Qualitative analysis and reproducibility assessment of the Scalp Itch Numeric Rating Scale among patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis of the scalp

A New Paradigm in the Management of Scalp Pruritus: Findings From the SCALP-PR Trial

PURPOSE

The "Impact of scalp pruritus in dermatological consultations in Spain: The SCALP-PR trial" was initiated to address the common yet often insufficiently examined issue of scalp pruritus in dermatology. This condition leads to an uncontrollable urge to scratch, affecting the patients' quality of life and potentially causing scalp damage. This study aimed to explore the prevalence, patient profile, underlying conditions, and therapeutic approaches for scalp pruritus in Spain, and to assess the safety and efficacy profile, as well as the tolerability of a non-pharmacologic treatment.

METHODS

From 2021 through 2022, 75 dermatologists enrolled a total of 359 patients in a study on scalp pruritus, approved by the Bellvitge University Hospital Research Ethics Committee, Barcelona, Spain. This evidence-based research combined a meta-analysis with observational study techniques focused on real-world evidence to examine the therapeutic impact on quality of life (QoL). Utilizing the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) for QoL assessments, the study evaluated the effectiveness of the topical product over 15 days. Data collection was conducted via an eCRF and analyzed with statistical methods to provide reliable insights into the management of scalp pruritus.

RESULTS

The prevalence of scalp pruritus in Spain was found to be 6.9%, predominantly among women with a mean age of 52.5 years. The leading causes identified were seborrheic dermatitis and pruritus of undetermined etiology or sensitive scalp. Stress was noted as a key factor, with corticosteroids and hygienic measures being common therapies. The topical product demonstrated significant reductions in pruritus and scratching in more than 90% of patients after 15 days. Improvements were also seen in dermatological quality of life, with 87.1% of patients showing enhancements in DLQI scores. The product was well-received thanks to its cosmetic properties, with high ratings in texture, ease of application, and fragrance.

CONCLUSION

The topical product studied is a safe, effective, and cosmetically appealing treatment, improving scalp pruritus in various etiologies for most patients. The results highlight the need for patient-center treatments in dermatology, providing important insights for clinical practice and future research.

A New Paradigm in the Management of Scalp Pruritus: Findings From the SCALP-PR Trial

PURPOSE

The "Impact of scalp pruritus in dermatological consultations in Spain: The SCALP-PR trial" was initiated to address the common yet often insufficiently examined issue of scalp pruritus in dermatology. This condition leads to an uncontrollable urge to scratch, affecting the patients' quality of life and potentially causing scalp damage. This study aimed to explore the prevalence, patient profile, underlying conditions, and therapeutic approaches for scalp pruritus in Spain, and to assess the safety and efficacy profile, as well as the tolerability of a non-pharmacologic treatment.

METHODS

From 2021 through 2022, 75 dermatologists enrolled a total of 359 patients in a study on scalp pruritus, approved by the Bellvitge University Hospital Research Ethics Committee, Barcelona, Spain. This evidence-based research combined a meta-analysis with observational study techniques focused on real-world evidence to examine the therapeutic impact on quality of life (QoL). Utilizing the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) for QoL assessments, the study evaluated the effectiveness of the topical product over 15 days. Data collection was conducted via an eCRF and analyzed with statistical methods to provide reliable insights into the management of scalp pruritus.

RESULTS

The prevalence of scalp pruritus in Spain was found to be 6.9%, predominantly among women with a mean age of 52.5 years. The leading causes identified were seborrheic dermatitis and pruritus of undetermined etiology or sensitive scalp. Stress was noted as a key factor, with corticosteroids and hygienic measures being common therapies. The topical product demonstrated significant reductions in pruritus and scratching in more than 90% of patients after 15 days. Improvements were also seen in dermatological quality of life, with 87.1% of patients showing enhancements in DLQI scores. The product was well-received thanks to its cosmetic properties, with high ratings in texture, ease of application, and fragrance.

CONCLUSION

The topical product studied is a safe, effective, and cosmetically appealing treatment, improving scalp pruritus in various etiologies for most patients. The results highlight the need for patient-center treatments in dermatology, providing important insights for clinical practice and future research.

Once-daily roflumilast foam 0.3% for scalp and body psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase IIb study

BACKGROUND

Scalp psoriasis affects most patients with psoriasis, but it can be difficult to treat.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily roflumilast foam 0.3% on scalp and body psoriasis.

METHODS

In a phase IIb randomized controlled trial, adults and adolescents aged ≥ 12 years with scalp and body psoriasis were randomized (2 : 1) to roflumilast foam 0.3% or vehicle for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was scalp Investigator Global Assessment (S-IGA) success (score of 'clear' or 'almost clear' plus ≥ 2-grade improvement from baseline) at week 8. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Significantly more roflumilast-treated patients (59.1%) than vehicle-treated patients (11.4%) achieved S-IGA success at week 8 (P < 0.001); differences favoured roflumilast as early as the first postbaseline visit at week 2 (P < 0.001). Significant improvements were also seen for secondary endpoints, including body IGA success, Scalp Itch Numeric Rating Scale and the Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index. The safety of roflumilast was generally similar to vehicle. Patients treated with roflumilast experienced low rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), with few discontinuations due to an AE. Few patients with skin of colour (11%) and few adolescents (0.7%) were included.

CONCLUSIONS

The results support the further development of roflumilast foam for treating scalp and body psoriasis.

Current Utilization of Qualitative Methodologies in Dermatology: A Scoping Review

The focus of this review was to determine how qualitative methods are used in dermatology research and whether published manuscripts meet current standards for qualitative research. A scoping review of manuscripts published in English between January 1, 2016 and September 22, 2021 was conducted. A coding document was developed to collect information on authors, methodology, participants, research theme, and the presence of quality criteria as outlined by the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Manuscripts were included if they described original qualitative research about dermatologic conditions or topics of primary interest to dermatology. An adjacency search yielded 372 manuscripts, and after screening, 134 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies utilized interviews or focus groups, and researchers predominantly selected participants on the basis of disease status, including over 30 common and rare dermatologic conditions. Research themes frequently included patient experience of disease, development of patient-reported outcomes, and descriptions of provider and caregiver experiences. Although most authors explained their analysis and sampling strategy and included empirical data, few referenced qualitative data reporting standards. Missed opportunities for qualitative methods in dermatology include examination of health disparities, exploration of surgical and cosmetic dermatology experiences, and determination of the lived experience of and provider attitudes toward diverse patient populations.