Sensitivity of neutral filter elution but not PFGE can be modified by non-dsb chromatin damage

Significant correlation of species longevity with DNA double strand break recognition but not with telomere length

The identification of the cellular mechanisms responsible for the wide differences in species lifespan remains one of the major unsolved problems of the biology of aging. We measured the capacity of nuclear protein to recognize DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and telomere length of skin fibroblasts derived from mammalian species that exhibit wide differences in longevity. Our results indicate DNA DSB recognition increases exponentially with longevity. Further, an analysis of the level of Ku80 protein in human, cow, and mouse suggests that Ku levels vary dramatically between species and these levels are strongly correlated with longevity. In contrast mean telomere length appears to decrease with increasing longevity of the species, although not significantly. These findings suggest that an enhanced ability to bind to DNA ends may be important for longevity. A number of possible roles for increased levels of Ku and DNA-PKcs are discussed.

S-phase cell-specific modification by gemcitabine of PFGE-analyzed radiation-induced DNA fragmentation and rejoining

PURPOSE

To assess the cell cycle-dependent influence of gemcitabine on ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breakage (DSB) and rejoining measured by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

WIDR cells (human colon carcinoma) were synchronized by serum starvation/stimulation providing populations with 7% (G1) or 50% S-phase cells, respectively. Following drug treatment (0.5 microg/ml for 2 hours) cells were irradiated (up to 90 Gy) or incubated for repair (up to 6 h after 40 Gy). Cell cycle changes were monitored by flow cytometry, DNA fragmentation was assessed by PFGE as fraction of electrophoretically mobile DNA.

RESULTS

Without drug treatment, irradiated S-phase cells exhibited lower PFGE signals than the G1 cells due to the well known electrophoretic immobility of replicative DNA fragments, but DSB rejoining was not different. Gemcitabine pretreatment increased the apparent initial radiation-induced DNA fragmentation specifically for S-phase cells. This effect was rapidly reversed (1 h) during incubation for repair.

CONCLUSIONS

The data indicate that gemcitabine causes the formation of additional radiation-induced DSB in S-phase cells or destabilizes the replicative structures that otherwise prevent DNA fragment migration during PFGE. The latter would be rapidly restituted superimposing DSB rejoining. This is discussed in relation to the recently proposed role of mismatch repair in gemcitabine radiosensitization.

Migration patterns in pulsed-field electrophoresis of DNA restriction fragments from log-phase mammalian cells after irradiation and incubation for repair

An assay system was developed to detect changes of restriction fragment profiles obtained after pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for DNA from mammalian cells that were irradiated and incubated for repair. DNA was prepared from irradiated log-phase human melanoma cells (MRI 221) after incubation for repair (6 h) and was digested with the rare-cutting restriction enzyme NotI (RE) prior to PFGE separation. DNA-fragment size distributions were compared to the respective PFGE profiles from unirradiated controls. After doses of 5 and 10 Gy (plus a 6-h incubation for repair), the relative amount of DNA retained in the plug during PFGE was increased. For higher doses (30 and 60 Gy), this phenomenon was superimposed by the residual fragmentation (25-30% of the initial breakage of 0.42 dsb/100 Mbp/Gy). Since irradiated cells accumulated in S phase during incubation for repair, a correction for the reduced electrophoretic migration of DNA from S-phase cells was necessary, and a 0.5% increase in DNA retention per 1% S-phase increment was found. However, the % retention for the 5 Gy plus repair sample was significantly higher than for the S-phase adjusted control (p < 0.01). Radiation induced DNA-protein crosslinks cannot account for the observed phenomenon because of the extensive proteolysis in DNA preparation, and also a loss of restriction enzyme recognition sites appear to be an unlikely explanation from simple quantitative considerations. Based on the recent observation of misrejoining during dsb repair, it is proposed that the incorrect joining of DNA ends also causes a more random distribution of replicating DNA in restriction fragments derived from cells in S phase after incubation for repair. This process would necessarily increase the proportion of DNA unable to migrate in PFGE.

Comparison between the alkaline unwinding technique and neutral filter elution using CHO, V79 and EAT cells

Induction and repair of DNA strand breaks were measured in X-irradiated CHO, V79 and EAT cells using either the alkaline unwinding or the neutral filter elution techniques. After irradiation on ice, the cells were incubated at 37 degrees C for various times to allow for repair. The repair curves obtained were quite similar and the fast initial decline was always characterized by a half-time of 6-8 min and the final slow phase by a half-time of about 200 min independently of the technique used. The curves were found to differ only in the relative fraction of damage repaired during the fast or slow phase. From the similarity of the half-times it is concluded that the fast phase recorded by alkaline unwinding reflects the repair of single-strand breaks but also the repair of fast rejoining double-strand breaks. Comparing the known ratio of induced single- and double-strand breaks with the measured ratio of fast and slowly rejoining strand breaks as derived from the kinetics, it can be further concluded that the slow phase measured by alkaline unwinding covers the repair of both slowly rejoining double strand breaks as well as slowly rejoining single strand lesions.

Free radical modes of cytotoxicity of adriamycin and streptonigrin

Free radical modes of cytotoxicity of streptonigrin (STN) and Adriamycin (ADR) in Chinese hamster V79 cells under aerobic conditions were evaluated using 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TP), a low molecular weight stable nitroxide free radical with antioxidant properties and desferrioxamine (DF), a transition metal chelator. In addition, exogenous superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC 1.15.1.1) and catalase (CAT, EC 1.11.1.6), were tested for cytoprotective effects. EPR studies showed that TP reacts with the semiquinones of both ADR and STN and also with O2- radicals generated during aerobic redox cycling of the respective semiquinone radicals. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis studies confirmed that DNA double-strand breaks (dsb) induced by STN in V79 cells were inhibited completely by TP, whereas ADR-induced DNA dsb were not affected by TP. Clonogenic cell survival studies showed that STN-induced cytotoxicity could be inhibited completely by DF or TP. Both agents were ineffective in inhibiting ADR-induced cytotoxicity. SOD and CAT were ineffective in protecting against both STN and ADR cytotoxicity. Our results are consistent with a mechanism requiring the semiquinone radical intermediate of STN for cytotoxicity and minimal free radical involvement in ADR-induced V79 cell cytotoxicity.

Mechanisms of induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks by ionizing radiation: some contradictions

The various aspects of formation and repair of radiation-induced double-strand breaks (DSB) are summarized. Concerning the structure of DSB found in irradiated cells, enzymatic and microdosimetric analysis hints at complex damage of the DNA structure at the position of a DSB. With increasing LET, the DSB damage may be more complex than that induced by low-LET irradiation. Most of the DSB are repaired in the irradiated cell; apparently the kinetics of DSB repair and the fraction of unrejoined DSB determine cell survival or cell death. We do not know the details of the complex machinery of DSB repair; certainly recombination processes are involved, but there are still contradictions between our current knowledge about the mechanisms of recombinational DSB repair and the observed kinetics.