Using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score for assessment of children: Reliability of the Spanish version

Haemophilia joint health score (HJHS) usage, patterns and outcome data in patients with haemophilia A and haemophilia B in Australia: A descriptive study using the Australian Bleeding Disorders Registry (ABDR)

INTRODUCTION

Assessment of joint health is an essential component of haemophilia management. A variety of clinical tools have been developed to standardise this assessment process. One such tool, the Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), is embedded for use within the Australian Bleeding Disorders Registry (ABDR). This provides a unique opportunity to analyse patterns of tool usage as well as associations between scores, demographics and clinical outcome factors.

AIMS

To characterise clinician practices regarding use of HJHS in routine clinical assessment of persons with haemophilia (PWH), to examine relationships between HJHS, and age, inhibitor status and body mass index (BMI), and to identify potential barriers to HJHS tool usage.

METHODS

A national, retrospective study was conducted using data extracted from the ABDR between 2014 and 2020, complemented by a qualitative questionnaire exploring haemophilia treatment centre (HTC) structure, resourcing and clinician perspectives about HJHS.

RESULTS

28.1% (622/2220) of PWH had at least one HJHS recorded in the ABDR during the defined study period (546 haemophilia A, 76 haemophilia B). HJHS were recorded more in children than adults and performed more in severe than non-severe haemophilia. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significant association of age, severity and inhibitor status with HJHS. No association was identified between BMI and HJHS. Qualitative surveys revealed significant variation in physiotherapy funding, availability and methods of tool use between HTCs.

CONCLUSION

This study provides valuable insights into joint health assessment in Australia. It improved our understanding of factors influencing long-term joint outcomes. Practical limitations of HJHS tool were also discussed.

Clinical and ultrasound evaluation of patients with haemophilia on prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Primary prophylaxis is the current gold standard in haemophilia care for the prevention of bleeding and ensuing joint damage. Early detection of joint bleeding, whether symptomatic or subclinical, preferably during childhood, helps prevent joint deterioration and subsequent disability. The aim of this study is to evaluate the level of agreement between the Haemophilia Joint Health Score and the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound tools in children with severe haemophilia on primary and secondary prophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients were followed up regularly at our centre. Elbows, knees and ankles were evaluated by physical examination using the Haemophilia Joint Health Score 2.1 (HJHS 2.1), and by ultrasound with HEAD-US score.

RESULTS

A total of 80 children with haemophilia on prophylaxis were included in this study. Mean age was 10.8 years (range 4-18). We evaluated 480 joints, of which 423 (88.1%) were concordant with both tools, whereas 57 (11.9%) were discordant; 377 (78.5%) joints scored 0 on HJHS, 370 (77%) on HEAD-US and 345 (72%) on both tools. The overall Kappa concordance coefficient was .656. For elbows, knees and ankles the respective values were .783, .522 and .589. For HJHS scores greater than 3, all joints scored ≥1 on HEAD-US.

CONCLUSION

HJHS and HEAD-US are used to assess joint health in children with haemophilia on prophylaxis. In this study, the level of agreement between both tools was consistent with literature values only for the elbow joint.