Development of the MobQoL patient reported outcome measure for mobility-related quality of life

QALYs and ambulatory status: societal preferences for healthcare decision making

BACKGROUND

This research aimed to review the theoretical and methodological aspects of the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) which give rise to potential for bias against certain patient populations, including those with problems with walking or an inability to walk (ambulatory disabilities), when health technology assessment decisions rely on QALY gain to show cost-effectiveness. Societal preferences for treating ambulatory versus non-ambulatory patients were also investigated.

METHODS

We reviewed published literature to identify information on theoretical underpinnings of the QALY, measurement of utilities for QALY assessment, and empirical evidence of societal preferences for the treatment of ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Health states which represent mobility impairment and the inability to walk receive low valuation from general public preferences. Non-ambulatory patients, for example those with advanced neuromuscular disease, have lower utilities determined by standardized preference-based measurement (PBM) tools. Any treatment that increases survival but could not restore ambulation would result in lower lifetime QALY gains for non-ambulatory versus ambulatory patients. Treatments could therefore potentially be deemed less cost-effective, or not cost-effective at all for this patient population.Empirical research indicates a societal preference for equal treatment of patients regardless of ambulatory status. The main limitation of our review was the non-systematic approach to evidence search and review, however, given the broad scope of content required to meet the aims of the review, we believe that the targeted approach was appropriate. The evidence presented in this article highlights the need for alternatives to strict QALY-based approaches to prevent avoidable health inequities when determining cost-effectiveness of healthcare interventions for non-ambulatory populations against fixed cost-effectiveness thresholds. An alternative metric, the Equal Value of Life Years Gained (evLYG), has been proposed as a supplementary measure for use alongside the QALY for its potential to alleviate bias against disabled patient populations during the assessment of healthcare treatments.

Preference-based measurement of mobility-related quality of life: developing the MobQoL-7D health state classification system

PURPOSE

Generic preference-based measures often lack validity in states of impaired mobility. Our aim was to derive a novel health state classification system from the MobQoL tool, for the purpose of preference-based measurement of states of impaired mobility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected through online and postal surveys. Respondents were recruited through the NHS, charitable organisations and HealthWise Wales. Statistical and psychometric analyses were used to assess the validity and reliability of the MobQoL tool. Exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis were used to determine dimensional structure and to select items for the MobQoL health state classification system.

RESULTS

Three hundred and forty-two respondents completed the survey. Respondents had a wide range of different mobility impairments. Nine of the MobQoL items demonstrated adequate validity and reliability. Exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis confirmed two sub-scales within the item structure: 1) physical and role functioning, and 2) mental wellbeing. Seven items were found to have adequate model fit and were retained in the final health state classification system, called the MobQoL-7D.

CONCLUSIONS

The MobQoL-7D contains seven dimensions of mobility-related quality of life: accessibility, contribution, pain/discomfort, independence, self-esteem, mood/emotions and anxiety. Population level preference weights are now needed for different states of mobility impairment.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONMobility impairment has distinct impacts on mental wellbeing and physical/role functioning.The MobQoL-7D will facilitate accurate preference-based outcome measurement in populations with impaired mobility, which in turn will promote methods of economic evaluation in this context.MobQoL-7D offers a concise and valid tool for rehabilitation professionals to measure and monitor mobility-related quality of life as part of routine clinical practice.

Preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in congenital mobility impairment: a systematic review of validity and responsiveness

INTRODUCTION

Mobility impairment is the leading cause of disability in the UK. Individuals with congenital mobility impairments have unique experiences of health, quality of life and adaptation. Preference-based outcomes measures are often used to help inform decisions about healthcare funding and prioritisation, however the applicability and accuracy of these measures in the context of congenital mobility impairment is unclear. Inaccurate outcome measures could potentially affect the care provided to these patient groups. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the performance of preference-based outcome measures for the measurement of utility values in various forms of congenital mobility impairment.

METHODS

Ten databases were searched, including Science Direct, CINAHL and PubMed. Screening of reference lists and hand-searching were also undertaken. Descriptive and narrative syntheses were conducted to combine and analyse the various findings. Results were grouped by condition. Outcome measure performance indicators were adapted from COSMIN guidance and were grouped into three broad categories: validity, responsiveness and reliability. Screening, data extraction and quality appraisal were carried out by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies were considered eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. The vast majority of studies related to either cerebral palsy, spina bifida or childhood hydrocephalus. Other relevant conditions included muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy and congenital clubfoot. The most commonly used preference-based outcome measure was the HUI3. Reporting of performance properties predominantly centred around construct validity, through known group analyses and assessment of convergent validity between comparable measures and different types of respondents. A small number of studies assessed responsiveness, but assessment of reliability was not reported. Increased clinical severity appears to be associated with decreased utility outcomes in congenital mobility impairment, particularly in terms of gross motor function in cerebral palsy and lesion level in spina bifida. However, preference-based measures exhibit limited correlation with various other condition-specific and clinically relevant outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

Preference-based measures exhibit important issues and discrepancies relating to validity and responsiveness in the context of congenital mobility impairment, thus care must be taken when utilising these measures in conditions associated with congenital mobility impairments.