Reliability and minimal detectable change of body-weight distribution and body sway between right and left brain-damaged patients at a chronic stage

Analyses of weight-bearing asymmetry pattern for standing in the early phase after stroke: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

How the weight-bearing asymmetry pattern and related maximum lateral weight-bearing capacity, physical functions, balance, and mobility involved in weight-bearing asymmetry and lesions are related to weight-bearing asymmetry in patients with early-onset stroke remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the difference between weight-bearing in the early phase after stroke categorized as symmetrical or nonsymmetrical regarding impairments, balance, walking, and independence, and any lesion location difference.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 46 persons with hemiparetic stroke within 3 weeks from onset undergoing inpatient rehabilitation and classified into symmetrical, paretic, and non-paretic groups. We performed posturographic, functional, mobility, and lesion location assessments on participants once the evaluation was possible.

RESULTS

The symmetrical, paretic, and non-paretic groups included 14, 11, and 21 patients, respectively. The non-paretic group had lesser mean % body weight in maximum lateral weight-bearing to the paretic direction (79% versus 55%, p < .001), motor function of the hip lower limb (64 versus 58, p = .003) per the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set, Trunk Impairment Scale (18 versus 15, p = .020), and Berg Balance Scale (42 versus 32, p = .047) than the paretic group with more lesions in the insula (55% versus 0%, p < .001) and parietal cortex (36% versus 0%, p = .009) than the non-paretic group.

CONCLUSION

The non-paretic group had low dynamic balance, severe motor paresis, and trunk dysfunction. The paretic group had lesions in the insula or parietal cortex.

Determining an optimal posturography dataset to identify standing behaviors in the post-stroke subacute phase. Cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

A key issue for posturography is the expression of robust results, in a simplified way. Most studies of individuals post-stroke concern the chronic phase, with small sample sizes.

OBJECTIVES

By reducing the number of posturographic indices, we aimed to determine an optimal dataset and understand typical postural behaviors in the subacute post-stroke phase.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study ancillary to the DOBRAS cohort, individuals were assessed as soon they could complete a full posturography session (with and without vision) after a first hemispheric stroke. Body-weight distribution on the mediolateral (ML) axis, position of the center of pressure on the antero-posterior (AP) axis, and postural sway on both axes were computed. Balance ability in daily life was quantified with the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke. Data were analyzed by principal component and hierarchical clustering analyses as well as multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

We enrolled 95 individuals (median age: 67.0 years [Q1; Q3 56.0; 72.0]; 68% males). Vision suppression had a marginal effect, only increasing postural sway. Regardless of the visual condition, posturographic behavior was captured by a set of 3 indices that explained almost all the information. One postural sway index (ML or AP) gave more information (48%) than both position indices (ML 26% and AP 15%). These 3 indices identified 3 standing behaviors: 1) stable and symmetric, 2) asymmetric, unstable, and positioned backward, and 3) very unstable and positioned forward. Balance ability in daily life was explained (49% of the information, 95%CI [35; 63]) by weight-bearing asymmetry and postural sway on the ML axis, which played an independent role (both p<10-5), with similar impact.

CONCLUSIONS

Three typical behaviors allow standing after stroke: described by only 3 posturographic indices. Weight-bearing asymmetry is not the primary parameter and should not be considered in isolation as an outcome. To increase the feasibility of posturography in the early subacute phase and to simplify evaluation sessions, trials could be limited to eyes open.

REGISTRATION

NCT03203109.

Brain Asymmetry and Its Effects on Gait Strategies in Hemiplegic Patients: New Rehabilitative Conceptions

Brain asymmetry is connected with motor performance, suggesting that hemiparetic patients have different gait patterns depending on the side of the lesion. This retrospective cohort study aims to further investigate the difference between right and left hemiplegia in order to assess whether the injured side can influence the patient’s clinical characteristics concerning gait, thus providing insights for new personalized rehabilitation strategies. The data from 33 stroke patients (17 with left and 16 with right hemiplegia) were retrospectively compared with each other and with a control group composed of 20 unaffected age-matched individuals. The 3D gait analysis was used to assess kinematic data and spatio-temporal parameters. Compared to left hemiplegic patients, right hemiplegic patients showed worse spatio-temporal parameters (p < 0.05) and better kinematic parameters (p < 0.05). Both pathological groups were characterized by abnormal gait parameters in comparison with the control group (p < 0.05). These findings show an association between the side of the lesion—right or left—and the different stroke patients’ gait patterns: left hemiplegic patients show better spatio-temporal parameters, whereas right hemiplegic patients show better segmentary motor performances. Therefore, further studies may develop and assess new personalized rehabilitation strategies considering the injured hemisphere and brain asymmetry.