Balance problems and dizziness after neck surgery - associations with pain and health-related quality of life

A more than 20-year follow-up of pain and disability after anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery for degenerative disc disease and comparisons between two surgical techniques

BACKGROUND

Follow-ups more than 20 years after neck surgery are extremely rare. No previous randomized studies have investigated differences in pain and disability more than 20 years after ACDF surgery using different techniques. The purpose of this study was to describe pain and functioning more than 20 years after anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery, and to compare outcomes between the Cloward Procedure and the carbon fiber fusion cage (CIFC).

METHODS

This study is a 20 to 24-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Questionnaires were sent to 64 individuals, at least 20 years after ACDF due to cervical radiculopathy. Fifty individuals (mean age 69, 60% women, 55% CIFC) completed questionnaires. Mean time since surgery was 22.4 years (range 20,5-24). Primary outcomes were neck pain and neck disability index (NDI). Secondary outcomes were frequency and intensity of neck and arm pain, headache, dizziness, self-efficacy, health related quality of life or global outcome. Clinically relevant improvements were defined as 30 mm decrease in pain and a decrease in disability of 20 percentage units. Between-group differences over time were analyzed with mixed design ANOVA and relationships between main outcomes and psychosocial factors were analyzed by Spearman´s rho.

RESULTS

Neck pain and NDI score significantly improved over time (p  <  .001), with no group differences in primary or secondary outcomes. Eighty-eight per cent of participants experienced improvements or full recovery, 71% (pain) and 41% (NDI) had clinically relevant improvements. Pain and NDI were correlated with lower self-efficacy and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

The results from this study do not support the idea that fusion technique affects long-term outcome of ACDF. Pain and disability improved substantially over time, irrespective of surgical technique. However, the majority of participants reported residual disability not to a negligible extent. Pain and disability were correlated to lower self-efficacy and quality of life.

Dizziness and balance outcomes after two different postoperative rehabilitation approaches following neck surgery: analyses of a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Dizziness and balance problems are common symptoms in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of neck surgery postoperatively combined with either structured rehabilitation or standard approach in patients with cervical radiculopathy and dizziness and/or balance problems, and investigate factors influencing dizziness and balance at 6-month follow-up.

METHODS

Individuals (n = 149) with cervical radiculopathy and dizziness and/or balance problems were randomized preoperatively to structured postoperative rehabilitation or standard postoperative approach. Outcomes were intensity of dizziness and subjective balance, and clinical measures of balance.

RESULTS

Self-reported measures improved at three months (p ˂ 0.001 to p = .007) and the standing balance at six months (p = .008). No between-group differences. Baseline values, neck pain, and physical activity level explained 23-39% of the variance in 6-month outcomes for self-reported measures. Baseline values and physical activity level explained 71% of the variance in walking balance, and lower baseline scores were significantly associated with standing balance impairments (OR 0.876).

CONCLUSION

Patients improved significantly in dizziness and subjective balance intensity shortly after surgery, and in standing balance at 6 months, independent of postoperative rehabilitation. Neck pain, physical activity, and neck muscle function influenced dizziness and balance, although preoperative values and neck pain were of most importance for 6-month outcomes.

Proprioceptive Cervicogenic Dizziness Care Trajectories in Patient Subpopulations: A Scoping Review

Proprioceptive cervicogenic dizziness (PCGD) is the most prevalent subcategory of cervicogenic dizziness. There is considerable confusion regarding this clinical syndrome's differential diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment strategy. Our objectives were to conduct a systematic search to map out characteristics of the literature and of potential subpopulations of PCGD, and to classify accordingly the knowledge contained in the literature regarding interventions, outcomes and diagnosis. A Joanna Briggs Institute methodology-informed scoping review of the French, English, Spanish, Portuguese and Italian literature from January 2000 to June 2021 was undertaken on PsycInfo, Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), All EBM Reviews (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), Web of Science and Scopus databases. All pertinent randomized control trials, case studies, literature reviews, meta-analyses, and observational studies were retrieved. Evidence-charting methods were executed by two independent researchers at each stage of the scoping review. The search yielded 156 articles. Based on the potential etiology of the clinical syndrome, the analysis identified four main subpopulations of PCGD: chronic cervicalgia, traumatic, degenerative cervical disease, and occupational. The three most commonly occurring differential diagnosis categories are central causes, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and otologic pathologies. The four most cited measures of change were the dizziness handicap inventory, visual analog scale for neck pain, cervical range of motion, and posturography. Across subpopulations, exercise therapy and manual therapy are the most commonly encountered interventions in the literature. PCGD patients have heterogeneous etiologies which can impact their care trajectory. Adapted care trajectories should be used for the different subpopulations by optimizing differential diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of outcomes.

The Significance of Pain Drawing as a Screening Tool for Cervicogenic Headache and Associated Symptoms in Chronic Fatigue

Purpose

Patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) present with a broad spectrum of symptoms, including headache. A simple, yet powerful tool – the pain drawing identifies essential aspects such as pain distribution. The aim with this study was to 1) evaluate the significance of pain drawing as a screening tool for cervicogenic headache using a predefined C2 pain pattern, 2) assess whether there was an association between dizziness/imbalance and a C2 pain pattern, and 3) compare subgroups according to the pain drawing with respect to pain characteristics and quality of life.

Patients and Methods

Pain drawings and clinical data from 275 patients investigated for ME/CFS were stratified into: 1) cervicogenic headache as determined by a C2 pain pattern, 2) headache with no C2 pain pattern, and 3) no headache. For inference logistic regression presented with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and Kruskal–Wallis test were applied.

Results

One hundred sixteen participants (42%) were stratified to the group for which the pain drawing corresponded to the C2 pain pattern, thus indicating putative cervicogenic origin of the headache. Dizziness/imbalance was strongly associated with a C2 pain pattern; OR 6.50 ([95% CI 2.42–17.40] p ˂ 0.00), whereas this association was non-significant for patients with headache and no C2 pain pattern. Those demonstrating a C2 pain pattern reported significantly higher pain intensity (p = 0.00) and greater pain extent (p = 0.00) than the other groups, and lower health-related quality of life (p = 0.00) than the group with no headache.

Conclusion

For patients with chronic fatigue who present with a C2 pain pattern (interpreted as cervicogenic headache) the pain drawing seems applicable as a screening tool for signs associated with neuropathic and more severe pain, dizziness and reduced quality of life as detection of these symptoms is essential for targeted treatment.