Characterizing the recovery trajectories of knee range of motion for one year after total knee replacement

Acupuncture Provides Short-Term Functional Improvements and Pain Relief for Patients After Knee Replacement Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The impact of acupuncture on knee function and pain intensity following knee replacement remains controversial. Therefore, we categorized the postsurgery recovery period into 3 phases: short-term (≤2 weeks), intermediate-term (2 weeks-3 months), and long-term (>3 months), and then assessed the effectiveness of acupuncture in improving function and alleviating pain at different stages following knee replacement. This meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials that compared acupuncture intervention with either no treatment or a sham group after knee replacement. Six databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2023, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and 2 Chinese databases (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and WanFang Data). A total of 23 studies comprising 1,464 participants were included. Significant improvement of active range of motion was observed on day 7 and week 2 after operation. Lower pain intensity at rest was noted in patients receiving acupuncture in short-term periods after operation (12 hours, day 1, day 2, day 5, and week 2). A reduction in pain intensity during movement with acupuncture was observed on postoperative day 1 and day 7. Auricular acupuncture did not show not significant effectiveness in improving range of motion and pain intensity. For conventional acupuncture, the combination of distal and local point selection was found to be the most effective. Early application of acupuncture, in conjunction with physical therapy, starting before postoperative day 1 or day 2, was recommended. Further high-quality researches are warranted to validate the findings in this meta-analysis. PERSPECTIVE: This article demonstrates that acupuncture has short-term effects (≤2 weeks) on improving active range of motion and reducing pain during rest and during movement following knee replacement surgery. The findings support the early application of acupuncture in hospital settings after knee replacement. REGISTRATION ID: The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024503479).

Improved postoperative kneeling ability in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty with medialized dome-patella resurfacing: A retrospective comparative outcome analysis

OBJECTIVES

This investigation aimed to evaluate if the modifications to prosthesis designs improve patients' clinical and functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with a special focus on pain and kneeling ability.

METHODS

Retrospective and comparative analysis of consecutive patients who were treated with posterior stabilized TKA using two different prostheses designs (single surgeon, single vendor). Group 1 received a traditional design TKA (PFC Sigma; DePuy, Inc., Warsaw, IN) with conventional dome-patella resurfacing, and group 2 received a modern design implant (Attune; DePuy, Inc., Warsaw, IN) with medialized dome-patella resurfacing. Functional outcome (range of motion: ROM) and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were collected preoperatively, at 4-6 weeks and 12 months following surgery.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine participants were included. Of these, 30 received traditional-design implants and 69 received modern-design knee implants. The comparison between the two implants showed a statistically significant increase in total OKS and kneeling ability in the modern design cohort at 1-year follow-up compared to the traditional design cohort (p ​< ​0.01). In the modern design group, 53% (N ​= ​37) could kneel easily or with little difficulty, compared to 30% (N ​= ​9) in the traditional design group. No statistically significant differences in ROM or the OKS pain component were seen.

CONCLUSION

The incorporation of a medialized dome-patella in modern knee implant design may offer advantages over traditional designs, as seen in improved total OKS and kneeling ability at one-year follow-up. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to confirm these findings and explore the broader impact of implant design changes on patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Clinical Study, Level III.

Correlation Between Patient-Reported "Happiness" With Knee Range of Motion and Objective Measurements in Primary Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between objective knee range of motion (ROM) and patient "happiness" with knee ROM after total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of all primary total knee arthroplasties from June through December 2019, yielding 902 patients (1,009 knees). Records were reviewed for knee ROM preoperatively and postoperatively at 6-week follow-up as well as whether patients self-reported being "Happy with their ROM" (HWROM). Clinical records were reviewed for documents ROM as well as manipulation under anesthesia (MUA).

RESULTS

The mean preoperative ROM was 110 ± 16 degrees, and 40% of patients were happy with their ROM. Postoperatively, the mean ROM was 106 ± 13 degrees (P < .001), and 76% of patients were HWROM (P < .001). The mean change in knee ROM was (-) 5 ± 17 degrees. The mean postoperative ROM and change in ROM of patients who were HWROM after surgery were 109 ± 12 degrees and (-)2 ± 16 degrees. In patients not HWROM postoperatively, the mean ROM and change in ROM were 98 ± 14 degrees and (-)12 ± 18 degrees (P < .001). Patients with a lower preoperative ROM were statistically significantly more likely to have a positive change in their HWROM (f ratio = 41, P < .001). MUAs were performed in 7.2% of knees, and 28% of patients who underwent an MUA were HWROM before MUA.

CONCLUSION

Early postoperative knee ROM was correlated with patient HWROM. However, further longer term follow-up and more detailed analysis of patient happiness with ROM are needed.

Effects of Sarcopenic Obesity and Its Confounders on Knee Range of Motion Outcome after Total Knee Replacement in Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Study

Sarcopenic obesity is closely associated with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and has high risk of total knee replacement (TKR). In addition, poor nutrition status may lead to sarcopenia and physical frailty in KOA and is negatively associated with surgery outcome after TKR. This study investigated the effects of sarcopenic obesity and its confounding factors on recovery in range of motion (ROM) after total knee replacement (TKR) in older adults with KOA. A total of 587 older adults, aged ≥60 years, who had a diagnosis of KOA and underwent TKR, were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Sarcopenia and obesity were defined based on cutoff values of appendicular mass index and body mass index for Asian people. Based on the sarcopenia and obesity definitions, patients were classified into three body-composition groups before TKR: sarcopenic-obese, obese, and non-obese. All patients were asked to attend postoperative outpatient follow-up admissions. Knee flexion ROM was measured before and after surgery. A ROM cutoff of 125 degrees was used to identify poor recovery post-surgery. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis was performed to measure the probability of poor ROM recovery among study groups. Cox multivariate regression models were established to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) of postoperative poor ROM recovery, using potential confounding factors including age, sex, comorbidity, risk of malnutrition, preoperative ROM, and outpatient follow-up duration as covariates. Analyses results showed that patients in the obese and sarcopenic-obese groups had a higher probability of poor ROM recovery compared to the non-obese group (all p < 0.001). Among all body-composition groups, the sarcopenic-obese group yielded the highest risk of postoperative physical difficulty (adjusted HR = 1.63, p = 0.03), independent to the potential confounding factors. Sarcopenic obesity is likely at the high risk of poor ROM outcome following TKR in older individuals with KOA.

Kneeling ability after total knee replacement

Kneeling ability is consistently the poorest patient-rated outcome after total knee replacement (TKR), with 60-80% of patients reporting difficulty kneeling or an inability to kneel.Difficulty kneeling impacts on many activities and areas of life, including activities of daily living, self-care, leisure and social activities, religious activities, employment and getting up after a fall. Given the wide range of activities that involve kneeling, and the expectation that this will be improved with surgery, problems kneeling after TKR are a source of dissatisfaction and disappointment for many patients.Research has found that there is no association between range of motion and self-reported kneeling ability. More research is needed to understand if and how surgical factors contribute to difficulty kneeling after TKR.Discrepancies between patients' self-reported ability to kneel and observed ability suggests that patients can kneel but elect not to. Reasons for this are multifactorial, including knee pain/discomfort, numbness, fear of harming the prosthesis, co-morbidities and recommendations from health professionals. There is currently no evidence that there is any clinical reason why patients should not kneel on their replaced knee, and reasons for not kneeling could be addressed through education and rehabilitation.There has been little research to evaluate the provision of healthcare services and interventions for patients who find kneeling problematic after TKR. Increased clinical awareness of this poor outcome and research to inform the provision of services is needed to improve patient care and allow patients to return to this important activity. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:460-467. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180085.