Minimal clinically important difference of the Berg Balance Scale score in older adults with hip fractures

A Systematic Review of the Effect of Physical Rehabilitation on Balance in People with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Who are at Risk of Falling

Background

Falls are a significant issue in people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Balance interventions have been broadly administered in individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, but the effects on static and dynamic balance in those who are at risk of falling have not yet been comprehensively reviewed.

Objective

To provide a synthesis of the literature regarding the effectiveness of physical rehabilitation interventions to improve balance in people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy who are at risk of falling.

Methods

Four databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature) were systematically searched from inception to July 2022. Articles meeting the eligibility criteria (ie, participants with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and at risk of falling based on validated fall balance outcome risk cut off scores; inclusion of physical rehabilitation intervention) underwent a quality assessment using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. Data regarding fall risk was extracted.

Results

Sixteen studies met the eligibility criteria. Participants in six studies improved balance such that their fall risk was reduced from a moderate-high risk of falls to no or low risk of falls from pre- to post-intervention. Interventions within these six studies were variable and included balance exercise, gait training, endurance, tai-chi with mental imagery, proprioceptive training, aerobic training, and yoga. Participants in seven of the remaining studies showed no improvement and participants in three studies showed mixed results regarding improved balance and reduced fall risk status by post-intervention.

Conclusion

While physical rehabilitation is sufficient to improve balance in individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy who are at risk of falling, few interventions led to improved balance and reduced fall risk. Interventions involving intentional weight shifting, manipulation of the base of support, and displacement of the center of mass such as tai-chi and yoga appear to provide the most consistent results in terms of decreasing fall risk. To better understand the effectiveness of rehabilitation on balance and fall risk, future studies should examine the impact of physical interventions on prospective fall rates.

Minimal important change in the Berg Balance Scale in older women with vertebral compression fractures: A retrospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Vertebral compression fractures, which are commonly associated with older age and osteoporotic fractures, have an increased risk of re-fracture. Therefore, improving balance is important to prevent falls. The minimal important change (MIC) has been recommended for interpreting clinically meaningful changes in rating scales. The MIC of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for use in older women with vertebral compression fractures has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the MIC of the BBS that can be used in older women with vertebral compression fractures using predictive modeling methods and the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC)-based method.

DESIGN

A retrospective longitudinal multicenter study.

PATIENTS

Sixty older women (mean age ± standard deviation: 84.1 ± 7.0 years) with vertebral compression fractures who were unable to ambulate independently on a level surface.

METHODS

A change of one point in the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) was used as an anchor to calculate the MIC of the BBS based on the change between admission and discharge. We calculated the MIC for the women whose FAC score improved by ≥1 point. We used three anchor-based methods to examine the MIC: the ROC-based method (MICROC), the predictive modeling method (MICpred), and the MICpred-based method adjusted by the rate of improvement and reliability of transition (MICadj).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine women comprised the "important change" group based on their FAC score improvement. In this group, the MICROC (95% confidence interval [CI]) value of the BBS was 10.0 points (5.5-15.5), with an area under the curve of 0.71. The MICpred (95% CI) value was 9.7 (8.1-11.0), and the MICadj (95% CI) was 7.0 (5.5-8.5) points.

CONCLUSION

For women with vertebral compression fractures who are unable to ambulate independently, a 7.0-point improvement in the BBS score may be a useful indicator for reducing the amount of assistance required for walking.

Challenges in applying minimal clinically important difference: a critical review

Healthcare clinicians strive to make meaningful changes in patient function and participation. A minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is an estimate of the magnitude of change needed to be meaningful to a patient. Clinicians and investigators may assume that a cited MCID is a valid and generalizable estimate of effect. There are, however, at least two concerns about this assumption. First, multiple methods exist for calculating an MCID that can yield divergent values and raise doubt as to which one to apply. Second, MCID values may be erroneously generalized to patients with dissimilar health conditions. With this in mind, we reviewed the methods used to calculate MCID and citations of reported MCID values for outcome measures commonly used in neurologic, orthopedic, and geriatric populations. Our goal was to assess whether the calculation methods were acknowledged in the cited work and whether the enrolled patients were similar to the sample from which the MCID estimate was derived. We found a concerning variation in the methods employed to estimate MCID. We also found a lack of transparency in identifying calculation methods and applicable health conditions in the cited work. Thus, clinicians and researchers must pay close attention and exercise caution in assuming changes in patient status that exceed a specific MCID reflect meaningful improvements in health status. A common standard for the calculation and reporting of an MCID is needed to address threats to the validity of conclusions drawn from the interpretation of an MCID.

Balance Function Required for Bathing Independence in Patients with Stroke and Hip Fracture

Objectives

Little attention has been paid to the relationship between balance function and bathing independence. This research aimed to determine the degree of balance function needed by patients with stroke and patients with hip fracture (hereinafter referred to as patients with stroke and hip fracture) to bathe independently.

Methods

Retrospective data analysis was performed on 59 patients with hip fracture and 201 patients with stroke. Logistic regression was performed to determine whether bathing independence was associated with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) in patients with stroke and hip fracture. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated to calculate cutoff values.

Results

The BBS was significantly associated with bathing independence in patients with stroke and hip fracture. The calculated BBS cutoff value was 48 points for those with stroke (sensitivity, 84.7%; specificity, 79.1%) and 43 points for those with hip fracture (sensitivity, 81.3%; specificity, 77.8%).

Conclusions

Balance function was independently associated with bathing independence. The level of balance function required for bathing independence may be lower for patients with hip fracture than for those with stroke. This could be a simple and useful indicator for rehabilitation professionals to interpret BBS results when conducting bathing interventions.