Successful therapy of plaque-type psoriasis with secukinumab in patients with multiple comorbidities treated with previous biologic therapies

Biological Therapy for Psoriasis in Cancer Patients: An 8-Year Retrospective Real-Life Study

Background: It is now recognized that psoriasis plays a key role in the development of several comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome. Some authors have hypothesized that patients with psoriasis may have an increased risk of developing certain types of cancer. The efficacy and safety of biologic drugs are well-documented in clinical trials and in real-life studies. However, there is limited evidence on the safety of the use of biologic treatments in cancer patients with psoriasis, and the use of this therapeutic class in patients with a pre-existing or concomitant malignancy is still debated. Methods: We have conducted a retrospective observational study of a group of oncology patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with biologic therapy at the Dermatology Clinic of the University of Naples Federico II, during the period from 2016 to 2024. We included 20 adult patients; in 15 of them the diagnosis of neoplasm preceded the start of treatment biologic, while four of these patients had been diagnosed with cancer during the course of therapy biologics. Results: The most represented neoplasms in our population were breast carcinoma, prostate carcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, and chronic lymphatic leukemia. Anti-IL17 drugs were the most frequently prescribed (47.7%), followed by anti-IL23p19 (36.8%), anti-IL-12/23 (10.5%) and anti-TNF alpha (5.26%). All patients showed improvement of psoriasis after starting the therapy. Conclusions: Our experience supports the effectiveness and safety of biological therapy for psoriasis in patients with a history of cancer or recent onset neoplasia.

Biologic treatment of psoriasis in oncologic patients

INTRODUCTION

There is a complex interplay between psoriasis and cancer, with therapeutic implications. Patients with psoriasis have an increased risk of developing several types of cancer, and safety concerns have arisen regarding biologic therapies and cancer. On the other hand, biologics can provide adequate control of psoriasis that appears or worsens as an immune-related adverse event following immune enhancing checkpoint inhibitor therapy for cancer, thus allowing prosecution of oncologic treatment without impairing its efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis under biological treatment and cancer who were treated at our Department between January 2009 and June 2022.

RESULTS

We included 31 adult patients with psoriasis and cancer; in 16 the diagnosis of cancer preceded the inception of biological treatment, and 9 of those patients were in remission. Most malignancies arose in the genitourinary system, followed by breast, hematologic, colorectal, thyroid, and others. Anti-IL23p19 biologics were most frequently used (36%), followed by anti-TNF (32%), anti-IL-17 (16%) and anti-IL-12/23 (16%) agents. All patients showed improvement of psoriasis after biologic initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Biologic treatment for moderate-severe psoriasis should be considered in oncologic patients since it is not formally contraindicated and is safe. Moreover, the efficacy and safety profile of IL-23 and IL-17 inhibitors may be advantageous for those patients.

Biologic treatment for psoriasis in cancer patients: should they still be considered forbidden?

Available evidence to guide clinicians in the management of psoriasis patients with a history of malignancies is scarce. The latest generation of biological drugs is traditionally considered to be safe in patients with previous malignancy, although only case reports and short case series on the use of biological drugs in this population are available in the literature. In this paper, we present the experience of our clinic on 37 psoriatic patients with a previous diagnosis of neoplasia treated subsequently with biological drugs. Subsequently, a systematic review of the literature was performed and 38 cases were found. The main biologic used in our patients and the patients described in the literature was secukinumab. In both populations treatment with biologics was safe, disease progressions reported were not related to treatment. Based on our experience, which is the largest currently available, and the cases reported in the literature the treatment of psoriasis in patients with previously diagnosed cancer with biologics against TNFalpha, IL17, IL23, and IL12 would appear to be safe. The first experience on the use of Risankizumab and brodalumab on this special population is also reported in our series.

Hepatitis Virus Reactivation in Patients with Psoriasis Treated with Secukinumab in a Real-World Setting of Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C Infection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Biologics for psoriasis, especially anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapies, may reactivate hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, as well in inactive carriers or patients with occult infection. However, some biologics, including anti-interleukin-17 therapies such as secukinumab, seem to be less likely to cause hepatitis reactivation. This study assessed the safety of secukinumab treatment in patients with psoriasis with HBV or HBC infection.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with secukinumab at seven Italian centers. Patients serologically positive for one or more of the following viral hepatitis markers were included: HCV antibody (± HCV-RNA positivity) and/or hepatitis B surface antigen, and/or HBV core antibody and/or HBV surface antibody (± HBV-DNA positivity). Patients received secukinumab 300 mg subcutaneously at week 0/1/2/3/4 then every 4 weeks; prophylactic therapy before starting secukinumab was prescribed where indicated. The primary study endpoint was the reactivation of hepatitis viral infection, defined as conversion to HBV-DNA or HCV-RNA positivity, with or without elevation of transaminases.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (17 with concomitant psoriatic arthritis) were included. Thirteen subjects were hepatitis B surface antigen positive, 19 were HBV core antibody positive, and 30 were positive for the HCV antibody; however, all were HCV-RNA negative. After 53.5 ± 37.5 weeks of secukinumab therapy, hepatitis reactivation occurred in only one patient, who had a reactivation of both hepatitis B and hepatitis C. This patient had not undergone hepatitis B prophylaxis or hepatitis C treatment before secukinumab.

CONCLUSIONS

These real-world data support the safety of secukinumab in patients with positive markers of HBV or HCV infection, when administered together with dedicated prophylaxis.

TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab for the treatment of psoriasis: therapeutic utility in the era of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory condition for which eleven FDA-approved biologic therapies are approved. Over the past decade, studies have documented the higher efficacy of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors for the treatment of psoriasis compared to the TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab, an IL-12/23 inhibitor. Despite this, there remains an important role for the use of TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab in the treatment of psoriasis. Here, we review how considerations of infection and malignancy risk, patient demographics, treatment resistance, and co-morbidities may make certain TNF-alpha inhibitors or ustekinumab an excellent choice for therapy in particular patient subgroups.

Practical update of the Recommendations Published by the Psoriasis Group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (GPS) on the Treatment of Psoriasis with Biologic Therapy. Part 1. Concepts and General Management of Psoriasis with Biologic Therapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A new, updated AEDV Psoriasis Group consensus document on the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis was needed owing to the approval, in recent years, of a large number of new drugs and changes in the treatment paradigm.

METHODOLOGY

The consensus document was developed using the nominal group technique and a scoping review. First, a designated coordinator selected a group of Psoriasis Group members for the panel. The coordinator defined the objectives and key points for the document and, with the help of a documentalist, conducted a scoping review of articles in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to January 2021. The review included systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical trials not included in those studies and high-quality real-world studies. National and international clinical practice guidelines and consensus documents on the management of moderate to severe psoriasis were also reviewed. Based on these reviews, the coordinator drew up a set of proposed recommendations, which were then discussed and modified in a nominal group meeting. After several review processes, including external review by other GPs members, the final document was drafted.

RESULTS

The present guidelines include general principles for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis and also define treatment goals and criteria for the indication of biologic therapy and the selection of initial and subsequent therapies. Practical issues, such as treatment failure and maintenance of response, are also addressed.

A real-world economic analysis of biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Italy: results of the CANOVA observational longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease which can also involve joints. It is often associated with burdensome comorbidities which negatively impact prognosis and quality of life (QoL). Biologic agents have been shown to be effective in controlling disease progression, but their use is associated with higher costs compared with traditional systemic treatments. The economic analysis of the CANOVA (EffeCtiveness of biologic treAtmeNts for plaque psOriasis in Italy: an obserVAtional longitudinal study of real-life clinical practice) study aims to assess the costs and cost-effectiveness of biologics in a real-world context in Italy.

METHODS

The annualised overall direct costs of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis management, the annualised cost of biologic drugs and the cost per responder in the Italian National Health System perspective were assessed. More specifically, the cost per response and cost per sustained response of the most prescribed biologic therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis within the CANOVA study were assessed using the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) at several score levels (75, 90 and 100%).

RESULTS

The most frequently used biologic therapies for plaque psoriasis were secukinumab, ustekinumab, adalimumab originator, and ixekizumab. Cost of biologics was the driver of expenditure, accounting for about 98% of total costs. Adalimumab originator was the biologic with the lowest cost per responder ratio (range: €7848 - €31,378), followed by secukinumab (range: €9015 - €33,419). Ustekinumab (range: €11,689 - €39,280) and ixekizumab (range: €11,092 - €34,289) ranked respectively third and fourth, in terms of cost-effectiveness ratio. As concerns the cost per sustained response analysis, secukinumab showed the lowest value observed (€21,375) over the other options, because of its high response rate (86% vs. 60-80%), which was achieved early in time.

CONCLUSION

Biologic therapy is a valuable asset for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Concomitant assessment of treatment costs against the expected therapeutic response over time can provide physicians and payers additional insights which can complement the traditional risk-benefit profile assessment and drive treatment decisions.

IL-17A inhibitors in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and history of malignancy: A case series with systematic literature review

The treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in patients with history of malignancy is challenging. To review the studies reporting the experience with IL-17A inhibitors in patients with psoriasis and history of malignancy; secondly, to investigate cancer recurrence in a series of patients with a prior malignancy and plaque psoriasis treated with IL-17A inhibitors. A systematic literature review and an observational retrospective analysis of patients with history of malignancy and plaque psoriasis treated with IL-17A inhibitors was performed. About 5 original articles out of 601 were retrieved, reporting a total of 10 patients with a median age of 59 years, interquartile range (IQR) 50-63. Seven patients were treated with secukinumab, one with ixekizumab and two with both sequentially. Although the stage ranged from in situ to IV stage, most of the cases were early-stage neoplasm. The IL-17A inhibitor was initiated after a median of 10 months, interquartile range (IQR) 5-30 (range 0-144) from the diagnosis of malignancy. In addition, a series of 12 patients with history of malignancy were identified from the University Hospital of Verona, including 9 cases with cancer in clinical remission and 3 with advanced disease at time of initiating IL-17 inhibitor. No malignancy recurrence was reported within a median of 12 (IQR 6-23) and 46 (IQR 36-48) months follow up in case series from literature and our experience, respectively. Data on use of IL-17A inhibitors in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and history of malignancy are limited. Registries and proactive pharmacovigilance activities are needed to guide clinical practice.