Cross-cultural validation of a Brazilian version of the adapted manual wheelchair circuit (AMWC-Brazil)

Measurement Properties of Clinical Instruments for Assessing Manual Wheelchair Mobility in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the measurement properties of clinical instruments used to assess manual wheelchair mobility in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

DATA SOURCES

This systematic review was conducted according to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments guidance and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The search was conducted up to December 2021 on MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Biblioteca Regional de Medicina, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health databases without time restriction.

STUDY SELECTION

Peer-reviewed original research articles that examined any clinical wheelchair mobility and/or skill assessment instrument among adults with SCI and reported data on at least one measurement property or described the development procedure were evaluated independently by two reviewers.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were independently extracted according to Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments methodology. Measurement property results from each study were independently rated by two reviewers as sufficient, insufficient, indeterminate, or inconsistent. The evidence for each measurement property was rated as high, moderate, low, or very low (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Recommendations for highly-rated instruments were performed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-nine studies with 21 instruments were identified. The methodological quality of studies ranged from insufficient to sufficient, and the quality of evidence ranged from very low to high. Six instruments reported content validity. Reliability and construct validity were the most studied measurement properties. Structural validity and invariance for cross-cultural measurement were not reported. The highly rated instruments were the Wheelchair Outcome Measure and Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

Although numerous instruments for assessing wheelchair mobility and/or skills among individuals with SCI were identified, not many measurement properties have been sufficiently established. The Wheelchair Outcome Measure and Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire show the current best potential to be recommended for clinical and research use. Further studies are needed to strengthen or change these recommendations.

Handgrip Strength Cutoff Points for Functional Independence and Wheelchair Ability in Men With Spinal Cord Injury

Objectives

To determine optimal handgrip strength (HGS) cutoff points for greater functional independence and wheelchair skills in men with spinal cord injury (SCI), and to establish predictive equations for functional independence and wheelchair ability in men with SCI, based on demographic characteristics, HGS, and functionality.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study conducted at a rehabilitation hospital, 54 men with SCI were recruited and stratified into high and low paraplegia groups. All participants performed a maximum HGS test to determine cutoff points for the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-III) and Adapted Manual Wheelchair Circuit (AMWC). The primary outcomes were the SCIM-III, AMWC, and HGS. Demographic characteristics obtained from participants' electronic medical records were the secondary outcomes, used as predictor variables of functional independence.

Results

The SCIM-III scale, performance score, and 3-minute overground wheeling test presented significant regression equations (R = 0.45, R = 0.69, and R = 0.72). The HGS showed a cutoff point of 102.5 kilogram force (kgf) to achieve a score of 70 on the SCIM-III and a 3-minute overground wheeling distance of 270 m. The HGS cutoff point to obtain a performance score of 23.7 seconds was 93.0 kgf.

Conclusion

The HGS was a significant predictor for the SCIM-III score, AMWC performance score, and 3-minute overground wheeling test. Three significant predictive equations were established based on HGS. The cutoff points could be adopted as parameters for optimal functional independence and wheelchair skills.

[Psychometric properties of observational instruments to evaluate wheelchair skills in persons with a spinal cord injury: A systematic review]

A total of 60% of people with a spinal cord injury are completely dependent on a wheelchair. There is a wide variety of instruments that assess wheelchair skills, but they are not specific for this population. OBJECTIVE: To identify, assess, compare and summarize the psychometric properties of instruments that assess wheelchair skills in persons with a spinal cord injury. A systematic review was conducted and observational instruments were included that assessed wheelchair skills in persons with spinal cord injury. Eleven articles were identified that evaluated eight instruments. Most of them reported activities according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Reliability was the most frequently evaluated psychometric property. The Queensland Evaluation of Wheelchair Skills and the Adapted Manual Wheelchair Circuit had the best degrees of confidence in the evidence, and their application could guide the selection of pertinent therapeutic strategies. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020161430.

The addition of three new items in the Adapted Manual Wheelchair Circuit improves the discrimination between different levels of spinal cord injury

Purpose: To determine whether the inclusion of three additional items improved the discriminative capacity of the Adapted Manual Wheelchair Circuit (AMWC). Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A total of 126 men (median age 28.9 years [percentiles 25 and 75: 23.7; 38.5 years]) with spinal cord injury were consecutively enrolled and divided into three subgroups: high paraplegia (HP), medium paraplegia (MP), and low paraplegia (LP). The participants performed the AMWC with three additional items. Ability score and total time of AMWC (AMWC_AS and AMWC_TT) and AMWC plus the three additional items (AMWC+3_AS and AMWC+3_TT), 3 min of overground wheeling test and performance score were evaluated. Results: AMWC was not able to discriminate HP from MP and LP (Wilks' lambda = 0.93; P= 0.07). In contrast, AMWC+3 was able to discriminate between the three subgroups (Wilks' lambda = 0.86; P≤ 0.05). AMWC+3_AS presented a better sensitivity compared to AMWC_AS (lower success rate for all subgroups, 38.5% vs. 82.1% for HP; 49.0% vs. 75.5% for MP; 78.9% vs. 94.7% for LP). The LP group presented a significant higher AMWC+3_AS compared to MP and HP (17.0 vs. 16.5 and 16.5, respectively, P≤ 0.05). AMWC+3_TT was significantly lower in LP compared to MP and HP (139.85 s vs. 242.52 s and 326.21 s, respectively, P≤ 0.05). Conclusion: The AMWC+3 outcomes were able to discriminate between HP, MP, and LP subgroups, and the addition of the three items enhanced the sensitivity of the wheelchair circuit. The performance of LP was more evident with significant differences compared to HP and MP for all AMWC+3 outcomes.