Physiotherapist attitudes and practices regarding head-down and modified postural drainage in the presence of heart disease

A modified postural drainage position produces less cardiovascular stress than a head-down position in patients with severe heart disease: A quasi-experimental study

QUESTION

Does a modified postural drainage position (horizontal) produce less cardiovascular and respiratory stress than a head-down postural drainage position (30 degrees) in people with severe heart disease?

DESIGN

A quasi-experimental study.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-one patients (mean age 69 years, SD 13) with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (mean ejection fraction 23%, SD 7) who were stable, receiving regular medication and free of acute respiratory illness.

INTERVENTION

Two manoeuvres were performed--one from long sitting to a modified (horizontal) postural drainage position, and one from long sitting to a head-down (30 degrees) postural drainage position.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Cardiovascular responses examined were blood pressure, sphygmocardiographic indices, and cardiac rhythm. Respiratory responses examined were respiratory rate, transcutaneous arterial oxyyhaemoglobin saturation, and dyspnoea.

RESULTS

Three participants were intolerant to the postural drainage positions--two during head-down and one during modified positioning. The remaining 28 participants maintained their resting cardiac rhythm and did not complain of chest pain or dyspnoea. The changes in cardiovascular responses during the sitting to head-down postural drainage manoeuvre in the tolerant participants were significantly greater (p < 0.05) than the changes during the sitting to the modified postural drainage manoeuvre for most of the sphygmocardiographic indices. In contrast, there were no significant respiratory responses to either postural drainage manoeuvre.

CONCLUSION

Modified positioning is associated with less cardiovascular stress than head-down positioning, yet for most patients with severe heart disease, both positions are generally well tolerated. For a subset of these patients, either position may be inappropriate. This suggests that modified positioning should be attempted first but that a head-down position may be attempted if the modified position proves ineffective.

Cardiovascular responses to short-term head-down positioning in healthy young and older adults

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Isolated head-down postural drainage is assumed to acutely load the cardiovascular system. Consequently, it is considered a relative contraindication in the presence of severe cardiovascular disease. Evidence demonstrating that the head-down manoeuvre as used by physiotherapists does significantly load the cardiovascular system is lacking. The present study documents the cardiovascular responses t short-term 30 degrees head-down positioning in healthy subjects. The results are a point of reference for respiratory patients with and without cardiovascular disease.

METHOD

A quasi-experimental research design was used, with multiple measurements obtained at rest (long sitting and in the head-down position. Twenty-one young subjects (mean age 25 years (standard deviation, (SD) 3 years)) and 19 older subjects (mean age 66 years (SD 6 years)) were studied. Applanation tonometry and sphygmocardiography were used to measure temporal and pressure variables, and indices that estimate myocardial work and coronary blood flow.

RESULTS

Absolute differences existed between the two age groups for all variables at rest (p < 0.001). No age-time interaction was observed for any variable in the head-down position (p > 0.05). Serial measures in the head-down position did not vary across time (p > 0.05). Small (<9%) but significant (p < or = 0.02) decreases in heart rate, relative diastolic duration, mean arterial blood pressure and diastolic time indices, and small (<12%) but significant (p < or = 0.002) increases in cardiac cycle time, ejection duration (relative and absolute) and absolute diastolic duration were observed in the head-down position compared with rest. A small (9%) but significant (p < 0.001) fall in the sub-endocardial viability ratio occurred in the head down position.

CONCLUSION

The findings have little consequence in health, but they suggest that head-down postural drainage may be of concern for chest physiotherapy recipients with reduced cardiac reserve or impaired barorefilex function.