The effect of microprocessor controlled exo-prosthetic knees on limited community ambulators: systematic review and meta-analysis

Advances in prosthetic technology: a perspective on ethical considerations for development and clinical translation

Technological advancements of prostheses in recent years, such as haptic feedback, active power, and machine learning for prosthetic control, have opened new doors for improved functioning, satisfaction, and overall quality of life. However, little attention has been paid to ethical considerations surrounding the development and translation of prosthetic technologies into clinical practice. This article, based on current literature, presents perspectives surrounding ethical considerations from the authors' multidisciplinary views as prosthetists (HG, AM, CLM, MGF), as well as combined research experience working directly with people using prostheses (AM, CLM, MGF), wearable technologies for rehabilitation (MGF, BN), machine learning and artificial intelligence (BN, KKQ), and ethics of advanced technologies (KKQ). The target audience for this article includes developers, manufacturers, and researchers of prosthetic devices and related technology. We present several ethical considerations for current advances in prosthetic technology, as well as topics for future research, that may inform product and policy decisions and positively influence the lives of those who can benefit from advances in prosthetic technology.

Design, fabrication and experiments of a hydraulic active-passive hybrid prosthesis knee

BACKGROUND

Due to low friction, passive mechanical prostheses move compliantly followed by the stump and are used widely. Advanced semi-active prostheses can both move passively like passive prostheses and provide active torque under specific conditions. However, the current mechanical-hydraulic coupling driven semi-active prostheses, in order to meet the low passive friction requirements with a low active transmission ratio, lead to a significant problem of insufficient active torque.

OBJECTIVE

A hybrid active and passive prosthesis was developed to solve the incompatibility problem of low passive friction and high active driving torque of semi-active prostheses.

METHODS

The mechanical structure and control strategy of the prosthesis were demonstrated. The performance of the prosthesis was tested by bench and human tests.

RESULTS

Passive subsystem damping adjustment ranges from 0.4 N⋅(mm/s)-1 to 300 N⋅(mm/s)-1. The switching time between the damping and the active subsystem is 32 ± 2 ms. The continuous active torque output is more than 24 Nm. In level walking, the peak torque is about 28 Nm.

CONCLUSION

The proposed active-passive hybrid hydraulic prosthesis could satisfy both low passive friction and high active actuation.

[New technologies and robotics]

The development of increasingly more complex computer and electromotor technologies enables the increasing use and expansion of robot-assisted systems in trauma surgery rehabilitation; however, the currently available devices are rarely comprehensively applied but are often used within pilot projects and studies. Different technological approaches, such as exoskeletal systems, functional electrical stimulation, soft robotics, neurorobotics and brain-machine interfaces are used and combined to read and process the communication between, e.g., residual musculature or brain waves, to transfer them to the executing device and to enable the desired execution.Currently, the greatest amount of evidence exists for the use of exoskeletal systems with different modes of action in the context of gait and stance rehabilitation in paraplegic patients; however, their use also plays a role in the rehabilitation of fractures close to the hip joint and endoprosthetic care. So-called single joint systems are also being tested in the rehabilitation of functionally impaired extremities, e.g., after knee prosthesis implantation. At this point, however, the current data situation is still too limited to be able to make a clear statement about the use of these technologies in the trauma surgery "core business" of rehabilitation after fractures and other joint injuries.For rehabilitation after limb amputation, in addition to the further development of myoelectric prostheses, the current development of "sentient" prostheses is of great interest. The use of 3D printing also plays a role in the production of individualized devices.Due to the current progress of artificial intelligence in all fields, ground-breaking further developments and widespread application possibilities in the rehabilitation of trauma patients are to be expected.

Impacts of Microprocessor-Controlled Versus Non-microprocessor-Controlled Prosthetic Knee Joints Among Transfemoral Amputees on Functional Outcomes: A Comparative Study

INTRODUCTION

Selecting a prosthetic knee mechanism is an important part of transfemoral (TF) amputee rehabilitation. Prosthetic knee joint selection depends on the users' gait and their energy consumption. This study compares the feedback of transfemoral prosthesis users based on the prosthetic knee design self-reporting responses using the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) outcome measure.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the impact of using a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee (MCPK) compared with a non-microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee (NMCPK); feedback on the amputee usage can improve the clinical decision for proper prosthetic knee joint selection.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study with a total of 76 adult unilateral transfemoral amputees classified into two groups. The participants in the first group (38) used the MCPK (Genium, Otto Bock, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and the participants in the second group (38) used the NMCPK (hydraulic and total knee joints). Enrolment was based on a sequence of appointments where all participants answered the PEQ, with different subscale questions including utility (UT), sounds (SO), appearance (AP), residual limb health (RL), frustration (FR), perceived response (PR), social burden (SB), ambulation (AM), and quality of life (QoL). PEQ was filled out during the follow-up appointments at the prosthetic clinic through a visual analog scale (VAS). All data entered into a database were analyzed.

RESULT

The MCPK participants have significantly improved utility, appearance, ambulation, and total PEQ score, the same results as the male participants. Middle-adulthood (25-40 years) MCPK participants have a significant p-value in the score of utility, frustration, ambulation, and total PEQ score compared to early-adulthood (18-24 years) and late-adulthood (41-60 years) participants. Also, there was a significant improvement in the p-value in ambulation scores in participants using MCPK with amputations caused by diseases compared to amputations caused by trauma and congenital cause.

CONCLUSION

Transfemoral amputee prosthesis utility, natural gait, and ambulation improved when using MCPK compared to when using NMCPK during prosthetic rehabilitation.