1
|
Tanaka M, Ozeki Y, Matsuyama F, Murata T, Imafuku S, Nakamura T. Apremilast Prolongs the Time to First Biologic Therapy in Japanese Patients with Psoriasis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2021; 12:451-466. [PMID: 34951693 PMCID: PMC8850490 DOI: 10.1007/s13555-021-00659-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Biologic agents are used in patients with severe psoriasis who have not adequately responded to existing conventional systemic therapies. However, only a limited number of medical institutions in Japan are approved to use them, and their relatively high cost represents a substantial burden to patients. Apremilast is an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor approved in Japan for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris in adult patients with an inadequate response to topical therapies and psoriatic arthritis in adult patients with active disease. To date, a large-scale real-world study of treatment patterns and costs associated with apremilast in Japan has not been conducted. The objective of this study was to assess whether apremilast can prolong time to first biologic therapy use and decrease total medical cost. Methods Using the Medical Data Vision hospital-based claims database, 506 psoriasis patients were propensity score matched and analyzed (apremilast: n = 253; non-apremilast: n = 253). Results The incidence rate of first biologic therapy use per 1000 patient-years was significantly lower in the apremilast group than in the non-apremilast group (30.3 vs. 107.6; P < 0.001), and the total medical costs per month were significantly lower in the apremilast group than in the non-apremilast group (76,594 yen/month vs. 102,411 yen/month, P < 0.001). In a sensitivity analysis of a propensity-score-matched subset of eligible patients prescribed biologics during the follow-up period (apremilast: n = 14; non-apremilast: n = 14), the incidence of first biologic therapy use was 2,797.6 per 1000 patient-years (95% CI: 1,656.9, 4,723.6) in the non-apremilast group and 856.1 per 1000 patient-years (95% CI: 507.0, 1,445.5) in the apremilast group. Conclusion These results suggest that apremilast prolongs the time to first biologic therapy use in patients with psoriasis, thereby reducing the total medical cost and decreasing the economic burden on patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-021-00659-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Tanaka
- Inflammation and Immunology, General Medicine, Medical Affairs, Research and Development, Amgen K.K., Midtown Tower 9-7-1 Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Yasushi Ozeki
- Inflammation and Immunology, General Medicine, Medical Affairs, Research and Development, Amgen K.K., Midtown Tower 9-7-1 Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Taichi Nakamura
- Inflammation and Immunology, General Medicine, Medical Affairs, Research and Development, Amgen K.K., Midtown Tower 9-7-1 Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guelimi R, Afach S, Régnaux JP, Bettuzzi T, Chaby G, Sbidian E, Naudet F, Le Cleach L. Overlapping network meta-analyses on psoriasis systemic treatments: an overview, quantity does not make quality. Br J Dermatol 2021; 187:29-41. [PMID: 34854074 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.20908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Network Meta-analyses (NMAs) have become successful in addressing gaps in the comparative effectiveness of systemic treatments in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. However, their increasing number carries both a risk of overlap and reproducibility issues that can hamper clinical decision-making. In this overview, we aimed to assess redundancy across these NMAs and to describe their characteristics. METHODS We considered all systematic reviews with NMAs of randomized controlled trials that included adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and that evaluated the efficacy and/or safety of systemic treatments compared with placebo or with an active comparator. PubMed/MEDLINE, Epistemonikos, PROSPERO and the Evidence Update of the Centre of Evidence-Based Dermatology of the University of Nottingham were searched up to 25 February 2021. Our main outcome was the number per year of redundant NMAs and the extent of their overlap. We also described their features, especially, the confidence in the results of the reviews, the studies' funding and the presence of spin (a description that overstates efficacy and/or understates harm), reporting issues and methodological characteristics. RESULTS In total, 47 redundant NMAs were included. Only 2/47 (4%) included all available treatments. Both efficacy and safety were evaluated in 14/47 (30%) NMAs and both short and long-term evaluations were assessed in 5/47 (11 %). Confidence in the results was critically low for 39/47 (83%) NMAs and only 10/47 (23 %) registered a protocol. 26/47 NMAs (55%) received pharmaceutical funding. CROs were involved in 19/47 (40%) NMAs. Reporting was poor across most of the NMAs' abstracts and spin was present in all of the abstracts. Almost half of the NMA failed to consider important limitations such as heterogeneity (32%) or consistency (66%). DISCUSSION In addition to a duplication of efforts, our overview showed heterogeneous methods and poor confidence in the results in a majority of the included NMAs, further distorted by reporting issues and spin. Clinicians need to interpret NMAs with caution when looking for the most reliable and comprehensive evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Guelimi
- EpiDermE EA 7379, Université Paris Est Créteil, F-94010, Créteil, France
| | - S Afach
- EpiDermE EA 7379, Université Paris Est Créteil, F-94010, Créteil, France
| | - J-P Régnaux
- EpiDermE EA 7379, Université Paris Est Créteil, F-94010, Créteil, France.,Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Santé Publique (EHESP), F-35000, Rennes, France
| | - T Bettuzzi
- EpiDermE EA 7379, Université Paris Est Créteil, F-94010, Créteil, France.,Department of Dermatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor Hospital, F-94010, Créteil, France
| | - G Chaby
- Dermatology Department, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital Center, Amiens, F-80000, France
| | - E Sbidian
- EpiDermE EA 7379, Université Paris Est Créteil, F-94010, Créteil, France.,Department of Dermatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor Hospital, F-94010, Créteil, France
| | - F Naudet
- CHU Rennes, INSERM CIC 1414 (Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Rennes), University Rennes, Rennes, F-35000, France
| | - L Le Cleach
- EpiDermE EA 7379, Université Paris Est Créteil, F-94010, Créteil, France.,Department of Dermatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor Hospital, F-94010, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Oliveira MDFP, Rocha BDO, Duarte GV. PASI 100 response to secukinumab in primary failure to ustekinumab: analysis of cost-effectiveness among biological drugs. Int J Dermatol 2021; 60:1165-1167. [PMID: 33934333 DOI: 10.1111/ijd.15493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria de Fátima P de Oliveira
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Complex Prof. Edgard Santos, The Federal University of Bahia (C-HUPES/UFBa), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Bruno de O Rocha
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Complex Prof. Edgard Santos, The Federal University of Bahia (C-HUPES/UFBa), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.,Aristides Maltêz Hospital, The Bahia's League Against Cancer (HAM-LBCC), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.,The Holy Family Hospital, Sister Dulce Social Works (HSF-OSID), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.,Integrated Center for Education and Health (CIES) -UniFTC, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Gleison V Duarte
- Instituto Bahiano de Imunoterapia (IBIS), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee TY, Kuo S, Yang CY, Ou HT. Cost-effectiveness of long-acting insulin analogues vs intermediate/long-acting human insulin for type 1 diabetes: A population-based cohort followed over 10 years. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 86:852-860. [PMID: 31782975 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Revised: 11/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of long-acting insulin analogues (LAIAs) vs intermediate/long-acting human insulin (ILAHI) for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in real-world clinical practice. METHODS Individual-level analyses were conducted within a longitudinal population-based cohort of 540 propensity score-matched T1D patients (LAIAs, n = 270; ILAHI, n = 270) with over 10 years of follow-up using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, 2004-2013, from third-party payer and healthcare sector perspectives. The study outcomes included the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one case of clinical events (eg, hypoglycaemia, diabetes-related complications), medical costs, and cost per case of events prevented. Cost estimates are presented in 2013 British pounds (GBP, £). RESULTS The NNTs using LAIAs vs ILAHI to avoid one case of hypoglycaemia requiring medical assistance, outpatient hypoglycaemia and any diabetes-related complications were 12, 9 and 10 for mean follow-up periods of 5.84, 6.02 and 3.62 years, respectively. From third-party payer and healthcare sector perspectives, using LAIAs instead of ILAHI saved GBP6924-GBP7116 per case of hypoglycaemia requiring medical assistance prevented, GBP5346-GBP5508 per case of outpatient hypoglycaemia prevented, and GBP3570-GBP3680 per case of any diabetes-related complications prevented. Sensitivity analyses considering sampling uncertainty showed that using LAIAs over ILAHI yields at least a 76% probability of cost-saving for avoiding one case of hypoglycaemia requiring medical assistance, outpatient hypoglycaemia or any diabetes-related complications. CONCLUSIONS This real-world evidence reveals that compared with ILAHI, the greater pharmaceutical costs associated with LAIAs for patients with T1D could be substantially offset by savings from averted hypoglycaemia or diabetes-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung-Ying Lee
- School of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Shihchen Kuo
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Chen-Yi Yang
- School of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Huang-Tz Ou
- School of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ueno F, Doi M, Kawai Y, Ukawa N, Cammarota J, Betts KA. Number needed to treat and cost per remitter for biologic treatments of Crohn's disease in Japan. J Med Econ 2020; 23:80-85. [PMID: 31294641 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1642900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Aims: Adalimumab, infliximab, and ustekinumab have been approved for patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease in Japan. This study compared the relative efficacy and cost-effectiveness of adalimumab, infliximab, and ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease based on data from randomized controlled trials.Methods: Data were extracted from four phase 3 clinical trials: CHARM, NCT00445432, ACCENT I, and IM-UNITI. A network meta-analysis (NMA) compared 1-year clinical remission rates in patients who responded to treatment during an induction phase. Remission was defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score <150. The number needed to treat (NNT) was defined as the inverse of the risk reduction (compared with placebo) estimated from the NMA among initial responders. Cost per incremental remitter was calculated based on the projected per patient drug cost (2018 Japanese Yen [¥]) and the NNT.Results: Among initial responders, the remission rates were 45.2%, 31.9%, 27.4%, 24.1%, and 15.6% for adalimumab 40 mg every other week (EOW), infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks, ustekinumab 90 mg every 8 weeks, ustekinumab 90 mg every 12 weeks, and placebo, respectively. The NNT was the lowest for adalimumab 40 mg EOW. Compared with adalimumab, the incremental cost per remitter was numerically higher for infliximab (¥5,375,470) and statistically higher for ustekinumab 90 mg every 8 weeks and ustekinumab 90 mg every 12 weeks (¥42,788,597 and ¥41,495,543, respectively).Limitations: Indirect comparisons are limited by the availability of suitable clinical evidence and there may be residual heterogeneity that could not be adjusted for.Conclusion: Adalimumab was associated with a numerically lower cost per remitter compared with infliximab and a statistically lower cost per remitter compared with ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumiaki Ueno
- Center for Gastroenterology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bolt T, Kobayashi H, Mahlich J. Patient and Physician Preferences for Therapy Characteristics for Psoriasis: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Japan. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2019; 3:255-264. [PMID: 30377992 PMCID: PMC6533353 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-018-0104-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With progress being made in the treatment of psoriasis, a variety of clinical research and treatment options are being pursued. This study used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to estimate treatment characteristic preferences for both patients and physicians in Japan. Subgroup analysis was also applied in order to examine differences within the range of patients and within the range of physicians. METHODS The DCE was developed with the input of clinical experts in the treatment of psoriasis to ensure inclusion of the most relevant attributes at appropriate levels in a way that is understandable to both physicians and patients. The study was conducted on parallel samples of Japanese physicians (n = 161) and Japanese psoriasis patients (n = 306) through an online panel. For each sample, a conditional logit statistical model and subgroup analysis were then performed to estimate respondent preferences for treatment attributes. RESULTS The overall findings are that better treatment efficacy as measured by proportion of patients achieving 90% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 90), lower risk of adverse events and the availability of a bio-holiday are important decision factors for both patients and physicians. Low injection frequency is less of a priority for both samples. Also, while both groups demonstrate a preference to receive the treatment injections at a clinic by a healthcare professional rather than self-injection at home, this is more pronounced for the patient sample. The physician sample shows considerably more emphasis on the type of injection, though both samples prefer subcutaneous injections to intravenous injections. IMPLICATIONS This study reveals the importance of addressing both clinical effectiveness and process factors in systemic, non-topical psoriasis treatments to gain acceptance by both physicians and patients. As well as efficacy (as measured by PASI 90), which remains a consistent priority in treatment, administration and development of new treatments should also consider process factors such as the mode of administration and possibility for a bio-holiday.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Bolt
- Faculty of Economics, Saitama University, Saitama, Japan.
| | | | - Jörg Mahlich
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Janssen, Neuss, Germany
- Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Igarashi A, Igarashi A, Graham CN, Gilloteau I, Tani Y. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of secukinumab in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a Japanese perspective. J Med Econ 2018; 22:1-9. [PMID: 30289010 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1532905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Revised: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 09/30/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of secukinumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, compared to other clinically used biologics (adalimumab, infliximab, and ustekinumab) in Japan for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis from the healthcare system (total costs) and patient co-payment (using different frequencies of drug purchase) perspectives. METHODS A decision-tree (first year)/Markov model (subsequent years), with an annual cycle, was developed. The model adopted a 5-year time horizon. Efficacy inputs were obtained from a mixed-treatment comparison analysis, and other model inputs were collected from published literature and local Japanese sources. Model outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of cost per QALY gained. The annual discounting rate of 2% was applied to both costs and outcomes. RESULTS Results for the healthcare system perspective showed that secukinumab had the highest number of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (4.07) vs other biologics, dominated ustekinumab and infliximab, and the ICER of secukinumab compared to adalimumab was ¥8,418,222/QALY gained. In the patient co-payment perspective with the monthly purchase of drugs, ustekinumab had the lowest co-payment cost, followed by infliximab, adalimumab, and secukinumab. In the patient co-payment perspective with a once every 3 months purchase of secukinumab and adalimumab, the co-payment costs of secukinumab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab became comparable, and infliximab had the highest co-payment cost. LIMITATIONS Only short-term efficacy data was modeled, as there was a lack of data on long-term outcomes. Treatment sequencing was restricted to first-line biologic treatment. Drop-out rates for comparators were assumed to be equivalent to secukinumab in the absence of available data. CONCLUSIONS Secukinumab is a cost-efficient treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis, providing greater health outcomes to patients at lower total costs compared to infliximab and ustekinumab, as well as comparable patient co-payment relative to other biologic treatments.
Collapse
|
8
|
Sruamsiri R, Iwasaki K, Tang W, Mahlich J. Persistence rates and medical costs of biological therapies for psoriasis treatment in Japan: a real-world data study using a claims database. BMC DERMATOLOGY 2018; 18:5. [PMID: 29996929 PMCID: PMC6042444 DOI: 10.1186/s12895-018-0074-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2017] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background Biological therapies (BTs) including infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADL), secukinumab (SCK) and ustekinumab (UST) are approved in Japan for the treatment of psoriasis. Although the persistence rates and medical costs of BTs treatment have been investigated in multiple foreign studies in recent years, few such studies have been conducted in Japan and the differences between patients who adhered to treatment and those who did not have not been reported. This study is aimed at investigating the persistence rates and medical costs of BTs in the treatment of psoriasis in Japan, using the real-world data from a large-scale claims database. Methods Claims data from the JMDC database (August 2009 to December 2016) were used for this analysis. Patient data were extracted using the ICD10 code for psoriasis and claims records of BT injections. Twelve-month and 24-month persistence rates of BTs were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology, and 12-month-medical costs before and after BT initiation were compared between persistent and non-persistent patient groups at 12 months. Results A total of 205 psoriasis patients treated with BTs (BT-naïve patients: 177) were identified. The 12-month/24-month persistence rates for ADL, IFX, SCK, and UST in BT-naïve patients were 46.8% ± 16.6%/46.8 ± 16.6%, 53.0% ± 14.9%/41.0% ± 15.5%, 55.4%/55.4% (95% CI not available) and 79.4% ± 9.9%/71.9% ± 12.2%, respectively. Statistically significant differences in persistence were found among different BT treatments, and UST was found to have the highest persistence rate. The total medical costs during the 12 months after BT initiation in BT-naïve patients were (in 1000 Japanese Yen): 2218 for ADL, 3409 for IFX, 465 for SCK, 2824 for UST (average: 2828). Compared with the 12-month persistent patient group, the total medical costs in the persistent group was higher (Δ:+ 118), but for some medications such as IFX or UST cost increases were lower for persistent patients. Conclusions UST was found to have the highest persistence rate among all BTs for psoriasis treatment in Japan. The 12-month medical costs after BT initiation in the persistent patient group may not have increased as much as in the non-persistent patient group for some medications. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12895-018-0074-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosarin Sruamsiri
- Health Economics, Janssen Pharmaceutical KK, 5-2, Nishi-kanda 3-chome Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-0065, Japan.,Center of Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
| | | | | | - Jörg Mahlich
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Johnson & Johnson Platz 1, Neuss, 41470, Germany. .,Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE), University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kromer C, Celis D, Sonntag D, Peitsch WK. Biologicals and small molecules in psoriasis: A systematic review of economic evaluations. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0189765. [PMID: 29298315 PMCID: PMC5751984 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Biological therapy for moderate-to-severe psoriasis is highly effective but cost-intensive. This systematic review aimed at analyzing evidence on the cost-effectiveness of biological treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. A literature search was conducted until 30/06/2017 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and EconLit. The quality of identified studies was assessed with the checklist by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidance. Out of 482 records, 53 publications were eligible for inclusion. Half of the studies met between 20 and 25 of the quality checklist items, displaying moderate quality. Due to heterogeneity of studies, a qualitative synthesis was conducted. Cost ranges per outcome were enormous across different studies due to diversity in assumptions and model design. Pairwise comparisons of biologicals revealed conflicting results. Overall, adalimumab appeared to be most cost-effective (100% of all aggregated pairwise comparisons), followed by ustekinumab (66.7%), and infliximab (60%). However, in study conclusions most recent publications favored secukinumab and apremilast (75% and 60% of the studies investigating these medications). Accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds varied between 30,000 and 50,000 USD/Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY). Three-quarters of studies were financially supported, and in 90% of those, results were consistent with the funder's interest. Economic evaluation of biologicals is crucial for responsible allocation of health care resources. In addition to summarizing the actual evidence this review highlights gaps and needs for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Kromer
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen University, Göttingen, Germany
- Mannheim Institute of Public Health, Social and Preventive Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Daniel Celis
- Faculty of Economic Sciences, Göttingen University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Diana Sonntag
- Mannheim Institute of Public Health, Social and Preventive Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Health Science, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom
| | - Wiebke K. Peitsch
- Department of Dermatology and Phlebology, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|