Medically unexplained physical symptoms, misunderstood and wrongly treated? A semiotic perspective on chronic pain

Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease (SEMCD) scale: translation and evaluation of measurement properties for a swedish version

BACKGROUND

Reinforcing self-efficacy in patients is important in person-centered care; therefore, reliable and valid measures of a person's self-efficacy is of clinical relevance. A questionnaire suitable for self-efficacy and patient engagement that is not limited to a particular condition is the Self-efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease (SEMCD). This study aims to evaluate the measurement properties of a Swedish translation of the SEMCD with a Rasch analysis.

METHODS

The translation and cultural adaptation of the SEMCD was performed according to the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) recommendations. Self-reported data was collected from two cohorts: patients with pituitary tumors (n = 86) and patients on sick leave due to common mental disorders (n = 209). Measurement properties were evaluated with a Rasch analysis in RUMM2030.

RESULTS

The original six-item SEMCD did not fit to a unidimensional scale. Two items, item 5 and item 6, deviated both statistically and conceptually and were removed. A four-item solution, the SEMCD-4 with collapsed thresholds for mid-range response options, showed good targeting and unidimensionality, no item misfit, and a reliability of 0.83.

CONCLUSION

In a Swedish context with a mix of patients with pituitary tumors or common mental disorders, SEMCD-4 showed satisfactory measurement properties. Thus, SEMCD-4 could be used to identify patient self-efficacy in long-term illnesses. This knowledge about patient self-efficacy may be of importance to tailor person-centered support based on each patient´s resources, needs and goals.

Experiences of unexplained chest pain and physical activity: A Meta-Ethnography

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim was to examine the experiences of physical activity in the patients with unexplained chest pain.

BACKGROUND

Previous qualitative studies have compiled data on the physical activity experiences of people with unexplained chest pain. Nevertheless, no meta-synthesis exists on this topic to advance the theoretical development of future-related studies.

DESIGN

A meta-ethnographic synthesis of qualitative studies was conducted. Original qualitative studies on the physical activity experiences of people with unexplained chest pain were identified and systematically synthesised using a meta-ethnographic approach.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched for relevant full-text articles in English, Danish, Norwegian and Swedish. There were no limitations concerning year of publication. Articles were first screened against inclusion criteria for eligibility and then assessed for quality and analysed using Noblit and Hare's seven-step meta-ethnography process. The ENTREQ checklist for systematic reviews was used.

RESULTS

Nine qualitative studies were included in the analysis. The physical activity experiences of people with unexplained chest pain illuminates the metaphor: "Physical activity means balancing uncertainty" with four themes: looking for possible explanations, feeling vulnerable, feeling uncertain of consequences and being physically active may mean becoming more capable.

CONCLUSION

For people with unexplained chest pain, being physically active meant moving toward being more capable. The participants felt vulnerable and physical activity helped in balancing uncertainty. A comprehensive model illustrates the antecedents and succedent for the physical activity experiences of individuals with unexplained chest pains.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

An approach to care which considers the patient's experience might be applicable; however, it needs to be accompanied with a biomedical perspective. Nurses and other health professionals need to provide a bridge between the patient's experiences and health professionals' advice and recommendations.

Understanding the diagnoses and medical care experience of patients with new daily persistent headache: a qualitative study in Spain

OBJECTIVE

To explore the experiences of patients suffering from new daily persistent headache (NDPH) regarding the diagnostic process, treatment and medical care.

DESIGN

A qualitative phenomenological study was conducted.

SETTING

A specialised headache unit at two university hospitals in Spain between February 2017 and December 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients diagnosed with NDPH according to the International Classification of Headache disorders (third beta edition).

METHODS

Purposeful sampling was performed. Data were collected using unstructured and semistructured interviews, researchers' field notes and patients' drawings. An inductive thematic analysis was used to identify significant emerging themes from interviews, field notes and descriptions of patients' drawings. Also, Guillemin's proposal was used to analyse the contents of drawings.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients with a mean age of 45.3 were recruited. Four main themes emerged: (1) Seeking a diagnosis, patients visit many doctors without receiving a clear answer and their diagnosis is delayed; (2) Self-medication-minimising pill intake, medication is ineffective, and therefore, some patients discontinue treatment, or are flexible with how they take medication; (3) Trying other non-pharmacological options, many patients turn to other therapies and complementary and/or alternative therapies as a second option, however these are ineffective and (4) Medical care, with two subthemes, referrals and lacking continuity of care, and building the doctor-patient relationship. Patients describe how the referral breaks the continuity of care, and how they identify the traits of a doctor who is approachable and which behaviours the doctor should avoid when caring for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

An in-depth knowledge of the beliefs and expectations of patients with NDPH will allow the professional to establish a relationship of trust, which will improve the patients' knowledge of which therapies are the most appropriate, and to establish expectations based on the relationship with the doctor, and not only on patients' beliefs.