A descriptive report of the variability in 3D hip and knee kinematics during a single limb squat in women who have patellofemoral pain and visually classified dynamic knee valgus

Clinical Significance of the Static and Dynamic Q-angle

Q-angle represents the resultant force vector of the quadriceps and patellar tendons acting on the patella. An increased Q-angle has been considered a risk factor for many disorders and injuries. This literature review challenges the clinical value of static Q-angle and recommends a more dynamic movement evaluation for making clinical decisions. Although there are many articles about static Q-angle, few have assessed the value of dynamic Q-angle. We searched Scopus and PubMed (until September 2021) to identify and summarize English-language articles evaluating static and dynamic Q-angle, including articles for dynamic knee valgus (DKV) and frontal plane projection angle. We also used textbooks and articles from references to related articles. Although static Q-angle measurement is used systematically in clinical practice for critical clinical decisions, its interpretation and clinical translation present fundamental and intractable limitations. To date, it is acceptable that mechanisms that cause patellofemoral pain and athletic injuries have a stronger correlation with dynamic loading conditions. Dynamic Q-angle has the following three dynamic elements: frontal plane (hip adduction, knee abduction), transverse plane (hip internal rotation and tibia external rotation), and patella behavior. Measuring one out of three elements (frontal plane) illustrates only one-third of this concept. Static Q-angle lacks biomechanical meaning and utility for dynamic activities. Although DKV is accompanied by hip and tibia rotation, it remains a frontal plane measurement, which provides no information about the transverse plane and patella movement. However, given the acceptable reliability and the better differentiation capability, DKV assessment is recommended in clinical practice.

Task-specific movement training improves kinematics and pain during the Y-balance test and hip muscle strength in females with patellofemoral pain

OBJECTIVES

Task-specific movement training is a proposed intervention for patellofemoral pain aimed to optimise movement during daily tasks. Focused, progressive task practice emphasising optimal limb alignment may yield improvements in performance-based function and hip muscle strength, and transfer learnt movement patterns to untrained tasks. The purpose of this study was to determine if task-specific movement training improves performance-based function (composite score, movement, pain during movement) in an untrained task. Our secondary purpose was to test whether hip muscle strength improved following the movement training intervention.

METHODS

This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective, non-randomised, within-group, double-baseline study. Twenty-three females with patellofemoral pain underwent task-specific movement training two times/week for 6 weeks. Outcomes were collected at three time points: enrolment (baseline), 6 weeks (preintervention) and 12 weeks (postintervention). A repeated measures analysis of variance tested whether the change during the intervention phase was greater than the change during the control phase. Y-balance composite score, hip and knee kinematics and pain during the Y-balance test were primary outcome measures; strength of the hip lateral rotator, abductor and extensor muscles was a secondary outcome measure.

RESULTS

The change in composite score for the Y-balance test was not statistically significantly different between the intervention and control phases (p=0.16). The change during the intervention phase exceeded the change during the control phase for hip and knee kinematics and pain during the Y-balance test, with all variables improving (p<0.0001). The change during the intervention phase was greater than the control phase for hip muscle strength, with all variables improving (p<0.04).

CONCLUSION

Although the Y-balance test composite score did not improve, performance-based function during an untrained task, measured by movement and pain during the test, improved following task-specific movement training. Hip muscle strength improved, despite no focused muscle strengthening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

CONSISTENCY OF DYNAMIC KNEE VALGUS KINEMATICS AND PAIN ACROSS FUNCTIONAL TASKS IN FEMALES WITH PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Background and Purpose

Dynamic knee valgus has been associated with patellofemoral pain (PFP) during high-level tasks, however, repeated lower-level stresses may be an alternative pain mechanism. The primary purpose of the current study was to examine the consistency of dynamic knee valgus and task-elicited pain demonstrated by females with PFP across four common functional tasks (stair ascent, stair descent, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit). A secondary purpose was to assess the correlation between the clinical test of single-limb squat and functional tasks.

Hypothesis

Females with patellofemoral pain will demonstrate a positive relationship in magnitude of dynamic knee valgus and task-elicited pain across functional tasks. Individuals who demonstrated greater dynamic knee valgus and task-elicited pain during the clinical test of single-limb squat would demonstrate greater dynamic knee valgus and task elicited pain during stair ascent/descent and sit-to-stand/stand-to-sit tasks.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; secondary analysis of a feasibility intervention study.

Methods

Twenty-three women with patellofemoral pain (age: 21.8 SD 3.7 years; BMI: 22.2 SD 2.0 kg/m²) participated. Three-dimensional kinematic data were captured during task completion. Hip and knee frontal and transverse plane angles at 45 ° of knee flexion, and pain using a visual analog scale, were assessed during single-limb squat, stair ascent/descent, and sit-to-stand. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were calculated to examine between-task relationships for each variable at the pre-intervention assessment.

Results

Correlation coefficients between tasks ranged from 0.23-0.76 for hip frontal plane measures (7/10 significant relationships, p<0.02), 0.31-0.90 for hip transverse plane measures (7/10 significant, p<0.01), 0.87-0.95 for knee frontal plane measures (10/10 significant, p<0.01), and 0.54-0.86 for knee transverse plane measures (10/10 significant, p<0.01). Correlations spanned 0.59-0.85 for pain during tasks (10/10 significant, p<0.01).

Conclusion

Females with patellofemoral pain demonstrated positive correlations in dynamic knee valgus kinematics and task-elicited pain across five tasks. Movement and pain during the clinical test of single-limb squat test also was correlated with movement and pain during the functional tasks of stair ascent/descent and sit-to-stand.

Level of Evidence

Level 2b.