1
|
Chernyshov PV, Lallas A, Tomas-Aragones L, Arenbergerova M, Samimi M, Manolache L, Svensson A, Marron SE, Sampogna F, Spillekom-vanKoulil S, Bewley A, Forsea AM, Jemec GB, Szepietowski JC, Augustin M, Finlay AY. Quality of life measurement in skin cancer patients: literature review and position paper of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Forces on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes, Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019; 33:816-827. [PMID: 30963614 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Forces (TFs) on Quality of Life (QoL) and Patient Oriented Outcomes, Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC) present a review of the literature and position statement on health-related (HR) QoL assessment in skin cancer patients. A literature search was carried out to identify publications since 1980 that included information about the impact of SC on QoL. Generic, dermatology-specific, cancer-specific, SC-specific, facial SC-specific, NMSC-specific, basal cell carcinoma-specific and melanoma-specific QoL questionnaires have been used to assess HRQoL in SC patients. HRQoL was assessed in the context of creation and validation of the HRQoL instruments, clinical trials, comparison of QoL in SC and other cancers, other diseases or controls, HRQoL assessment after treatment, comorbidities, behaviour modification, predictors of QoL and survival, supportive care needs, coping strategies and fear of cancer recurrence. The most widely used instruments for HRQoL assessment in SC patients are the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma (FACT-M), Skin Cancer Index (SCI), Short Form 36 Item Health Survey (SF-36) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The TFs recommend the use of the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30, especially in late stages of disease, and the melanoma-specific FACT-M and SC-specific SCI questionnaires. These instruments have been well validated and used in several studies. Other HRQoL instruments, also with good basic validation, are not currently recommended because the experience of their use is too limited. Dermatology-specific HRQoL instruments can be used to assess the impact of skin-related problems in SC. The TFs encourage further studies to validate HRQoL instruments for use in different stages of SC, in order to allow more detailed practical recommendations on HRQoL assessment in SC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P V Chernyshov
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National Medical University, Kiev, Ukraine
| | - A Lallas
- First Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - L Tomas-Aragones
- Department of Psychology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - M Arenbergerova
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - M Samimi
- Dermatology Department, University of Tours, Tours, France
| | - L Manolache
- Dermatology, Dali Medical, Bucharest, Romania
| | - A Svensson
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - S E Marron
- Department of Dermatology, Royo Villanova Hospital, Aragon Psychodermatology Research Group (GAI+PD), Zaragoza, Spain
| | - F Sampogna
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata (IDI)-IRCCS FLMM, Rome, Italy
| | - S Spillekom-vanKoulil
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Bewley
- Whipps Cross University Hospital, London, UK.,The Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - A M Forsea
- Department of Oncologic Dermatology and Allergology, Elias University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - G B Jemec
- Department of Dermatology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.,Health Sciences Faculty, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - J C Szepietowski
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - M Augustin
- Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - A Y Finlay
- Department of Dermatology and Wound Healing, Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gordon LG, Brynes J, Baade PD, Neale RE, Whiteman DC, Youl PH, Aitken JF, Janda M. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Skin Awareness Intervention for Early Detection of Skin Cancer Targeting Men Older Than 50 Years. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2017; 20:593-601. [PMID: 28408001 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2015] [Revised: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 12/18/2016] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the cost-effectiveness of an educational intervention encouraging self-skin examinations for early detection of skin cancers among men older than 50 years. METHODS A lifetime Markov model was constructed to combine data from the Skin Awareness Trial and other published sources. The model incorporated a health system perspective and the cost and health outcomes for melanoma, squamous and basal cell carcinomas, and benign skin lesions. Key model outcomes included Australian costs (2015), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years, and counts of skin cancers. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken to address parameter uncertainty. RESULTS The mean cost of the intervention was A$5,298 compared with A$4,684 for usual care, whereas mean QALYs were 7.58 for the intervention group and 7.77 for the usual care group. The intervention was thus inferior to usual care. When only survival gain is considered, the model predicted the intervention would cost A$1,059 per life-year saved. The likelihood that the intervention was cost-effective up to A$50,000 per QALY gained was 43.9%. The model was stable to most data estimates; nevertheless, it relies on the specificity of clinical diagnosis of skin cancers and is subject to limited health utility data for people with skin lesions. CONCLUSIONS Although the intervention improved skin checking behaviors and encouraged men to seek medical advice about suspicious lesions, the overall costs and effects from also detecting more squamous and basal cell carcinomas and benign lesions outweighed the positive health gains from detecting more thin melanomas.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Age Factors
- Aged
- Australia
- Awareness
- Carcinoma, Basal Cell/diagnosis
- Carcinoma, Basal Cell/economics
- Carcinoma, Basal Cell/mortality
- Carcinoma, Basal Cell/therapy
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/economics
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy
- Cost Savings
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Decision Support Techniques
- Early Detection of Cancer/economics
- Early Detection of Cancer/methods
- Health Care Costs
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
- Humans
- Male
- Markov Chains
- Melanoma/diagnosis
- Melanoma/economics
- Melanoma/mortality
- Melanoma/therapy
- Men's Health/economics
- Middle Aged
- Models, Economic
- Patient Education as Topic/economics
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Prognosis
- Quality-Adjusted Life Years
- Reproducibility of Results
- Risk Factors
- Self-Examination/economics
- Sex Factors
- Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Skin Neoplasms/economics
- Skin Neoplasms/mortality
- Skin Neoplasms/therapy
- Time Factors
- Video Recording/economics
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa G Gordon
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Sun and Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Joshua Brynes
- Centre for Applied Health Economics, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
| | - Peter D Baade
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland, Australia; Cancer Council Queensland, Spring Hill, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rachel E Neale
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Sun and Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - David C Whiteman
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Sun and Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Philippa H Youl
- NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Sun and Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland, Australia; Cancer Council Queensland, Spring Hill, Queensland, Australia
| | - Joanne F Aitken
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland, Australia; Cancer Council Queensland, Spring Hill, Queensland, Australia
| | - Monika Janda
- NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Sun and Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia; School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kadouch DJ, Wolkerstorfer A, Elshot Y, Zupan-Kajcovski B, Crijns MB, Starink MV, Bekkenk MW, van der Wal AC, Spuls PI, de Rie MA. Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma Using a One-Stop-Shop With Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: Study Design and Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2015; 4:e109. [PMID: 26362616 PMCID: PMC4704900 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.4303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2015] [Revised: 04/03/2015] [Accepted: 04/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer diagnosed in white populations worldwide. The rising incidence of BCC is becoming a major worldwide public health problem. Therefore, there is a need for more efficient management. Objective The aim of this research is to assess the efficacy and safety of a one-stop-shop (OSS) concept, using real-time in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) (Vivascope 1500; Lucid Technologies, Henrietta, NY, USA) as a diagnostic tool, prior to surgical management of new primary BCCs. Methods This is a prospective non-inferiority multi-center RCT designed to compare the “OSS concept using RCM” to current standards of care in diagnosing and treating clinically suspected BCC. Patients ≥ 18 years attending our outpatient clinic at the Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, and the Department of Dermatology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) with a clinically suspected new primary BCC lesion will be considered for enrollment using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and will be randomly allocated to the experimental or control group. The main outcome parameter is the assessment of incomplete surgical excision margins on the final pathology report of confirmed BCC lesions (either by punch biopsy or RCM imaging). Other outcome measures include diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of RCM for diagnosing BCC and dividing between subtypes, and throughput time. Patient satisfaction data will be collected postoperatively after 3 months during routine follow-up. Results This research is investigator-initiated and received ethics approval. Patient recruitment started in February 2015, and we expect all study-related activities to be completed by fall 2015. Conclusions This RCT is the first to examine an OSS concept using RCM for diagnosing and treating clinically suspected BCC lesions. Results of this research are expected to have applications in evidence-based practice for the increasing number of patients suffering from BCC and possibly lead to a more efficient disease management strategy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02285790; https://clinicaltrial.gov/ct2/show/NCT02285790 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6b2LfDKWu).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Kadouch
- Academic Medical Center, Department of Dermatology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kadouch DJ, Fortuin S, Kadouch JA, Ovadia ZN, Karim RB, de Rie MA. Improvement of efficacy in surgical management of facial basal cell carcinoma: an interdisciplinary pilot study in The Netherlands. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s00238-014-1010-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|