1
|
Turner-Stokes L, Benaichouche-Motam K, Goodison W, Altaie A, Howard A, McKnight P, Alfonso J. Improving the systematic screening and documentation of mental capacity for patients with severe brain injury: The Mental Capacity Screening assessment tool (MCScreen). Clin Med (Lond) 2024; 24:100236. [PMID: 39168184 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinme.2024.100236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2024] [Revised: 08/07/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
For patients who may lack capacity, the Mental Capacity Act 2005 requires capacity to be assessed for each decision at the time that treatment is offered, but this is not practical for every element of basic care and intervention delivered to patients undergoing rehabilitation following acquired brain injury, especially if their needs are changing. In this quality improvement project, we introduced a system for screening Mental Capacity and documentation to identify patients with a) largely intact cognition for whom capacity may be reasonably be presumed, and b) those in prolonged disorders of consciousness who clearly lacked capacity for all decisions. This enabled the multidisciplinary team to concentrate on evaluation of capacity in the third group who had more nuanced ability and required detailed assessment or support for decision-making. Two rounds of audit demonstrated that implementation improved the consistency of assessment and documentation. Multicentre roll-out of this approach is now required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynne Turner-Stokes
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, UK; Regional Hyper-acute Rehabilitation Unit, London North-West University Hospitals Trust, UK.
| | | | - William Goodison
- Rehabilitation Medicine, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS, UK
| | - Adam Altaie
- Regional Hyper-acute Rehabilitation Unit, London North-West University Hospitals Trust, UK
| | - Alice Howard
- Regional Hyper-acute Rehabilitation Unit, London North-West University Hospitals Trust, UK
| | - Patrick McKnight
- Regional Hyper-acute Rehabilitation Unit, London North-West University Hospitals Trust, UK
| | - Jessie Alfonso
- Regional Hyper-acute Rehabilitation Unit, London North-West University Hospitals Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hinckley J, Jayes M. Person-centered care for people with aphasia: tools for shared decision-making. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES 2023; 4:1236534. [PMID: 37928752 PMCID: PMC10623353 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1236534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Shared decision-making is a fundamental aspect of person-centered care, and can and should be part of many different aspects of the rehabilitation process. Communication disabilities like aphasia, which affects people's ability to use and understand spoken and written language, can make shared decision-making especially challenging to the resources and skills of rehabilitation practitioners. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive description of tools that can support successful shared decision-making with people with aphasia in the rehabilitation environment. These tools and strategies are appropriate for use by physicians, nurses, social workers, physical therapists (also referred to as physiotherapists), occupational therapists, and other service or care providers. The important role of speech-language pathologists as consultants is also described. Case scenarios throughout the paper illustrate the application of recommended tools and strategies along with best practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Hinckley
- Department of Speech/Language Pathology, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, United States
| | - Mark Jayes
- Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Menger F, Cresswell H, Lewis J, Volkmer A, Sharp L. Speaking up for the lost voices: representation and inclusion of people with communication impairment in brain tumour research. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:355. [PMID: 37237058 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07804-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Brain tumours and their associated treatments can lead to progressive impairments of communication, adversely affecting quality-of-life. This commentary explores our concerns that people with speech, language, and communication needs face barriers to representation and inclusion in brain tumour research; we then offer possible solutions to support their participation. Our main concerns are that there is currently poor recognition of the nature of communication difficulties following brain tumours, limited focus on the psychosocial impact, and lack of transparency on why people with speech, language, and communication needs were excluded from research or how they were supported to take part. We propose solutions focusing on working towards more accurate reporting of symptoms and the impact of impairment, using innovative qualitative methods to collect data on the lived experiences of speech, language, and communication needs, and empowering speech and language therapists to become part of research teams as experts and advocates for this population. These solutions would support the accurate representation and inclusion of people with communication needs after brain tumour in research, allowing healthcare professionals to learn more about their priorities and needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Menger
- Speech and Language Sciences, School of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
| | | | - Joanne Lewis
- Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Anna Volkmer
- Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Linda Sharp
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jayes M, Austin L, Brown LJE. Supported decision-making and mental capacity assessment in care homes: A qualitative study. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e1061-e1069. [PMID: 34250675 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Up to 75% of UK care home residents may lack the mental capacity to make certain decisions (Wade, Clinical Rehabilitation, 2019, 33, 1561-1570). Care home staff need evidence-based tools to help them assess residents' mental capacity and provide decision-making support (NICE, Decision-making and mental capacity NICE guideline NG108, 2018). The Mental Capacity Assessment Support Toolkit (MCAST) was designed to support multidisciplinary healthcare staff to prepare, complete and document legally compliant mental capacity assessments. MCAST has not yet been trialled in care homes. This study used a descriptive qualitative design to: (a) understand the current challenges faced by care home staff when supporting residents to make decisions and participate in mental capacity assessments; (b) explore staff members' support needs in this context and (c) to identify if and how the toolkit could be adapted for use in care homes. A purposive sample of 29 staff working as managers (n = 18), nurses (n = 7) and care assistants (n = 4) across five care homes in North West England participated in five semi-structured focus groups between May and July 2019. Data from the focus group transcripts were analysed thematically (Braun & Clarke, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006, 3, 77-101). Five main themes were identified: (a) involvement of residents in decision-making; (b) approaches to mental capacity assessment; (c) working with residents with communication difficulties; (d) feelings about practice and (e) responses to MCAST. Participants appeared competent and confident about supporting decision-making and assessing capacity, but recognised the complexity of this area of practice, and identified a need for further support. They reported a range of challenges, including accessing support from speech and language therapists for residents with communication needs. They responded positively to the toolkit and were keen to use it in practice. This study suggests that care home staff would benefit from, and welcome, support to develop their practice. Furthermore, MCAST appears usable in this context and formal feasibility testing is justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Jayes
- Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Lynn Austin
- Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Laura J E Brown
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ariyo K, McWilliams A, David AS, Owen GS. Experiences of assessing mental capacity in England and Wales: A large-scale survey of professionals. Wellcome Open Res 2021; 6:144. [PMID: 34235274 PMCID: PMC8246303 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16823.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The Mental Capacity Act (2005) of England and Wales described in statute a test to determine whether a person lacked the “mental capacity” to make a particular decision. No large-scale survey has explored experiences of capacity assessment across professional groups. Methods: We administered an opportunistic self-report questionnaire survey of professionals who undertake capacity assessments in England and Wales (n= 611). Topics of interest included; how often and where capacity assessment took place, self-ratings of competency and challenges experienced in assessment, use of psychological testing and concerns about undue influence. We analysed the quantitative responses using a mixed-methods approach using regression methods for the quantitative ratings and a thematic analysis for qualitative data. Results: Our sample included 307/611 (50.2%), social workers, 89/611 (14.6%) psychiatrists, 62/611 (10.1%) nurses, 46/611 (7.5%) clinical psychologists, 30/611 (4.9%) doctors from other medical specialties, 12/611 (2.0%) speech and language therapists and 8/611 (1.3%) solicitors. 53% of these professionals undertook more than 25 capacity assessments per year, with psychiatrists, social workers and nurses undertaking them the most frequently. Most professionals reported high self-ratings of confidence in their assessment skills, although non-psychiatrist doctors rated themselves significantly lower than other groups (p< .005). Most professionals (77.1%) were at least moderately concerned about undue influence, with people with dementia and learning disabilities and older adults considered to be the most at risk. Qualitative themes for challenges in capacity assessment included inter-disciplinary working, complicated presentations and relational issues such as interpersonal influence. Requests for support mainly focused on practical issues. Conclusions: Most professionals feel confident in their ability to assess capacity but note substantial challenges around practical and relational issues. Undue influence is a particularly common concern amongst professionals when working with service users with dementia and learning disabilities which public services and policy makers need to be mindful of.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Ariyo
- Mental Health, Ethics and Law Research Group, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Andrew McWilliams
- Mental Health, Ethics and Law Research Group, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Metacognition Group, Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.,Experimental Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL, UK
| | - Anthony S David
- UCL Institute of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University College London, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Gareth S Owen
- Mental Health, Ethics and Law Research Group, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jayes M, Palmer R, Enderby P. Giving voice to people with communication disabilities during mental capacity assessments. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2021; 56:90-101. [PMID: 33325623 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare professionals without specialist training in communication disorders may not know how to identify and support patients with communication disabilities during mental capacity assessments. To meet this need, a novel communication screening tool was developed and tested as part of a mental capacity assessment support toolkit. AIMS To provide an initial evaluation of the communication screening tool's usability, interrater reliability and criterion validity. METHODS & PROCEDURES A prototype communication screening tool was developed iteratively using co-production and user-centred design principles. A mixed-methods case series design was used to explore how multidisciplinary healthcare professionals used the tool to test patients in acute hospital and intermediate care settings. Usability data were collected in an electronic survey and from a documentary analysis. Screening test outcomes obtained by pairs of professionals were compared to measure the tool's interrater reliability. Outcomes obtained by professionals were compared with the outcomes of a speech and language therapist's communication assessment to measure criterion validity. Quantitative data were analysed using frequency counts and inferential statistics. Qualitative data were analysed using framework analysis. OUTCOMES & RESULTS A total of 21 professionals, including physicians, nurses, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, and speech and language therapists, and 17 patients with diagnoses of stroke or cognitive impairment took part. Professionals reported they found the tool easy to use, useful and that its use increased their understanding of communication support methods and the speech and language therapist role in relation to mental capacity assessment. However, not all used it consistently or accurately. Professionals reported they chose not to use the tool when they perceived patients' communication to be intact. Four of eight patients with a diagnosis of dementia or memory impairment, who professionals elected not to screen, were found to have significant communication needs. Screening outcome data for nine patients suggest the tool's interrater reliability is currently moderate, whilst its criterion validity is poor. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS This study highlights that non-speech and language therapist health professionals have difficulty identifying and screening for communication difficulties. This confirms existing evidence that people with communication disabilities may not receive the decision-making support they require during mental capacity assessments when speech and language therapists are not involved. Greater understanding of health professionals' thought processes regarding communication is required to further develop this unique communication screening tool so that it can effectively enable healthcare professionals to identify and use communicative adaptations to support decision-making. What this paper adds What is already known on this subject Limited previous research suggests that assessing the mental capacity of people with communication disabilities is complex. Practice needs to be improved to ensure this group is adequately supported to make decisions, in line with legal requirements. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This paper describes the development and testing of a novel communication screening tool for use by healthcare professionals preparing to undertake mental capacity assessments. It increases our understanding of how healthcare professionals without specialist training understand communication disability and the role of the speech and language therapist in relation to mental capacity assessment. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Healthcare professionals without specialist training require support to understand and respond to the needs of people with communication disabilities during mental capacity assessments. With further development and testing, in response to initial evaluation, this novel communication screening tool may be able to provide this support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Jayes
- Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Palmer
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Pamela Enderby
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|