Impairments, and physical design and culture of a rehabilitation unit influence stroke survivor activity: qualitative analysis of rehabilitation staff perceptions

"Wasting time": a qualitative study of stroke survivors' experiences of boredom in non-therapy time during inpatient rehabilitation

PURPOSE

Stroke survivors regularly report experiencing boredom during inpatient rehabilitation which may detrimentally affect mood, learning and engagement in activities important for functional recovery. This study explores how stroke survivors meaningfully occupy their non-therapy time and their experiences of boredom, to further our understanding of this complex phenomenon.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of transcripts from semi-structured interviews with stroke survivors exploring activity during non-therapy time. Transcripts were coded and analysed using a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive thematic analysis, guided by a published boredom framework.

RESULTS

Analysis of 58 interviews of 36 males and 22 females, median age 70 years, revealed four main themes: (i) Resting during non-therapy time is valued, (ii) Managing "wasted" time, (iii) Meaningful environments support autonomy and restore a sense of normality, and (iv) Wired to be social. Whilst limited therapy, social opportunities and having "nothing to do" were common experiences, those individuals who felt in control and responsible for driving their own stroke recovery tended to report less boredom during their rehabilitation stay.

CONCLUSION

Creating rehabilitation environments that support autonomy, socialisation and opportunities to participate in activity are clear targets to reduce boredom during non-therapy time, increase meaningful engagement and possibly improve rehabilitation outcomes post-stroke.

Changes in physical activity level during hospitalization in patients with stroke and those with fracture: a prospective longitudinal study

[Purpose] To examine changes in physical activity levels between admission and discharge in patients hospitalized after stroke and fracture. [Participants and Methods] Patients with stroke (n=36) or fracture (n=41) wore an accelerometer during the daytime for three days after admission and before discharge. Physical activity was divided into sedentary behavior (SB), light-intensity (LIPA), and moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA), and then compared between hospital admission and discharge using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The characteristics of patients with or without changes in SB during hospitalization were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. [Results] The median LIPA time in patients after stroke and fracture increased from 107.5 and 106.7 minutes on admission to 122.0 and 127.3 minutes at discharge, and the median MVPA time increased from 2.7 and 0.7 minutes on admission to 4.2 and 2.7 minutes at discharge, respectively. In particular, LIPA in non-therapy time increased for patients both after stroke and fracture. No differences in characteristics were observed between with or without changes in SB regardless of differences in diagnoses. [Conclusion] These findings indicate that while physical activity levels increased during hospitalization, they remained below World Health Organization recommendations for MVPA, and patient characteristics alone may not account for increased activity levels.

Stroke Patients' Free-Time Activities and Spatial Preferences During Inpatient Recovery in Rehabilitation Centers

Objectives:

To investigate which spaces stroke patients visit in their free time while undergoing inpatient recovery in rehabilitation centers, what activities they engage in, and what kind of spaces they want.

Background:

Research studies consistently show that stroke patients are highly inactive during rehabilitation. Much remains unknown about what patients do in their free time and how the built environment might affect their behavior and activities.

Methods:

Patients’ free-time activities were recorded via patient shadowing (n = 70, 840 hr), and their spatial preferences were collected using a survey (n = 60) in seven rehabilitation centers. Each participant was observed over one typical day (12 consecutive hours). Their activities, durations, and locations were recorded using floor plans and time log sheets.

Results:

Six main themes emerged from the analysis of shadowing data and patient surveys: (1) spending most free time in their room, (2) corridor as the overlooked activity hub, (3) food and beverage stations as triggers of activity, (4) wanting to socialize, (5) variety of common spaces for different activities is desired, and (6) common room’s atmosphere, comfort, style, and view are important. Even though socializing with other patients was mentioned as a primary reason for visiting common spaces in the survey, patients spent most of their free time alone.

Conclusions:

Corridor emerged as a space with great potential to motivate and support various activities of patients. Patients’ free-time activities could contribute to their recovery, and the built environment may play a role in facilitating and supporting these activities.

Stroke survivors' perceptions of the factors that influence engagement in activity outside dedicated therapy sessions in a rehabilitation unit: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate stroke survivors' perceptions of factors influencing their engagement in activity outside of dedicated therapy sessions during inpatient rehabilitation.

DESIGN

Qualitative study.

SETTING

Four metropolitan rehabilitation units in Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

People undertaking inpatient rehabilitation after stroke.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews conducted in person by a speech pathologist A stepped iterative process of inductive analysis was employed until data saturation was achieved with themes then applied against the three domains of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (perceived behavioural control, social norms and attitude).

RESULTS

Interviews of 33 stroke survivors (60% female, median age of 73 years) revealed five themes (i) uncertainty about how to navigate and what was available for use in the rehabilitation unit restricts activity and (ii) post-stroke mobility, fatigue and pre- and post-stroke communication impairments restrict activity (perceived behavioural control); (iii) unit set up, rules (perceived and actual) and staff expectations influence activity and (iv) visiting family and friends are strong facilitators of activity (social norms), and (v) personal preferences and mood influence level of activity (attitude).

CONCLUSION

At the individual level, stroke survivors perceived that their ability to be active outside of dedicated therapy sessions was influenced by their impairments, including mood, and their attitude towards and preference for activity. At the ward level, stroke survivors perceived that their ability to be active was influenced by ward set-up, rules and staff expectations. Visitors were perceived to be important facilitators of activity outside of therapy sessions.