The most common comorbidities in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a 15-year nationwide population-based cohort study

Estimates of the excess cost burden of Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: a United States MarketScan® claims database analysis

Introduction

Patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) have significant health challenges that are well-documented, however their impact in terms of cost is not known. Our research objective was to examine the cost burden of EDS and HSD in the United States. We focused this analysis on those with commercial insurance plans.

Methods

We queried the MarketScan® database for year 2021 for claims that contained an ICD-10 diagnosis code for EDS or hypermobility. Excess costs for patients in the EDS and HSD cohorts were determined by matching each patient to one patient in the database that did not have a claim for EDS or HSD and comparing total costs for the calendar year. We determined whether patients had claims for selected comorbid conditions likely to impact costs during the calendar year.

Results

Sample sizes were 5,113 for adult (age ≥ 18) patients with EDS, 4,880 for adult patients with HSD, 1,059 for child (age 5-17) patients with EDS, and 2,427 for child patients with HSD. The mean excess costs were $21,100 for adult EDS patients, $11,600 for adult HSD patients, $17,000 for child EDS patients, and $11,000 for child HSD patients. EDS and HSD cohorts, both adults and children, with any of the comorbidities had greater healthcare costs. The largest difference was found in the EDS cohort with gastrointestinal comorbid conditions, with more than double the costs for adults.

Discussion

We found that patients in the MarketScan database, adults and children, who had EDS or HSD had substantially higher associated excess healthcare costs than patients without EDS or HSD when considering age, sex, geographic location, and comorbidities. These disproportionate healthcare costs in this population have health policy and economic implications, including the need for rapid diagnosis, access to treatment, and accelerated research to advance treatments.

Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Patients With Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database analysis.

OBJECTIVES

To study postoperative complication rates following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) compared with patients without EDS.

METHODS

The Mariner database was utilized to identify patients with EDS undergoing one or two level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Postoperative short-term outcomes assessed included medical complications, readmissions, and ED-visits within 90 days of surgery. Additionally, surgical complications including wound complications, surgical site infection, one- and two-year anterior revision along with posterior revision, pseudarthrosis, and hardware failure within 2 years were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for demographic variables, comorbidities and number of levels operated on.

RESULTS

The present study identified 533 patients in the EDS group and 2634 patients in the matched control group. EDS patients undergoing ACDF are at an increased risk for 90-day major medical complications (OR 3.31; P < .001). EDS patients were also found to be associated with surgical complications including wound complications (OR 2.94; P < .001), surgical site infection (OR 8.60; P < .001) within 90 days, pseudarthrosis (OR 2.33; P < .001), instrument failure (OR 4.03; P < .001), anterior revision (OR 22.87; P < .001), and posterior revision (OR 3.17; P < .001) within 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

EDS is associated with higher rates of both medical and surgical complications following ACDF. Spine surgeons should be cognizant of the increased risks in this population to provide appropriate preoperative counseling and enhanced perioperative medical management.

Assessment of a novel Ehlers-Danlos syndromes disability index

Background

The Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) are a group of inherited connective tissue disorders characterized by disruptions in collagen synthesis and processing. These disorders lead to various symptoms, including hypermobility, musculoskeletal conditions, and chronic pain that can significantly limit patients' daily living. In the absence of a curative treatment, an EDS specific disability index that tracks changes in patient-reported outcomes can facilitate the investigation of new treatment options and enhance the quality of life for EDS patients.

Methods

An EDS-specific disability index was created using survey data and input from clinicians. A total of 222 EDS patients in a multidisciplinary clinical program completed the index during their initial visit. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to determine the index's factor solution and assess its goodness-of-fit. Paired t-tests were performed with follow-up visit data collected over the course of one year.

Results

The exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated a two-factor solution, accounting for 42.40% of the variance. The index demonstrated adequate fit to the data, supported by Tucker and Lewis's index (0.85) and root mean square error of approximation (0.1). Data from follow-up visits showed significant improvement in three symptom related variables and one function related variable in addition to the total score and the symptom subscale score when compared to the initial visit.

Conclusion

The development of an EDS-specific disability index is a crucial step in creating a clinical tool that enables healthcare professionals to gain a deeper understanding of the impact EDS has on patients' lives and potentially identify new therapeutic interventions.

Clinical trajectory of hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorders in older adults

BACKGROUND

Research on hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorder (hEDS/HSD) has described its natural history and clinical course in children, adolescents, and young to middle-aged adults. However, more research is needed on the clinical trajectory of hEDS/HSD into older age. Therefore, clinicians, including nurse practitioners, know little about identifying older adults with undiagnosed hEDS/HSD.

OBJECTIVE

This review sought to identify studies regarding aging in hEDS/HSD.

DATA SOURCES

This scoping review included PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Scopus and found 15 studies that mentioned age or aging on the symptoms and health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

No study had a stated aim regarding aging in hEDS/HSD, but all studies corroborated earlier natural history studies describing the age-related trajectory of manifestations in younger people. Studies found that symptom progression was heterogeneous, multisystemic, and unpredictable. Studies also noted prolonged diagnosis delays and long symptom duration, but the impact of these factors on outcomes was unclear. The high variability in patient outcomes precludes the prediction of outcomes based on the included studies. The clinical impact of aging on hEDS/HSD remains mostly speculative.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nurse practitioners, especially those in primary care, should consider that older adults presenting with multimorbidity may have undiagnosed hEDS/HSD. More research is needed to identify symptom patterns and clinical history that may suggest an underlying connective tissue disorder.

Assessment of functional respiratory complaints and related factors in people with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: Cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) is the most common type of EDS. Apart from joint symptoms, people with hEDS have systemic manifestations as a chronic modification of the breathing pattern (functional respiratory complaints (FRCs)) and mental disorders. However, the prevalence of FRCs, and its relationship with mental disorders, have not yet been estimated for this population.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the FRCs, central sensitization, disease perception, depression, and anxiety in people with hEDS from Belgium; and to identify the clustering of FRCs and determine any association with the characteristics assessed for this sample.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study assessed socio-demographic characteristics, Nijmegen questionnaire (NQ), Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in people with hEDS from Belgium. A two-step cluster analysis was performed to identify clusters according to NQ, and to understand how the other questionnaires are grouped among these clusters.

RESULTS

The Spearman correlation coefficients showed that all the outcomes were significantly and positively correlated with each other (p<0.05). Furthermore, 84.9% of the sample had symptoms suggestive of FRCs, and 54.3% had probable anxiety. Three clusters were grouped (no FRCs, mild FRCs, and severe FRCs), with NQ, HADS-D and CSI-part A being the variables that contributed the most. People from cluster of severe FRCs got the worst scores for all the questionnaires.

CONCLUSION

FRCs, central sensitization, depression, and anxiety are prevalent comorbidities in people with hEDS. Moreover, those people with FRCs had worse results in the investigated parameters, with depression being the variable that contributed the most to the clusters of FRCs. Consequently, investigating mechanisms for these co-occurring symptom profiles may improve our understanding of pathogenesis and indicate new management strategies to alleviate these symptoms and lead to the development of more effective care for persons with hEDS.

Pediatric joint hypermobility: a diagnostic framework and narrative review

BACKGROUND

Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) are debilitating conditions. Diagnosis is currently clinical in the absence of biomarkers, and criteria developed for adults are difficult to use in children and biologically immature adolescents. Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) is a prerequisite for hEDS and generalized HSD. Current literature identifies a large proportion of children as hypermobile using a Beighton score ≥ 4 or 5/9, the cut off for GJH in adults. Other phenotypic features from the 2017 hEDS criteria can arise over time. Finally, many comorbidities described in hEDS/HSD are also seen in the general pediatric and adolescent population. Therefore, pediatric specific criteria are needed. The Paediatric Working Group of the International Consortium on EDS and HSD has developed a pediatric diagnostic framework presented here. The work was informed by a review of the published evidence.

OBSERVATIONS

The framework has 4 components, GJH, skin and tissue abnormalities, musculoskeletal complications, and core comorbidities. A Beighton score of ≥ 6/9 best identifies children with GJH at 2 standard deviations above average, based on published general population data. Skin and soft tissue changes include soft skin, stretchy skin, atrophic scars, stretch marks, piezogenic papules, and recurrent hernias. Two symptomatic groups were agreed: musculoskeletal and systemic. Emerging comorbid relationships are discussed. The framework generates 8 subgroups, 4 pediatric GJH, and 4 pediatric generalized hypermobility spectrum disorders. hEDS is reserved for biologically mature adolescents who meet the 2017 criteria, which also covers even rarer types of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome at any age.

CONCLUSIONS

This framework allows hypermobile children to be categorized into a group describing their phenotypic and symptomatic presentation. It clarifies the recommendation that comorbidities should be defined using their current internationally accepted frameworks. This provides a foundation for improving clinical care and research quality in this population.

Bone fragility in Hereditary Connective Tissue Disorders: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate bone fragility in patients with hereditary connective tissue disorders (HCTD), including Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), Marfan's syndrome (MFS) and Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS).

METHODS

From inception to June 2022, potentially eligible studies were identified in the Medline and EMBASE databases using search strategy that included terms for "HCTD", "Fracture" and "Osteoporosis". Eligible studies must consist of a group of patients with HCTD and report prevalence/incidence of fracture/osteoporosis in their participants, with or without comparison with healthy individuals. Point estimates with standard errors were obtained from each study and combined using the generic inverse variance method.

RESULTS

Among the 4,206 articles identified, 19 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of fracture in EDS, MFS and LDS were 44% (95%CI, 25 - 65%, I² 88%), 17% (95%CI, 11 - 26%, I² 68%), 69% (95%CI, 47 - 85%, I² 83%), respectively. The pooled prevalence of osteoporosis in EDS was 17% (95%CI, 8 - 34%, I² 96%). EDS was associated with fracture [pooled odds ratio 4.90 (95%CI, 1.49 - 16.08, I² 86%)], but not osteoporosis [pooled odds ratio 1.34 (95%CI, 0.28 - 6.36, I² 87%). One study reported a 5% (95%CI, 3 - 8%) prevalence of osteoporosis in MFS, which was associated with fracture [incidence rate ratio 1.35 (95%CI, 1.18 - 1.55)] and osteoporosis [subhazard ratio 3.97 (95%CI, 2.53 - 6.25)].

CONCLUSION

EDS was associated with fracture, which could be independent of osteoporosis status. MFS had a milder degree of increased risk of fracture and osteoporosis. Despite no data from cohort studies, there was a significantly higher rate of fracture in LDS.

The value of dynamic elastomeric fabric orthoses in the management of a complex hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome patient: A case report

The use of dynamic elastomeric fabric orthoses is examined in a young woman with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) referred for physiotherapy with hip dysplasia, prior to a right periacetabular osteotomy. Dynamic elastomeric fabric orthoses plus rigorous subjective examination, therapists' listening skills, and patient-centered goals were useful for this hEDS patient.

Secondary Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a global public health problem, with fractures contributing to significant morbidity and mortality. Although postmenopausal osteoporosis is most common, up to 30% of postmenopausal women, > 50% of premenopausal women, and between 50% and 80% of men have secondary osteoporosis. Exclusion of secondary causes is important, as treatment of such patients often commences by treating the underlying condition. These are varied but often neglected, ranging from endocrine to chronic inflammatory and genetic conditions. General screening is recommended for all patients with osteoporosis, with advanced investigations reserved for premenopausal women and men aged < 50 years, for older patients in whom classical risk factors for osteoporosis are absent, and for all patients with the lowest bone mass (Z-score ≤ -2). The response of secondary osteoporosis to conventional anti-osteoporosis therapy may be inadequate if the underlying condition is unrecognized and untreated. Bone densitometry, using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, may underestimate fracture risk in some chronic diseases, including glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, type 2 diabetes, and obesity, and may overestimate fracture risk in others (eg, Turner syndrome). FRAX and trabecular bone score may provide additional information regarding fracture risk in secondary osteoporosis, but their use is limited to adults aged ≥ 40 years and ≥ 50 years, respectively. In addition, FRAX requires adjustment in some chronic conditions, such as glucocorticoid use, type 2 diabetes, and HIV. In most conditions, evidence for antiresorptive or anabolic therapy is limited to increases in bone mass. Current osteoporosis management guidelines also neglect secondary osteoporosis and these existing evidence gaps are discussed.

Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes, Joint Hypermobility and Hypermobility Spectrum Disorders

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is an umbrella term for a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of hereditary soft connective tissue disorders mainly featuring abnormal cutaneous texture (doughy/velvety, soft, thin, and/or variably hyperextensible skin), easy bruising, and joint hypermobility. Currently, musculoskeletal manifestations related to joint hypermobility are perceived as the most prevalent determinants of the quality of life of affected individuals. The 2017 International Classification of Ehlers-Danlos syndromes and related disorders identifies 13 clinical types due to deleterious variants in 19 different genes. Recent publications point out the possibility of a wider spectrum of conditions that may be considered members of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome community. Most Ehlers-Danlos syndromes are due to inherited abnormalities affecting the biogenesis of fibrillar collagens and other components of the extracellular matrix. The introduction of next-generation sequencing technologies in the diagnostic setting fastened patients' classification and improved our knowledge on the phenotypic variability of many Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. This is impacting significantly patients' management and family counseling. At the same time, most individuals presenting with joint hypermobility and associated musculoskeletal manifestations still remain without a firm diagnosis, due to a too vague clinical presentation and/or the lack of an identifiable molecular biomarker. These individuals are currently defined with the term "hypermobility spectrum disorders". Hence, in parallel with a continuous update of the International Classification of Ehlers-Danlos syndromes, the scientific community is investing efforts in offering a more efficient framework for classifying and, hopefully, managing individuals with joint hypermobility.

Practical management strategies for benign hypermobility syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with symptomatic hypermobility syndrome such as hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) commonly present to rheumatologists with joint pain and functional disability. Providers often have difficulty with diagnosis due to a lack of knowledge on the range of associated manifestations and the available therapeutic modalities. This review will discuss recent updates on diagnostic measures and treatment options for rheumatologists to help patients navigate hEDS/HSD.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article describes newer diagnostic measures and assessment of hEDS/HSD manifestations. Evidence supporting physical therapy and occupational therapy is provided, as well as recent updates on assistive devices, compressive garments, orthoses, and surgical interventions. Given patient heterogeneity specific guidance about the amount and type of therapies required to produce a beneficial effect is lacking. Treatment should be individualized, and many of the studies focus on regional joint complaints rather than a whole-body approach.

SUMMARY

Physical therapy and occupational therapy remain the cornerstone of treatment.