Pharmacokinetics of ingenol mebutate gel under maximum use conditions in large treatment areas

Safety of topical interventions for the treatment of actinic keratosis

Introduction: Actinic keratosis (AK) are proliferations of atypical keratinocytes that may eventually progress to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, AK requires consequent and early treatment. Areas covered: A variety of effective approaches is currently available for the clearance of AK. These interventions may be applied either in a lesion-directed or field-directed mode as AK can occur as single or multiple lesions. Field-directed approaches typically comprise topical drug-mediated interventions which aim at eliminating all visible lesions and also at clearing subclinical changes of the actinically damaged field. However, most treatment options are associated with local adverse events such as erythema, scaling, pain, and rarely with systemic symptoms. This expert review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the safety considerations of the commonly prescribed topical treatment agents cyclooxygenase inhibitors, 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, and photodynamic therapy. All these therapies have been proven efficient, yet they differ considerably regarding their safety profile. Expert opinion: In the future, safety concerns will relate to long-term and irreversible adverse drug events instead of application site reactions. In particular, the rate of treatment-associated non-melanoma skin cancers will increasingly come into focus and warrant investigation in postmarketing surveillance trials with a long-term follow-up.

Targeting Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Cells by Ingenol Mebutate (PEP005) Correlates with PKCδ Activation, ROS Induction as Well as Downregulation of XIAP and c-FLIP

New therapeutic strategies are needed for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and the plant extract ingenol mebutate (PEP005) may be considered. PEP005 has been approved for actinic keratosis, and proapoptotic activities were described in different cancer cells. Here, we aimed to investigate its efficacy in four CTCL cell lines and its mode of action. While HuT-78 and HH responded with induced apoptosis as well as with loss of cell viability and cell proliferation, MyLa and SeAx remained resistant. Interestingly, both sensitive and resistant cells showed caspase-8 activation and enhanced levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), while final caspase-3 activation was restricted to sensitive cells. Apoptosis induction was prevented by the caspase inhibitor QVD-Oph as well as by the antioxidant vitamin E. Caspase activation by PEP005 may be explained to some extent by the downregulation of the caspase antagonistic proteins c-FLIP and XIAP in sensitive cells, whereas both proteins were strongly expressed in resistant cells. Finally, PEP005 resulted in the activation of proapoptotic PKCδ, and the PKC inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide I reduced apoptosis, caspase-3 processing and ROS production, as well as restored cell viability. In conclusion, PKCδ appeared as a central player in apoptosis regulation in CTCL cells, also suggesting its therapeutic targeting.

Ingenol mebutate treatment in actinic keratosis - clinical effectiveness and potential side effects

Introduction

Actinic keratosis is a common skin disease that occurs in response to prolonged exposure to ultraviolet radiation. This problem affects up to 60% of the population over 40 years of age. Actinic keratosis is considered to be a precancerous lesion leading to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The new therapeutic option for the treatment of actinic keratosis is ingenol mebutate gel (0.015%, 0.05%).

Aim

Retrospective evaluation of response and potential side effects of ingenol mebutate treatment in clinical practice.

Material and methods

Eight patients with actinic keratosis lesions on the face or scalp self-applied a 0.015% gel for 3 consecutive days on the 25 cm² marked area. They were assessed at baseline and on day 4, 7, 14 and 57.

Results

All patients on day 57 presented a complete absence of AK lesions in the area of ingenol mebutate application. No adverse events were observed.

Conclusions

Our study shows that ingenol mebutate is highly efficacious field treatment for actinic keratosis.

Efficacy and safety of ingenol mebutate gel in field treatment of actinic keratosis on full face, balding scalp, or approximately 250 cm2 on the chest: A phase 3 randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) 0.015% or 0.05% is approved for actinic keratosis (AK) areas of 25 cm² or less; some patients require treatment of larger fields.

OBJECTIVE

To determine efficacy and safety of IngMeb 0.027% in areas of AK of up to 250 cm² during an 8-week initial assessment period and extended 12-month follow-up.

METHODS

This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial (NCT02361216) enrolled adult patients with 5 to 20 AK lesions on the face/scalp (25-250 cm²) or chest (approximately 250 cm²). Patients received once-daily IngMeb or vehicle for 3 consecutive days on the full face, full balding scalp, or approximately 250 cm² on the chest. The primary endpoint was complete AK clearance (AKCLEAR 100; week 8). Additional endpoints included partial AK clearance (AKCLEAR 75), recurrence, patient satisfaction, cosmetic outcome, and safety.

RESULTS

IngMeb was superior to vehicle for complete AK clearance (21.4% vs 3.4%, P < .001) and AK clearance of 75% or greater (59.4% vs 8.9%, P < .001) at week 8. Probability of sustained clearance during the 12-month follow-up was 22.9% for patients treated with IngMeb. Increased treatment satisfaction and cosmetic outcomes were observed with IngMeb versus vehicle. No unexpected safety signals were identified.

LIMITATIONS

Localized skin responses hindered maintenance of double-blinding.

CONCLUSIONS

IngMeb 0.027% was superior to vehicle for treatment of AK areas of up to 250 cm². The safety profile of IngMeb was as expected.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Ingenol Disoxate Gel Administered Under Maximum-Use Conditions to Patients With Actinic Keratosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ingenol disoxate (LEO 43204) is a field therapy in development for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK) on areas between 25 and 250 cm². We evaluated the systemic exposure and safety of ingenol disoxate under maximum-use conditions.

METHODS

This was a phase I, open-label, non-randomized, multicenter trial. Patients ≥ 18 years of age with ≥ 15 clinically typical, visible, discrete AK lesions in a treatment area on the full face or approximately 250 cm² on the arm or scalp were treated once-daily for 3 consecutive days with ingenol disoxate 0.018, 0.1, or 0.037% gel, respectively.

RESULTS

The trial included 58 patients. Median age (range) of patients was 68 years (42-89) [face, N = 18], 66 years (43-88) [arm, N = 21], and 67 years (37-83) [scalp, N = 19]. The highest quantifiable ingenol disoxate level was observed in the arm group (0.33 nM, area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last data point [AUC_tlast] 3.12 nM·h). Mean composite local skin response scores peaked at Day 4 and declined towards baseline by Day 15 in all treatment groups. Most adverse events (AEs) were of mild or moderate intensity; the most common treatment-related AEs were application-site pain (face, 88.9%; arm, 57.1%; scalp, 100.0%) and application-site pruritus (face, 50.0%; arm, 52.4%; scalp, 42.1%).

CONCLUSION

Very low systemic exposure to ingenol disoxate was observed when applied to the face, arm, or scalp in patients with AK under maximum-use conditions. No new safety signals were identified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02424305.