Generalized joint hypermobility and perceived harmfulness in healthy adolescents; impact on muscle strength, motor performance and physical activity level

Prevalence and Demographic Distribution of Hypermobility in a Random Group of School-Aged Children in Nigeria

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of hypermobility in randomly selected healthy children, without previous trauma or disease process affecting the joints and whether other demographic variables (age, sex, BMI) had an impact on Beighton scores and range of motion (RoM) in children between 6 and 10 years of age.

RESULTS

286 children were included; 27.3% of them had a Beighton score ≥7/9 and 72% would be classified hypermobile if we had used a Beighton cut-off score ≥4/9. Prevalence declined with increasing age. Girls were more often hypermobile (34%) than boys (20%) and this was mainly caused by increased RoM in the knees. Positive scores of finger items of the Beighton were more common than on the other items, leading to a high prevalence of peripheral hypermobility. Localized hypermobility was only found in the fifth MCP joint. A total of 15% of the children with normal mobility reached 20 excess degrees RoM of the left and right fifth MCP. Pain was present in 12 of the 239 children but was not linked to the level of mobility.

CONCLUSION

Hypermobility is the rule in this pain-free population of children with GJH.

The value of dynamic elastomeric fabric orthoses in the management of a complex hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome patient: A case report

The use of dynamic elastomeric fabric orthoses is examined in a young woman with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) referred for physiotherapy with hip dysplasia, prior to a right periacetabular osteotomy. Dynamic elastomeric fabric orthoses plus rigorous subjective examination, therapists' listening skills, and patient-centered goals were useful for this hEDS patient.

Supervised, Heavy Resistance Training Is Tolerated and Potentially Beneficial in Women with Knee Pain and Knee Joint Hypermobility: A Case Series

Introduction

Adults with generalised joint hypermobility including knee joint hypermobility (GJHk) report more knee joint symptoms when compared to adults without GJHk. There is no consensus on best practice for symptom management. For instance, controversy exists regarding the appropriateness and safety of heavy resistance training as an intervention for this specific group. This case series aims to describe a supervised, progressive heavy resistance training program in adults with GJHk and knee pain, the tolerability of the intervention, and the outcomes of knee pain, knee-related quality of life, muscle strength, proprioception, and patellar tendon stiffness through a 12-week period.

Materials and Methods

Adults with GJHk and knee pain were recruited to perform supervised, progressive heavy resistance training twice a week for 12 weeks. The main outcome was the tolerability of the intervention. Secondary outcomes were knee pain during a self-nominated activity (VASNA); Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS); Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK); maximal quadriceps voluntary isometric contraction and rate of torque development; 5 repetition maximum strength in five different leg exercises; single leg hop for distance; knee proprioception and patellar tendon stiffness.

Results

In total, 16 women (24.2 years, SD 2.5) completed at least 21/24 training sessions. No major adverse events were observed. On average, VASNA decreased by 32.5 mm (95% CI 21.4-43.6), in addition to improvements in KOOS and TSK scores. These improvements were supported by an increase in all measures of lower extremity muscle strength, knee proprioception, and patellar tendon stiffness.

Conclusion

Supervised heavy resistance training seems to be well tolerated and potentially beneficial in young women with GJHk and knee pain.

Are chronic musculoskeletal pain and generalized joint hypermobility: disabling contributors to physical functioning?

BACKGROUND

Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP), Generalized Joint Hypermobility (GJH) and pain-related fear have influence on physical functioning in adolescents.

AIM

To evaluate differences in physical functioning between adolescents with CMP, GJH or the combination of both, and in addition evaluate the potential contribution of pain-related fear.

DESIGN

Observational, cross-sectional design.

SETTING

The adolescents with CMP were recruited by a physician in rehabilitation medicine and measured in the university outpatient rehabilitation clinic (Adelante/Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands). The adolescents without CMP were recruited in the Southern area of the Netherlands and measured in the university outpatient rehabilitation clinic (Adelante/Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands).

POPULATION

Four subgroups of adolescents were included; 21 adolescents with CMP without GJH, 9 adolescents with CMP and GJH, 51 adolescents without CMP without GJH, and 11 adolescents without CMP with GJH.

METHODS

Outcome measures were muscle strength and endurance, motor performance, physical activity level, and pain-related fear were measured. Hierarchical regression analyses were used to study differences in physical functioning and the contribution of pain-related fear in adolescents with/without CMP as well as with/without GJH.

RESULTS

Adolescents with CMP had decreased muscle strength (p=0.01), endurance (p=0.02) and lower motor performance (p<0.01) compared to adolescents without CMP. Higher levels of pain-related fear were related to decreased muscle strength (p=0.01), endurance (p<0.01) and motor performance (p<0.01). No differences in physical functioning and pain-related fear between hypermobile and non-hypermobile adolescents with CMP were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents with CMP had decreased muscle strength and motor performance associated with increased levels of pain-related fear compared to adolescents without CMP. The association of being hypermobile with physical functioning is not more pronounced in adolescents with CMP.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

No differences were found in physical functioning and pain-related fear between hypermobile adolescents with CMP compared to nonhypermobile adolescents with CMP. Future rehabilitation treatment in hypermobile adolescents with CMP should also focus on psychological components, such as pain-related fear.

Exploring the underlying mechanism of pain-related disability in hypermobile adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain

OBJECTIVES

A significant proportion of adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) experience difficulties in physical functioning, mood and social functioning, contributing to diminished quality of life. Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) is a risk factor for developing CMP with a striking 35-48% of patients with CMP reporting GJH. In case GJH occurs with one or more musculoskeletal manifestations such as chronic pain, trauma, disturbed proprioception and joint instability, it is referred to as generalized hypermobility spectrum disorder (G-HSD). Similar characteristics have been reported in children and adolescents with the hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS). In the management of CMP, a biopsychosocial approach is recommended as several studies have confirmed the impact of psychosocial factors in the development and maintenance of CMP. The fear-avoidance model (FAM) is a cognitive-behavioural framework that describes the role of pain-related fear as a determinant of CMP-related disability.

CONTENT

Pubmed was used to identify existing relevant literature focussing on chronic musculoskeletal pain, generalized joint hypermobility, pain-related fear and disability. Relevant articles were cross-referenced to identify articles possibly missed during the primary screening. In this paper the current state of scientific evidence is presented for each individual component of the FAM in hypermobile adolescents with and without CMP. Based on this overview, the FAM is proposed explaining a possible underlying mechanism in the relations between GJH, pain-related fear and disability.

SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK

It is assumed that GJH seems to make you more vulnerable for injury and experiencing more frequent musculoskeletal pain. But in addition, a vulnerability for heightened pain-related fear is proposed as an underlying mechanism explaining the relationship between GJH and disability. Further scientific confirmation of this applied FAM is warranted to further unravel the underlying mechanism.In explaining disability in individuals with G-HSD/hEDS, it is important to focus on both the physical components related to joint hypermobility, in tandem with the psychological components such as pain-related fear, catastrophizing thoughts and generalized anxiety.