Balcer-Kubiczek EK, Harrison GH, Torres BA, McCready WA. Application of the constant exposure time technique to transformation experiments with fission neutrons: failure to demonstrate dose-rate dependence.
Int J Radiat Biol 1994;
65:559-69. [PMID:
7910195 DOI:
10.1080/09553009414550651]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
A direct comparison of the effectiveness of fission neutrons at high (11.0-31.3 cGy/min) or several low dose-rates (0.14-3.2 cGy/min) was carried out under identical conditions. Monolayers of exponentially growing C3H/10T1/2 cells were exposed at 37 degrees C to reactor-produced neutrons (fluence-mean energy En = 0.68 MeV, < or = 5% gamma component, frequency mean linear energy yF = 21 keV/micron, dose mean lineal energy yD = 42 keV/micron in an 8-micron spherical cavity). Survival or transformation induction were studied at five doses from 10.5 to 94 cGy. In low dose-rate irradiations, these doses were protracted over 0.5, 1, 3 or 4.5 h, resulting in 17 different dose-rates. Up to six experiments were performed at each of five exposure times. Concurrently with transformation we studied cell proliferation in control versus cells irradiated at 40 cGy (acute and a 4.5-h protraction) and found no evidence of a shift in the cell cycle distribution among these cells. At a given dose and dose-rate, the effect of dose protraction on survival or transformation was assessed by the dose-rate modifying factor (DRMF), defined as the low:high dose-rate effect ratio at the same dose. Survival or transformation induction curves were nearly linear with initial slopes, respectively, of about 6.5 x 10(-3) or 6.2 x 10(-6) cGy-1. Consistent with dose-response curves, DRMFs were independent of the dose and dose-rate. The mean values of the DRMF with their uncertainties and 99% confidence intervals, based on measurements in individual doses and dose-rates for survival or transformation were, respectively: 1.01 +/- 0.03 (0.92, 1.09) or 0.98 +/- 0.04 (0.83, 1.08) indicating a similar precision in determining DRMF for survival or transformation, and no dose or dose-rate influence on these end points.
Collapse