Assessing emergence from a prolonged disorder of consciousness: Current opinion and practice in the UK

Short-term outcomes of early intensive neurorehabilitation for prolonged disorders of consciousness: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Advances in medical care have increased survival in people with severe brain injuries and with that the number of survivors with prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDOC) has increased. In the literature, early intensive neurorehabilitation (EIN) for people with PDOC is recommended to achieve the best possible outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the frequency and extent of recovery of consciousness, mortality, complications, pain and discomfort, and medication during a nationwide EIN programme in people with PDOC after acquired brain injury. We hypothesized that level of consciousness would improve in half of people with PDOC.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study. People with PDOC aged 16 years and older admitted to the EIN department centralized in a single rehabilitation centre in the Netherlands (Libra Rehabilitation & Audiology) were included. The EIN delivers a subacute medical level of care and rehabilitation for a maximum duration of 14 weeks. The outcome measures were level of consciousness (CRS-R), mortality, number of complications, medication and pain/discomfort (NCS-R).

RESULTS

Of the 104 people included, 68 % emerged to a minimal conscious state with command-following or higher during EIN and 44 % regained consciousness. Mortality during EIN was 6 %, and 50 % of deaths followed a non-treatment decision or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Almost all participants had at least 1 medical complication, leading to hospital readmission for 30 %. 73 % showed no pain or discomfort. During EIN, cardiovascular medication and analgesics were reduced by 15 %.

CONCLUSIONS

During the EIN programme, a large percentage of people with PDOC regained at least a minimal conscious state or even consciousness. These outcomes and the frequent medical complications in these people suggest that intensive specialized care should be offered to all people with PDOC. The outcomes of this study might help health professionals to better inform the families of people with PDOC about the short-term prognosis of PDOC.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The Dutch Trial Register, NL 8138.

Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for disorders of consciousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) and compare differences in efficacy between different stimulation modalities.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases for all studies published in English from inception to April 2023. Literature screening and quality assessment were performed independently by two investigators. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects of NIBS. The Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic were used to evaluate heterogeneity between studies. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify the source of heterogeneity, and differences in efficacy between different stimulation modalities were compared by Bayesian analysis.

Results

A total of 17 studies with 377 DoC patients were included. NIBS significantly improved the state of consciousness in DoC patients when compared to sham stimulation (WMD: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.46, 1.17; I2 = 78.2%, p = 0.000). When divided into subgroups according to stimulation modalities, the heterogeneity of each subgroup was significantly lower than before (I2: 0.00-30.4%, p >0.05); different stimulation modalities may be the main source of such heterogeneity. Bayesian analysis, based on different stimulation modalities, indicated that a patient's state of consciousness improved most significantly after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Diagnosis-based subgroup analysis showed that NIBS significantly improved the state of consciousness in patients with a minimal consciousness state (WMD: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.37, 1.86) but not in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or a vegetative state (WMD: 0.31; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.71). Subgroup analysis based on observation time showed that single treatment did not improve the state of consciousness in DoC patients (WMD: 0.28; 95% CI: -0.27, 0.82) while multiple treatments could (WMD: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.49, 1.61). Furthermore, NIBS had long-term effects on DoC patients (WMD: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.08-1.49).

Conclusion

Available evidence suggests that the use of NIBS on patients with DoC is more effective than sham stimulation, and that rTMS of the left DLPFC may be the most prominent stimulation modality.