infliximab therapy. Overall, this review will provide physicians who use infliximab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease with several practical recommendations for the management of some complex situations that may occur in daily clinical practice.

Update on the use of etanercept across a spectrum of rheumatoid disorders

Etanercept is a soluble TNF receptor p75 fusion protein which is approved for subcutaneous use (50 mg weekly) in the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile RA, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis. Etanercept binds to both TNFα and lymphotoxin and has quite a short mean half-life (70 hours). Numerous randomized clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy to improve signs and symptoms in early and established RA and other inflammatory arthritis. Furthermore, etanercept has shown its ability to prevent radiographic progression and to improve health-related quality of life in patients with RA and psoriatic arthritis. A combination of etanercept plus methotrexate was more efficacious than etanercept monotherapy in RA patients but there is currently no evidence that such rheumatic combination is better than monotherapy in other disorders. Etanercept was generally well tolerated both in controlled trials with withdrawal rates being similar to the comparator groups and in large observational studies. Infections and injection-site reactions were the most frequently reported events. Serious infections were slightly increased but the occurrence of tuberculosis seemed less frequent than with anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies (infliximab and adalimumab). The benefit-risk ratio of etanercept appeared to be very positive, and this drug has now emerged as a major therapy in patients with active inflammatory arthritis. Furthermore, it is more frequently considered as an emerging and valuable option in patients with early disease.

Hepatitis C and arthritis: an update

Extrahepatic symptoms during chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are common and varied. Arthritis can be seen either as part of autoimmune processes (eg, associated with cryoglobulinemia) or independently. Whether the manifestation is specifically attributable to HCV infection or rather to the nonspecific result of a chronic inflammatory process is not clear. The literature available at this time is insufficient to guide the most appropriate course of treatment of HCV arthritis. Standard antirheumatic treatment can be considered, but with caution, because some of these medications occasionally may be hepatotoxic and response to therapy seems variable. Treatment decisions should be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Problems encountered during anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy

Worldwide, over 400,000 patients have been treated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antagonists for indications that include rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Since their approval, concerns regarding safety have been raised. There is a risk of re-activation of granulomatous diseases, especially tuberculosis, and measures should be taken for detection and treatment of latent tuberculosis infections. Preliminary data suggest that anti-TNF therapy may be safe in chronic hepatitis C. However, TNF-alpha antagonists have resulted in re-activation of chronic hepatitis B if not given concurrently with antiviral therapy. Solid tumours do not appear to be increased with anti-TNF therapy. Variable rates of increased lymphoma risk have been described with anti-TNF therapy compared with the general population, although no increased risk was found compared with a rheumatoid arthritis population. Large phase II and III trials with TNF-alpha antagonists in advanced heart failure have shown trends towards a worse prognosis, and should therefore be avoided in this population. Both etanercept and infliximab are associated with the formation of autoantibodies, and these autoantibodies are rarely associated with any specific clinical syndrome. Rare cases of aplastic anaemia, pancytopenia, vasculitis and demyelination have been described with anti-TNF therapy. This chapter will discuss the safety profile and adverse events of the three commercially available TNF-alpha antagonists: etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab. The data presented in this review have been collected from published data, individual case reports or series, package inserts, the Food and Drug Administration postmarketing adverse events surveillance system, and abstracts from the American College of Rheumatology and European Congress of Rheumatology meetings for 2005.

Inhibition of TNFalpha does not induce viral reactivation in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection: two cases

Chronic infections, such as hepatitis C, in the setting of rheumatic disorders pose a potential hindrance to optimal management because of possible complications linked to the institution of immune suppression, as well as the high incidence of hepatotoxicity associated with many of the disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs included in the conventional therapeutic regimens. In the setting of hepatitis C, however, the effect of TNFalpha blockade may be potentially beneficial because TNFalpha appears to be involved in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis through the stimulation of apoptotic pathways. Data related to this subject are, unfortunately, still limited and without detailed information regarding the clinical progression of the rheumatic disorder. We report the cases of two patients, one with ankylosing spondylitis and one with psoriatic arthritis, who were efficiently treated long-term with anti-TNF agents for their rheumatic disease without any evidence of reactivation or flaring of their hepatitis C infection or deterioration of their liver function. Our results indicate that TNFalpha blockade is a highly efficient and uncompromising therapy in hepatitis C-affected individuals with connective tissue disorders. However, systematic, large-scale studies addressing the issue of safety of these new efficient drugs, i.e., monoclonal antibodies targeted against TNFalpha, in patients with chronic hepatitis C will be needed to properly assess the risks and benefits of this treatment in analogous cases.

Etanercept therapy for patients with psoriatic arthritis and concurrent hepatitis C virus infection: report of 3 cases

Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis are exacerbated by interferon alfa and other treatments for hepatitis C virus infection. Immunosuppressants and hepatotoxic drugs are relatively contraindicated in hepatitis C. Data in the literature suggest that etanercept is a safe option in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and concurrent hepatitis C. We present three cases in which we have successfully used etanercept to treat psoriatic arthritis/psoriasis in patients with hepatitis C without worsening their hepatitis or interfering with their hepatitis treatment. With close monitoring of viral load and hepatic enzymes, etanercept may be a safe option for treating psoriatic arthritis/psoriasis in patients who also have hepatitis C.

The treatment of psoriasis with etanercept

Etanercept is a tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitor approved for the treatment of psoriasis. Etanercept is a soluble version of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) that neutralizes the proinflammatory activity of TNF-alpha, a molecule central to the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Patients receiving etanercept continuously during both 12 and 24 weeks show a significant reduction in the signs of psoriasis. Further, higher doses of etanercept provide better efficacy. Both clinical trial and postmarketing experience with etanercept is extensive and, thus, etanercept has a well-defined safety and tolerability profile. With appropriate patient selection and follow-up, etanercept therapy has a very good benefit-to-risk ratio and represents a convenient option for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.