1
|
Sioen S, D'Hondt L, Van Houte F, Demuynck R, Bacher K, De Wagter C, Vral A, Vanderstraeten B, Krysko DV, Baeyens A. Peripheral blood lymphocytes differ in DNA damage response after exposure to X-rays with different physical properties. Int J Radiat Biol 2024; 100:236-247. [PMID: 37819795 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2023.2261525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: In radiology, low X-ray energies (<140 keV) are used to obtain an optimal image while in radiotherapy, higher X-ray energies (MeV) are used to eradicate tumor tissue. In radiation research, both these X-ray energies being used to extrapolate in vitro research to clinical practice. However, the energy deposition of X-rays depends on their energy spectrum, which might lead to changes in biological response. Therefore, this study compared the DNA damage response (DDR) in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) exposed to X-rays with varying beam quality, mean photon energy (MPE) and dose rate.Methods: The DDR was evaluated in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) by the ɣ-H2AX foci assay, the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay and an SYTOX-based cell death assay, combined with specific cell death inhibitors. Cell cultures were irradiated with a 220 kV X-ray research cabinet (SARRP, X-Strahl) or a 6 MV X-ray linear accelerator (Elekta Synergy). Three main physical parameters were investigated: beam quality (V), MPE (eV) and dose rate (Gy/min). Additional copper (Cu) filtration caused variation in the MPE (78 keV, 94 keV, 118 keV) at SARRP; dose rates were varied by adjusting tube current for 220 kV X-rays (0.33-3 Gy/min) or water-phantom depth in the 6 MV set-up (3-6 Gy/min).Results: The induction of chromosomal damage and initial (30 min) DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) were significantly higher for 220 kV X-rays compared to 6 MV X-rays, while cell death induction was similar. Specific cell death inhibitors for apoptosis, necroptosis and ferroptosis were not capable of blocking cell death after irradiation using low or high-energy X-rays. Additional Cu filtration increased the MPE, which significantly decreased the amount of chromosomal damage and DSBs. Within the tested ranges no specific effects of dose rate variation were observed.Conclusion: The DDR in PBLs is influenced by the beam quality and MPE. This study reinforces the need for consideration and inclusion of all physical parameters in radiation-related studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Sioen
- Radiobiology group, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Louise D'Hondt
- Radiobiology group, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Fien Van Houte
- Radiobiology group, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Robin Demuynck
- Cell Death Investigation and Therapy Laboratory, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Klaus Bacher
- Medical Physics Group, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Gent, Belgium
| | - Carlos De Wagter
- Medical Physics Group, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Gent, Belgium
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| | - Anne Vral
- Radiobiology group, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Barbara Vanderstraeten
- Medical Physics Group, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Gent, Belgium
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| | - Dmitri V Krysko
- Cell Death Investigation and Therapy Laboratory, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ans Baeyens
- Radiobiology group, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meng QQ, Zhang RF, Zhang ZX, Yang Y, Chai DL, Yuan YY, Ren Y, Dong JC, Dang XH. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE IN VITRO DOSE-RESPONSE CALIBRATION CURVE FOR X-RAY-INDUCED MICRONUCLEI IN HUMAN LYMPHOCYTES. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2022; 198:1338-1345. [PMID: 35961020 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncac170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay has proven to be a reliable technique for biological dosimetry. This study aimed to establish the dose-response curve for X-ray-induced micronucleus. Peripheral blood samples from three healthy donors were irradiated with various doses and scoring criteria by the micronuclei (MN) in binucleated cells. The results showed that the frequency of MN increased with the elevation of radiation dose. CABAS and Dose Estimate software were used to fit the MN and dose into a linear quadratic model, and the results were compared. The linear and quadratic coefficients obtained by the two software were basically the same and were comparable with published curves of similar radiation quality and dose rates by other studies. The dose-response curve established in this study can be used as an alternative method for in vitro dose reconstruction and provides a reliable tool for biological dosimetry in accidental or occupational radiation exposures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian-Qian Meng
- China Institute for Radiation Protection (CIRP), Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
| | - Rui-Feng Zhang
- China Institute for Radiation Protection (CIRP), Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
| | - Zhong-Xin Zhang
- China Institute for Radiation Protection (CIRP), Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
| | - Yi Yang
- China Institute for Radiation Protection (CIRP), Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
| | - Dong-Liang Chai
- China Institute for Radiation Protection (CIRP), Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
| | - Ya-Yi Yuan
- China Institute for Radiation Protection (CIRP), Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
| | - Yue Ren
- China Institute for Radiation Protection (CIRP), Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
| | - Juan-Cong Dong
- China Institute for Radiation Protection (CIRP), Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
| | - Xu-Hong Dang
- China Institute for Radiation Protection (CIRP), Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|