Differences in the perspectives of functioning and health in the ICF model between patients with brachial plexus birth injury and their parents versus healthcare professionals

Patient reported outcomes in brachial plexus birth injury: results from the iPLUTO world-wide consensus survey

PURPOSE

Brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBI) can have lifelong effects on the development and functional use of the upper extremity. Currently there is no agreement with regards to what patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures should be used. Therefore, the ability to compare the effects of treatment between individuals and institutions is challenging. This study aimed to achieve consensus among clinicians on the use of PRO measures within this patient group to allow for improved comparison of treatments and outcomes in the future.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Online, a 3 round Delphi survey was completed by 35 international multi-disciplinary specialist centers.

RESULTS

All respondents (100%) agreed that PRO measures are useful for clinical evaluation and patient treatment. None of the outcome measures scored >75% agreement for ability to assess responsiveness and current state in children with BPBI as most outcome measures were judged as not specific for BPBI. Additionally, participant centers were asked their perspective on the best available PRO option for each of the 3 categories: functional use of the upper limb, quality of life and pain. This resulted in endorsement by the participant centers of the Brachial Plexus Outcome Measure - Self-Evaluation, the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, and Visual Analogue Scale/Brief Pain Inventory respectively.

CONCLUSION

International specialists in BPBI agree that PRO measures are important to use both clinically and in research in children aged 5 years and above.

Quality of upper extremity skills and disability inventory via manual ability classification in children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy

PURPOSE

The aim of study was to investigate the relationship between upper extremity skill quality and disability inventory according to manual ability classification system in children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Children with NBPP were included between the ages of 4-7.5 years. Children were classified in Manual Ability Classification System (MACS). Upper extremity skill quality was evaluated with Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), disability status was assessed with Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI).

RESULTS

Total of 63 children (girls:31/boys:32), and mean age was 6.32 ± 1.73 years. 37 (58.73%) of children were at MACS Level-2. According to MACS classification, significant differences were noted in PEDI scores (p = 0.001), dissociated movements (p = 0.016) and grasp (p = 0.002) domains of QUEST. However, no significant differences between QUEST total scores (p = 0.079). PEDI (ROC; AuC = 0.762) and QUEST total score (ROC; AuC = 0.714) were sensitive to difference between groups across MACS in children with NBPP.

CONCLUSION

The PEDI and QUEST are sensitive in distinguishing the disability of children with NBPP at different MACS levels. Assessment of children with NBPP is not limited to functionality, disability, and quality of movement, it is multidimensional. Outcomes measures studies of movement's quality in children with NBPP are needed.