Probabilistic description of infant head kinematics in abusive head trauma

Modeling of inflicted head injury by shaking trauma in children: what can we learn? : Update to parts I&II: A systematic review of animal, mathematical and physical models

Inflicted shaking trauma can cause injury in infants, but exact injury mechanisms remain unclear. Controversy exists, particularly in courts, whether additional causes such as impact are required to produce injuries found in cases of (suspected) shaking. Publication rates of studies on animal and biomechanical models of inflicted head injury by shaking trauma (IHI-ST) in infants continue rising. Dissention on the topic, combined with its legal relevance, makes maintaining an up-to-date, clear and accessible overview of the current knowledge-base on IHI-ST essential. The current work reviews recent (2017-2023) studies using models of IHI-ST, serving as an update to two previously published reviews. A systematic review was conducted in Scopus and PubMed for articles using animal, physical and mathematical models for IHI-ST. Using the PRISMA methodology, two researchers independently screened the publications. Two, five, and ten publications were included on animal, physical, and mathematical models of IHI-ST, respectively. Both animal model studies used rodents. It is unknown to what degree these can accurately represent IHI-ST. Physical models were used mostly to investigate gross head-kinematics during shaking. Most mathematical models were used to study local effects on the eye and the head's internal structures. All injury thresholds and material properties used were based on scaled adult or animal data. Shaking motions used as inputs for animal, physical and mathematical models were mostly greatly simplified. Future research should focus on using more accurate shaking inputs for models, and on developing or and validating accurate injury thresholds applicable for shaking.

Inflicted head-injury by shaking-trauma in infants: the importance of spatiotemporal variations of the head's rotation center

Inflicted head injury by shaking trauma (IHI-ST) in infants is a type of abusive head trauma often simulated computationally to investigate causalities between violent shaking and injury. This is commonly done with the head's rotation center kept fixed over time. However, due to the flexibility of the infant's neck and the external shaking motion imposed by the perpetrator it is unlikely that the rotation center is static. Using a test-dummy, shaken by volunteers, we demonstrated experimentally that the location of the head's rotation center moves considerably over time. We further showed that implementation of a spatiotemporal-varying rotation center in an improved kinematic model resulted in strongly improved replication of shaking compared to existing methods. Hence, we stress that the validity of current infant shaking injury risk assessments and the injury thresholds on which these assessments are based, both often used in court cases, should be re-evaluated.

Thresholds for the assessment of inflicted head injury by shaking trauma in infants: a systematic review

In order to investigate potential causal relations between the shaking of infants and injuries, biomechanical studies compare brain and skull dynamic behavior during shaking to injury thresholds. However, performing shaking tolerance research on infants, either in vivo or ex vivo, is extremely difficult, if not impossible. Therefore, infant injury thresholds are usually estimated by scaling or extrapolating adult or animal data obtained from crash tests or whiplash experiments. However, it is doubtful whether such data accurately matches the biomechanics of shaking in an infant. Hence some thresholds may be inappropriate to be used for the assessment of inflicted head injury by shaking trauma in infants. A systematic literature review was conducted to 1) provide an overview of existing thresholds for head- and neck injuries related to violent shaking, and 2) to identify and discuss which thresholds have been used or could be used for the assessment of inflicted head injury by shaking trauma in infants. Key findings: The majority of studies establishing or proposing injury thresholds were found to be based on loading cycle durations and loading cycle repetitions that did not resemble those occurring during shaking, or had experimental conditions that were insufficiently documented in order to evaluate the applicability of such thresholds. Injury thresholds that were applied in studies aimed at assessing whether an injury could occur under certain shaking conditions were all based on experiments that did not properly replicate the loading characteristics of shaking. Somewhat validated threshold scaling methods only exist for scaling concussive injury thresholds from adult primate to adult human. Scaling methods that have been used for scaling other injuries, or for scaling adult injury thresholds to infants were not validated. There is a clear and urgent need for new injury thresholds established by accurately replicating the loading characteristics of shaking.