Heterogeneous decomposition of indoor ammonia in a photoreactor with TiO2-finished cotton fabrics

Visible-light-activated photocatalysis of malodorous dimethyl disulphide using nitrogen-enhanced TiO2

This study evaluated the feasibility of applying a visible-light-activated photocatalytic technique to cleanse air dimethyl disulphide (DMDS) at low concentration conditions (0.027-5.4 ppm), by using nitrogen-enhanced TiO2. In addition, the applicability of a backup adsorption unit for the secondary control of DMDS exiting from the photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) unit was investigated. The PCO unit functioned effectively for the control of DMDS at low concentration levels ( < or = 0.027 ppm) for long-time periods (at least 603 h). However, rapid photocatalyst deactivation levels were observed during photocatalytic processes with a higher DMDS input concentration (IC) (2.7 ppm). The photocatalyst reactivated with humidified or dried air, under visible-light irradiation, did not regain all its initial activities. The photocatalytic degradation efficiencies (PDEs) for DMDS were close to 100% for the relative humidity (RH) range of 45-55%, whereas they were between 86% and 91% and between 78% and 82% regarding the RH ranges of 10-20% and 80-90%, respectively. The PDEs via the PCO alone were close to 100% during this time period for the lowest IC conditions (0.027 ppm), whereas they decreased gradually for the other ICs. The FTIR spectra of the photocatalysts, as well as a solid-liquid extraction method, suggested the formation of sulphate groups on the catalyst surface during a photocatalytic process. Methanol was identified as a gaseous by-product. In addition, the backup adsorption unit could be effectively utilized to remove methanol, under a broad indoor pollution level (0.027-5.4 ppm), as well as DMDS exiting from the PCO units.

Nanotechnology safety concerns revisited

Nanotechnology is an emerging science involving manipulation of matter at the nanometer scale. Due to concerns over nanomaterial risks, there has been a dramatic increase in focused safety research. The present review provides a summary of these published findings, identifying areas of agreement and discordance with regard to: (1) the potential for nanomaterial exposure, (2) the relative hazard nanomaterials pose to humans and the environment, and (3) the present deficits in our understanding of risk. Special attention is paid to study design and methodologies, offering valuable insight into the complexities encountered with nanomaterial safety assessment. Recent data highlight the impact of surface characteristics on nanomaterial biocompatibility and point to the inadequacy of the current size-dependent mechanistic paradigms, with nanoscale materials lacking unique or characteristic toxicity profiles. The available data support the ability of the lung, gastrointestinal tract, and skin to act as a significant barrier to the systemic exposure of many nanomaterials. Furthermore, the acute systemic toxicity of many nanomaterials appear to be low. By contrast, the potential pulmonary toxicity of certain nanomaterials, such as carbon nanotubes, is significant, requiring a better understanding of exposure to further evaluate their risk. While these findings arrive at an overall picture of material-specific rather than nanogeneralized risk, any conclusions should clearly be tempered by the fact that nanomaterial safety data are limited. Until such time as the exposures, hazards, and environmental life cycle of nanomaterials have been more clearly defined, cautious development and implementation of nanotechnology is the most prudent course.