1
|
Ming X, Mao J, Ma N, Chen J, Wang W, Sheng Y, Wu K. Intensity-modulated proton and carbon-ion radiotherapy using a fixed-beam system for locally advanced lung cancer: dosimetric comparison with x-ray radiotherapy and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) evaluation. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:015025. [PMID: 38064747 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad13d1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Objective. To assess the dosimetric consequences and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the organs at risk (OARs) in intensity-modulated particle radiotherapy of proton (IMPT) and carbon-ion (IMCT) using a fixed-beam delivery system when compared with intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) for locally advanced small-cell lung cancer.Approach. The plans were all designed under the same total relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted prescription dose, in which the planning target volume (PTV) of the internal gross target volume(IGTV) and the PTV of the clinical target volume was irradiated with 69.3 Gy (RBE) and 63 Gy (RBE), respectively, using a simultaneously integrated boosting (SIB) technique. NTCPs were estimated for heart, lung, esophagus and spinal cord by Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) and logistic models. Dose escalation was simulated under the desired NTCP values (0.05, 0.10 and 0.50) of the three radiation techniques.Main results. Under the similar target coverage, almost all OARs were significantly better spared (p< 0.05) when using the particle radiotherapy except for D1cc (the dose to 1 cm3of the volume) of the proximal bronchial tree (p> 0.05). At least 57.6% of mean heart dose, 28.8% of mean lung dose and 19.1% of mean esophageal dose were reduced compared with IMRT. The mean NTCP of radiation-induced pneumonitis (RP) in the ipsilateral lung was 0.39 ± 0.33 (0.39 ± 0.31) in IMPT plans and 0.36 ± 0.32 (0.35 ± 0.30) in IMCT plans compared with 0.66 ± 0.30 (0.64 ± 0.28) in IMRT plans by LKB (logistic) models. The target dose could be escalated to 78.3/76.9 Gy (RBE) in IMPT/IMCT plans compared with 61.7 Gy (RBE) in IMRT plans when 0.50 of NTCP in terms of RP in the ipsilateral lung was applied.Significance. This study presents the potential of better control of the side effects and improvement of local control originating from the dosimetric advantage with the application of IMPT and IMCT with the SIB technique for locally advanced lung cancer, even with limited beam directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Ming
- Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingfang Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Ningyi Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Weiwei Wang
- Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Yinxiangzi Sheng
- Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, People's Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Kailiang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gogineni E, Chen H, Istl AC, Johnston FM, Narang A, Deville C. Comparative In Silico Analysis of Ultra-Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Photon Radiotherapy (IMRT) Versus Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) in the Pre-Operative Treatment of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3482. [PMID: 37444592 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While pre-operative radiation did not improve abdominal recurrence-free survival for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) in the randomized STRASS trial, it did reduce rates of local recurrence. However, the risk of toxicity was substantial and the time to surgery was prolonged. A combination of hypofractionation and proton therapy may reduce delays from the initiation of radiation to surgery and limit the dose to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). We conducted a dosimetric comparison of the pre-operative ultra-hypofractionated intensity-modulated photon (IMRT) and proton radiotherapy (IMPT). METHODS Pre-operative IMRT and IMPT plans were generated on 10 RPS patients. The prescription was 25 Gy radiobiological equivalents (GyEs) (radiobiological effective dose of 1.1) to the clinical target volume and 30 GyEs to the margin at risk, all in five fractions. Comparisons were made using student T-tests. RESULTS The following endpoints were significantly lower with IMPT than with IMRT: mean doses to liver, bone, and all genitourinary and gastrointestinal OARs; bowel, kidney, and bone V5-V20; stomach V15; liver V5; maximum doses to stomach, spinal canal, and body; and whole-body integral dose. CONCLUSIONS IMPT maintained target coverage while significantly reducing the dose to adjacent OARs and integral dose compared to IMRT. A prospective trial treating RPS with pre-operative ultra-hypofractionated IMPT at our institution is currently being pursued.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emile Gogineni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Hao Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Alexandra C Istl
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | - Fabian M Johnston
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Amol Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Curtiland Deville
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rust DJ, Kato T, Yoon SS. Treatment for local control of retroperitoneal and pelvis sarcomas: A review of the literature. Surg Oncol 2022; 43:101814. [PMID: 35834940 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Retroperitoneal and pelvis sarcomas are uncommon tumors for which complete surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment. However, achieving complete gross resection with microscopically negative margins is challenging, and local recurrence rates can be high. Patients often succumb to uncontrolled local disease. Radiation therapy offers a potential means for sterilizing microscopic residual disease, although its use continues to be controversial. Chemotherapy alone or in combination with radiation continues to be investigated as an adjunct to surgery, along with immunotherapy and targeted therapies. In this review, we discuss the current management of retroperitoneal and pelvis sarcomas, focusing on studies of surgery and radiation therapy to maximize local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan J Rust
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tomoaki Kato
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sam S Yoon
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hu P, Li X, Liu W, Yan B, Xue X, Yang F, Ford JC, Portelance L, Yang Y. Dosimetry impact of gating latency in cine magnetic resonance image guided breath-hold pancreatic cancer radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [PMID: 35144247 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac53e0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Objective.We investigated dosimetry effect of gating latency in cine magnetic resonance image (cine MRI) guided breath-hold pancreatic cancer radiotherapy.Approach.The gating latency was calculated based on cine MRI obtained from 17 patients who received MRI guided radiotherapy. Because of the cine MRI-related latency, beam overshoot occurs when beam remains on while the tracking target already moves out of the target boundary. The number of beam on/off events was calculated from the cine MRI data. We generated both IMRT and VMAT plans for all 17 patients using 33 Gy prescription, and created motion plans by applying isocenter shift that corresponds to motion-induced tumor displacement. The GTV and PTV coverage and dose to nearby critical structures were compared between the motion and original plan to evaluate the dosimetry change caused by cine MRI latency.Main results.The time ratio of cine MRI imaging latency over the treatment duration is 6.6 ± 3.1%, the mean and median percentage of beam-on events <4 s are 67.0 ± 14.3% and 66.6%. When a gating boundary of 4 mm and a target-out threshold of 5% is used, there is no significant difference for GTV V33Gy between the motion and original plan (p = 0.861 and 0.397 for IMRT and VMAT planning techniques, respectively). However, the PTV V33Gy and stomach Dmax for the motion plans are significantly lower; duodenum V12.5 Gy and V18Gy are significantly higher when compared with the original plans, for both IMRT and VMAT planning techniques.Significance.The cine MRI gating latency can significantly decrease the dose delivered to the PTV, and increase the dose to the nearby critical structures. However, no significant difference is observed for the GTV coverage. The dosimetry impact can be mitigated by implementing additional beam-on control techniques which reduces unnecessary beam on events and/or by using faster cine MRI sequences which reduces the latency period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panpan Hu
- Department of Engineering and Applied Physics, School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyang Li
- Department of Engineering and Applied Physics, School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Bing Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Xudong Xue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China
| | - Fei Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, United States of America
| | - John Chetley Ford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, United States of America
| | - Lorraine Portelance
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, United States of America
| | - Yidong Yang
- Department of Engineering and Applied Physics, School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|