1
|
Gopi Y, Madan CR. Subjective memory measures: Metamemory questionnaires currently in use. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2024; 77:924-942. [PMID: 37300278 PMCID: PMC11032637 DOI: 10.1177/17470218231183855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Subjective memory evaluation is important for assessing memory abilities and complaints alongside objective measures. In research and clinical settings, questionnaires are used to examine perceived memory ability, memory complaints, and memory beliefs/knowledge. Although they provide a structured measure of self-reported memory, there is some debate as to whether subjective evaluation accurately reflects memory abilities. Specifically, the disconnect between subjective and objective memory measures remains a long-standing issue within the field. Thus, it is essential to evaluate the benefits and limitations of questionnaires that are currently in use. This review encompasses three categories of metamemory questionnaires: self-efficacy, complaints, and multidimensional questionnaires. Factors influencing self-evaluation of memory including knowledge and beliefs about memory, ability to evaluate memory, recent metamemory experiences, and affect are examined. The relationship between subjective and objective memory measures is explored, and considerations for future development and use of metamemory questionnaires are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yashoda Gopi
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Groot JHB. Smells in Sustainable Environments: The Scented Silk Road to Spending. Front Psychol 2021; 12:718279. [PMID: 34489823 PMCID: PMC8417554 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.718279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Humanity's demand for ecological resources and services exceeds what earth can regenerate in that year, creating an urgent need for more sustainable behavior. Here, the focus is on a particular factor that so far has been overlooked in facilitating sustainable behavior, namely smell. The two-fold aim of this study was (i) to investigate whether ambient scent could enhance customers' subjective experience and spending behavior in a sustainable environment, and (ii) to elucidate the affective and cognitive pathways from scent to spending. To test this, a double-blind field experiment was designed where customers of a second-hand clothing store (N = 57) could face one of three conditions: fresh linen scent (pleasant and semantically priming "clean clothing" increasing the products' value), vanilla sandalwood scent (pleasant control odor), or regular store odor (odorless control). Buttressed by prior research, the fresh linen scent was expected to cause the strongest increase in spending behavior due to its positive semantic association with the product (i.e., clean clothing). The results indeed showed that fresh linen scent almost doubled consumer spending vs. the odorless control and the pleasant control odor. Other factors potentially affecting consumer behavior (e.g., weekday, weather, odor awareness) were uncorrelated. Whereas a conceptually-driven mediation analysis showed that only fresh linen scent increased mood and evaluations of the store, staff, and products, these variables did not mediate the relation between scent and spending. An explorative structural equation model suggested cognitive priming to be mainly responsible for increasing consumers' spending in the fresh linen condition by enhancing the general store evaluation. Further support is needed to corroborate the indirect findings that specific scents can follow a "cold" semantic road and a "hot" affective road to spending. At minimum, consumers are no "zombies" that empty their pockets in the presence of whatever odor; the smell needs to have a meaningful link to the (sustainable) context at hand to influence consumer behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper H. B. de Groot
- Department of Social and Cultural Psychology, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cyr AA, Anderson ND. Effects of Question Framing on Self-Reported Memory Concerns across the Lifespan. Exp Aging Res 2018; 45:1-9. [PMID: 30585139 DOI: 10.1080/0361073x.2018.1560104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Background/Study Context: Evidence regarding whether there is an age-related increase in subjective memory concerns is mixed. The goal of this study was to investigate whether calling to mind specific instances of memory failures affects the likelihood that individuals report being concerned about their memory. METHODS Young, middle-aged, and older individuals responded to statements that probed general memory concerns (e.g., I am concerned about my memory) before or after probing the frequency of memory difficulties in specific everyday situations (e.g., I forget appointments). RESULTS We found no relationship between age and memory concern, and older compared to younger adults reported having fewer everyday memory failures. Furthermore, individuals of all ages were more likely to report being concerned about their memory if asked before relative to after rating the frequency of specific everyday memory failures. CONCLUSION Increasing age is associated with fewer reported difficulties with specific everyday memory situations, but people of all ages display anchoring effects on memory concern based on realistic occurrences of remembering. Our findings have implications for the measurement of self-reported memory as they show that the order of questions can influence responding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrée-Ann Cyr
- a Department of Psychology , Glendon Campus, York University , Toronto , Canada
| | - Nicole D Anderson
- b Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, and Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology , University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Molinuevo JL, Rabin LA, Amariglio R, Buckley R, Dubois B, Ellis KA, Ewers M, Hampel H, Klöppel S, Rami L, Reisberg B, Saykin AJ, Sikkes S, Smart CM, Snitz BE, Sperling R, van der Flier WM, Wagner M, Jessen F. Implementation of subjective cognitive decline criteria in research studies. Alzheimers Dement 2017; 13:296-311. [PMID: 27825022 PMCID: PMC5344703 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 361] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2016] [Revised: 07/07/2016] [Accepted: 09/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) manifesting before clinical impairment could serve as a target population for early intervention trials in Alzheimer's disease (AD). A working group, the Subjective Cognitive Decline Initiative (SCD-I), published SCD research criteria in the context of preclinical AD. To successfully apply them, a number of issues regarding assessment and implementation of SCD needed to be addressed. METHODS Members of the SCD-I met to identify and agree on topics relevant to SCD criteria operationalization in research settings. Initial ideas and recommendations were discussed with other SCD-I working group members and modified accordingly. RESULTS Topics included SCD inclusion and exclusion criteria, together with the informant's role in defining SCD presence and the impact of demographic factors. DISCUSSION Recommendations for the operationalization of SCD in differing research settings, with the aim of harmonization of SCD measurement across studies are proposed, to enhance comparability and generalizability across studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José L Molinuevo
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Barcelona βeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Laura A Rabin
- Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College and The Graduate Center of CUNY, Brooklyn, NY, USA; Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Rebecca Amariglio
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Brigham and Women's Hosptial and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rachel Buckley
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Brigham and Women's Hosptial and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Bruno Dubois
- Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease and Brain and Spine Institute (ICM) Pitié Salpetriere University Hospital, Sorbonne Universities, Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Kathryn A Ellis
- Department of Psychiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Ewers
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Harald Hampel
- Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease and Brain and Spine Institute (ICM) Pitié Salpetriere University Hospital, Sorbonne Universities, Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France; AXA Research Fund & UPMC Chair, Paris, France
| | - Stefan Klöppel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Center of Geriatrics and Gerontology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lorena Rami
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Barry Reisberg
- Department of Psychiatry, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Saykin
- Indiana Alzheimer Disease Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Sietske Sikkes
- Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Colette M Smart
- Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada; Institute on Aging and Lifelong Health, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Beth E Snitz
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Reisa Sperling
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Brigham and Women's Hosptial and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Wagner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disorders (DZNE), Bonn-Cologne, Germany
| | - Frank Jessen
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Disorders (DZNE), Bonn-Cologne, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rowell SF, Green JS, Teachman BA, Salthouse TA. Age does not matter: Memory complaints are related to negative affect throughout adulthood. Aging Ment Health 2016; 20:1255-1263. [PMID: 26305735 PMCID: PMC5135579 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1078284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Memory complaints are present in adults of all ages but are only weakly related to objective memory deficits, raising the question of what their presence may indicate. In older adults, memory complaints are moderately related to negative affect, but there is little research examining this relationship in young and middle-aged adults. This study examined whether memory complaints and negative affect were similarly related across the adult lifespan and in adults with varying levels of objective memory performance. METHOD The sample included 3798 healthy adults, aged 18 to 99, and was divided into five groups: young, middle-aged, young-old, old-old, and oldest-old adults. Participants completed questionnaire measures of memory complaints and negative affect (neuroticism and depressive and anxiety symptoms), in addition to lab measures of objective memory. RESULTS Using structural equation models, we found that the relationship between memory complaints and negative affect was moderate in all the age groups, and there was no evidence for moderation by objective memory. CONCLUSION For adults of all ages, perceived memory decline may be distressing and/or negative affect may lead to negative self-evaluations of memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaina F Rowell
- a Department of Psychology , University of Virginia , Charlottesville , Virginia
| | - Jennifer S Green
- a Department of Psychology , University of Virginia , Charlottesville , Virginia
| | - Bethany A Teachman
- a Department of Psychology , University of Virginia , Charlottesville , Virginia
| | - Timothy A Salthouse
- a Department of Psychology , University of Virginia , Charlottesville , Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lineweaver TT, Horhota M, Hull R, McRoberts SM, Fishbaugh ME. Compared to what? The effects of a frame of reference on older adults' subjective memory. AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION 2015; 23:327-37. [PMID: 26473624 DOI: 10.1080/13825585.2015.1099606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
It is often unclear what comparisons older adults make when evaluating their own memory. If thinking about their memory relative to others, they may assess their own abilities differently than if comparing it to their past capabilities. To test the effect of reference frames on memory assessments and memory performance, we randomly assigned 120 older adults to one of three conditions in which we manipulated frames of reference (control, past-self comparison, or other adults comparison) on a memory self-efficacy questionnaire. Participants also completed general and specific memory predictions and an objective memory test. Participants in the past-self condition reported significantly lower global memory self-efficacy compared with the other adults and control conditions. No condition differences emerged for memory predictions, objective memory, or the likelihood of over- or underpredicting memory performance. These findings suggest that reference frames impact global memory self-efficacy, but do not influence the accuracy of subjective memory judgments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara T Lineweaver
- a Department of Psychology , Butler University , Indianapolis , IN , USA
| | - Michelle Horhota
- b Department of Psychology , Furman University , Greenville , SC , USA
| | - Rose Hull
- b Department of Psychology , Furman University , Greenville , SC , USA
| | - Sarah M McRoberts
- a Department of Psychology , Butler University , Indianapolis , IN , USA
| | - Megan E Fishbaugh
- a Department of Psychology , Butler University , Indianapolis , IN , USA
| |
Collapse
|