Loss of reirradiation tolerance in the kidney with increasing time after single or fractionated partial tolerance doses

Radiation-induced tissue damage and response

Normal tissue responses to ionizing radiation have been a major subject for study since the discovery of X-rays at the end of the 19th century. Shortly thereafter, time-dose relationships were established for some normal tissue endpoints that led to investigations into how the size of dose per fraction and the quality of radiation affected outcome. The assessment of the radiosensitivity of bone marrow stem cells using colony-forming assays by Till and McCulloch prompted the establishment of in situ clonogenic assays for other tissues that added to the radiobiology toolbox. These clonogenic and functional endpoints enabled mathematical modeling to be performed that elucidated how tissue structure, and in particular turnover time, impacted clinically relevant fractionated radiation schedules. More recently, lineage tracing technology, advanced imaging and single cell sequencing have shed further light on the behavior of cells within stem, and other, cellular compartments, both in homeostasis and after radiation damage. The discovery of heterogeneity within the stem cell compartment and plasticity in response to injury have added new dimensions to the consideration of radiation-induced tissue damage. Clinically, radiobiology of the 20th century garnered wisdom relevant to photon treatments delivered to a fairly wide field at around 2 Gy per fraction, 5 days per week, for 5-7 weeks. Recently, the scope of radiobiology has been extended by advances in technology, imaging and computing, as well as by the use of charged particles. These allow radiation to be delivered more precisely to tumors while minimizing the amount of normal tissue receiving high doses. One result has been an increase in the use of schedules with higher doses per fraction given in a shorter time frame (hypofractionation). We are unable to cover these new technologies in detail in this review, just as we must omit low-dose stochastic effects, and many aspects of dose, dose rate and radiation quality. We argue that structural diversity and plasticity within tissue compartments provides a general context for discussion of most radiation responses, while acknowledging many omissions. © 2020 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Therapeutic application of CCK2R-targeting PP-F11: influence of particle range, activity and peptide amount

BACKGROUND

Targeted radionuclide therapy with high-energy beta-emitters is generally considered suboptimal to cure small tumours (<300 mg). Tumour targeting of the CCK2 receptor-binding minigastrin analogue PP-F11 was determined in a tumour-bearing mouse model at increasing peptide amounts. The optimal therapy was analysed for PP-F11 labelled with (90)Y, (177)Lu or (213)Bi, accounting for the radionuclide specific activities (SAs), the tumour absorbed doses and tumour (radio) biology.

METHODS

Tumour uptake of (111)In-PP-F11 was determined in nude mice bearing CCK2 receptor-transfected A431 xenografts at 1 and 4 h post-injection for escalating peptide masses of 0.03 to 15 nmol/mouse. The absorbed tumour dose was estimated, assuming comparable biodistributions of the (90)Y, (177)Lu or (213)Bi radiolabelled peptides. The linear-quadratic (LQ) model was used to calculate the tumour control probabilities (TCP) as a function of tumour mass and growth.

RESULTS

Practically achievable maximum SAs for PP-F11 labelled with (90)Y and (177)Lu were 400 MBq (90)Y/nmol and 120 MBq(177)Lu/nmol. Both the large elution volume from the 220 MBq (225)Ac generator used and reaction kinetics diminished the maximum achieved (213)Bi SA in practice: 40 MBq (213)Bi/nmol. Tumour uptakes decreased rapidly with increasing peptide amounts, following a logarithmic curve with ED50 = 0.5 nmol. At 0.03 nmol peptide, the (300 mg) tumour dose was 9 Gy after 12 MBq (90)Y-PP-F11, and for (111)In and (177)Lu, this was 1 Gy. A curative dose of 60 Gy could be achieved with a single administration of 111 MBq (90)Y labelled to 0.28 nmol PP-F11 or with 4 × 17 MBq (213)Bi (0.41 nmol) when its α-radiation relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was assumed to be 3.4. Repeated dosing is preferable to avoid complete tumour receptor saturation. Tumours larger than 200 mg are curable with (90)Y-PP-F11; the other radionuclides perform better in smaller tumours. Furthermore, (177)Lu is not optimal for curing fast-growing tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

Receptor saturation, specific radiopharmaceutical activities and absorbed doses in the tumour together favour therapy with the CCK2 receptor-binding peptide PP-F11 labelled with (90)Y, despite its longer β-particle range in tissue, certainly for tumours larger than 300 mg. The predicted TCPs are of theoretical nature and need to be compared with the outcome of targeted radionuclide experiments.

ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs--threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context

This report provides a review of early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs with respect to radiation protection. It was instigated following a recommendation in Publication 103 (ICRP, 2007), and it provides updated estimates of 'practical' threshold doses for tissue injury defined at the level of 1% incidence. Estimates are given for morbidity and mortality endpoints in all organ systems following acute, fractionated, or chronic exposure. The organ systems comprise the haematopoietic, immune, reproductive, circulatory, respiratory, musculoskeletal, endocrine, and nervous systems; the digestive and urinary tracts; the skin; and the eye. Particular attention is paid to circulatory disease and cataracts because of recent evidence of higher incidences of injury than expected after lower doses; hence, threshold doses appear to be lower than previously considered. This is largely because of the increasing incidences with increasing times after exposure. In the context of protection, it is the threshold doses for very long follow-up times that are the most relevant for workers and the public; for example, the atomic bomb survivors with 40-50years of follow-up. Radiotherapy data generally apply for shorter follow-up times because of competing causes of death in cancer patients, and hence the risks of radiation-induced circulatory disease at those earlier times are lower. A variety of biological response modifiers have been used to help reduce late reactions in many tissues. These include antioxidants, radical scavengers, inhibitors of apoptosis, anti-inflammatory drugs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, growth factors, and cytokines. In many cases, these give dose modification factors of 1.1-1.2, and in a few cases 1.5-2, indicating the potential for increasing threshold doses in known exposure cases. In contrast, there are agents that enhance radiation responses, notably other cytotoxic agents such as antimetabolites, alkylating agents, anti-angiogenic drugs, and antibiotics, as well as genetic and comorbidity factors. Most tissues show a sparing effect of dose fractionation, so that total doses for a given endpoint are higher if the dose is fractionated rather than when given as a single dose. However, for reactions manifesting very late after low total doses, particularly for cataracts and circulatory disease, it appears that the rate of dose delivery does not modify the low incidence. This implies that the injury in these cases and at these low dose levels is caused by single-hit irreparable-type events. For these two tissues, a threshold dose of 0.5Gy is proposed herein for practical purposes, irrespective of the rate of dose delivery, and future studies may elucidate this judgement further.

Reirradiation of recurrent canine nasal tumors

Canine nasal tumors are typically treated with radiation therapy but most patients develop local recurrence. Our purpose was to evaluate tumor and normal tissue response to reirradiation in nine dogs. The median dose delivered with the first protocol was 50 Gy (range 44-55 Gy) and the median fraction number was 18 (range 15-20). For the second protocol, the median dose was lower intentionally, median of 36 Gy (range 23-44 Gy), without changing the median fraction number of 18 (range 14-20) to avoid late effects. The median time between protocols was 539 days (range 258-1652 days). Median survival was 927 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 423-1767 days). Median time to progression following the first and second courses was 513 days (95% CI 234-1180 days) and 282 days (95% CI 130-453 days), respectively. These were not significantly different (P=0.086). The qualitative response assessment was better for the first course compared with the second (P=0.018). Severity and timing of skin, mucous membrane, and ocular effects were similar for early side effects between the two courses (P>0.05 for all comparisons). All dogs experienced some late side effects, with two out of nine being classified as severe. These severe effects were blindness in each dog, possibly related to tumor recurrence. Reirradiation of canine nasal tumors resulted in a second clinical remission in eight of nine dogs, although the second response was less complete. Acute and late effects for seven of nine patients were not life threatening, indicating that reirradiation of canine nasal tumors may be a viable treatment option after recurrence.

[Reirradiation of normal tissues: preclinical radiobiological data]

Reirradiation represent an unfrequent particular clinical situation. The risk/benefit ratio assessment must be taken into account, considering both clinical and dosimetric aspects. There is a relatively limited amount of preclinical data available to date and clinicians should cautiously perform reirradiations in selected indications. This review summarizes the experimental data available on reirradiation of normal tissues, the consequences on early and late toxicities as well as the intrinsic limitations of these models.

Preclinical evaluation of erythropoietin administration in a model of radiation-induced kidney dysfunction

PURPOSE

To test whether the clinically available growth factor erythropoietin (EPO) influences radiation-induced normal-tissue damage in a model of kidney dysfunction.

METHODS

Animal experiments were conducted to test the role of EPO administration in a C3H mouse model of unilateral kidney irradiation with 6, 8, and 10 Gy and to assess the effects of 2 different dose levels of EPO. The kidney function was assessed before radiotherapy, as well as 19, 25, 31, and 37 weeks thereafter by means of (99m)Tc-dimercaptosuccinat scans (static scintigraphy).

RESULTS

Concomitant EPO administration significantly increased the degree of radiation-induced kidney dysfunction. A dose of 2,000 IU/kg body weight per injection tended to cause more damage than the lower dose of 500 IU/kg.

CONCLUSION

Administration of growth factors concomitant to radiotherapy might modify the development of kidney dysfunction. Although insulin-like growth factor-1 has previously been shown to protect the kidney, such an effect could not be demonstrated for EPO. The latter agent even increased the development of nephropathy.

The impact on oncology of the interaction of radiation therapy and radiobiology

The quantitative analysis of the cell dose-survival curves, the randomness of cell killing by radiation, the probabilistic basis of the response to irradiation of tumors and normal tissues, the understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying to this response, the rationale for dose-time and fractionation in radiotherapy, the introduction of the concepts of tumor control probability (TCP) and biologically effective dose (BED), the relationships TCP-dose, BED-alpha/beta BED-fraction size and BED-treatment time, the problems associated with the accelerated regeneration of surviving tumor clonogens during the course of fractionated radiotherapy, the new demands of knowledge on oncology and radiation biology derived from heterogeneous dose distributions in conformal radiation therapy programs and the definition of the biological basis of normal tissues tolerance to reirradiation are, probably, the most important contributions of radiobiology to clinical radiotherapy in the last twenty five years. Radiotherapy is today a scientific discipline based on the interplay of mathematics, physics, biology and oncology. The knowledge of the basic concepts of radiobiology is essential for daily radiotherapy practices and for all oncologists. The most efficient use of multimodality treatments in cancer therapy cannot be done without a clear understanding of these principles.

Radiation nephropathy

The pronounced radiosensitivity of renal tissue limits the total radiotherapeutic dose that can be applied safely to treatment volumes that include the kidneys. The incidence of clinical radiation nephropathy has increased with the use of total-body irradiation (TBI) in preparation for bone marrow transplantation and as a consequence of radionuclide therapies. The clinical presentation is azotemia, hypertension, and, disproportionately, severe anemia seen several months to years after irradiation that, if untreated, leads to renal failure. Structural features include mesangiolysis, sclerosis, tubular atrophy, and tubulointerstitial scarring. Similar changes are seen in a variety of experimental animal models. The classic view of radiation nephropathy being inevitable, progressive, and untreatable because of DNA damage-mediated cell loss at division has been replaced by a new paradigm in which radiation-induced injury involves not only direct cell kill but also involves complex and dynamic interactions between glomerular, tubular, and interstitial cells. These serve both as autocrine and as paracrine, if not endocrine, targets of biologic mediators that mediate nephron injury and repair. The renin angiotensin system (RAS) clearly is involved; multiple experimental studies have shown that antagonism of the RAS is beneficial, even when not initiated until weeks after irradiation. Recent findings suggest a similar benefit in clinical radiation nephropathy.

In vitro and in vivo expression of endothelial von Willebrand factor and leukocyte accumulation after fractionated irradiation

Previous investigations have demonstrated an increased release of von Willebrand factor (VWF; also known as vWF) in endothelial cells after high single-dose irradiation in vitro. We have also found increased levels of Vwf protein in mouse glomeruli after a high single dose of renal irradiation in vivo. In addition, increased numbers of leukocytes were observed in the renal cortex after irradiation in vivo. The aim of the present study was to investigate and quantify these biological processes after clinically relevant fractionated irradiation and to relate them to changes in renal function. A significantly greater increase in release of VWF was observed in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) after fractionated irradiation (20 x 1.0 Gy) than after a single dose of 20 Gy (147% compared to 115% of control, respectively, P < 0.0005). In contrast with the in vitro observations, glomerular Vwf staining was lower after fractionated irradiation in vivo (20 x 2.0 Gy or 10 x 1.6 Gy +/- re-irradiation) than after a single dose of 16 Gy. The number of leukocytes accumulating in the renal cortex was also lower after fractionated in vivo irradiation than after a single radiation dose. The onset of these events preceded renal functional and histopathological changes by approximately 10 weeks. These data indicate that radiation-induced changes in endothelial VWF expression after in vivo irradiation may be distinct from the in vitro observations. Increased VWF expression may reflect pivotal processes in the pathogenesis of late radiation nephropathy and provide a clue to appropriate timing of pharmacological intervention.

Tissue tolerance to reirradiation

There are increasing requests for delivering a second course of radiation to patients who develop second primary tumors within or close to previous radiotherapy portal or late in-field recurrences. Rational treatment decisions demand rather precise knowledge on long-term recovery of occult radiation injury in various organs. This article summarizes available experimental and clinical data on the effects of reirradiation to the skin, mucosa, gut, lung, spinal cord, brain, heart, bladder, and kidney. The data reveal that, in general, acutely responding tissues recover radiation injury within a few months and, therefore, can tolerate another full course of radiation. For late toxicity endpoints, however, tissues vary considerably in their capacity to recover from occult radiation damage. The heart, bladder, and kidney do not exhibit long-term recovery at all. In contrast, the skin, mucosa, lung, and spinal cord do recover subclinical injury partially to a magnitude dependent on the organ type, size of the initial dose, and, to a lesser extent, the interval between radiation courses. The available clinical data have inspired many radiation oncologists to undertake systematic studies addressing the efficacy and toxicity of reirradiation in various clinical settings. Hopefully, systematic scoring, collection, and analysis of patient outcome will produce quantitative data useful for clinical practice.

Re-treatment after full-course radiotherapy: is it a viable option?

Re-irradiation of previously treated areas may become necessary for recurrent cancer, new primary tumours (common in head and neck cancer patients), or nodal and metastatic disease. Factors that should be taken into account in the decision to re-treat include: 1) previously treated volume (how much overlap is there with new treatment fields) and dose fractionation schedule; 2) which critical tissues or organs are at risk; 3) how much time has elapsed since first treatment; 4) whether there are any practical alternatives to re-irradiation? Rapidly proliferating tissues generally recover well from the initial radiotherapy and will tolerate re-irradiation to almost full doses. Some slowly proliferating tissues are also capable of partial proliferative and functional recovery, although this takes several months and some residual damage remains. Preclinical data demonstrate that re-irradiation with reduced doses is possible in lung and spinal cord after intervals of 3-6 months. Other slowly proliferating organs, e.g. the kidneys, do not appear to be capable of recovery, even after low, subtolerance doses. The largest clinical experience of re-irradiation is for head and neck cancers. A review of this literature reveals that the most frequent normal tissue complication seen is trismus (lockjaw), which occurs in 16 to 30% of re-treated cases, with lower incidences of soft tissue or bone necrosis and fibrosis. Myelitis is rarely reported, even in the re-treatment situation. In general the highest incidence of local control for the lowest incidence of serious complications is achieved for combinations of external beam and brachytherapy, and for small, well-differentiated, new primary tumours rather than recurrent disease. Re-treatment with total doses < 55 Gy gives very poor local control rates. Re-treatment schedules with curative intent require a high re-treatment dose, which is accompanied by an increased risk of normal tissue damage. To minimize serious complications, re-irradiation schedules require the best possible treatment planning (conformal therapy where possible). Hyperfractionation or a combination of external beam and brachytherapy could also be beneficial.

Outcomes of high-dose unilateral kidney irradiation in patients with gastric lymphoma

PURPOSE

To review the long-term clinical effects of unilateral kidney irradiation on overall renal function and blood pressure in patients with gastric lymphoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In the study were 27 patients with Stage I or II gastric lymphoma who had undergone irradiation of at least 24 Gy to > or = 1/3 of the left kidney. They include 16 women and 11 men, aged 31 to 77, with a mean age of 57.6 years (median 56). Fifteen patients had Stage I and 12 had Stage II disease. In 13 patients the whole kidney had been irradiated, and 14 had had partial kidney irradiation, at doses ranging between 24 and 40.5 Gy. All patients received combined chemotherapy with various drugs: all patients received corticosteroids, and five received cis-platinum. Their follow-up ranged between 0.7 and 7.8 years (mean 3.4 years). Data on possible effects of the treatment on blood pressure, renal function as assessed by blood urea and creatinine, and kidney shrinkage as seen by serial computed tomography scanning were collected on all patients.

RESULTS

Three patients had persistent, mild elevations of urea and creatinine levels, which did not require special treatment. All three also received cis-platinum. Ipsilateral kidney shrinkage was evident in most patients. In 19 patients the craniocaudal measurement of the kidney shrank by > or = 1.6 cm. Shrinkage in other dimensions was also evident. The degree of atrophy was related to the volume of kidney irradiated. Only two patients developed hypertension, both at a low level of 150/90; one patient had had 40 Gy to the whole kidney, the other 40 Gy to half the kidney. Neither patient had elevated urea or creatinine.

CONCLUSIONS

Notwithstanding the shrinkage to the irradiated part of the kidney, the treatment did not lead to clinically significant hypertension or renal dysfunction. The administration of cis-platinum to patients with gastric lymphoma that requires kidney irradiation should be further evaluated.

Reirradiation tolerance of the rat heart

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of reirradiation on the tolerance of the heart after a previous irradiation treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Female Wistar rats were locally irradiated to the thorax. Development of cardiac function loss was studied with the ex vivo working rat heart preparation (20). To compare the retreatment experiments, initial, and reirradiation doses were expressed as the percentage of the extrapolated tolerance dose (ETD) (1).

RESULTS

Local heart irradiation with a single dose led to a dose-dependent and progressive decrease in cardiac function. The progressive nature of irradiation-induced heart disease is shown to affect the outcome of the retreatment, depending on both the time interval between subsequent doses and the size of the initial dose. The present data demonstrate that hearts are capable of repairing a large part of the initial dose of 10 Gy within the first 24 h. However, once biological damage as a result of the first treatment is fixed, the heart does not show any long-term recovery. At intervals up to 6 months between an initial treatment with 10 Gy and subsequent reirradiation, the reirradiation tolerance dose slightly decreased from 74% of the ETDref (at 24-h interval) to 68% of the ETDref (at 6-month interval). Between 6 and 9 months, reirradiation tolerance dose dropped more even to 43% of the ETDref. Treatment of the heart with an initial dose of 17.5 Gy, instead of 10 Gy, 6 months prior to reirradiation, also led to a further decrease of the reirradiation tolerance dose (< 38 vs. 68% of the ETDref).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of the present study shows a decreased tolerance of the heart to reirradiation at long time intervals (interval > 6 months). This has clinical implications for the estimation of reirradiation tolerance in patients whose mediastinum has to be reirradiated a long time after a first irradiation course.

Late renal function following whole abdominal irradiation

Sixty patients treated with whole abdominal radiotherapy who had remained disease-free since completion of treatment participated in a study to assess the late clinical and biochemical effects of bilateral renal irradiation. Minimum follow-up was 5 years with a maximum of 20 years and a median of 9 years. Fifty-two patients in the study group were treated for primary ovarian cancer. Seven had non-Hodgkins lymphoma arising in the gastrointestinal tract and one patient had a carcinoid tumour arising in small bowel. None of the patients received chemotherapy. Abdominal radiation was given using an open beam technique to a mean dose of 22.92 Gy (range 6.68-27.54 Gy) in 1.02 to 1.25 Gy fractions treated once daily. Posterior kidney shields were used in order to limit the renal dose to < 20 Gy. Mean radiation dose to both kidneys (retrospectively calculated) was 19.28 Gy (range 6.68-22.99 Gy). Patients ranged in age from 32-81 years with a median of 61 years. No patient had clinical evidence of renal impairment. Nine patients were hypertensive prior to radiotherapy and a further five patients became hypertensive after treatment. Serum creatinine values ranged from 44-123 mumol/l, with a mean of 87 mumol/l. Creatinine clearance ranged from 0.61-2.38 ml/s (mean 1.28 ml/s). Tubular function tests revealed one borderline high 24-h protein excretion and normal 24-h phosphorous and uric acid. Using a multiple linear regression analysis with creatinine clearance as the endpoint, age was the only significant variable (P < 0.00001) and renal dose and interval from treatment were not independently significant. There was no evidence of late renal toxicity more than 5 years after whole abdominal radiotherapy delivered with this technique and dose/fractionation schedule, and using the clinical and biochemical endpoints assessed in this study.

Renal damage after total body irradiation in a mouse model for bone marrow transplantation: effect of radiation dose rate

Late renal damage after total body irradiation (TBI) and bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is a recently recognised morbidity. We have tested the effect of single fraction TBI given at two different dose rates on late kidney damage in a mouse model. TBI was given at either high dose rate (HDR; 0.71 Gy/min) or low dose rate (LDR; 0.08 Gy/min). Transplantation with syngeneic marrow cells was done 4-6 h after TBI. Kidney damage was tested using 51CrEDTA residual activity, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and percentage haematocrit (Hct). TBI alone given at HDR or LDR caused progressive renal damage with no evidence of recovery or plateau. The time latency before the expression of damage was dependent on both dose and the end point used. It was shorter the higher the dose. 51CrEDTA detected renal damage at the same doses as BUN but earlier in time, while %Hct showed evidence of renal damage at doses lower than both BUN and 51CrEDTA. Using the 51CrEDTA the dose-response curves for renal damage were steep and continuously shifting towards lower doses as follow-up time after treatment increased. There was a sparing effect of reducing the dose rate that was more evident at follow-up times of less than a year than at 66 weeks after TBI. Thus, the dose modifying ratio (DMF), defined as the dose needed to cause renal damage in 50% of irradiated animals (ED50) using LDR divided by the ED50 using HDR, was dependent on the time of evaluation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)