Canes may not improve spatiotemporal parameters of walking after stroke: a systematic review of cross-sectional within-group experimental studies

Effect of insole on postural control and gait of stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review aims to examine the evidence of adding postural insole to traditional physical therapy to improve weight distribution, gait, mobility, balance, and postural control in stroke survivors. Five databases were searched to retrieve all related randomized controlled trials examining the effect of insole on stroke patients. Two independent authors checked the potential articles against eligibility criteria according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A meta-analysis was conducted for available outcomes and the statistical heterogeneity was examined using the I2 test. Of 762 articles, only 15 with 448 patients were included after they met the inclusion criteria with most of them including participants exceeding 6 months of stroke incidence. When insole was used as compelled body weight shifting method, pooled statistical analysis revealed significant improvement in gait velocity [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31, 1.02; P = 0.0003], cadence (SMD = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.16, 1.18; P = 0.01] and stride length (SMD = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.57, 1.65; P < 0.0001), while no significant effect on step length (SMD = 0.48; 95% CI: -0.37, 1.33; P = 0.27). Pooled statistical analysis of balance outcomes revealed significant improvement in weight-bearing symmetry balance (SMD = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.25, 1.39; P = 0.005) and long-term improvement in Berg Balance Scale (SMD = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.19, 2.20; P = 0.02), while no difference was observed in balance confidence (SMD = 0.44; 95% CI: -0.15, 1.04; P = 0.14) and sensorimotor functions (SMD = 0.36; 95% CI -0.39, 1.11; P = 0.35). Insoles significantly improved spatiotemporal gait parameters, gait symmetry, and static balance compared with traditional physical therapy alone.

Using a cane for one month does not improve walking or social participation in chronic stroke: An attention-controlled randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of the provision of a cane, delivered to ambulatory people with chronic stroke, for improving walking and social participation.

DESIGN

Two-arm, randomized trial.

SETTING

Community-based.

PARTICIPANTS

Ambulatory individuals with chronic stroke.

INTERVENTIONS

The experimental intervention was the provision of a single-point cane during one month. The control group received a placebo intervention.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Walking speed, step length, cadence, walking capacity, and walking confidence were measured without the cane to examine its rehabilitative effect. Walking speed was also measured with the cane for inclusiveness, and social participation was measured for examining carry over effects. Outcomes were measured at baseline, and after one and two months.

RESULTS

Fifty individuals were included. In the experimental group, mean age was 69 years (SD 14), and walking speed was 0.58 m/s (SD 0.17). In the control group, mean age was 68 years (SD 13), and walking speed was 0.63 m/s (SD 0.15). When walking without the cane, after one and after two months, there were no between-group differences in any measures. When walking with the cane, after one month, the experimental group walked 0.14 m/s (95% CI 0.05-0.23) faster than the control group and after two months, they were still walking 0.18 m/s (95% CI 0.06-0.30) faster.

CONCLUSION

Use of a cane improved walking speed, only when participants walked with the cane. Use of cane for one month did not improve walking outcomes, when walking without the cane. People with stroke would need to continue to use the cane to maintain any benefits in walking speed.