Lack of dose rate modification (0.0049 vs. 0.12 Gy/min) of fission-neutron-induced neoplastic transformation in C3H/10T1/2 cells

Mechanistic basis for nonlinear dose-response relationships for low-dose radiation-induced stochastic effects

The linear nonthreshold (LNT) model plays a central role in low-dose radiation risk assessment for humans. With the LNT model, any radiation exposure is assumed to increase one's risk of cancer. Based on the LNT model, others have predicted tens of thousands of deaths related to environmental exposure to radioactive material from nuclear accidents (e.g., Chernobyl) and fallout from nuclear weapons testing. Here, we introduce a mechanism-based model for low-dose, radiation-induced, stochastic effects (genomic instability, apoptosis, mutations, neoplastic transformation) that leads to a LNT relationship between the risk for neoplastic transformation and dose only in special cases. It is shown that nonlinear dose-response relationships for risk of stochastic effects (problematic nonlethal mutations, neoplastic transformation) should be expected based on known biological mechanisms. Further, for low-dose, low-dose rate, low-LET radiation, large thresholds may exist for cancer induction. We summarize previously published data demonstrating large thresholds for cancer induction. We also provide evidence for low-dose-radiation-induced, protection (assumed via apoptosis) from neoplastic transformation. We speculate based on work of others (Chung 2002) that such protection may also be induced to operate on existing cancer cells and may be amplified by apoptosis-inducing agents such as dietary isothiocyanates.

Neutron carcinogenesis: past, present, and future

An interest in the possible cancer causing ability of neutrons began soon after their discovery. Early use of neutrons from radioactive sources and from cyclotrons led to a need to define risk for such exposures. This need was soon followed by a more tangible need to define risk to the general population of high LET radiation from nuclear fall out and use of the Atomic bomb and possible use of the H-bomb. Neutrons were soon found to be very effective cell killing agents compared to conventional ionizing radiation. However High LET radiation sources and neutrons in particular, come in many different energies and from many types of sources. I will survey the differences between different energy neutrons and conventional types of radiation, particularly with respect to the dose rate of exposures and the influence of repair or lack thereof and more recently the effect of cell cycle distribution on the carcinogenic outcome. I will illustrate these ideas with examples of carcinogenicity studies and mutation studies from my own laboratory and in some cases from the work of others. Lastly I will introduce some possible avenues for molecular studies of neutron effects that might answer such vexing questions as the real risk at very low doses, is repair error free or error prone, do neutrons cause genetic instability for many cell generations after exposure, and others? There remain many questions about the biology of neutron action that require answers if we are to protect the ever increasing number of people exposed to them because of their growing use in medicine, in the military and in commercial industry.

Chromosome aberrations induced in human lymphocytes by U-235 fission neutrons. Part III: Evaluation of the effect of the induced alpha and beta activity on the chromosomal aberration yield

AIM

Further experiments were performed to explain a difference in chromosomal aberration yield found between samples cultivated immediately after fission neutron irradiation and samples which were cultivated with 96 h delay after irradiation.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Human peripheral blood samples were irradiated in mixed fission neutron/gamma field (1800 s) and biological effect assessed in the mean of analysis of unstable chromosome aberrations with a time delay in culturing cells of 12, 24, 48, and 96 h. Additional measurements were performed on irradiated and blank blood samples with the aim to detect any increase in alpha and beta activity after fission neutron irradiation. No difference was found. Results were compared to theoretically calculated values of the alpha and beta activity released from natural radioactive isotopes.

RESULT AND CONCLUSION

As a conclusion it is shown that in our experimental conditions the secondary effects resulting from nuclear transformations of natural or induced radioactive isotopes, recoil reactions and accompanying alpha, beta, and gamma radiation are not the reason for the increase observed in chromosomal aberration yield in blood samples cultured with a time delay of at least 24 hours.

A diversity of responses displayed by a stochastic model of radiation carcinogenesis allowing for cell death

A stochastic model is presented of carcinogenesis induced by irradiation with arbitrary time-dependent dose rate. The key feature of the model is that it allows for radiation-induced cell killing to compete with the process of tumor promotion. Two versions of the model arise when considering target tissues with slow and rapid replacement of damaged cells. These versions show dissimilar shapes of the dose-response curves in the case of short-term exposure. The model provides a natural explanation of the basic experimental findings documented in the radiobiological literature.

Application of the constant exposure time technique to transformation experiments with fission neutrons: failure to demonstrate dose-rate dependence

A direct comparison of the effectiveness of fission neutrons at high (11.0-31.3 cGy/min) or several low dose-rates (0.14-3.2 cGy/min) was carried out under identical conditions. Monolayers of exponentially growing C3H/10T1/2 cells were exposed at 37 degrees C to reactor-produced neutrons (fluence-mean energy En = 0.68 MeV, < or = 5% gamma component, frequency mean linear energy yF = 21 keV/micron, dose mean lineal energy yD = 42 keV/micron in an 8-micron spherical cavity). Survival or transformation induction were studied at five doses from 10.5 to 94 cGy. In low dose-rate irradiations, these doses were protracted over 0.5, 1, 3 or 4.5 h, resulting in 17 different dose-rates. Up to six experiments were performed at each of five exposure times. Concurrently with transformation we studied cell proliferation in control versus cells irradiated at 40 cGy (acute and a 4.5-h protraction) and found no evidence of a shift in the cell cycle distribution among these cells. At a given dose and dose-rate, the effect of dose protraction on survival or transformation was assessed by the dose-rate modifying factor (DRMF), defined as the low:high dose-rate effect ratio at the same dose. Survival or transformation induction curves were nearly linear with initial slopes, respectively, of about 6.5 x 10(-3) or 6.2 x 10(-6) cGy-1. Consistent with dose-response curves, DRMFs were independent of the dose and dose-rate. The mean values of the DRMF with their uncertainties and 99% confidence intervals, based on measurements in individual doses and dose-rates for survival or transformation were, respectively: 1.01 +/- 0.03 (0.92, 1.09) or 0.98 +/- 0.04 (0.83, 1.08) indicating a similar precision in determining DRMF for survival or transformation, and no dose or dose-rate influence on these end points.