Reduction of cervical and respiratory muscle strength in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain and having moderate to severe disability

Respiratory dysfunction in persistent somatic symptoms: A systematic review of observational studies

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to analyze the existing literature investigating respiratory functioning in people with Persistent Somatic Symptoms (PSS) compared to healthy controls, to identify patterns of respiratory disturbances by symptom or syndrome, and describe any respiratory outcomes consistent across diagnoses.

METHODS

A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. A comprehensive search was carried out across five databases (PubMed (NCBI), PsycArticles (Ovid), Web of Science (Core Collection), Embase, and Scopus) using two customised search strings for persistent somatic symptoms and objective respiratory parameters. Title/abstract screening and data extraction were carried out independently by two reviewers. The modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment of the studies. Studies investigating baseline respiratory functioning in adult patients with PSS compared to healthy controls, using at least one objective respiratory were included.

RESULTS

18 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review, with a pooled sample size of n = 3245. Chronic pain conditions were found to be the most prevalent subset of diagnoses of interest, comprising six of the studies. 10 studies included measures of lung capacity, flow and/or volume, nine studies reported measures of ventilation, and four studies investigated respiratory muscle functioning. 13 of the included studies reported significant differences in at least one objective respiratory measure between groups (at rest). Scores on self-reported measures of dysnpea and breathlessness were higher in patients compared to healthy controls, while objective respiratory outcomes were varied.

CONCLUSION

The current systematic review is consistent with previous literature suggesting more pronounced experiences of breathlessness in patients with PSS, and significant disparities between reported dyspnea and objective respiratory outcomes. Research investigating the uncoupling between subjective and objective respiratory outcomes is needed to understand the mechanisms behind breathing disturbances in PSS.

Conditioned pain modulation and psychological factors in young adults with recurrent or chronic neck pain

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists with the presence of alterations in descending pain inhibition mechanisms in patients with non-specific neck pain (NSNP). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the status of conditioned pain modulation CPM, remote pressure pain thresholds (PPT), and psychological factors in a specific subgroup of patients with NSNP such as young adult students. In addition, possible associations between CPM, psychological factors, and pain characteristics were analyzed.

METHODS

Thirty students with recurrent or chronic NSNP and 30 pain-free students were included in this cross-sectional study. The following measures were assessed: CPM, remote PPT, psychological factors (depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia), pain characteristics (duration, intensity, severity of chronic pain, interference with daily life), and central sensitization inventory (CSI).

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in the efficacy of CPM between students with chronic or recurrent NSNP and pain-free students (β coefficient = -0.67; 95% CI = -1.54, 0.20). However, students with pain showed a significantly higher remote PPT (mean difference = -1.94; 95% CI = -2.71, -1.18). and a greater presence of anxious (mean difference = 6; 95% CI = 2, 9) and depressive symptoms (mean difference = 8.57; 95% CI = 3.97, 13.16). In addition, significant moderate or strong correlations were found between CPM and pain intensity (partial r = 0.41), pain catastrophizing and mean pain intensity (r = 0.37), grade (r = 0.50), and interference of pain (r = 0.57), kinesiophobia and disability (r = 0.38), and depression and CSI (r = 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Young adult students with chronic or recurrent NSNP present remote hyperalgesia and symptoms of depression and anxiety but not dysfunctional CPM.

Differences of diaphragmatic muscle contraction between female patients with chronic neck pain and asymptomatic controls: A case-control study based on ultrasonography

BACKGROUND

Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses show that individuals with chronic neck pain (CNP) have altered respiratory muscle strength and abnormal respiratory mechanics. However, no study has investigated the diaphragmatic function in individuals with CNP compared to asymptomatic peers.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the respiratory muscle strength and diaphragmatic function between patients with CNP and asymptomatic controls.

DESIGN

Observational, case-control study.

METHODS

A total of 25 women with CNP and 23 asymptomatic controls participated in this case-control study. The visual analog scale and neck disability index were used to assess the pain and disability characteristics of the CNP group. Maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP) were measured to determine respiratory muscle strengths. The diaphragmatic function (muscle thickness in deep inspiration, Tins; and at the end of calm expiration, Texp; muscle thickness change, ΔT; contraction ratio, CR) were evaluated by two-dimensional ultrasonography.

RESULTS

The MIP (p = 0.001, d = 1.11), ΔT (p = 0.033, d = 0.63), and CR (p = 0.012, d = 0.75) of the diaphragm were found significantly reduced in the CNP group compared to asymptomatic controls whilst MEP, Tins, and Texp of the diaphragm were similar between study groups (p > 0.05). The intensity of neck pain was moderately correlated with MIP (r = -0.48), Tins (r = -0.46), and ΔT (r = -0.42) while NDI (r = -0.42) had a moderate correlation with Tins (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The present findings revealed that women with CNP have altered diaphragmatic function. Thus, screening and targeting diaphragm may improve the rehabilitation process in CNP. However, further experimental studies regarding the efficacy of breathing exercise approaches are needed.

Comparison of breathing pattern and diaphragmatic motion in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy and asymptomatic group

BACKGROUND

The associations between neck pain and respiratory dysfunction were clarified in patients with neck pain. There is dearth of evidence on pulmonary dysfunction and diaphragmatic excursion in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy (CR). The purpose of this study was to compare the breathing pattern and diaphragmatic excursion in patients with unilateral CR with those in an asymptomatic group.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with unilateral CR and 25 asymptomatic individuals aged between 30 and 55 participated in this study. Diaphragmatic motion, breathing pattern, active cervical range of motion and kinesiophobia were investigated in both groups by using fluoroscopy, manual assessment of respiratory motion (MARM), cervical range of motion device, and Tampa scale of kinesiophobia. Statistical significance was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups with regard to sex, age and body mass index. The mean excursion of the hemi diaphragm on the involved side (the side of CR) was significantly lower than that on the uninvolved side in patients with unilateral CR with a large effect size. The excursion of the involved hemi diaphragm in patients was reduced compared to the matched hemi diaphragm in the control group. There was no significant difference between the hemi diaphragms excursion in the control group. The results of the MARM variables showed that the volume of breathing and the percentage rib cage motion in normal and deep breathing were significantly different between the two groups, but there was no significant difference in the balance of breathing between the two groups. Additionally, the active cervical range of motion was reduced in these patients in comparison to the control group, and it was less on the involved side than on the uninvolved side.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study revealed a dysfunctional breathing pattern in normal and deep breathing and a unilateral reduction in diaphragmatic excursion on the side of radiculopathy in patients with unilateral CR compared to the control group.

Impact of Indoor Air Quality and Breathing on Back and Neck Pain: A Systematic Review

Back pain and neck pain are important public health concerns and are among the most common and disabling conditions globally. However, the relationships among indoor air quality (IAQ), breathing parameters (pulmonary function, respiratory disorders), and back pain and neck pain have not been adequately assessed. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature about the impact of IAQ and breathing parameters on back pain and neck pain (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022380515). CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDRo, and PubMed databases were searched through January 19, 2023. Inclusion criteria for study eligibility were observational studies (except case reports) or randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published in peer-reviewed journals in the English language, human research, original research, examined the relationships between IAQ, or breathing parameters with back pain or neck pain. Review procedures were conducted and reported according to PRISMA recommendations. Empirical evidence statements were developed for observational studies, and grades of evidence statements were developed for RCTs. Sixty-seven eligible studies were found (54 observational studies and 13 RCTs) that enrolled 345,832 participants. None of the studies assessed the combined impact of IAQ and breathing parameters on back pain or neck pain. No level 1 studies were found, which precludes making strong statements about causality and strong recommendations about the efficacy of IAQ and breathing exercise interventions for reducing pain and disability related to back pain and neck pain. Evidence indicates that poor IAQ and respiratory disorders are related to an increased risk of back pain and neck pain. Conflicting evidence exists about the association between pulmonary function with back pain and neck pain. Evidence for breathing exercise interventions was mixed with numerous limitations. This review provides preliminary evidence on the relationships of IAQ and breathing parameters with back pain and neck pain, which can be used to guide future research and clinical implementation efforts. Assuming positive findings in subsequent research, a wide range of stakeholders involved with this complex human-building-environment interface can be equipped to address IAQ and breathing parameters, along with other established risk factors to help those suffering from back pain and neck pain.

Effects of breathing reeducation on cervical and pulmonary outcomes in patients with non specific chronic neck pain: A double blind randomized controlled trial

Objective

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to study effects of breathing reeducation in the treatment of patients with non specific chronic neck pain.

Methods

A total of sixty eight eligible patients with chronic neck pain were randomly allocated to breathing reeducation (BR) group (n = 34) and routine physical therapy (RPT) group (n = 34). Clinical outcomes were neck pain measured through visual analogue score, cervical active range of motion through CROM device, strength of neck muscles through hand held dynamometer and endurance of neck muscles measured through craniocervical flexion test. The neck disability was measured through neck disability index (NDI) and pulmonary outcomes such as forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC ratio were measured through Spirolab 4. The outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 4 and at 8 weeks from baseline.

Results

There were significant improvements in the BR group compared with the RPT group (P = 0.002) for cervical flexion, extension (P = 0.029), endurance (P = 0.042), strength of neck flexors (P <0.001), neck extensors (P = 0.034). Likewise there was a significant change in NDI (P = 0.011), FEV1 (P = 0.045), FVC (P <0.001), and FEV1/FVC ratio (P <0.001) in the BR group compared with the RPT group. The cervical side flexion and rotation showed no significant difference in breathing reeducation group with p > 0.05.

Conclusion

Breathing reeducation combined with routine physical therapy is an effective treatment in patients with non specific chronic neck pain.

Trial registration

IRCT 20200226046623N1, https://www.irct.ir/trial/46240.

Respiratory dysfunction in patients with chronic neck pain: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine the differences in respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary function between patients with chronic neck pain (CNP) and asymptomatic individuals.

METHODS

Databases were MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and EMBASE up to the end of September 2021. Studies with cross-sectional and longitudinal design were selected, with adult patients with CNP and asymptomatic individuals with reports respiratory function.

RESULTS

11 studies met the inclusion criteria and 10 were included in the meta-analysis showing a statistically significant reduction in inspiratory/expiratory muscle strength (MIP/MEP) in the patients with CNP compared with the asymptomatic individuals (mean difference (MD) for MIP, -11.67 [-14.57 to -8.77]; MD for MEP, -11.80 [-14.99 to -8.60]) and pulmonary function: vital capacity (standardized mean difference (SMD), -0.31 [-0.56 to -0.06]); maximum voluntary ventilation (SMD, -0.36 [-0.59 to -0.14]); forced vital capacity (SMD, -0.53 [-0.99 to -0.06]); peak expiratory flow (SMD, -0.58 [-1.03 to -0.12]); and forced expiratory volume in the first second (SMD, -0.28 [-0.51 to -0.05]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CNP have reduced respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary function compared with asymptomatic individuals, and this difference could be clinically meaningful. However, more studies of high methodological quality and longitudinal studies are needed to strengthen the results of this meta-analysis. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONRespiratory dysfunction has been observed in patients with chronic neck pain.Patients with chronic neck pain present a decrease in respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary function compared with asymptomatic individuals.Respiratory pattern disorders should be considered in the clinical context of chronic neck pain.Interventions focused on respiratory muscle training could be helpful for this population.

Chronic neck pain and respiratory dysfunction: a review paper

Background

Neck pain is one of the most frequently reported musculoskeletal complaints among adults; its prevalence in the world is ranging from 16.7 to 75.1%. It can have an impact on a person’s physical, psychological, and social well-being. Along with pain, disability, muscle weakness, and alterations in the posture, neck pain patients are likely to develop affection of the respiratory function as reported in numerous studies. However, these patients are primarily managed with a musculoskeletal perspective with little or no emphasis to the changes observed in the respiratory system. There is a paucity of literature evaluating the need for respiratory rehabilitation in these patients.

Main body

All relevant published literature related to respiratory dysfunction in patients with chronic neck pain were critically reviewed in this study. Patients having chronic neck pain were found to have alterations in respiratory function in terms of reduced lung volumes, reduced chest mobility, and decreased respiratory muscle strength. Various factors such as decreased cervical range of motion, decreased strength of deep neck flexors and extensors, forward head posture, and pain are known to cause these dysfunctions. Respiratory system intervention in the form of breathing re-education and respiratory exercises are significantly proven to improve treatment outcomes.

Conclusion

There is limited literature relating to respiratory dysfunction and its management in neck pain patients. Incorporation of both respiratory and musculoskeletal assessments can enhance their treatment outcomes. Additionally, it can be suggested to consider intervention in the form of respiratory rehabilitation while strategizing treatment goals for these patients.

Neck Pain and Disability: Are They Related to Dysfunctional Breathing and Stress?

Purpose: People with neck pain are likely to have negative respiratory findings. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between neck pain and dysfunctional breathing and to examine their relationship to stress. Method: This cross-sectional study included 49 participants with neck pain and 49 age- and sex-matched controls. We measured neck pain using the numeric rating scale (NRS); neck disability using the Neck Disability Index (NDI); dysfunctional breathing using the Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ), Self-Evaluation of Breathing Questionnaire (SEBQ), breath hold time, and respiratory rate (RR); and stress using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Results:Participants with neck pain scored higher on the NQ ( p < 0.001) and the SEBQ ( p < 0.001) than controls. NQ and SEBQ scores correlated moderately with NDI scores ( r > 0.50; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.68 and 0.33, 0.73, respectively) and PSS scores ( r > 0.50; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.78 and 0.31, 0.73, respectively). SEBQ scores showed a fair correlation with NRS scores and RR a fair correlation with NDI scores. Conclusions: Participants with neck pain had more dysfunctional breathing symptoms than participants without neck pain, and dysfunctional breathing was correlated with increased neck disability and increased stress. The NQ and SEBQ can be useful in assessing dysfunctional breathing in patients with neck pain.

Sensory, Motor, and Psychosocial Characteristics of Individuals With Chronic Neck Pain: A Case-Control Study

OBJECTIVE

Given the complex and unclear etiology of neck pain, it is important to understand the differences in central sensitization as well as psychosocial factors in individuals with chronic neck pain and healthy controls. The purpose of this study was to benchmark differences in central sensitization, psychosocial factors, and range of motion between people with nonspecific chronic neck pain and healthy controls and to analyze the correlation between pain intensity, neck disability, and psychosocial factors in people with chronic neck pain.

METHODS

Thirty individuals with chronic neck pain and 30 healthy controls were included in this case-control study. Outcome measures were as follows: central sensitization (pressure pain threshold, temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation), psychosocial factors (depressive symptoms, pain catastrophizing, and quality of life), and active cervical range of motion.

RESULTS

People with neck pain had lower local pressure pain threshold, a decrease in conditioned pain modulation, more depressive symptoms, greater pain catastrophizing, lower quality of life, and reduced range of motion for neck rotation when compared with healthy controls. In people with neck pain, moderate correlations were observed between pain intensity and quality of life (ρ = -0.479), disability and pain catastrophizing (ρ = 0.379), and disability and quality of life (ρ = -0.456).

CONCLUSIONS

People with neck pain have local hyperalgesia, impaired conditioning pain modulation, depressive symptoms, pain catastrophizing, low quality of life, and reduced active range of motion during neck rotation, which should be taken into account during assessment and treatment.

IMPACT

This study shows that important outcomes, such as central sensitization and psychosocial factors, should be considered during assessment and treatment of individuals with nonspecific chronic neck pain. In addition, pain intensity and neck disability are correlated with psychosocial factors.

Reliability and Validity of Clinical Tests for Measuring Strength or Endurance of Cervical Muscles: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability and validity of clinical tests for measuring cervical muscle strength or endurance in participants with and without neck pain.

DATA SOURCE

Systematic review and meta-analysis on reliability and validity. Literature search was conducted on January 28, 2020, using 5 databases: MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, and Scopus.

STUDY SELECTION

We included studies that investigated the reliability or validity of clinical tests for measuring cervical muscle strength or endurance in participants with nonspecific chronic neck pain, with or without irradiation, or healthy participants. We included only those that were viable for daily practice and of low cost.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted as follows: (1) author and year of publication, (2) demographic values and health condition, (3) reported clinical tests, (4) inclusion and exclusion criteria, (5) description of test, (6) interrater reliability, and (7) intrarater reliability. For validity studies we also extracted the (8) reference method and (9) validity estimates.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Methodological quality was assessed with the Quality Appraisal of Diagnostic Reliability and the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies. Data on reliability and validity were extracted from included articles and then analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were included. Cervical flexor and extensor endurance test, craniocervical flexion test (CCFT), AND cervical muscle strength using a handheld dynamometer (HHD) showed moderate to good intra- and interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.64-0.90). Concurrent validity was measured by only 2 studies, which do not provide adequate evidence for a recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

The cervical flexor and extensor endurance tests, CCFT, and HHD for measuring cervical strength presented an acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability.

Respiratory Dysfunction in Individuals With Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare pulmonary function and respiratory muscle strength and endurance in individuals with thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) and healthy participants.

METHODS

Sixty-two individuals with TOS (mean age 30.81 ± 10.69 years; 10 male, 52 female) and 47 healthy individuals (mean age 30.64 ± 9.16 years; 14 male, 33 female) participated in this study. Pulmonary function testing was performed using a spirometer. Respiratory muscle strength (maximal inspiratory pressure [MIP] and maximal expiratory pressure [MEP]) were measured using a mouth pressure device. Respiratory muscle endurance was tested at 35% MIP and measured as the time in seconds from the start of the test to voluntary exhaustion.

RESULTS

Age distribution and physical characteristics were similar between the groups (P > .05). All pulmonary function parameters except for peak expiratory flow rate were similar in patients with TOS and healthy controls (P > .05). Patients with TOS had significantly lower peak expiratory flow rate, MIP, MIP%, MEP, MEP%, and respiratory muscle endurance compared with controls (P < .05). Forty-six patients with TOS (74.2%) had MIP values below the lower limit of the 95% CI of the control group (97.05-113.88 cmH₂O), and 53 patients with TOS (85.2%) had MEP values below the lower limit of the 95% CI of the control group (124.74-146.49 cmH₂O).

CONCLUSION

Expiratory flow rate and respiratory muscle strength and endurance may be adversely affected in TOS. Trunk muscles perform both postural and breathing functions. Therefore, disruption in one function may negatively affect the other.