Dosimetry study on Auger electron-emitting nuclear medicine radioisotopes in micrometer and nanometer scales using Geant4-DNA simulation

Validation of the plasmid study to relate DNA damaging effects of radionuclides to those from external beam radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

The biological consequences of absorbed radiation doses are ill-defined for radiopharmaceuticals, unlike for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). A reliable assay that assesses the biological consequences of any radionuclide is much needed. Here, we evaluated the cell-free plasmid DNA assay to determine the relative biological effects of radionuclides such as Auger electron-emitting [67Ga]GaCl3 or [111In]InCl3 compared to EBRT.

METHODS

Supercoiled pBR322 plasmid DNA (1.25 or 5 ng/μL) was incubated with 0.5 or 1 MBq [67Ga]GaCl3 or [111In]InCl3 for up to 73 h or was exposed to EBRT (137Cs; 5 Gy/min; 0-40 Gy). The induction of relaxed and linear plasmid DNA, representing single and double strand breaks, respectively, was assessed by gel electrophoresis. Chelated forms of 67Ga were also investigated using DOTA and THP. Topological conversion rates for supercoiled-to-relaxed (ksrx) or relaxed-to-linear (krlx) DNA were obtained by fitting a kinetic model.

RESULTS

DNA damage increased both with EBRT dose and incubation time for [67Ga]GaCl3 and [111In]InCl3. Damage caused by [67Ga]GaCl3 decreased when chelated. [67Ga]GaCl3 proved more damaging than [111In]InCl3; 1.25 ng/μL DNA incubated with 0.5 MBq [67Ga]GaCl3 for 2 h led to a 70% decrease of intact plasmid DNA as opposed to only a 19% decrease for [111In]InCl3. For both EBRT and radionuclides, conversion rates were slower for 5 ng/μL than 1.25 ng/μL plasmid DNA. DNA damage caused by 1 Gy EBRT was the equivalent to damage caused by 0.5 MBq unchelated [67Ga]GaCl3 and [111In]InCl3 after 2.05 ± 0.36 and 9.3 ± 0.77 h of incubation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This work has highlighted the power of the plasmid DNA assay for a rapid determination of the relative biological effects of radionuclides compared to external beam radiotherapy. It is envisaged this approach will enable the systematic assessment of imaging and therapeutic radionuclides, including Auger electron-emitters, to further inform radiopharmaceutical design and application.

Targeted Auger electron-emitter therapy: Radiochemical approaches for thallium-201 radiopharmaceuticals

INTRODUCTION

Thallium-201 is a radionuclide that has previously been used clinically for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Although in this role it has now been largely replaced by technetium-99 m radiopharmaceuticals, thallium-201 remains attractive in the context of molecular radionuclide therapy for cancer micrometastases or single circulating tumour cells. This is due to its Auger electron (AE) emissions, which are amongst the highest in total energy and number per decay for AE-emitters. Currently, chemical platforms to achieve this potential through developing thallium-201-labelled targeted radiopharmaceuticals are not available. Here, we describe convenient methods to oxidise [201Tl]Tl(I) to chelatable [201Tl]Tl(III) and identify challenges in stable chelation of thallium to support future synthesis of effective [201Tl]-labelled radiopharmaceuticals.

METHODS

A plasmid pBR322 assay was carried out to determine the DNA damaging properties of [201Tl]Tl(III). A range of oxidising agents (ozone, oxygen, hydrogen peroxide, chloramine-T, iodogen, iodobeads, trichloroisocyanuric acid) and conditions (acidity, temperature) were assessed using thin layer chromatography. Chelators EDTA, DTPA and DOTA were investigated for their [201Tl]Tl(III) radiolabelling efficacy and complex stability.

RESULTS

Isolated plasmid studies demonstrated that [201Tl]Tl(III) can induce single and double-stranded DNA breaks. Iodo-beads, iodogen and trichloroisocyanuric acid enabled more than 95% conversion from [201Tl]Tl(I) to [201Tl]Tl(III) under conditions compatible with future biomolecule radiolabelling (mild pH, room temperature and post-oxidation removal of oxidising agent). Although chelation of [201Tl]Tl(III) was possible with EDTA, DTPA and DOTA, only radiolabeled DOTA showed good stability in serum.

CONCLUSIONS

Decay of [201Tl]Tl(III) in proximity to DNA causes DNA damage. Iodobeads provide a simple, mild method to convert thallium-201 from a 1+ to 3+ oxidation state and [201Tl]Tl(III) can be chelated by DOTA with moderate stability. Of the well-established chelators evaluated, DOTA is most promising for future molecular radionuclide therapy using thallium-201; nevertheless, a new generation of chelating agents offering resistance to reduction and dissociation of [201Tl]Tl(III) complexes is required.