1
|
Clarkson P, Pitts R, Islam S, Peconi J, Russell I, Fegan G, Beresford R, Entwistle C, Gillan V, Orrell M, Challis D, Chester H, Hughes J, Kapur N, Roe B, Malik B, Robinson C. Dementia Early-Stage Cognitive Aids New Trial (DESCANT) of memory aids and guidance for people with dementia: randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022; 93:1001-1009. [PMID: 34667103 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Common memory aids for people with dementia at home are recommended. However, rigorous evaluation is lacking, particularly what guidance or support is valued. OBJECTIVE To investigate effects of memory aids and guidance by dementia support practitioners (DSPs) for people in early-stage dementia through a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. METHODS Of 469 people with mild-to-moderate dementia and their informal carers, 468 were randomised to a DSP with memory aids or to usual care plus existing dementia guide. Allocation was stratified by Trust/Health Board; time since first attendance at memory service; gender; age; and living with primary carer or not. Primary outcome was Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale (BADLS) Score at 3 and 6 months (primary end-point). Secondary outcomes for people with dementia: quality of life (CASP-19; DEMQOL); cognition and functioning (Clinical Dementia Rating Scale; S-MMSE); capability (ICECAP-O); social networks (LSNS-R); and instrumental daily living activities (R-IDDD). Secondary outcomes for carers: psychological health (GHQ-12); sense of competence (SSCQ). RESULTS DSPs were successfully trained, compliance was good and welcomed by participants. Mean 6 months BADLS Score increased to 14.6 (SD: 10.4) in intervention and 12.6 (SD: 8.1) in comparator, indicative of greater dependence in the activities of daily living. Adjusted between-group difference was 0.38 (95% CI: -0.89 to 1.65, p=0.56). Though this suggests greater dependency in the intervention group the difference was not significant. No differences were found in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This intervention did not maintain independence in the activities of daily living with no improvement in other outcomes for people with dementia or carers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12591717.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Clarkson
- Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rosa Pitts
- Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Saiful Islam
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Julie Peconi
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Ian Russell
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Greg Fegan
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Rebecca Beresford
- Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Vincent Gillan
- Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Martin Orrell
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David Challis
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Helen Chester
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jane Hughes
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Narinder Kapur
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Brenda Roe
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
| | - Baber Malik
- Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baptista C, Afonso RM, Silva AR. Practitioners’ knowledge, acceptability and use of external memory aids with individuals with cognitive deficits: An exploratory study. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2022; 33:745-763. [DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2022.2044354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Catarina Baptista
- Department of Psychology and Education, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
| | - Rosa Marina Afonso
- Department of Psychology and Education, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS, Faculty of Medicine University of Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Rita Silva
- Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioral Interventions, CINEICC, Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Neal D, van den Berg F, Planting C, Ettema T, Dijkstra K, Finnema E, Dröes RM. Can Use of Digital Technologies by People with Dementia Improve Self-Management and Social Participation? A Systematic Review of Effect Studies. J Clin Med 2021; 10:604. [PMID: 33562749 PMCID: PMC7915697 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
There is increasing interest in the use of technology to support social health in dementia. The primary objective of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence of effectiveness of digital technologies used by people with dementia to improve self-management and social participation. Records published from 1 January 2007 to 9 April 2020 were identified from Pubmed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Controlled interventional studies evaluating interventions based on any digital technology were included if: primary users of the technology had dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI); and the study reported outcomes relevant to self-management or social participation. Studies were clustered by population, intervention, and outcomes, and narrative synthesis was undertaken. Of 1394 records identified, nine met the inclusion criteria: two were deemed to be of poor methodological quality, six of fair quality, and one of good quality. Three clusters of technologies were identified: virtual reality, wearables, and software applications. We identified weak evidence that digital technologies may provide less benefit to people with dementia than people with MCI. Future research should address the methodological limitations and narrow scope of existing work. In the absence of strong evidence, clinicians and caregivers must use their judgement to appraise available technologies on a case-by-case basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Neal
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location VUMC, 1081 HJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Floor van den Berg
- Department of Linguistics and English as a Second Language, University of Groningen, 9712 EK Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - Caroline Planting
- Department of Research and Innovation, GGZ inGeest, 1070 BB Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Teake Ettema
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location VUMC, 1081 HJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Karin Dijkstra
- Research Group Nursing, Saxion University of Applied Sciences, 7417 DH Deventer, The Netherlands;
| | - Evelyn Finnema
- Health Sciences-Nursing Research, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands;
- Department of Healthcare, NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences, 8917 DD Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
- School of Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, 9747 AS Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rose-Marie Dröes
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location VUMC, 1081 HJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Øksnebjerg L, Woods B, Vilsen CR, Ruth K, Gustafsson M, Ringkøbing SP, Waldemar G. Self-management and cognitive rehabilitation in early stage dementia - merging methods to promote coping and adoption of assistive technology. A pilot study. Aging Ment Health 2020; 24:1894-1903. [PMID: 31429315 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1625302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: It is essential to develop interventions that meet individual needs for coping and self-management of people with dementia. This study explored the feasibility and applicability of an intervention merging methods of cognitive rehabilitation and self-management groups for people with early stage dementia. The potential of this intervention to promote adoption of assistive technology was also explored.Method: People with early stage Alzheimer's disease (N = 19) participated in the programme comprising both individual and group sessions. Caregivers were involved in the individual session and a separate group meeting. The intervention both addressed individual goals and more general self-management approaches. In addition, both participants and caregivers were introduced to the ReACT app, a holistic solution tailormade to meet self-management needs of people with early stage dementia.Results: There was significant improvement in the participants' attainment of individual goals and satisfaction with goal attainment from pre- to post-intervention. Participants and caregivers generally reported a positive attitude towards the intervention, attendance rate was high, and all participants completed the intervention. Qualitative results also indicated that the intervention promoted awareness, acceptance and coping among participants. The specific benefits of using the ReACT app for self-management were also emphasised. Forty-two percent of the participants adopted the app and continued using it after completing the intervention.Conclusion: Results from this pilot study indicated that the intervention is both feasible and applicable and can be an effective method to promote coping and adoption of assistive technology among people with early stage dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laila Øksnebjerg
- Danish Dementia Reseach Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bob Woods
- Dementia Services Development Centre Wales, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kathrine Ruth
- Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Department of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care, Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Moa Gustafsson
- Department of Neurology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Signe Pertou Ringkøbing
- Copenhagen Memory Clinic and Danish Dementia Research Centre, Section 6911, Department of Neurology, The Neuroscience Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Danish Dementia Reseach Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chudoba LA, Church AS, Dahmen JB, Brown KD, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. The development of a manual-based digital memory notebook intervention with case study illustrations. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2020; 30:1829-1851. [PMID: 31046586 PMCID: PMC6825881 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2019.1611606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
There is currently a need to identify feasible and effective interventions to help older individuals suffering from memory loss maintain functional independence and quality of life. To improve upon paper and pencil memory notebook interventions, the Digital Memory Notebook (DMN) application (app) was developed iteratively with persons with cognitive impairment. In this paper we detail a manual-based intervention for training use of the DMN app. A series of three case studies are described to illustrate the clinical process of the DMN intervention, the key components of the intervention and participants' perceptions of the intervention. The Reliable Change Index was applied to pre/post intervention scores that examined everyday memory lapses, daily functioning, coping self-efficacy, satisfaction with life, and quality of life with standardized measures. Following the intervention, two of three participants self-reported a clinically significant reduction in everyday memory lapses and improved everyday functioning. One participant reported clinically significant change in quality of life. All participants demonstrated clinically significant changes in their ability to cope with problems and build self-efficacy. Furthermore, all participants scored in the normative range post-intervention on the measure of satisfaction with life. Clinical observations and participant feedback were used for refinement of the DMN intervention (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03453554).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A. Chudoba
- Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
| | | | - Jessamyn B. Dahmen
- School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
| | - Katelyn D. Brown
- Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Clare L, Kudlicka A, Oyebode JR, Jones RW, Bayer A, Leroi I, Kopelman M, James IA, Culverwell A, Pool J, Brand A, Henderson C, Hoare Z, Knapp M, Morgan-Trimmer S, Burns A, Corbett A, Whitaker R, Woods B. Goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation for early-stage Alzheimer's and related dementias: the GREAT RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 23:1-242. [PMID: 30879470 DOI: 10.3310/hta23100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive rehabilitation (CR) is an individualised, person-centred intervention for people with mild to moderate dementia that addresses the impact of cognitive impairment on everyday functioning. OBJECTIVES To determine whether or not CR is a clinically effective and cost-effective intervention for people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease or vascular or mixed dementia, and their carers. DESIGN This multicentre randomised controlled trial compared CR with treatment as usual (TAU). Following a baseline assessment and goal-setting to identify areas of everyday functioning that could be improved or better managed, participants were randomised (1 : 1) via secure web access to an independent randomisation centre to receive either TAU or CR and followed up at 3 and 9 months post randomisation. SETTING Community. PARTICIPANTS Participants had an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition, diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease or vascular or mixed dementia, had mild to moderate cognitive impairment (Mini Mental State Examination score of ≥ 18 points), were stable on medication if prescribed, and had a family carer who was willing to contribute. The exclusion criteria were people with a history of brain injury or other neurological disorder and an inability to speak English. To achieve adequate power, we needed 350 people to complete the trial, with 175 people in each trial arm. INTERVENTION Cognitive rehabilitation consisted of 10 therapy sessions over 3 months, followed by four maintenance sessions over 6 months, delivered in participants' homes. The therapists were nine occupational therapists and one nurse. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was self-reported goal attainment at 3 months. Goal attainment was also assessed at 9 months. Carers provided independent ratings of goal attainment at both time points. The secondary outcomes were participant quality of life, mood, self-efficacy and cognition, and carer stress, health status and quality of life. The assessments at 3 and 9 months were conducted by researchers who were blind to the participants' group allocation. RESULTS A total of 475 participants were randomised (CR arm, n = 239; TAU arm, n = 236), 427 participants (90%) completed the trial and 426 participants were analysed (CR arm, n = 208, TAU arm, n = 218). At 3 months, there were statistically significant large positive effects for participant-rated goal attainment [mean change in the CR arm: 2.57; mean change in the TAU arm: 0.86; Cohen'sd = 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75 to 1.19], corroborated by carer ratings (Cohen'sd = 1.11, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.34). These effects were maintained at 9 months for both the participant ratings (Cohen's d = 0.94, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.17) and the carer ratings (Cohen's d = 0.96, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.20). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes. In the cost-utility analyses, there was no evidence of cost-effectiveness in terms of gains in the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of the person with dementia (measured using the DEMentia Quality Of Life questionnaire utility score) or the QALYs of the carer (measured using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, three-level version) from either cost perspective. In the cost-effectiveness analyses, by reference to the primary outcome of participant-rated goal attainment, CR was cost-effective from both the health and social care perspective and the societal perspective at willingness-to-pay values of £2500 and above for improvement in the goal attainment measure. There was no evidence on the cost-effectiveness of the self-efficacy measure (the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale) from either cost perspective. LIMITATIONS Possible limitations arose from the non-feasibility of using observational outcome measures, the lack of a general measure of functional ability and the exclusion of people without a carer or with rarer forms of dementia. CONCLUSIONS Cognitive rehabilitation is clinically effective in enabling people with early-stage dementia to improve their everyday functioning in relation to individual goals targeted in the therapy sessions. FUTURE WORK Next steps will focus on the implementation of CR into NHS and social care services and on extending the approach to people with rarer forms of dementia. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN21027481. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 10. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Clare
- Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Aleksandra Kudlicka
- Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jan R Oyebode
- School of Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Roy W Jones
- Research Institute for the Care of Older People (RICE), Bath, UK
| | - Antony Bayer
- Division of Population Medicine, University Hospital Llandough, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Iracema Leroi
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael Kopelman
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ian A James
- Centre of the Health of the Elderly, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Alison Culverwell
- Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, St Martin's Hospital, Canterbury, UK
| | | | - Andrew Brand
- North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Catherine Henderson
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Zoe Hoare
- North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Martin Knapp
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | | | - Alistair Burns
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Anne Corbett
- Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Bob Woods
- Dementia Services Development Centre, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mioni G, Fracasso V, Cardullo S, Stablum F. Comparing different tests to detect early manifestation of prospective memory decline in aging. Clin Neuropsychol 2020; 36:105-137. [PMID: 32301378 DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1749308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Objective: Prospective memory (PM) is the ability to remember to perform future intentions. Previous studies have demonstrated that, compared to a younger cohort, healthy older adults have impairments in PM. Considering the importance of early detection of age-related PM decline, the present study aims to compare the performance of healthy older adults using three well-known PM tests commonly used in clinical settings.Method: In the present study, we tested 70 older adults (65-95 years old) using the Cambridge Prospective Memory Test (CAMPROMPT), the Memory for Intentions Screening Test (MIST) and the Royal Prince Alfred Prospective Memory Test (RPA-ProMem). In order to compare performance across tests and the interaction between age and cues, we performed a linear mixed model with random intercept and random slopes. Moreover, additional mixed models with random intercept were run for analyzing the additional information provided by MIST and RPA-ProMem regarding delay responses, response modality effects and type of errors committed.Results: Our data showed a drop in PM performance as age increased detected by all three tests. Furthermore, CAMPROMPT was the most sensitive test to identify differences in PM for event-and time-based cues, at least for participants with 65-77 years old. When data were analyzed in term of delay responses, participants were more accurate for 2 min delay (MIST) and 30 in delay (RPA-ProMem). Participants were less accurate when response modality was "verbal" compared to "action" (MIST) and made more PM errors as age increased.Conclusions: Overall, the study provides important information regarding age-related PM decline and can help researchers as well as clinicians in deciding the preferred test to evaluate PM performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanna Mioni
- Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Verena Fracasso
- Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Franca Stablum
- Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES With the rapid growth of the older population worldwide, understanding how older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) use memory strategies to mitigate cognitive decline is important. This study investigates differences between amnestic and nonamnestic MCI subtypes in memory strategy use in daily life, and how factors associated with cognition, general health, and psychological well-being might relate to strategy use. METHODS One hundred forty-eight participants with MCI (mean age = 67.9 years, SD = 8.9) completed comprehensive neuropsychological, medical, and psychological assessments, and the self-report 'Memory Compensation Questionnaire'. Correlational and linear regression analyses were used to explore relationships between memory strategy use and cognition, general health, and psychological well-being. RESULTS Memory strategy use does not differ between MCI subtypes (p > .007) despite higher subjective everyday memory complaints in those with amnestic MCI (p = .03). The most marked finding showed that increased reliance-type strategy use was significantly correlated with more subjective memory complaints and poorer verbal learning and memory (p < .01) in individuals with MCI. Moreover, fewer subjective memory complaints and better working memory significantly predicted (p < .05) less reliance strategy use, respectively, accounting for 10.6% and 5.3% of the variance in the model. CONCLUSIONS In general, the type of strategy use in older adults with MCI is related to cognitive functioning. By examining an individual's profile of cognitive dysfunction, a clinician can provide more personalized clinical recommendations regarding strategy use to individuals with MCI, with the aim of maintaining their day-to-day functioning and self-efficacy in daily life.
Collapse
|
9
|
Øksnebjerg L, Woods B, Waldemar G. Designing the ReACT App to Support Self-Management of People with Dementia: An Iterative User-Involving Process. Gerontology 2019; 65:673-685. [PMID: 31266031 DOI: 10.1159/000500445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assistive technology (AT) has the potential to support and enhance self-management of people living with dementia. However, a range of special and heterogeneous needs must be considered when designing and deploying AT for people with dementia, and consequently the involvement of end-users throughout the design process is essential to provide usable and effective AT solutions. OBJECTIVE The ReACT study was conducted to investigate how a tailor-made app, the ReACT app, can be designed and deployed to meet the needs of people with dementia in relation to self-management. METHODS This paper presents 4 steps of an iterative user-involving app design process. In the first step, a pilot study was conducted to explore the potential benefits and challenges of using existing off-the-shelf apps to support self-management when living with early-stage dementias. In the second step, focus group interviews provided in-depth understanding of the perspectives and needs of potential end-users of the app. The third step was a product benchmarking process, which served to further qualify the design process. Finally, results from these first 3 steps were included in the fourth step where the ReACT app was designed through an iterative codesign process. In total, 28 people with dementia, 17 family caregivers, and 10 professional caregivers were involved through these 4 iterative steps. RESULTS The functionalities and the design of the ReACT app directly reflect the perspectives and needs of end-users in relation to self-management. Support of memory and structure in daily living were identified as main needs, and the ReACT app was designed as a holistic and adaptable solution with a tailor-made calendar as a key feature. CONCLUSION Based on this extensive iterative user-involving design process, the ReACT app has great potential to support and enhance self-management of people living with dementia. Further studies are needed to test and validate the usability and impact of the app, and methods for deployment and adoption of AT for people with dementia also need to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laila Øksnebjerg
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark,
| | - Bob Woods
- Dementia Services Development Centre Wales, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|