The experience and perspective of people with spinal cord injury about well-being interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies

Perceptions of patients towards oral health care in a spinal cord injury rehabilitation unit: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCIs) are at an increased risk of poor oral health compared to the general population. However, little is known about the related barriers and facilitators experienced by these individuals within the hospital setting.

OBJECTIVES

Understand the oral health knowledge, attitudes and practices of people with SCIs, barriers and facilitators to managing their oral health, and recommendations to improve oral care at acute/rehabilitation hospital settings.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 participants, from a major metropolitan hospital in Sydney, Australia. The interviews were thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Three themes were constructed. Participants believed that the onus was on them to manage their oral health. Individuals also had limited knowledge of its importance to general health, and placed a lower priority on oral health compared to other aspects of health. All participants identified a combination of factors, such as cost, time, resources and prior negative experiences, that contributed to the neglect of their oral care. Participants also discussed the need of support from the multidisciplinary team and family/carers to facilitate oral care and identified various appropriate oral health education formats.

CONCLUSION

This study highlighted some areas where oral health knowledge among people with SCIs could be improved. It also identified the need for oral health training for the multidisciplinary team, as well as carers, to better integrate oral care during rehabilitation in the hospital. The development of oral health interventions would need to utilise a co-design approach to best support clients and their carers to facilitate oral care self-management.

Experiencing the unreal. Mapping patient journeys from injury towards rehabilitation for a life with tetraplegia

When patients are brought to the emergency room with a traumatic injury to the spinal cord, the road to recovery is long and uncertain. In minutes, their lives have been irreversibly altered. Time will tell if the paralysis to the limbs is permanent or if some degree of mobility or sensation can be reacquired. To many patients, the first weeks feel almost unreal. They find themselves in a state of shock, and feelings of uncertainty and loss of control are dominating. Spinal cord injuries are treated in multiple specialized hospital units. Each unit is accountable for providing the best possible treatment within their area of expertise. While continuity in care has been a hot research topic for the past 20 years, few studies provide empirical data on patients' perspectives on long-term hospital treatments. This study examines how patients with tetraplegia experience continuity in care when they journey across multiple hospital units over the course of several months. This paper is based on a study of patient pathways for patients with tetraplegia caused by high spinal cord injuries. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine patients, seven next of kin and thirteen healthcare professionals in Copenhagen University Hospital. Data from the interviews were analyzed using patient journey mapping, to uncover variations in patients' experience during various stages of their admission. The study finds that patients are struggling to maintain a sense of control over their life as they continuously engage in negotiations of perceptions of their body, of the physical surroundings and of their perception of time and the future. The study concludes that health care professionals should be mindful of these key themes to support the patients' empowerment and active participation during recovery.

Co-design of an intervention exploring meaning and purpose after spinal cord injury

PURPOSE

Rebuilding a strong sense of meaning and purpose following trauma is a vital contributor to post-traumatic growth and adapting well to a spinal cord injury. This project aimed to develop an intervention that used the concept of post-traumatic growth to foster a stronger sense of meaning and purpose in people with a spinal cord injury.

METHODS

Using participatory action research methodology, the intervention was designed in an iterative process with health professionals and people with lived experience of spinal cord injury. We developed a ten-week online group program and delivered two pilot programs to 13 participants. We used their feedback to further refine the program before finalisation.

RESULTS

A participatory action research approach resulted in a positive intervention well received by participants and consumer organisations. Feedback suggests the intervention shows promise for improvements in functional and psychosocial outcomes and has long-term viability.

CONCLUSIONS

The project successfully developed and delivered a novel program that uses the concept of post-traumatic growth to foster a stronger sense of meaning and purpose. Further implementation of the program with larger numbers will allow for evaluation of the program's effectiveness.

Research priorities to enhance life for people with spinal cord injury: a Swedish priority setting partnership

STUDY DESIGN

Mixed-method consensus development project.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the top ten research priorities for spinal cord injury (SCI).

SETTING

Nationwide in Sweden in 2021-22.

METHODS

The PSP process proposed by the James Lind Alliance was used. It comprises two main phases: question identification and priority selection. People living with SCI, relatives of people with SCI as well as health professionals and personal care assistants working with people with SCI were included.

RESULTS

In the first phase, 242 respondents provided 431 inputs addressing potentially unanswered questions. Of these, 128 were beyond the scope of this study. The remaining 303 were merged to formulate 57 questions. The literature review found one question answered, so 56 questions proceeded to the prioritisation. In the second phase, the interim prioritisation survey, 276 respondents ranked the 56 questions. The top 24 questions then proceeded to the final prioritisation workshop, at which 23 participants agreed on the top ten priorities.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper reveals issues that people living with SCI, relatives of people with SCI as well as health professionals and personal care assistants working with people with SCI find difficult to get answered. The top-priority questions for people living with SCI in Sweden concern specialist SCI care and rehabilitation, followed by a number of questions addressing physical health. Other topics, from the 56 key questions include Mental health, Ageing with SCI, Community support and personal care assistance, and Body functions. This result can guide researchers to design appropriate studies relevant to people with SCI.

SPONSORSHIP

The project was funded by the Gothenburg Competence Centre for Spinal Cord Injury and the Swedish Association for Survivors of Accident and Injury (RTP).

Qualitative Evaluation of a Comprehensive Online Wellness Program (MENTOR) Among People With Spinal Cord Injury

People with spinal cord injury (SCI) experience a plethora of health conditions that hinder their health and wellness. This qualitative retrospective evaluation describes the perceptions of 14 peoples with SCI, several months after they completed an eight-week telewellness community program (MENTOR-Mindfulness, Exercise and Nutrition To Optimize Resilience). The program offered daily online classes that covered three core wellness domains (mindfulness, exercise, nutrition) and one health coaching session to introduce participants to eight other wellness domains (sleep, self-care, core values, arts & leisure, outdoor time in nature; spiritual practice, relationships, contribution to others). Qualitative analysis resulted in 4 themes related to program benefits, likes, and improvement recommendations. First, participants valued the program for the social support provided by a sense of community and relationship building with peers. Second, self-regulation was facilitated by the comprehensiveness of the program components, easy online access, and shared lifestyle goals for self-improvement among peers. Third, participants reported improved psychological wellbeing and adopted healthy behaviors that were maintained long after the program. Last, future programs should include flexible class times, post-program support, specific exercise adaptations for people with limited arm function, and supplementary in-person meetings. These preliminary findings demonstrate that MENTOR may benefit the wellbeing of people with SCI and warrant further study.

Exploring well-being services from the perspective of people with SCI: A scoping review of qualitative research

Objective

Well-being after spinal cord injury is affected by a range of factors, many of which are within the influence of rehabilitation services. Although improving well-being is a key aim of rehabilitation, the literature does not provide a clear path to service providers who seek to improve well-being. This study aimed to inform service design by identifying the experience and perspective of people with SCI about interventions targeting their well-being.

Method

The scoping review of qualitative literature used thematic analysis to identify and categorize themes related to service activities, valued aspects, limitations and perceived outcomes.

Results

Thirty-eight studies were selected, related to a range of service types. Most studies did not adopt a well-being conceptual framework to design and evaluate the services. People with SCI particularly valued being treated with dignity, positive expectations, increased autonomy and peer support. Improvements to well-being were reported, including many years post-SCI. However, people with SCI reported limited opportunities to engage in such services.

Conclusions

Rehabilitation services can improve well-being across the lifetime of people with SCI, but gaps in service provision are reported. The review identified valued aspects of services that may inform service design, including staff approach and positive expectations, having own skills and worth valued, peer support and interaction, autonomy in valued occupations, and long-term opportunities for gains.