Multi-scale finite element modelling at the posterior lumbar vertebra: analysis of pedicle stresses due to pars fracture

Risk Factors for Nonunion After Nonoperative Treatment for Pediatric Lumbar Spondylolysis: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Pediatric lumbar spondylolysis, a stress fracture of the lumbar spine, frequently affects young athletes, and nonoperative treatment is often the first choice of management. Because the union rate in lumbar spondylolysis is lower than that in general fatigue fractures, identifying risk factors for nonunion is essential for optimizing treatment.

PURPOSE

To determine the risk factors for nonunion after nonoperative treatment of acute pediatric lumbar spondylolysis through multivariate analysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We analyzed 574 pediatric patients (mean age, 14.3 ± 1.9 years) with lumbar spondylolysis who underwent nonoperative treatment between 2015 and 2022. Nonoperative treatment included the elimination of sports activities, bracing, and weekly athletic rehabilitation, with follow-up computed tomography. Patient data, lesion characteristics, sports history, presence of spina bifida occulta at the lamina with a lesion or at the lumbosacral spine excluding the lesion level, and lumbosacral parameters were examined. Differences between the union and nonunion groups were investigated using multivariate analysis to determine the risk factors for nonunion.

RESULTS

Of the 574 patients, 81.7% achieved bone union. Multivariate analysis revealed that an L5 lesion and the progression of the main and contralateral lesion stages were significant independent risk factors for nonunion. An L5 lesion had a lower union rate than non-L5 lesions. As the main lesion progressed, the likelihood of nonunion increased significantly, and the progression of the contralateral lesion also showed a similar trend. Spina bifida occulta and lumbosacral parameters were not significant predictors of nonunion in this study.

CONCLUSION

We identified the L5 lesion level and the progression of the main and contralateral lesion stages as independent risk factors for nonunion in pediatric lumbar spondylolysis after nonoperative treatment. These findings aid in treatment decision-making. When bone union cannot be expected with nonoperative treatment, symptomatic treatment is required without prolonged external fixation and rest, and without aiming for bone union. Individualized treatment plans are crucial based on identified risk factors.

Factors associated with failure of bony union after conservative treatment of acute cases of unilateral lumbar spondylolysis

Background

If bone union is expected, conservative treatment is generally selected for lumbar spondylolysis. However, sometimes conservative treatments are unsuccessful. We sought to determine the factors associated with failure of bony union in acute unilateral lumbar spondylolysis with bone marrow edema including contralateral pseudarthrosis.

Methods

This study targeted unilateral lumbar spondylolysis treated conservatively in high school or younger students. Conservative therapy was continued until the bone marrow edema disappeared on MRI and bone union was investigated by CT. We conducted a univariate analysis of sex, age, pathological stage, lesion level complicating the contralateral bone defect, lesion level, and intercurrent spina bifida occulta, and variables with p < 0.1 were considered in a logistic regression analysis. An item with p < 0.05 was defined as a factor associated with failure of bony union.

Results

We found 92 cases of unilateral spondylolysis with bone marrow edema and 66 cases were successfully treated conservatively. Failure of bony union in unilateral lumbar spondylolysis with bone marrow edema was associated with progressive pathological stage (p = 0.004), contralateral pseudarthrosis (p < 0.001), and L5 lesion level (p = 0.002). The odds ratio was 20.0 (95% CI 3.0–193.9) for progressive pathological stage, 78.8 (95% CI 13–846) for contralateral pseudarthrosis, and 175 (95% CI 8.5–8192) for L5 lesion level.

Conclusions

Conservative therapy aiming at bony union is contraindicated in cases of acute unilateral spondylolysis when the pathological stage is progressive, the lesion level is L5, or there is contralateral pseudarthrotic spondylolysis.

Characteristics of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis with acute unilateral fatigue fracture and contralateral pseudoarthrosis

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the characteristics of lumbar spondylolysis with acute lumbar spondylolysis on one side and pseudoarthrotic spondylolysis on the other, relative to acute lumbar spondylolysis on one side only.

Patients and Methods: Short-tau inversion recovery images obtained through magnetic resonance imaging were used to diagnose 58 patients with acute lumbar spondylolysis with bone marrow edema on one side only. A total of 20 patients who had pars defects on the contralateral side (terminal-stage pseudoarthrotic spondylolysis) were included in the contralateral pseudoarthrosis group (P group). The remaining 38 patients with normal images for the contralateral pars interarticularis were included in the unilateral lesion group, in which the contralateral side was normal (U group). We investigated the union rate, age, sex, lesion laterality, vertebral level, pathological stage, and existing spina bifida occulta in both groups.

Results: The P group was characterized by a higher proportion of right-side cases, L5 lesions, more progressed pathological stage, and spina bifida occulta and a significantly lower union rate than the U group.

Conclusion: The union rate in patients with lumbar spondylolysis with acute lumbar spondylolysis on one side and pseudoarthrotic spondylolysis on the opposite side was only 15%. We should inform patients with acute unilateral spondylolysis lesions and contralateral pseudoarthrosis about this poor union rate and urge them to choose their therapy accordingly.

Adaptive remodeling at the pedicle due to pars fracture: a finite element analysis study

Object

Spondylolysis is a common condition among the general population and a major cause of back pain in young athletes. This condition can be difficult to detect with plain radiography and has been reported to lead to contralateral pars fracture or pedicle fracture in the terminal stages. Interestingly, some patients with late-stage spondylolysis are observed to have radiographic or CT evidence of a sclerotic pedicle on the side contralateral to the spondylolysis. Although computational studies have shown stress elevation in the contralateral pedicle after a pars fracture, it is not known if these changes would cause sclerotic changes in the contralateral pedicle. The objective of this study was to investigate the adaptive remodeling process at the pedicle due to a contralateral spondylolysis using finite element analysis.

Methods

A multiscale finite element model of a vertebra was obtained by combining a continuum model of the posterior elements with a voxel-based pedicle section. Extension loading conditions were applied with or without a fracture at the contralateral pars to analyze the stresses in the contralateral pedicle. A remodeling algorithm was used to simulate and assess density changes in the contralateral pedicle.

Results

The remodeling algorithm demonstrated an increase in bone formation around the perimeter of the contralateral pedicle with some localized loss of mass in the region of cancellous bone.

Conclusions

The authors' results indicated that a pars fracture results in sclerotic changes in the contralateral pedicle. Such a remodeling process could increase overall bone mass. However, focal bone loss in the region of the cancellous bone of the pedicle might predispose the pedicle to microfractures. This phenomenon explains, at least in part, the origin of pedicle stress fractures in the sclerotic contralateral pedicles of patients with unilateral spondylolysis.